Attachment: Influence Of Early Attachment On Later Relationships Flashcards
1
Q
Kerns (1994) Peer Relationships In Childhood.
A
- Attachment type is associated with quality of peer relationships in children.
- Securely attached infants tend to go onto from the best quality childhood friendships.
- Insecurely attached infants later have friendship difficulties.
2
Q
Myron-Wilson And Smith (1988) Bullying.
A
- Bullying behaviour can be predicted by attachment type.
- Assessed attachment type and bullying involvement using standard questionnaires in 196 children aged 7-11 from London.
- Secure children were not likely to be involved in bullying.
- Insecure-avoidant were most likely to be the victims and insecure resistant were more likely to be the bullies.
3
Q
McCarthy (1999) Friendship And Romantic Relationships.
A
- Relationship between attachment type and effects of both romantic relationships and friendships.
- 40 women who were assessed when they were infants to establish their early attachment type.
- Those who were securely attached infants had best friendships and romantic relationships.
- Insecure avoidant struggled with intimacy.
- Insecure resistant have problems with maintaining friendships.
4
Q
Hazan And Shaver (1987) Romantic Relationships.
A
- Relationships between attachment type and effects on both romantic relationship or friendships.
- Those who secure attachment were more likely to have good and longer lasting romantic experiences.
- Secure attachment had good long romantic experience.
- Insecure avoidant attachment tended to have jealousy and fear of intimacy.
5
Q
Bailey Et Al Internal Working Models And Parenting.
A
- IWM affects the child’s to be a parent their own as they base parenting style on IWM, therefore attachment types tend to be passed through generations.
- Bailey looked at attachment types of 99 mothers to their babies with SS and their own mothers.
- Majority of women had the same attachment classification to their babies and their own mother.
6
Q
Evaluation: Limitation - Methodological Issues.
A
- A limitation is that most studies have issues with validity.
- These studies typically use interviews or questionnaires to assess attachment as a child in later years.
- A related problem concern the retrospective nature of assessment.
- Looking back in adulthood at one’s early attachment lacks validity because it relies on accurate recollections.
7
Q
Evaluation: Limitation - Mixed Evidence.
A
- Another limitation is that the evidence of continuity is mixed.
- Zimmer (2000) assessed infant attachment type and adolescent attachment to parents.
- There was little relationships between quality of infant and adolescent attachment.
- This is a limitation because it is not what we would expect if internal working models were important in development.
8
Q
Evaluation: Limitation - Causation.
A
- Several studies indicate associations but this is not the same as causation.
- A third environmental factor such as parenting style might have a direct effect on both attachment and child’s ability to form relationships with others,
- Temperament may also influence both attachment and later relationships.
- This is a limitation because it is a counter to Bowlby’s view that the internal working model caused these outcomes.
9
Q
Evaluation: Limitation - Theoretical Issues.
A
- There is theoretical problem with research related to internal working models.
- Internal working models are unconscious; we are not directly aware of their influence on us.
- We would not expect to get direct evidence about them by means of interviews and questionnaires - it is not possible to report on something you are not aware of.
- This is a potential limitation of most research involving the concept of internal working models.
10
Q
Evaluation: Limitation - Exaggerate Influence.
A
- The influence of infant attachment on future relationship is exaggerated.
- People are not doomed to always have bad relationships just because they had attachment problems they just have a greater risk of problems.
- By over-emphasising this risk we become too pessimistic about people’s future.