Attachment Flashcards

1
Q

What is attachment

A

Close two way emotional bond between two individuals
Each sees the other as essential for their own emotional security
takes a few months to develop

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are attachment behaviours

A

Proximity
Separation distress
Secure based behaviours - make regular contact with attachment figures when independent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Non verbal communication

A

Form the basis of attachment
Manner in each responds - more sensitive to signals, the deeper the relationship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is reciprocity

A

Responding to a positive action with another positive action, rewarding kind actions
Infants coordinated their actions with caregivers in a kind of conversation
Move in a rhythm, taking turns

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Research into reciprocity

A

Brazelton - Regularity of an infant’s signals allows a caregiver to anticipate the infant’s behaviour and respond appropriately
Tronick et al - mothers stop dialogue and stop moving remaining static, unsmiling expressions on their own faces. Babies would try to tempt the mother into interaction by smiling themselves, when not interact they became distressed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is interactional synchrony

A

When two people interact in a mirror pattern in terms of their facial and body movements
Imitating emotions and behaviours.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Research into interactional synchrony

A

Meltzoff and Moore - observed infants as young as 2 weeks
adult displayed one of three facial expressions or one of three distinctive gestures.
Response was filmed and identified by independent observers
Association found between the expression or gesture the adult had displayed and the actions of the babies
Isabella et al - securely attached mother infant pairs had shown more instances of interactional synchrony in first year of life suggesting that strong emotional attachments are associated with high levels of synchrony

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

AO3 for infant caregiver interactions

A
  • Problems with testing infant behaviour, don’t know if actions are deliberate
    +Controlled observations capture fine details
  • Research into mother infant interactions is socially sensitive
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Early research

A

Focused on mother infant interaction
Fathers presented as less of a caregiver and more of a playmate
Mothers - more nurturing, responds to child’s needs (sensitive responsiveness)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Parent infant attachments research

A

Schaffer and Emerson - babies attached to mothers first around 7 months
Few weeks/months later formed secondary attachments
75% of infants studied formed attachment to father by age of 18 months
Infants protested when their father walked away- sign of attachment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Role of father research

A

Aim - How important are fathers in children’s development and do they have a role
Longitudinal study (44 families)
Looked both parents behaviour and quality of children’s attachment
Mothers attachment related to attachments in adolescence
Father attachment is less important for later relationships
Quality of fathers play was related to quality of adolescent attachments
Play a different role ( play and stimulation.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Fathers as primary caregivers

A

Adopt behaviour more typical of mothers
Field - filmed 4 month old babies in face to face interaction with -
primary caregiver mothers
secondary caregiver fathers
primary caregivers fathers
Primary caregiver fathers spent more time smiling, imitating and holding infants than the secondary caregiver father, important in building attachment
Fathers can be the more nurturing attachment figure
Key to attachment is the level of responsiveness, not the gender

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Role of father AO3

A

+ Real world application - helps make decisions about who is the primary caregiver, make informed decisions about the implications for society and practical applications
- Grossman study doesn’t take into account non-heterosexual relationships
- Difficult to research the role of the father because many factors influence it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Schaffer and Emerson study

A

Observed babies for 18 months
looked at interactions between the baby and carers
Longitudinal study on 60 babies from Glasgow (working class families mainly)
Monthly intervals for first 18 months of life
Studied in their own home
regular pattern of attachment identified
visited monthly for one year, interactions observed, and carers were interviewed
Evidence of attachment - baby showed separation anxiety after a carer left
25 and 32 weeks 50% babies showed signs of separation anxiety towards particular adult (specific attachment)
attachment with most interactive and sensitive to infants signals and facial expressions (sensitive responsiveness and reciprocity)
Age of 40 weeks 80% of babies had specific attachment, 30% had multiple attachments
Several attachments by 10 months old
Mother was the main attachment figure for about half of children, 18 months, father for most others
Forming attachment dependent on who plays and communicates with them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Schaffer and Emerson stages

A

Asocial , first few weeks, display attachment behaviour to anything
Indiscriminate, 2-7 months, show preference to people rather than objects, show little separation anxiety
Specific, from 7 months, separation anxiety towards primary caregiver
Multiple, by one year, separation anxiety towards multiple attachments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

AO3 for stages of attachment

A

+ Good external validity, carried out in homes, observations during ordinary activities and reported to researcher
+ longitudinal design, children followed up observed regularly, good internal validity
- problem studying asocial stage, babies have poor coordination/immobile, difficult to make judgements about them based of observations
- Limited sample characteristics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Lorenz animal study

A

12 grey lag geese
Randomly allocated them, two experimental conditions
Condition 1 - 6 hatched in incubator, Lorenz first moving object seen by goose chicks
Condition 2 - 6 hatched with mother goose in natural environmental, mother goose first moving object they saw
Chicks who saw Lorenz followed him as if he was their mother, as adults displayed mating displays to him and ignored other geese
chick who saw mother first followed her, performed mating rituals to other geese
‘Critical period’ of just a few hours to imprint, form an attachment, if they didn’t within this time, they never would
biological basis to attachment adaptive for survival, goslings imprint after matter of minutes due to their increased mobility
Birds that imprinted on humans would display courtship behaviour towards humans
case study - Peacock in reptile house in zoo, display direct courtship behaviour to tortoises, first moving object they saw

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

AO3 for Lorenz study

A
  • issue with generalisation and conclusion from birds to humans
    + support for the concept of imprinting, Guiton et al. found chickens imprinted on yellow washing up gloves and perform mating rituals to them, innate mechanism to imprint in critical period
  • issues regarding critical period, Sluckin, replicated Lorenz’s research using ducklings, sucessfully imprinted on to him, kept one isolated for five days,still possible for duckling to imprint, critical period /a sensitive period, attachments could still be performed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Harlow Animal Study

A

New-born monkeys would die if if kept in cages alone, given something soft to cuddle they are more likely to survive
Tested whether soft object served some of the functions of the mother
Reared 16 rhesus monkeys with two options - cloth mother and wire mother
In one condition the cloth mother dispensed milk and in the other the wire mother dispensed milk
Preferred cloth mother and cuddled her in preference to wire mother
seek comfort from cloth mother regardless of which mother dispensed milk
Sometimes remain in contact with the cloth whilst feeding from wire mother
Contact comfort more important than food in formation of attachment
Attached to cloth mother but never formed real attachment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Harlow maternal deprivation

A

Followed monkeys who had been deprived of real mother into adulthood to see if this maternal deprivation had a permanent effect
Monkeys reared with just wire mother, most dysfunctional
Monkeys reared with soft toy did not develop normal social behaviour
More aggressive, less sociable, bred less often
as mothers deprived monkeys neglected their young, attacked children and some killed them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Harlow - critical period

A

Longer than Lorenz
Found that mother figure had to be introduced to monkey within 90 days for attachment to form
if not attachments would never form and irreversible damage would occur

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

AO3 Harlow Animal Study

A

+ theoretical value - influential effect on psychologists understanding of human infant attachment
+ Practical value - Help social workers understand risk factors in child neglect and abuse
- Ethical issues, long term impact

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Learning theory of attachment

A

All behaviour is learned
Not innate
Learning result of conditioning
Children will form attachments on the basis of primary care provision
Attachment increase from birth
Strongest attachments to those who provide primary care
Cupboard love - Importance of food, Children learn to love whoever feeds them

24
Q

Classical conditioning in learning theory of attachment

A

The stimulus of food (unconditioned stimulus) produces a sense of pleasure (unconditioned response).
The person (primary caregiver) providing the food becomes associated with pleasure.
As a result the provider of the food becomes a conditioned stimulus that independently produces the unconditioned stimulus (pleasure).
Babies attach to mother as provider of food
learned through association that the mother brings pleasure

25
Classical conditioning model
Before conditioning - Mother: Neutral Stimulus = no response Food : Unconditioned stimulus = Happiness : Unconditioned response During conditioning - Mother + food = Happiness After conditioning - Mother : Conditioned stimulus + Happiness : Conditioned response
26
Operant conditioning in learning theory of attachment
Dollard and Miller - Hungry infant feels uncomfortable creating a drive to reduced this discomfort Infant is fed discomfort is reduced, feelings of pleasure produced (rewarding) Food, primary reinforcer, reinforces behaviour to avoid discomfort Secondary reinforcer, person who supplies food associated with avoiding discomfort Attachment occurs because child seeks person who can supply reward Settling crying baby through feeding acts as negative reinforcement for parent Drive motivates behaviour - Discomfort = a drive to reduced discomfort/ hungry infant = a drive to reduce hunger Positive reinforcer - crying behaviour reduces hunger through being feed negative reinforcer - feed baby to stop crying, unpleasant sound for mum hunger primary drive Attachment secondary drive learned through association between caregiver and satisfaction of primary need
27
AO3 of learning theory of attachment
+ learn through association and reinforcement - Schaffer and Emerson refutes this, attachments formed on the basis of play and comfort not food - Harlow and Lorenz refutes this concept, attachments occurs as result of comfort not feeding
28
Bowlby's theory
Infants have an innate tendency to form attachment to their primary caregiver, most often their mother A- Adaptive S- Social releasers C - Critical period M - Monotropy I - Internal Working Model
29
Adaptive
Attachments are adaptive Species an 'adaptive advantage', making us more likely to survive if an infant has attachment to caregiver, safe, given food, kept warm
30
Social Releasers
Caregiving evolutionary behaviour Social releasers - Characteristics infants are born with to elicit care giving Social releasers unlock innate tendency for adults to care for them Physical - 'baby face' features and body proportions Behavioural - crying, cooing Activate adult attachment system Attachment reciprocal process, both mother and baby have innate predisposition to attached and social releasers trigger response in caregiver
31
Critical period
Babies have to from attachment with caregiver during critical period Between birth and 2 1/2 years old Bowlby said if it didn't happen child would be damaged - socially, emotionally, intellectually, and physically Bowlby viewed as sensitive period if attachment not formed harder to form one in later life
32
Monotropy
Infants form one very special attachment with their mother. Special, intense attachment If mother isn't available the infant could bond with another primary caregiver More time mother figure spent with baby the better Two principles - The law of continuity = the more constant and predictable a child's care, the better the quality of attachment The law of accumulated separation = effects of every separation from the mother 'add up and the safest dose is therefore dose zero'
33
Internal Working Model
Through monotropic attachment infant would form internal working model Child forms a mental representation of the relationship with the primary attachment figure Serves as a template for what relationships are like A child with relaible caregiver will form expectation that all relationships are loving and reliable. Poor treatment, expect that treatment from others Continuity hypothesis states infants internal working model will influence later adult relationships infants who are strongly attached more likely to have socially and emotionally competent relationships in later life
34
AO3 for Bowlby's theory of attachment
- Monotropy can be considered to be socially sensitive idea + Evidence support for IWM, Bailey et al studied 99 mothers, those with poor attachments to own parents were more likely to have one year olds who were poorly attached.
35
The Strange Situation
Mary Ainsworth - places the infant in different situations in order to research the quality of attachment to the caregiver 12 to 18 months 100 middle class American families Observed through a two way mirror Proximity seeking - well attached children stay close to caregiver Exploration and secure base - Well attached children will explore but also use the caregiver as a point of safety Stranger anxiety - A sign of attachment is to show anxiety when a stranger approaches Separation anxiety - A sign of attachment is to protest at separation from caregiver Response to reunion - Well attached children are enthusiastic upon their caregivers return Explore through 8 events - parent is seated while baby plays with toys (parent as a secure base) Parent leaves the room, stranger responds to baby and offers comfort if baby is upset (Separation anxiety) Parent returns, greets baby, and offers comfort if necessary. Stranger leaves room (Reaction to Reunion)
36
What did the strange situation find
Three types of attachment : Type A - Insecure - Avoidant : ignored their mothers and her presence did not affect their play, did not return to her, displayed little stress when she left and ignored her when returned, reacted to stranger and mother in similar way, little stranger anxiety, mother not sensitive to the infants needs, 20-25% of British toddlers Type B - Securely Attached, played contently with mother present ( it didn't matter if the stranger was present ), return to her periodically, sought comfort from her upon reunion then went back to playing, mother and stranger treated differently with moderate separation distress and stranger anxiety, mothers were consistent supportive and sensitive to baby's needs, 60-75% of British toddlers Type C - Insecure - Resistant, fussy and wary even with mother present, explored less stayed by mother, huge stranger and separation anxiety, distressed by her leaving and sought contact at reunion simultaneously would show anger, mothers were inconsistent to how they responded to baby's needs, 3% of British toddlers Ainsworth argued that the differences are caused by the sensitivity of the mother to infants needs
37
AO3 for the Strange Situation
+ Good reliability, inter- rater reliability (observers agree) Controlled lab conditions/ use of behavioural categories makes behaviour easy to observe and record - Cultural differences - At least one other attachment type, Solomon pointed out a minority of children do not fall within the behaviour categories, disorganised attachment
38
Cultural Variations Study
Grossman and Grossman - See if the Strange Situation can be used to explore attachment types in German infants and to explore the relationship between maternal sensitivity and attachment type 49 German families Controlled and naturalistic observation Infants insecurely attached (anxious avoidant) rather than securely attached Sensitive to child's needs more likely to have secure attachment Over 10yrs, 80% of children kept the same attachment type, anxious and avoidant children reported having no or few friends Different child rearing practices, German children taught to be independent, used to being left by their parents, led to them being classified as insecurely attached Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg - Investigated the extent of cross cultural variations in attachment, studied cross cultural differences and intra-cultural differences Meta analysis of 32 studies Conducted in 8 countries 1900 children studied overall types of attachment across a range of countries Looked at difference within same countries Secure attachment was the most common type of attachment in all countries Insecure - resistant attachment were similar to Ainsworth's original sample under 14% Collectivist cultures where rates above 25% = Suggests that there were cultural differences in the distribution of insecure attachment Great Britain - 75% securely attached, 3% insecure resistant Israel - 29% insecure resistant Germany - insecure avoidant 35%
39
AO3 for cultural variations
+ Large samples, increase internal validity, reduced the impact of extraneous variables or anomalies - Samples tend to be unpresentative of culture , comparisons between countries not culture, many different child rearing practices within a country, cultural characteristics of the sample need to be specified - Method of assessment is biased, imposed etic (cultural universal)
40
What is attachment disruption?
Separation - distress when separated for a relatively short period of time from primary caregiver to whom an attachment has been formed + Deprivation - occurs when a bond that has been formed is broken = Bond disurption
41
Maternal deprivation
Children should experience a warm, intimate and continuous relationship with this mother/mother substitute in which both find satisfaction and enjoyment. Innate and a variation selected through evolution for survival of young Prolonged deprivation of a young child of maternal care may have grave effects on character If a chid doesn't form an attachment within the critical period they would suffer delayed intellectual development, characterised by abnormally low IQ Emotional development - affectionless psychopathy as the inability to experience guilt or strong emotion for others, lack remorse for their actions as cannot appreciate feelings of victims, stunt normal relationship development and associated with criminality
42
Bowlby maternal deprivation study
44 thieves - Examined the links between affectionless psychopathy and maternal deprivation 44 teenage delinquents (accused of stealing) Interviewed for signs of affectionless psychopathy Families interviewed to establish whether prolonged separation from their mothers had occurred Control of 44 non criminal teenagers, with emotional problems were assessed to see how often maternal deprivation occurred to the children 14/44 thieves were affectionless psychopaths and 17/44 had maternal separation 14 that were affectionless, 12 had also experienced prolonged separation in the first two years of life 0/44 in control group were categorised as affectionless psychopaths Prolonged separation/ deprivation caused affectionless psychopathy
43
A03 of maternal deprivation
+ Real life application, his work led to a major social change in the way children were cared for in hospitals - Critical period or sensitive period + Animal studies have demonstrated maternal deprivation, Levy et al - separating baby rats from their mother for as little as a day had a permanent effect on social development
44
What is institutionalisation
The effect of institutional care. The possible effects include social,mental and physical underdevelopment, some the effects may be irreversible
45
Difference between institutional care and family care
I - No attachment figure, less sociable, more aggressive, less intelligent, not cared for well S - Strong emotional attachment, more sociable and cared for well
46
Romanian institutions
Lacked medicines and washing facilities Sexual and physical abuse Flea and rat infestations At 18 would be kicked out onto the street
47
Effects of institutionalisation study
Longitudinal study Children adopted in 1990s and how they developed 165 Romanian children, 111 adopted before age of 2 and 54 adopted by the age of 4 Compared to 52 British children adopted by the age of 6 months Tested regularly for physical, social and cognitive development at the ages of 4, 6, 11, 15 British children in all three aspects By 4, most of the Romanian orphans who had been adopted beofre 6 months had caught up with the British children Children adopted after the age of 6 months showed dis inhibited attachment and difficulties with peer relationships Disinhibited attachment - Child doesn't seem to prefer parents over other people, even strangers, child seeks comfort and attention from anyone
48
What are the four effects of institutionalisation
Physically underdeveloped - Children are usually small, research has shown that lack of emotional care rather than poor nourishment is the cause of deprivation dwarfism Intellectual underfunctioning - Cognitive development is also affected by emotional deprivation Disinhibited attachment - insecure attachment, treat strangers with inappropriate familiarity and attention seeking Poor parenting - Harlow showed monkeys who had experienced poor parenting went to be bad mothers themselves Research - (Quinton) - compared group of 50 women raised in institutions with control group reared at home, ex-institutional women had extreme difficulties acting as parents
49
AO3 effects of institutionalisation
+ Real world application, greater understanding of effects - Data was not followed into adulthood - Confounding variables, could be due to poor institutional care not institutionalisation itself
50
Behaviours influenced by IWM - Childhood friendships
Childhood friendships - Continuity between early attachment and later emotional/ social behaviour, securely attached child more popular/sociable, higher expectations that others are friendly and trusting Attachment type is associated with the quality of peer relationships. quality friendships - securely attached, insecurely attached struggle with friendships
51
Research into childhood friendship
Myron- Wilson and Smith - Insecure avoidant, most likely to be bullied, insecure resistant most likely to be bullies Questionnaire 196 children aged 7-11
52
Behaviour influenced by IWM - Poor parenting
Poor parenting - lack of attachment / later difficulties parenting, base parenting style on their IWM so attachment type passed on through generations
53
Poor parenting research
Bailey et al - attachments of 99 mothers to their babies and their own mothers, using strange situation, mother own attachment assessed using adult attachment interview, same attachment classification both to their babies and their own mothers
54
Behaviours influenced by IWM - Mental health
lack of attachment in critical period, lac of IWM Attachment disorders = no preferred attachment figure, inability to interact and relate to others evident before age of 5 Psychiatric condition within the DSM
55
Behaviours influenced by IWM - Romantic relationships
Continuity hypothesis - Infant's relationship with caregiver form basis of child's IWM of relationships, effect child's expectations
56
Romantic relationships - Research
Hazan and Shaver Love quiz - 620 replies to the love quiz analysed, from American local newspaper Three sections - first, respondent's current or most important relationships, second general love experiences, third attachment type 56% securely attached 25% insecure - avoidant 19% insecure resistant Secure had good and longer lasting relationships
57
AO3 for influence on later relationships
- Self report techniques, social desirability bias - Can't prove a causal relationship + Supporting evidence from longitudinal research, Simpson et al - securely attached children 1yr higher social competence, 16yrs more expressive and emotionally attached to romantic partners