Attachment Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

attachment theory (4-stage theory)

A
  • Claimed that infants require a secure base from which to explore their world -> the primary caregiver(s) form this secure base
  • Need for secure base is innate, but develops with major individual differences
  • 4 stages of attachment development:
    1. pre-attachment stage
    2. attachment in the making stage
    3. clear-cut attachment stage
    4. reciprocal relationship stage
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

pre-attachment stage

A
  • Birth to 6 weeks
  • Infant-caregiver bond is mostly parent-controlled
  • Infant uses reflexive behaviour to interact with parent (ie. Crying)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

attachment in the making stage

A
  • 6 weeks to 6-8 months
  • Infants begin to behave preferentially toward familiar people (ex. Smiling more at people they know, babbling and laughing more with people they know)
  • Infants learn how caregivers respond and learn to trust or not trust them)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

clear-cut attachment stage

A
  • 6-8 months to 18 months
  • Infants actively seek attachment figure
  • Exhibit separation anxiety from attachment figure
  • Begin exploration using the caregiver as a secure base
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

reciprocal relationship stage

A
  • 18 months through remainder of childhood
  • Infants’ linguistic and cognitive abilities improve
  • Begin to understand attachment figure’s goals/feelings/expectations
  • Form a “working partnership” with caregiver -> baby engages in helping behaviour
  • Separation anxiety declines
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

internal working model

A
  • The outcome of the 4-stage model
  • a mental representation of the self, of attachment figures, and of relationships
  • Based on the dependability of the caregiver
  • Based on the internal working model, an attachment subtype is formed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

attachment subtype

A
  • Either secure, avoidant, or resistant
  • A child’s attachment subtype influences the way the child acts toward the parent, which then affects the way the parent acts toward the child
  • Affects overall adjustment, social behaviour, etc. throughout lifespan (including their attachment style with their future children)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

testing individual attachment differences in infancy

A
  • All infants require an attachment figure for normal development, but individual differences exist in how infants are attached
  • Ainsworth developed the Strange Situation Procedure to operationalize and measure these variables in attachment types
  • On the basis of Strange Situation, Ainsworth proposed 4 attachment subtypes:
    • Secure attachment
    • Insecure attachment:
  • — Insecure/resistant
  • — Insecure/avoidant
  • — Disorganized/disoriented
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

secure attachment

A
  • 60% of infants
  • Explore the room and toys, using caregiver as a secure base
  • Look towards stranger and don’t exhibit fear (when caregiver is present)
  • Usually (but not always) distressed by caregiver’s departure, and cannot typically be calmed down by the stranger
  • Greets caregiver with happiness or reduced distress upon return
  • Rates of securely attached infants correlates with socioeconomic status
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

insecure-resistant attachment

A
  • 10% of infants
  • Cling to caregiver from beginning of situation
  • Exhibit nervousness/wariness at room and stranger
  • Little exploration of toys
  • Become very upset at departure of caregiver
  • Establishes contact when caregiver returns, but resists caregiver’s soothing efforts
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

insecure-avoidant attachment

A
  • 15% of infants
  • Indifference to caregiver during the strange situation (may or may not explore the room/toys)
  • Little distress at caregiver’s departure
  • Little regard for caregiver at reunion
  • Ignore/turn away from caregiver before and after reunion
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

disorganized-disoriented attachment

A
  • After Ainsworth completed her research, it began to be clear that approximately 15% of the infants tested didn’t fall into the other 3 categories
  • Her colleagues noted that these infants could be grouped together based on their confused behaviour
  • Fearful of approaching caregiver in strange situation (gaze aversion to parent)
  • Switching rapidly from calm to distress
  • Appearance of daze/disorientation
  • “freezing” behaviour (with no frightening stimulus present)
  • Attempt to approach mother at reunion, but also exhibiting fear of her (ie. Gaze aversion)
  • Many of the babies in this category have experienced abuse or trauma
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

adult attachment

A
  • Adults continue to have working attachment models
  • Tested with Adult Attachment Interview (AAI), which asks questions about relationship with parents
  • Adults’ attachment models are classified into 4 categories based on the consistency of their responses (rather than content): autonomous, dismissing, preoccupied, unresolved/disorganized
  • Adult attachment models appear to predict infant attachment models (ie. Autonomous parents tend to have securely attached infants)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

autonomous

A

coherent, consistent, relevant responses (even if responses are negative)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

dismissing

A

“can’t remember” childhood, minimize the impact that these experience had on them, contradictory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

preoccupied

A

confused and angry responses, so preoccupied that they cannot provide consistent answers

17
Q

unresolved/disorganized

A

striking lapses in reasoning, often suffering from memory lapses due to childhood trauma

18
Q

parental sensitivity/contingency

A
  • One way that adult temperament/attachment models might affect infant attachment models (however, this is correlational)
  • Securely attached infants tend to have parents who are highly sensitive: respond with appropriate behaviour to infants’ happiness and distress
  • Insecure-resistant infants’ parents tend to be more inconsistent
  • Insecure-avoidant parents tend to be emotionally unavailable
  • Disorganized/disoriented infants may have experienced abusive or frightening parental behaviour
19
Q

causational study about parental sensitivity/contigency

A
  • Van den Boom recruited irritable infants shortly after birth and intervened at 6 months
  • Experimental group: mothers attended sensitivity training
  • Control group: mothers did not attend training
  • At 12 months, 62% of experimental mothers had securely attached infants; 22% of control mothers did
20
Q

secure base

A

the presence of a trusted caregiver provides an infant with a sense of security that makes it possible for the child to explore the environment

21
Q

cultural variation in attachment

A
  • generally, all attachment styles are present in all cultures
  • rates of secure attachment are consistent across all cultures, but the proportions of insecure attachment may be different
22
Q

Case study: Attachment in Japanese infants

A
  • Same rate of secure attachment as North American infants
  • But all insecurely attached infants classified as “insecure-resistant”
  • May be because Japanese culture emphasizes “oneness” between mother and baby -> more mother-baby closeness -> angrier babies when separated
  • Strange Situation may cause inhibited parents (which would affect babies), and when studies were conducted, few Japanese infants attended daycare -> less separation from moms than N.American infants