Attachment Flashcards
Define attachment
An emotional link between an infant and caregiver, each seek closeness and feel more secure when in the presence of the attachment figure. Interactions between a carer and an infant is where an attachment starts. It is the responsiveness of the caregiver to the infants signals that has a deep effect on the child.
How do researchers recognise an infant has an attachment?
1) Proximity: People try to stay physically close to those they are attached to.
2) Separation distress: People are distressed when an attachment figure leaves their presence.
3) Secure base behaviour: We always ‘touch base’ with our attachment figure regularly return to their attachment
What are the 2 caregiver - infant interactions?
- Interactional Synchrony
- Reciprocity
What is interactional synchrony?
(mirroring actions) Caregiver and infant respond in time to keep communication going. e.g infant smiles, caregiver smiles back at the same time. This type of communication ensures infant and caregivers emotions and actions mirror each other’s.
Who conducted research into caregiver - infant interactions?
Meltzoff and Moore
Outline research into Caregiver - infant interactions
Meltzoff and Moore (77) conducted a controlled observation of forty two-week old babies to measure caregiver-infant interactions. An adult displayed one of three facial expressions or distinctive gestures, such as mouth opening or tongue protrusion. The child’s response was filmed and identified by an independent observer. A link was found between the facial expression/gesture of the adult and the response of the baby.
What is reciprocity?
This is a two-way, mutual process where infant and caregiver take turns to respond to each other’s behaviours/signals, to sustain interaction (like a conversation). The behaviour of each party elicits a response from the other, E.g child puts arms out to be held - caregiver picks up.
Babies have ‘alert phases’ and signal when they are ready for interaction. Mothers pick up and act on these signals 2/3rd of the time (Feldman and Eidelman).Brazleton said both mother and baby initiate (start) the interaction and take it in turns to do so. He called this the ‘dance.’ He said it’s like when a couple dance together they respond to each other’s moves.
AO3: Caregiver-infant interactions
Ecological validity
One potential criticism of the research into caregiver-infant intercations, is that much of the research lacks ecological validity. This is because the research takes place in controlled environments, such as a controlled observation with the caregiver and infant being filmed. Therefore, it is difficult to generalize the findings to real life cases of caregiver-infant interactions as the infant may not behave how they usually do in the real world, for example, they may interact with the parent more as they are the only familiar person in the room, or they may interact less as they feel uncomfortable or shy in an unfamiliar environment. Therefore, lowering the external validity of the research in to care-giver infant interactions. Discussion: However, some would argue that because the baby is young they may not notice the change in the environment, and this would not affect the validity.
AO3: Caregiver-infant interactions
Extraneous Variables
Moreover, because the research takes place in controlled environments (controlled observation) this means that the research can be praised for having high control over extraneous variables. A potential extraneous variable that would be controlled is not having other adults in the room during observations of caregiver-infant interactions as it may distract the baby. This means that cause and effect can be established in the interactions between caregivers and infants, thus increasing the internal validity of the research in to caregiver-infant interactions.
AO3: Caregiver-infant interactions
Bias
However, critics argue that the research in to caregiver-infant interactions can be prone to bias, as babies cannot speak, inferences must be drawn about their behaviour. This means that a psychologist may interpret this information in a way that fits their hypothesis, for example a baby may have wind but the psychologist may infer that this is a smile in response to their parents smile, reducing the internal validity of the research in to caregiver-infant interactions. In order to minimise this, there should be two observers present to agree on the findings.
Who identified the stages of attachment?
Schaffer and Emerson
What are the 4 stages of attachment?
Asocial
Indiscriminate
Specific
Multiple
What was the aim of Schaffer and Emerson’s research?
To investigate the formation of early attachments (stages and multiple attachments), the age at which they develop and who they are directed to.
Outline the procedure of research into the stages of attachment by Schaffer and Emerson
- Longitudinal study on 60 working class newborn babies and their mothers from Glasgow
- The babies and mothers were visited at their own homes every month for the first year of the baby’s life and again at 18 months
- Observations and interviews (with mothers) were used.
Attachment was measured in two ways:
* Separation anxiety - assessed by the infant being left alone in a room, or the researcher asking the mother how the infant reacts in this instance.
* Stranger Anxiety – assessed by the researcher starting each home visit by approaching the infant to see if this distressed the child.
* Researchers asked the mothers questions such as who infants smiled at, whom they responded to etc.
What were the 2 ways that attachment was measured in Schaffer and Emerson’s research?
- Separation anxiety
- Stranger anxiety
What were the findings of Schaffer and Emerson’s research into the stages of attachment?
There are 4 stages of attachment
1) Asocial (first few weeks) Babies behaviour to adults and inanimate objects was similar.
2) Indiscriminate (2-7 months) Babies show a preference to people over inanimate objects but usually do not show stranger or separation anxiety.
3) Specific – from around 7 months babies start to form attachments and show separation and strangers anxiety when separated. In 65% of cases this was with the mother.
4) Multiple – within 1 months of formin a specific attachment 29% of children formed multiple attachment. By 1 year most infants had multiple attachments. At 18 months 75% of children had an attachment with their father.
What was the conclusion of research into the stages of attachment by Schaffer and Emerson?
Infants form attachments in stages, multiple attachments can be formed.
What is the ASOCIAL stage of attachment?
First few weeks. The baby’s behaviour towards non-human objects and humans is quite similar. However, babies are happier when in the presence of other humans.
What is the MULTIPLE stage of attachment?
Shortly after children show specific attachments, they usually extend this attachment behaviour to other adults whom they regularly spend time with. In Schaffer and Emerson’s study, 29% of children had multiple attachments within a month of forming a specific attachment. By the age of one year, the majority of infants have developed multiple attachments. At 18 months, 75% of infants had an attachment with their father.
What is the SPECIFIC stage of attachment?
From around 7 months the majority of babies start to display stranger anxiety and separation anxiety when separated from one particular adult (the biological mother in 65% of cases). This is a specific attachment, and is not necessarily the person the child spends most time with, but the one who offers the most interaction and responds to the babies ‘signals’ the most.
What is the INDISCRIMINATE stage of attachment?
From 2-7 months babies start to display more observable social behaviour. They show a preference for people over inanimate objects (smile more at them) and recognise and prefer familiar adults. Babies will usually accept cuddles and comfort from any adult, they usually do not show separation or stranger anxiety.
AO3: Stages of Attachment
High Ecological Validity
A plausible strength of Schaffer’s research is that it has high ecological validity, this is because observations were carried out in the families’ own homes during ordinary activities by the parent such as leaving the room. This makes it easier to generalise the findings to real life examples of attachment as the childrens’ behavior is likely to be representative of everyday interactions. Therefore increasing the external validity of the research in to stages of attachment/multiple attachments.
AO3: Stages of Attachment
Social desirability
However the research could be prone to social desirability bias as interviews were used to gather information, therefore the mothers could have lied about their child’s behaviour to present their parenting in the best possible light, for example they may say that the child is distressed when they leave the room even if they are not, so the results may have lacked internal validity and not measure the true stages of attachment/multiple attachments.
AO3: Stages of Attachment
Culture bias
Moreover, Schaffer’s research can also be criticised for being culture bias as the sample used were all from the same city (Glasgow). Therefore it is difficult to generalise the findings of the stages of attachment to other cultures, for example, psychologists studying non-western (Collectivist) cultures where families often work together to look after a child have found that infants can form multiple attachments from the outset without forming a specific attachment first. Limiting the external validity of the research into the stages/multiple attachments.