Attachment Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Explain attachment

A

-Attachment is a strong, enduring emotional relationship between two poeple(especially an infant and caregiver)
-A two way process that is characterised by a desire for closeness and a feeling of security when the attachment figure is present

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the two learning theories of attachment

A

Classical conditioning
Operant conditioning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Explain classical conditioning for the learning theory of attachment

A

-Food is the UCS and being fed gives a feeling of pleasure which is the UCR
-Caregivers starts as the NS - child has not learned to react to them in anyway
-When the same caregiver(NS) provides food(UCS) over a long time, the caregiver becomes associated with food
-After learning, the mother (CS) starts producing the response of pleasure(CR) by themselves
-According to the learning theory, fhd baby has become attached to the caregiver

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Explain operant conditioning(based on negative reinforcement) for the learning theory of attachment

A

-In operant conditioning, behaviour is repeated due to reinforcement
-In the case of attachment, hunger acts as a drive(a feeling of discomfort that motivates behaviour)
-This leads to babies crying as a desired behaviour
-This may lead to the child being fed which will reduce the hunger and lead to drive reduction
-The food which is the reward is the primary reinforcer as it is the actual object reducing the drive
-The mother is the secondary reinforcer as it is the person who provides the food
-As the process repeats, the child becomes attached to the mother as she is the agent of drive reduction and source of reward

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Bowlbys theory name
What did he believe all humans had?
He thought forming attachments had an…
Whats the acronym for this process

A

Bowlby monotonic theory of attachment
All humans have an intrinsic tendency to form an attachment and it I’d not something that is merely learnt
He thought forming attachments had an evolutionary value/advantages
ACSMI

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Explain ACSMI for Bowlby Monotropic theory of attachment

A

ADAPTIVE AND INNATE serves an important survival function for infants, infants who are well protected are likely to survive. Also, forming an attachment ensures that the offspring survives so it ensures to parents that their genes can be passed on to next generations
CRITICAL PERIOD This innate drive to form an attachment has a special limited time period for its development which in humans is 0-2 years
Children who do not have the opportunity to form an attachment during the critical period have difficulty forming attachments later on
SOCIAL RELEASERS
During the critical period, the quality of attachment is determined by their parents sensitivity to their social releases
Social releasers are behaviours like crying, smiling, cooing that elicit caregiving responses from the carer
The tendency of demonstrating social releasers is innate and done to capture the attention of the carer
MONOTROPY
The child will form a monotropic attachment with the caregiver who is most responsive to their social releasers
Monotropic attachment is when an infant forms one special, emotional bond which is a primary attachment
This is often the biological mother, but that is not always the case
INTERNAL WORKING MODEL
The first monotropic attachment formed provides a template for future relationships and forms a concept of what to expect our of future, intimate relationship. This is called internal working model
This led to development of the continuity hypothesis
Individuals who had secure relationships in infanct have positive templates, they continue to be socially and emotionally competent abs bave secure relationships with others in the future
Difficult relationships in infancy create negative templates, more likely to have the same difficulties in adult relationship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the strengths, limitations and one alternative for Bowlbys Monotropic theory of attachment

A

STRENGTH: Research support for continuity hypothesis, Practical applications
LIMITATION: Refuting evidence for the concept of critical period
Refuting evidence for the concept of monotropy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

One strength of Bowlby’s monotropic theory of attachment is there is research support for continuity hypothesis

A

One strength of Bowlby’s monotropic theory of attachment is there is research support for continuity hypothesis
The minnesota parent child study followed participants from infance to late adolescence and found continuity between the quality of early attachment and late emotional and social behaviour ghat the person engaged in. Participants who has secure attachments at infancy were highest rated for social competence in childhood, were less isolated, more popular and more empathetic
This is a strength as it is consistent with the continuity hypothesis as those with strong attachments in infancy go on to be more socially and emotionally competent than those who lacked strong attachments during infancy
Therfore this increases the validity of Bowlby’s theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

One strength of Bowlby’s theory of attachment is it has practical applications for the care of adoptive children

A

One strength of Bowlby’s theory of attachment is that it has practical applications for the care of adoptive children
For example, Bowlby’s stated that children form attachments during the critical period and this has led to adoptive agencies to ensure that children are adopted from 0 to 2 years or at the youngest possible age
This is a strength as it gives the children the best possible chance to form an attachment with their new caregiver so they will go on to form good relationships in the future as the theory states
Therefore, Bowlby’s theory I’d not purely theoretical as jt has been applied and is useful in improving the lives of adopted children

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

One limitation of Bowlby’s theory is there is Refuting evidence for the concept of the critical period

A

One limitation of Bowlby’s theory is there is Refuting evidence for the concept of the critical period
Tizard and Hodges found that attachment does generally happen in starting years of life. They studied orphanage children’s who have been adopted at the age of 3 and 4 and found that they were still capable of forming new attachments with their new adoptive parents at that age
This is a problem as Bowlby stated that children can only form an attachment during the critical period which is 0 to 2 years, howver this study suggests that close attachments can still be formed outside the critical period
This refutes the existence of a strict critical period so reduces the validity of Bowlby’s theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

One limitation of Bowlby’s theory of attachment is there is Refuting evidence of the concept of monotropy

A

One limitation of Bowlby’s theory of attachment is there is Refuting evidence of the concept of monotropy
Studies have shown the babies’attahcment to the first figure is not necessarily special or unique
Schaffer and Emerson studied 60 Glasgow babies and found that jt was the norm to have multiple attachments
Around the age of 10 months, 30% of the babies had multiple attachments
Furthermore, Bowlby implied that the main attachment is likely to be with the mother but the study found that a third of the babies were strongly attached to their fathers
This is a limitation as Bowlby underestimated children’s potential of forming attachments with their fathers and also contradicts the idea that children only form one special bond
This therefore reduced the validity of Bowlby’s theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

JUST READ THIS

A

ALTERNATIVE EXPLANATION OF BOWLBY’S MONOTROPIC THEORY OF ATTACHMENT
A weakness of Bowlby’s theory of attachment is that he failed to acknowledge the role of learning in the attachment process. According to learning theory, attachments are formed when infants associate the primary caregiver with the pleasure they experience from tbe food they provide of recognise that the caregiver has a role in removing the unpleasant experience of hunger. This indicated Bowlby’s explanation of attachment is too narrow and that he focused too much on the innate mechanisms involved in the formation of attachments and failed to acknowledge the role of learning and consequences. Therefore, Bowlby’s theory of attachment can be considered an incomplete explanation of attachment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is one strength, 2 limitations and one alternative for the learning theory of attachment

A

STRENGTH: Practical applications
LIMITATIONS: Refuting evidence from animal research, Refuting evidence from human research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

One strength of the learning theory is there are practical applications

A

One strength of the learning theory is there are practical applications
The learning theory explains that feeding behaviour forms attachments(e.g. through associating the caregiver with pleasure provided by food). This can be utilised to allow both parents to form an attachment with the infant. For the father, this can be achieved by feeding the infant expressed milk or formula milk.
This is a strength as it means both parents can look after the infant which creates a lot more flexibility in the household in terms of childcare and parental leave
Therefore, it is not purely theoretical and it increases the utility of the explanation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are the two animal studies of attachment

A

Lorenz’s Goslings
Harlow’s monkeys

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What do animal studies of attachment look into
Why is this behaviour of interest to psychologists

A

Animal studies have looked into formation of early bonds between non human parents and their offspring
We can learn more about attachment behaviour in humans by observing it in other species

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Define imprinting

A

Animal forms a special bond with the first moving thing it sees after birth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

LORENZ’S GOSLINGS
Procedure
Findings
Conclusion

A

PROCEDURE: Lorenz investigated the idea of imprinting. He took a clutch of goose eggs and divided them into two groups. The cotton geoup was left with their natural mother while in the experimental group, eggs were placed in an incubator. When these eggs hatched, the first living thing they saw an had contact with was Lorenz. Lorenz then interacted with the goslings and observed their behaviour
FINDINGS The incubator group followed Lorenz everywhere whereas the control group followed the mother group. Furthermore, Lorenz goose showed no recognition of their natural mother. Lorenz claimed that a young animal will form an attachment to a moving object it observes during its critical period (up to 2 days). Lack of an object will mean a primary attachment is not formed. He also claimed that animals (especially birds) will chosoe to mate with the same kind of animal they were imprinted and this is called sexual imprinting
CONCLUSION Animals form attachments through imprinting and have ab evolutionary need to form attachments to improve their survival chances

19
Q

HARLOW’S MONKEYS
Procedure
Findings
Conclusion

A

PROCEDURE: Harlow placed monekys(that were raised in isolation until they were eight months old) in cages with two ‘surrogate’ mothers. One was made of wire with a monkey like head that dispensed milk for the monkeys. The other was made from a wooden block covered in a soft towel which provided comfort to the monkeys
FINDINGS It was found that baby monkeys cuddled the towel mother more than the wire mother to seek comfort. When they were frightened, they always went to the towel mother. This shows that contact comfort is more important than food when forming attachments
Harlow did a follow up on the monkeys and found that later in life, even those that did have contact comfort developed abnormally as they all showed abnormal social interactions and mating behaviours with other monkeys. Harlow concluded that this may be due to them not forming healthy attachments during the critical period(up to 90 days after birth)
CONCLUSION: Food does not form attachments, contact comfort and social interaction is the key factor to forming attachments. Any theory that states that attachments forms through providing food is too simplistic.

20
Q

What is one strength and 3 limitations of animal research

A

STRENGTH: Research support for imprinting
WEAKNESSES: Problems extrapolating findings to humans
Imprinting effects are not fixed
Ethical issues

21
Q

One strength of animal research is there is research support for imprinting

A

One strength of animal research is there is research support for imprinting
Mamy studies have shown support for Lorenz’s research and the concept of imprinting in animals. Guiton exposed leghorn chicks to yellow rubber gloves used to feed them and the chick’s became imprinted to the gloves. Guiton also found that male chickens later tried to mate with the gloves.
This shows the impact of imprinting as young animals are not brkn with innate ability to imprint to specific species, they imprint on amy moving thing they observe during their critical period
This shows the strength of imprinting in forming attachments in animals
Imprinting also affects characteristics of the desired mate
This therefore, increases the validity of Lorenz’s research

22
Q

One limitation of animal studies of attachment is there are problems extrapolating the findings to humans

A

One limitation of animal studies of attachment js there are problems extrapolating the findings to humans
It is clear that human infants are significantly more complex than animals (e.g. showing much greater emotional attachments to animals). Additionally, the critical period is significantly different in human infants (0-2 years - Bowlby) compared to monkeys(90 days) and geese (up to 2 days).
This means it is difficult to generalise Lorenz’s and Harlow’s findings directly to humans as attachment behaviour is more complex and the critical period is very different between animals and humans.
Therefore, it is too problematic to apply animal findings to humans

23
Q

One limitation of the learning theory is there is Refuting evidence from animal research

A

One limitation of the learning theory is there is Refuting evidence from animal research
For example, Harlow showed that feeding does not lead to forming attachments as the monkeys sought contact comfort and formed lasting attachments with the towel mother rather than the food providing wire mother. Also Lorenz found that geese imprinted with the first moving object they saw regardless of whether that object provided them with food. This shows animals don’t form attachments with those that feed them so it actively refutes the role of food based pairing and drive reduction in the formation of attachments
Therefore, this reduces the validity of the learning theory as an explanation of forming attachments

24
Q

A limitation of the learning theory is there is Refuting evidence from human research

A

A limitation of the learning theory is there is Refuting evidence from human research
Schaffer and Emerson did a study where they found that attachments tended to be stronger with caregivers who was most interactive and sensitive to the infants needs, and not the person who fed them the most. In fact some of the children also had multiple attachments, energy though the mothers may have done more of the feeding
This is a problem as it further solidifies the notion that food is not the most important factor in forming attachments in humans
Therfore, this reduces the validity of the learning theory as an explanation for forgetting attachments

25
Q

One limitation of animal research is the effects of imprinting are not as permanent as Lorenz believed

A

One limitation of animal research is the effects of imprinting are not as permanent as Lorenz believed
Imprinting is a ‘plastic’ or flexible mechanism. Guiton found that he could reverse the imprinting in chickens who tried to mate with gloves by making them spend time with their own species and he found that they were able to engage in normal sexual behaviour with other chickens
This suggests that the impact of imprinting on mating behaviours is not fixed and can be changed with experiences
This suggests that Lorenz overestimated its effect of the development of sexual and attachment behaviour
Therefore, this decreases the validity of animal research as an explanation to the formation of attachments

26
Q

ANIMAL RESEARCH A limitation of Harlow’s research is there are ethical issues

A

A limitation of Harlow’s research is there are ethical issues
Monkeys suffered both physically(self mutilation) and emotionally due to the procedures of the experiment
This species is considered very similar to humans so suffering can be considered quite serious too
The damage caused was also long term as many of the moneys struggled to engage in normal sexual and social behaviour when older
Overall, this shows Harlow’s research causes significant psychological and physical harm to monkeys
Therefore, this reduces the credibility of Harlows research

27
Q

JUST READ THIS
Alternative explanation for Learning Theory (Bowlby’s theory)

A

A limitation of the learning theory of attachment is there is an alternative explanation of attachment such as Bowlby’s theory, which explains why attachments have formed, not just how. Attachment has an evolutionary function. Infant-increases chances of survival. Parent-ensures genes are passed on to next generations. Bobby states that attachments form when a caregiver responds to social releasers of infants during a critical. Social releasers can be sings of care needs not just feeding related behaviours. Therefore, Bowlby’s theory is a more rounded and powerful explanation of attachment whereas the learning theory only provides a partial explanation

28
Q

READ THIS
What animal studies tell us about human attachment

A
  1. Critical period for imprinting (Lorenz)/Attachment (Harlow), informs is that we have a limited window of opportunity for human attachments to form, otherwise it has long term negative effects, this idea was taken up by Bowbly in the monotropic theory
  2. Evidence from Harlow on importance of contact comfort helped shale theories of human attachment as researchers turned away from learning theory as food was no longer seen as a key factor is forming attachments
  3. Showed damaging effects of poor early attachments. Harlow claimed problems with social relationships and mating sbaled tbe idea of iwm in humans and had negative effects on attachment in future relationships
  4. Problems with extrapolation as humans are more complex(form stronger emotional attachment) and cp is different
  5. Idea of critical period not relevant to humans, human attachments occur in a sensitive period, early problems with attachment puts children at risk of negative consequences later in life, but evidence shows recovery can happen(Rutfeds evidence on memal redordation/koluchava twins)
29
Q

Explain caregiver and infant
What are the two mechanisms involved within these social interactions and when do they occur

A

From an early age, babies have social interactions with their caregivers. These interactions form the basis of the caregivers infant attachments.
Interactional synchrony- First weeks of life
Reciprocity - around 3 months

30
Q

CAREGIVER AND INFANT
Explain interactional synchrony

A

-When the child and parent are synchronised as they engaged in the same actions in unison
-It is believed that interactional synchrony is important for the development of mother infant attachments
-Isabella et al looked at the quality of mother infant attachments and levels of synchrony and found that higher levels of interactional synchrony was associated to better quality mother infant attachments

31
Q

CAREGIVER AND INFANT
Explain reciprocity

A

-Two way process of communication between infant and caregiver
-Each party responds to the others signal to sustain the interaction
-The behaviour of each patty elicits a response from the other
E.g. mother smiling leads to the infant smiling back
-This basic rhythm is an important precursor to later communications
-If the infants signals are regular, it allows the caregiver to anticipate the infants behaviour and respond accordingly
-If there is effective back and forth interactions, the infant delvops a healthy attachment

32
Q

What are 2 strengths and 2 limitations of Caregiver infant interactions

A

STRENGTHS: Supporting evidence for the role of interactional synchrony and reciprocity in infant carer interactions
Supporting cross cultural evidence
WEAKNESS: Studies don’t tell us exact purpose of interactional synchrony and reciprocity
Often difficult to form meaningful and valid observations to measure infants behaviour

33
Q

One strength is there is supporting evidence for the role of interactional synchrony and reciprocity in infant caree interactions

A

One strength is there is supporting evidence for the role of interactional synchrony and reciprocity in infant carer interactions
Murray and Traverthan asked mother to interact with their two month old infants through live video chat in real time. In the next part of the study, the infant saw a video of the mother interacting. Since this was a pre recorded video, the mother didn’t not respond to the infants facial and bodily gestures. The results showed that this led to acute distress as infants tried to gain their mothers interest but could not.
This shows reciprocity and interactional synchrony are important as a lack of them can lead to the infant showing distress so it possibly harms the deployment of infant caregiver interactions and attachments. Therefore, this supports the notion that both of these processes are likely to lead to better attachments

34
Q

A strength is there is supporting cross cultural evidence for the role of interactional synchrony

A

A strength is there is supporting cross cultural evidence for the role of interactional synchrony
Gratier studied the timings of spontaneous vocal interactions of 30 mothers and their 2 to 5 month old infants from India, France and US. She found that mother’s and infants from India, France and US coordinate their spontaneous vocalisations to eachother. This shows infants and carers from different cultures engage in interactional synchrony during social interactions. Therefore, it is a universal behaviour so it might be a fundamental part of forming attachments between the mother and infant. Therefore, it increases the validity of understanding caregiver infant interactions

35
Q

A limitation of research into caregiver infant interaction is that it does not tell us the purpose of interactional synchrony and reciprocity

A

A limitation of research into caregiver infant interaction is that it does not tell us the purpose of interactional synchrony and reciprocity
Fieldman points out that synchrony simply described behaviour between parent and child occurring at the same time. While these are obvious behaviours that cab be easily observed, our understanding of it may be useful as it does not tell us their purpose
This is a limitation as while we understand that it does occur within parental interactions but we do not know exactly the mechanism of how it affects the quality of future attachments. This gives us a shallow understanding. This is a weakness of our understanding of caregiver interactions as it may be considered incomplete.

36
Q

A weakness of caregiver interactions is it is often difficult to form meaningful and valid observations that measure infant behaviour

A

A weakness of caregiver interactions is it is often difficult to form meaningful and valid observations that measure infant behaviour
For example, infant’s mouths are in constant motion and they constantly make and change their expressions(e.g. yawn, smile). This is an issue as this makes it difficult to distinguish between general activity which a child engages in and special direction expressions as part of a conversation
This leaves data open to interpretation so we question the validity of the observations
Research and understanding of infant caregiver interactions is based on such observations, the theory that relies on such research may lack validity too

37
Q

What are the two roles of fathers

A

Role in play and stimulation
Role as a primary caregiver and nurturing attachment figure

38
Q

ROLE OF FATHERS IN PLAY AND STIMULATION
What was the method, findings and conclusion

A

METHOD: Grossman carried out a longitudinal study where he looked at the influence of parental behaviour on attachment
FINDINGS: The quality of father’s play with infants and not their security of attachment with the infant was related to the quality of early adolescent attachments with the father
CONCLUSION: This suggests that the father’s Role is to do with play and stimulation and this can impact the infants later attachments in adolescence

39
Q

ROLE OF FATHERS AS A PRIMARY CAREGIVER AND NURTURING ATTACHMENT ROLE
What was the method, findings and conclusion

A

METHOD: Field observed 4 month old infants interact face to face with either their primary caregiver father, mother or secondary caregiver father.
FINDINGS: Primary caregiver fathers, like mothers, spent longer smiling, imitating and holding the infant than secondary caregiver fathers
CONCLUSION: This suggests that the father can play a nurturing role for the infant just like a mother can

40
Q

What is one strength and 2 weaknesses of role of fathers

A

STRENGTHS Practical applications
WEAKNESSES Refuting evidence for fathers influence
Refuting evidence from learning theory

41
Q

One weakness of role of fathers is there is Refuting evidence for the fathers influence

A

One weakness of role of fathers is there is Refuting evidence for the fathers influence
For example, MacCallum and Golombok have found that children growing up in a single or same sex family may not develop any differently from those in two parent heterosexual families
This suggests that the role of fathers as an attachment figure is mot critical for a child’s development and fathers do not have a unique as an attachment figure
Therefore, this reduces the validity of our understanding of the father’s role in attachment

42
Q

A strength of role of fathers is it has practical applications

A

A strength of role of fathers is it has practical applications
Research that shows infants form attachments with fathers during early development suggests rearing responsibilities can be divided more evenly between the mother and father. This allows the mother to return to work quickly after giving birth and gives the father a more significant role rearing infants during early life. To aid this process, more and more societies are giving fathers paternity leave after birth. For example, in Sweden, fathers get 90 days paid paternity leave to give them time to help with childcare. This shows that research into the role of the father had helped to reduce the burden on the mother for childcare and there is more flexibility in terms of providing childcare
Therefore, this research is not purely theoretical and can be applied to improve the lives of families

43
Q

One limitation of the role of father is there is Refuting evidence from the learning theory

A

One limitation of the role of father is there is Refuting evidence from the learning theory.
According to the learning theory, attachments are formed when the infant forms an association betweeb the mother and the pleasure that comes from feeding. When infants are very young, they are often breastfed and fathers play no real part in this process.
This suggests that a infants attachments may be formed with the mother and the father will play a minimal role in development of early attachments
Therefore, since research on the role of father may exaggerate their influence on attachment behaviour, this reduces the validity of our understanding of the father’s role