Attachment Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Tronic Et Al

A
  • Asked mothers to stop smiling at their babies.
  • Stoic expression.
  • Babies smiled to try to get an interaction.
  • Supports reciprocity.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Bowlby Strengths

A
  • Influential, has stimulated a great deal of research and many of his ideas have been applied to a variety of different situations.
  • Research support i.e Harlow/Lorenz however limited.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Bowlby Weaknesses

A
  • Emphasises the role of the mother. What about the role of the father?
  • Contradicted by Schaffer and Emerson who found that many infants can form multiple attachments in the Multiple Attachments Stage (10/11 months+)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Ainsworth 1978 Strange Situation - Findings

A
  • Baby interacts with stranger when mother present.
  • Cries when mother leaves.
  • Stranger unable to comfort child.
  • Baby shows secure attachment.
  • Tested stranger anxiety, separation anxiety and reunion behaviour (when mother re-enters the room.)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Secure Attachment

A

Safe base: Uses mother as a safe base, explores.
Separation Anxiety: Mildly distressed when mother leaves.
Stranger Anxiety: Wary of stranger when alone, friendly when mother present.
Reunion Behaviour: Joy at reunion, easily comforted.
68% in Ainsworth’s study.

Mothers are affectionate and comforting, consistently. Responsive.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Insecure Avoidant (think Apathetic)

A

Safe base: Explores more, doesn’t use mum as safe space.
Separation Anxiety: No sense of distress when mother leaves. Doesn’t notice.
Stranger Anxiety: Not distressed by stranger.
Reunion Behaviour: Shows no interest when mother returns.
20% in Ainsworth’s study.

Mothers less responsive to social releasers, pay less attention and reject affection more than accept it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Insecure Resistant

A

Safe base: Infant wouldn’t explore in first place.
Separation Anxiety: Intense Distress.
Stranger Anxiety: Avoids stranger, resists interaction/getting to know.
Reunion: Approaches mother but rejects contact, resents her for leaving.
12% in Ainsworth’s study.

Mothers respond based on routine, lacking in affection or comfort.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Strange Situation AO3 - Strengths

A
  • Standardised procedures, easily replicable.
  • Control of extraneous variables.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Strange Situation AO3 - Weaknesses

A
  • Ecological Validity.
  • Ethical Issues babies distressed.
  • Role of the father? Some babies may have had a primary caregiver as father and thus are attached to them.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Cultural Variation

A
  • Repeated in 1988
  • Great Britain: highest no. of secure
  • Germany: highest no. of avoidant
  • Japan: highest no. of resistant, very few avoidant.
  • Result: Cross-cultural differences in raising children produced different reactions to the strange situation.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Maternal Deprivation

A

When an infant is deprived of maternal care for a long period of time during infancy. During critical period of 2.5 years, harmful effects.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Bowlby and MD

A
  • Critical period 0-2.5 years
  • Effects PIES and may result in them becoming emotionless, potentially sociopathic.
  • Continuity Hypothesis: Idea that our earlier relationships can predict our later ones. Similar to internal working model idea MICI.
  • May lead to inability to be a good parent in the future.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Continuity Hypothesis

A

Continued separation may lead to problems in adulthood; idea that our early relationships can predict our later ones; suggestion (with internal working model) that MD kids will become bad parents due to absence of the vital affection from primary caregiver.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Bowlby’s 44 Thieves

A
  • 44 delinquents boys. 32% affectionless psychopaths, of these 86% experienced prolonged periods of maternal separation between 0-5 years.
  • 44 control (non-delinquents). 0% affectionless psychos. 2 of them had also experienced prolonged separation.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

44 thieves strengths

A
  • Impacted childcare practices.
  • His research is influential in this area of attachment.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

44 thieves weaknesses

A
  • Gender Bias, sample of only boys.
  • Failed to explain the 2 controls and why they didn’t become delinquent.
  • Perhaps correlation but not cause and effect.
  • Investigator Effects
17
Q

Investigator Effects

A

When a researcher unintentionally influences the outcome of the research they are conducting. Often communicated to the patient unintentionally.

18
Q

Longitudinal Study

A

Same participants over a long period of time.

19
Q

Hazan and Shaver

A
  • Love Quiz.
  • Childhood attachments and views on romantic love.
  • Strong correlation between childhood attachment and success in adult relationships
20
Q

MICIS: ‘Mickey’s’

A

Monotropic
Internal Working Model
Critical Period (0-2.5 yrs)
Innate
Social Releasers

21
Q

AISM: All Infants Say Mum

A

Asocial (0-6 weeks)
Indiscriminate (6 weeks - 6 months)
Specific (7 months +)
Multiple (10/11 months +)