Attachment Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Care giver - infant ineractions

A

Reciprocity and interactional synchrony
-These interactions are believed to have important functions for the child’s social development
-Good early quality interactions are associated with the successful development of attatchments between babies and caregivers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Reciprocity in care giver-infant interactions

A

-Sometimes called turn taking
-Essential in any conversation otherwise people talk over eachother
-Responding to eachother’s signals and each elicits a response from eachother
-Alert Phase:
Babies signal they are ready for ineraction e.g eye contact
Feldman and Eidelman found mothers pick up on and respond to baby’s alrtness around 2/3 of the time although Findgood believes this varies towards skill of mother and external factors such as stress
-Feldman says from 3 months this interaction becomes increasingly frequent and involves both mother and baby paying close attention to eachother’s verbal signals and facial expressions
-Active involement:
-Traditional views of childhood portray babies in a passive role, recieving care from adult
-However babies aswell as caregivers take an active role
-Both initiate interactions and take turns
-Brazleton described this interaction as a ‘dance’ because they respond to eachothers moves

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Interactional synchrony

A

-2 people are said to be synchronies when they carry the same action simultaneously
-Feldman sayd synchrony can be defined as ‘the termporal co-ordination of micro-level social behaviour’
-When caregiver and baby interact in such a way that their acions and emotions mirror the other
-Meltzoff and Moore observed the beginings of interactional synchrony in babies from as young as 2 weeks old
-An adult displayed one of 3 facial expressions or one of 3 gestures
-Babies expression and gestures were filmed and labeled by independent observers
-Babies; expression and gestures were more likely to mirror those of the adults more than chance were predict
-Significant association
-It is believed that interactional synchrony is important for the development of caregiver-baby attachment
-Isabella observed 30 mothers and babies together and assessed the degree of synchrony
-Researchers also assessed the quality of mother-baby attachment
-They found that high levels of synchrony were assocated with better motherbaby attathent e.g the emotional intensity of the relationship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Stages of attachment

A

By Schaffer and Emerson
Stage 1) Asocial stage
-First few weeks
-Observable behaviour to humans and inaminate objects are similar
-Babies do show signs they prefer to be other people
-Also show a preference for the company of familiar people and more easily comfoted by them
-Baby is forming bonds with certain people and forms the basis of later attachments
Stage 2) Indiscrimate attachment
-2-7 months
-Shows more obvious and observable social behaviours
-Now show a clear preference for being with other humans rather than inaminate objects
-Also recognise and prefer company of familiar people
-Accepts comfort from any person and do not show seperation anxiety when caregivers leace or stranger anxiety in precense of strangers
Stage 3) Specific attachment
-From 7 months
-Signs of attachment to one person
-Stranger anxiety and seperation anxiety
-Not necesaially the person who spend most time but one who offers most interaction and responds to the baby’s signals with most skill
-65% of time is the mther
Stage 4) Multiple attachments
-Shortly after baby shows attachment behvaiour of stranger anxiety and seperation anxiety to one person, they extend this behvaiour to multiple attatchments with other people they spend time with called Secondary attachments
-Schaffer and Emerson obsevered that 29% of the children formed secondary attachments within a months of forming a specific primary attachment
-By 1 year, majority of babies develop multiple attatchments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Schaffer and Emersons research

A

-Observational study
-Glasgow working class families
-Researchers visited mothers and baby in their homes every month for first year and again at 18 months
-Researchers asked mothers about the protests babies made in everyday seperations i.e seperation anxiety
-Also assesed stranger anxiety

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Attachment to father research

A

-Evidence suggests that fathers are less likely to be babies’ first attachment figure compared to mothers
-Schaffer and EMerson found that majority of babies became attached to their mother at 7 months
-Only 3% was the father as sole attachment
-27% of cases was both father and mother
-But 75% of babies studied by Shaffer and Emerson formed attachment with father by 18 months
-This was determined by the fact that babies protested when their father walked away, sign of attachment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Distinctive role of fathers research

A

-Grossman carried out a longitudional study where babies’ attachments were studied until they were into thir teens
-Researchers looked at both parents’ behaviour and its relationship to the quality of the baby’s later interations to other people
-Quality of a baby’s attachment with mothers (not fathers) were related to attachments in adolecense
-This suggets that attachment to fathers is less important than attachment to mothers
-However Grossman found that quality of father’s play with babies was related to the quality of adolescent attachments
-Suggests fathers has a role to do with play and stimulation and less to do with emotional development

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Fathers as primary attachment figures research

A

-Baby’s primary attachment is not only first but also had special emotional significance
-Baby’s relationship with their first primary atttachment figure forms the basis of all later close emotional relationships
-There is evidence that when fathers are the primary caregiver they are able to adopt the emotional role more typically associated with mothers
-Fiels filmed 4 month babies in face to face interaction with primary caregiver mothers, secondary caregiver fathers, and primary caregiver fathers
-Primary caregiver fathers and mothers spent more time smiling,imitating and holding babies than secondary caregiver fathers
-These are all part of reciprcoity and interactional synchrony which are part of the process of attachment formation (Isabella)
-Seems fathers have the potential to be more emotion focused primary attachment figure
-They can provide the reponsiveness required for aclose emotional attatchment but perhaps only when given role of primary care giver

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Word for assumption that everything is heteto

A

Heteronormativity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Animal studies of attachment

A

Lorenz’s research and Harlow’s research
Ethologists conducted animal studies of realtionships between newborn animals and their mothers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Lorenz’ research

A

Imprinting:
-Lorenz disocvered the phenomenon of iprinting when he was a child and a newly hatched duckling followed him around
-As an adult he set up a classical experiment where he randomlu divided a larch clutch of goose eggs
-Half hatched with mother goose in natural environment and half hathed in an incubator where they first saw Lorenz
-Incubator group followed Lorenz everywhere, but control group followed their motheer
-When two groups were mixed up the control group kept following mother and experimental group followed Lorenz
-Imprinting: Wherby bird species that are mobile from birth like geese and ducks attach to and follow the first moving object they see
-Lorenz identified a critical period in which imprinting needs to take place
-Depending on the species this can be as brief as few hours after birth
-If imprinting does not occur within that time, Lorenz found that chicks did not attach themselves to a mother figure
-Sexual imprinting:
Lorenz also investigated the relationship betweeen imprinting and adult mate preferences
-He obeserved that birds that imprinted on a himan would later display courtship behaviour towards humans
-In Lorenz’s case study, he described a peacock that had been reared in the reptile house where the first moving objects the peacock saw were giant tortoises
-As an adult this bird would only direct courtship behaviour towards giant tortoises
-Lorenx concluded meant the peacock had undergone sexual imprinting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Harlow’s research

A

-Worked with rhesus monkeys which are more similar to humans than Lorenz’s birds
-Harlow observed that newborns kept alone in a bare cage often died but usually survived if given something soft like a cloth to cuddle
-Harlow tested the idea that soft objects serves some of the functions of a mother
-In one experiment he reared 16 baby monkeys with two wire model ‘mothers’
-In one condition milk was dispensed by plain wire mother and the had milk dispensed by cloth covered mother
-Found that baby monkeys cuddled coth mother in preference and sought comfort from cloth when frigthened e.g by noisy mechanical teddy bear , regardeless of which mother dispensed milk.
-Shows that ‘contact comfort’ was more of importnace to monkeys than food when it came to attachment behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Maternally deprived monkeys as adults

A

-Harlow followed monkeys who had been deprived of a ‘real mother’ into adulthood to see if maternal deprivation had a permanent ffect
-Monkeys reared with plain wire mothers were the most dysfunctional
-Cloth covered mother monkeys did not develop normal social behaviour
-These deprived monkeys were more agressive and less sociables and bred less often than typical for monkeys, being unskilled at mating
-When they became mothers, some neglected their young, others attacked their children and some killed their children
-The critical period for attachment formation in monkeys was concluded to be within 90 days
-After this time, attachment was impossible and damage done by early deprivation is irreversible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Learning theory and attatchment

A

-Dollard and Miller proposed that caregiver attachment can be explained by learning theory
-Their approachi s sometimes called a ‘cupboard love’ approach because it emphasised the importnace of the attachment figure as a provider of food
-Simply they proposed that children learn to love whoever feeds them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Classical conditioning for caregiver attatchment (learning theory)

A

Food - unconditioned stimulus
Pleasure from food - unconditioned response
Caregiver - neutral stimulus
-Caregiver becomes a conditioned stimulus when they are associated with food
-Caregiver overtime produces a conditioned response of pleasure
-To a learning theorist, this pleasure response is love thus an attachment is fromed and the caregiver becomes an attachment figure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Operant conditioning for caregiver attachment (learning theory)

A

-Can explain why babies cry for comfort, an important behvaiour in building attachment
-Crying leads to response from care giver e.g feeding
-Where caregiver provides correct response, crying is reinforced
-Baby then directs crying for comfort towards the caregiver who responds with comforting ‘social suppressor’ behaviour
-The baby is reinforced for crying but also the caregiver recieves negative reinforcement because the crying stops
-Escaping from something unpleasant is reinforcing
-This interplay of mutual reinforcement strengthens an attachment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Attachment as a secondary drive (learning theory)

A

-As well as conditioning , learning theory draws on the concept of drive reduction
-Hunger can be thought of as a primary drive
-Hunger is an innate, biological motivator
-We are motivated to eat to reduce the hunger drive
-Sears suggested that as caregivers provide food, the primary drive of hunger becomes generalised to them
-Attachment is thus a secondary drive learned by association between the caregiver and the satisfaction of a primary drive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Bowlbys monotropic theory type etc

A

-Criticised the learning theory and proposed an evolutionary explanation
-Attachment is an innate system that gives a survival advantage
-Attachment, like imprinting evolved as a mechanism to keep young animals safe by ensuring they stay close to adult care givers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Monotropy in Bowlbys theory & laws

A

Mono = one , Tropic = learning towards
-Bowlby places great emphasis on a child attachment to one care giver
-Believed this attachment is different and more important than others
-Bowlby called this person the Mother but it was clear it did not need to be the biological mother or a woman
-He believed the more time a baby spent with this mother, the better
-The law of continuity: The more constant and predictable a child’s care, the better quality of their attachment
-The law of accumulated separation: The effects of every separation from the mother add up ‘-!: the safest dose is therefore a zero dose”

20
Q

Social releasers and the critical period in the monotropic theory

A

-Babies are born with Social releasers: a set of innate “cute behaviours” e.g smiling or cooing
-They activate adult social interaction to make an adult attach to the baby
-Bowlby recognised that attachment was a reciprocal process
-Both mother and baby are hardwired to become attached
-The interplay and adult attachment system gradually builds between them in the early weeks of life
-There is a critical period around 6 months when the infant attachment system is active
-Also viewed as a sensitive period
-A child is maximally sensitive at 6 months and this can extend to age of 2
-If an attachment is not formed in this time, child will find it much harder to form one later

21
Q

Internal working model for monotropic theory

A

-Bowlby proposed that a child forms a mental representation of their relationship with their primary attachment figure
-Called an internal working model because it serves as a model for what relationships are like
-First relationship with caregiver being loving = expectation that all relationships are loving and reliable and they will bring these qualities to future relationships
-First relationship with caregiver being poor treatment= Form poor relationships in future where they expect such treatment and treats others in that way
-Internal working model affects child’s Lster ability to be a parent themselves
-People tend to base their parenting behaviour on their own experiences of being parented
-Explains why children from functional families tend to have similar families themselves

22
Q

Ainsworths strange situation nethod

A

-By ainsworth and Bell
-Aim to observe key attachment behaviours by assessing quality of a baby’s quality of attachment to a care giver
-non participant observation
-Time sampling of 15 seconds

23
Q

Ainsworths strange situation procedure

A

-Controlled observation procedure designed to measure the security of attachment a baby displays towards caregiver
-Takes place in a room with controlled conditions e.g laboratory with a two way mirror and/or cameras which psychologists can observe babies behaviour
Behaviours used to judge attachment :
-Proximity seeking
-Exploration and secure base behaviour
-Stranger anxiety
-Separation anxiety
-Response to reunion
7 episodes which lasts 3 minutes ,
Beginning : Caregiver and baby enter an unfamiliar room
1. Baby is encouraged to explore (tests exploration and secure base)
2.Stranger comes in, talks to care giver and approaches baby (tests stranger anxiety)
3.Caregiver leaves the baby and stranger together (tests separation and stranger anxiety)
4.Caregiver returns and stranger leaves (tests reunion behaviour and exploration/secure base)
5.Caregiver leaves baby alone (tests Seperation anxiety )
6.Stranger returns (tests stranger anxiety )
7. Caregiver returns and is reunited with the baby (tests reunion behaviour)

24
Q

Types of attachment from ainsworth strange situation Type A

A

Type A) Insecure- avoidant attachment:
-Babies explore freely but do not seek proximity or show secure base behaviour
-Show little or no reaction when their caregiver leaves and little stranger anxiety
-Make little effort to make eye contact when caregiver returns and may even avoid contact
-20-25% of British babies

25
Q

Types of attachment from ainsworth strange situation Type B

A

Type B: Secure attachment
-High proximity seeking and secure base behaviour
-Show moderate separation distress and moderate stranger anxiety
-Require and accept comfort from the caregiver at the reunion stage
-60-75% of British babies

26
Q

Types of attachment from ainsworth strange situation Type C

A

Type C ) Insecure resistant
-Babies seek greater proximity than others and explore less
-Show high levels of stranger and depression distress but resist comfort when reunited with caregiver (reunion behaviour)
-3% of British babies

27
Q

Cultural variations (main)

A

Van Izjendoorn and Kroonberg assessed cultural variation by loooking at proportions of Type A B and C in different countries
-Also looked at the differences within the same countreis to get an idea of variations within a culture
Procedure: Researchers located 32 studies of attachment where trange Situation was used
-Conducted in 8 countries , 15 studies were in the US
-Overall results from 1990 children
-Data for these 32 studies were meta analysed
-Means results of studies were combined and analysed together, weighing each study for its sample size
Findings: Wide variation between proportions of attachment types in different studies
-All countries had secure attachment as the most common classificaion
-Secure attachment varied from 75% in Britain to 50% in China
-Individualist cultures rates of insecure-resistant attachment were all under 14%, similar to Ainsworth’s orginal sample
-But collectivist cultures from China, Japan and Israel Insecure resistant was above 25% and insecure avoidant was reduced
-Variations between results of studies within the same countries were 150% greater than those between countries
-e.g the US, one study found sample 46% securely attached compared to one sample at 90%

28
Q

Cultural variations Italy

A

-Simonelli assessed 76 babies aged 12 months using the Strange situation
-50% were secure and 36% isnecure avoidant
-This is a lower rate of secure and higher avoidant than many other studies
-Researchers suggets this is due to increasing numbers of mothers of young children who work long hours and use proffesional care
-Suggets patterns of attachment types are not static but vary in line with cultural change

29
Q

Cultural variations Korea

A

-Jin used stange situation to assess 87 babies
-Overall proportions of insecure and secure babies were similar to those in most countries with babies being mainly secure
-However those insecurely attached were more resistant and only one was avoidant
-Similar to Ijzendoorn and Kroonberg
-Since Japan and Korea have similar child rearing styles, this similarity may be explained in terms of child rearing style

30
Q

Conclusions of cultural variations

A

-Bowlby was right that attachment is innate and a univeral norm due to secure attachment being the norm in a wide range of cultures
-Hiwever research shows cultural practices have an influence on attatchment type

31
Q

Bowlby’s theory of maternal derpivation

A

-The emotional and intellectual consequences of separation between a child and their mother or mother substiture
-Bowlby proposed that contnuous care from a mother is essential for normal psychological development and that prolonged seperation causes serious damage to emotional and intellectual development

32
Q

Maternal deprivation vs seperation

A

-Seperation = child not being in presence of primary attachment fifure
-This is only a problem if the child becomes deprived of emotional care, which can happen with present but depressed mother
-Brief seperations where the child is with substitute caregiver who can provide emotional care are not significant for development, but extended sperations can lead to deprivation which by definition causes harm

33
Q

Maternal deprivation critical period Bowlbys theory of maternal deprivation

A

-First 2 and a half years by Bowlby for psychological development
-If child is seperated from their mother in anscense of suitable subsittute care and so deprived of her emotional care for an extended duration during this critical period then Bowlby believed psychological damage as inevitble
-Also believed there was a continuing risk up to age of 5

34
Q

Maternal deprivation effects on development

A

Intellectual development :
-Deprivation of maternal care for too long during the critical period would experience delayed intellectual development e.g low iq
-Demonstrated in studies of adoption
-Goldfarb found lower IQ in children who remained in institutions opposed to those who were fostered and thus hd a higher standard of emotional care
Emotional devlopment:
-Bowlby affected affectionless psychopathy, inability to feel guilt or strong emotion towards others
-This prevents a person from developing fulfiling relationships and is associated with criminality
-Affectionaless psychopaths cannot appreciate feelings of victims and so lack remorse for their actions

35
Q

Bowlby’s research for maternal deprivation

A

-44 teenage thieves
-All thieves were interviewed for signs of affectionless psychopathy e.g lack of affection, guilt and empathy for victims
-Ther families were interviewed to establis whether thieves had prolonged early seperations from their mothers
-Sample was compared to a control group of 44 non-criminal but emotionally disturbed young people
-Bowlby found that 14/44 thieves could be described as affectionless psychopaths and 12 of these had prolonged seperation from mothers in first 2 years of their lives
-Only 5 of the remaining 30 thieves had experienced seperations (not psycho)
-Only 2 participants of the control group of 44 had experienced long seperations
-Bowlby concluded that prolonged early seperation/deprivation caused affectionless psychopathy

36
Q

Deprivation and iq Study

A

Goldfarb followed up 30 orphaned children to the age of 12
-Half of the original sample had been fostered by 4 months whilst toher half remained in orphanage
-At 12 their IQs were assessed using the Stanford Binet test
-Found that the fostered group had average IQ of 96 but those who remained in orphanage had averaged 68, below the cutoff point to define intellectual disability

37
Q

Romanian orphan study and researchers

A

-Rutter and Zeanah
-President of Romania required Romanian women ti have 5 children and they could not afford to keep children and they ended up in orphanages in poor conditions

38
Q

Rutters research procedure

A

-Followed a group of 165 Romanian orphan for many years as part of the English and Romanian adoptee (ERA) stud y
-Orphans were adopted by families in the UK
-Aim or ERA was to investigate the extent to which good care could make up for poor early experiences in institutions
-Physical, congnitve and emotional development assessed at 4,6,11,15, 22-25 years
-Control group of 52 children from the UK adopted at the same time served as a control group

39
Q

Rutters research findings

A

-When the Romanian first arrived inthe UK, half of adoptes showed signs of delayed devlopement, and majority were severly undernourished
-At age 11 the adopted children showed differential rates of recovery that were related to their age of adoption
-Mean IQ of children adopted before 6 months was 102
-Mean IQ of those adopted between 6 months and 2 years was 86
-Mean IQ of those adopted after 2 years was 77
-Beckett found that these differences remained at age 16
-Kennedy found that ADHD was more common in 15- and 22-25 year samples
-Children adopted after 6 months showed signs of Dishibited attachment
-Symptoms include; attention seeking, clinginess and social behaviour directed indiscriminately towards all unfamilar and familiar adults
-Those adopted before age of 6 months rarely displayed disinhibted attachment

40
Q

Zeanah’s research

A

-Zeanah conducted the Bycharest early intervention (BEI) project, assessing attatchment in 95 Romanian children aged 12-31 months who had spent average 90% of their lives in insitutional care
-They were compared to a group of 50 children who never lived in institution
-Their attachment was measured using the Strange Situation
-Carers were also asked about unusual social behaviour including clingy,attnetion seeking behaviour directed inappropriately at all adults (measure of disinhibted attachment)
-Researchers found that 74% of the control group were securely attached in the Strange situation
-But only 19% of institutional group were securely attached
-The description of dishinhibited attachment applied to 44% of institutionalised children oppsed to less than 20% of the controls

41
Q

Effects of institutionalisation

A

Disinhibited attachment:
-Children who spent early lives in an institution often showed signs of disinhibited attachment, being equally friendly and affectionate towards familiar people and strangers
-This is highly unusual behaviour - most children in their second year show stranger anxiety
-Rutter explained disinhibited attachment as an adaption to living with multiple caregivers during the senstive period for attachment
-In poor quality institutions like Romania, a child may have 50 carers, but if they dont spend enough time with one of them, they cant form a secure attachment
Intellectual disability
-In Rutter’s study, most children showed signs of intellectual disability when they arrived in Britain
-But most of those adopted before they were 6 months old caught up with the control group by age 4
-Like emotional development, damage to intellectual devlopment as a result of institutonalisation can be recovered provided adopion takes place before 6 months , the age attachment forms

42
Q

Disorganised attachment

A

Attachment pattern by showd by a mix of avoidant and resistant behaviour

43
Q

Internal working model in attachment and later relationships

A

-Bowlby suggested the baby;s first relationship with their primary attachment figure leads to a mental representaion of relationships
-Internal working model acts a template for future childhood and adult relationships
-Quality of a baby’s first attachment is crucial because it will powerfully affect the nature of their future relationships
-First relationship being loving will tend to assume this is how relationships are meant to be
-They will then seek functional relationships and behave functionally e.g not beeing too uninvolved or emotionally close (inescure avoidant attachment) or being controlling and argumentative (insecure resistant attachment)
-Bad attachment will mean stuggle to for relationships in the first place or may not behave approprately within relationships, displaying insecure aoidant or insecure resistant behvaiour towards friends and partners

44
Q

Early attachment influence on relationship in childhood in attachment and later relationships

A

-Attachment associated with qulity of peer relationships in childhood
-Kerns found Securely attached babies tend to form the best quality childhood friendships but insecurely attached babies have friendship difficulties
-Bullying behaviour can be predicted by attachment type
-Wilson and Smith assessed attachment type and bullying involvment using standard questions in 196 children aged 7-11 in London
-Secure children were unlikely to bully
-Insecure avoidant children likely to be victims and insecure resistant likely to bully

45
Q

Internal working models in relationships in adulthood in attachment and later relationshpis study

A

Affects romantic relationships and parental relationships with own children
-Studied by Hazan and Shaver
-McCarthy studied 40 women who had their attachment types assessed as a baby
-Those assessed as securely attached babies had the best adult friendships and romantic relationships
-Adults who are insecure resistant had problems mainting friendships while insecure -avoidant stuggled with intimacy
-People also base their parenting style on their internal working model so attachment types tend to be passed on through generations of family
-e.g Bailey’s study of attachments of 99 mothers to their babies and their own mothers
-Mother baby attachment was assessed using the Strange situtation and the mother’s attachment to her own mother was assessed using an adult attachment interview
-Majority of women had the same attachment clasfication to both their babies and own mothers

46
Q

Hazan and Shaver study in attachment and later relationships

A

-Studied association between attachment and adult relationships
-They analysed 620 replies to a ‘love quiz’ printed in an American newspaper
-3 sections of quiz: 1) Assessed respondents current or most important relationship
2) Assessed general love experiences such as number of partners
3) Assessed attachment types by asking which othe 3 statements best described their feelings
-56% identified as securely attached
-25% insecure avoidant
-19% insecure resistant
-Secure ones were most likely to have good and longer lasting romantic experiences
-Avoidents revealed jealousy and fear of intimacy
-Shows patterns of attachment behaviour are reflected in romantic relationships