Attachment Flashcards

1
Q

Hetero-regularity

A

behaviours that elicit intervention of caregiver such as protesting, crying (negative) or attracting attention of caregiver with look or smile (positive).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Self regulation strategies

A

Activities to soothe yourself e.g thumb sucking

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is attachment?

A

Attachment is an emotional bond with as specific person that is enduring across space and time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the attachment theory?

A

Bowlby suggests children are biologically predisposed to develop attachments to caregivers as a means of increasing the chances of their own survival

Infants are competence motivated and use caregivers as secure base

Focus on imprinting and evolutionary roots

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Why is attachment important

A

Keep caregiver in close proximity

Emotional security - allowing them to explore the world without fear

Form of co-regulation helping child manage levels of arousal and their emotions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the 4 phases of attachment theory?

A

Preattachment (0-6 weeks): infant produces innate signals e.g crying that summon caregivers and are then comforted by the interaction.

Attachment-in-the-making (6weeks-6/8 months): infants begin to respond preferentially to familiar people e.g smile/laugh more around them and are easily soothed by them (form expectations of responses)

Clear-cut attachment (6/8 months – 18 months): infants actively seek contact with caregivers and exhibit separation anxiety (secure base)

Reciprocal relationships (18/24 months+): toddlers develop rapidly to understand caregivers feelings, goals and motives and use this to organise their efforts towards them —> more mutually regulated relationship gradually emerges

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the consequences of attachment?

A

Child develops an internal working model of attachment which is the child’s mental representation of the self, attachment figure and relationships in general

This model guides children’s interactions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Ainsworth strange situation procedure

A

Studies mother-infant interactions and assesses attachment style through behaviour

the caregiver and infant interacting in a lab playroom, with two short (3 mins) periods of separation followed by reunions as well as two interactions with a stranger (one with caregiver present and one without) and the child’s reactions and behaviours are observed.

Observations include the rate of seeking closeness with caregiver, resistance to or avoidance of caregiver/stranger.

Limited method - ecological validity, required substantial resources, should be measured on continuum not categories

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the attachment styles?

A

Secure

Insecure

Ambivalent

Avoidant

Disorganised

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Secure attachment

A

Pattern of attachment in which infants or young children have a positive and trusting relationship with their attachment figure.

In the Strange Situation a securely attached infant for example may be upset when the caregiver leaves but may be happy to see them return, recovering quickly from any distress.

When children are securely attached hey can use caregivers as a secure base for exploration.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Insecure attachment

A

Pattern of attachment in which infants or young children have a less positive attachment to their caregiver than do securely attached children. They can be classified as insecure/resistant (ambivalent), avoidant or disorganised/disorientated.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Insecure ambivalent attachment

A

When children are clingy and stay close to their caregiver rather than explore the environment.

In the Strange Situation they tend to become very upset when the caregiver returns, they are not easily comforted and both seek comfort and resist efforts to be comforted.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Insecure avoidant attachment

A

When children feel somewhat indifferent toward their caregiver and may avoid them.

In the Strange Situation they seem unconcerned with their caregiver before they leave and either stay indifferent or become avoidant when they return.

If the infant gets upset when left alone they are just as easily comforted by a stranger than by a parent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Disorganised attachment

A

When infants have no consistent way of coping with the stress of the Strange Situation.

Their behaviour is often confused or even contradictory and they often appear dazed or disorientated.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Other measures of attachment

A

Q sort requires parents, teachers or other observers to take a large number of cards with descriptions of child behaviours and sort them into 9 equal piles according to how well they describe the target child. This measures the child on a security continuum and has been found a very reliable and valid measure of attachment across cultures.

children are explicitly asked about relationships with caregivers in a Adult Attachment Interview or through Inventory of Parent or Peer Attachment questionnaires. These measure reliance on peers for emotional support. These measures have found that securely attached adolescents continue to use parents as secure bases.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Cultural variation in attachment styles

A

Strange situation findings are fairly consistent across cultures

Some don’t have disorganised styles

There are still some differences such as Japanese infants were categorised as insecure/resistant and not avoidant which suggests they didn’t display any signs of avoidance whereas the reverse was seen in Korean families with insecure avoidant and not resistant

17
Q

Posada et al (2016)

A

Conducted a study with Columbian, Mexican, Peruvian and USA mother child dryads (3-6) and measured behaviours in natural settings. They found that maternal sensitivity significantly associated with child security in all four cultures. This study is more valid and reliable as it takes place in natural settings.

18
Q

Parenting and attachment styles

A

Should be a good predictor - Ainsworth found behaviour in study correlated with that at home

Maternal sensitivity hypothesis - warmth and responsiveness good predictor of attachment style

19
Q

Genetic influences

A

Serotonin transporter gene - vulnerability in face of stress - less secure attachment more disorganised

DRD4 gene involved in the dopamine system - associated with disorganised attachment when infant is in a stressful environment and secure when in less stressful environment

20
Q

Socioemotional development

A

Status - predicts later adjustment and social skills

Secure —> affection and trust = open and honest
Avoidant —> no affection, rejection = avoid
Ambivalent —> uncertain what to expect = inconsistent, unable to communicate intent

21
Q

Adults acount of attachment

A

Autonomous (secure) — recalls earlier attachment-related experiences objectively and openly. Sees them as important. Is coherent and consistent, gives a balanced account by talking about positives and negatives.

Dismissing (avoidant) — dismisses attachment relationships as of little concern, value or influence. Has poor recall. Their account can be inconsistent/contradictory.

Preoccupied (ambivalent) — will intensely focused on parents and give confused and angry accounts. Gets caught up in memories and is not coherent.

Unresolved (disorganised) — will have experienced a trauma or early death of an attachment figure and have not come to terms with this. Their account may not make sense and lack reasoning.