Attachment Flashcards
Naturalistic observations
Watching and recording behaviour in the setting within which it would normally occur.
Strengths and limitations of naturalistic observations
S= High ecological validity as the researcher records naturally occurring behaviour in a natural environment, without any outside interference from the researcher.
L = Cannot be replicated to check reliability, as the researcher is not in control of variables.
Controlled observations
Watching and recording behaviour within a structured environment
Strengths and limitations of Controlled observations
L= Low ecological validity as the researcher records behaviours in an artificial (manipulated) environment, with potential outside interference from the researcher. Findings can’t be applied to everyday life.
S= Can be replicated to check reliability, as the researcher is in control of variables and therefore can repeat the method as they wish
Participant observations
The researcher becomes a member of the group whose behaviour he/she is watching and recording
Strengths and limitations of Participant observations
S=The researcher can obtain in-depth data as they are in close proximity to the participants and so are unlikely to overlook or miss any behaviours.
L=The researchers’ presence might influence the participants’ behaviour= may show demand characteritics = reduces validity
Non -participant
The researcher remains outside of the group whose behaviour he/she is watching and recording.
Strengths and limitations of Non -participant
S=Investigator effects and evaluation apprehension are less likely as the researcher is not visible.
L=Due to a lack of proximity the researcher might overlook or miss behaviours of interest.
- may lose valuable insight
Covert Observations
Participant’s behaviour is watched and recorded without their knowledge or consent.
Strengths and limitations of Covert Observations
S= Investigator effects are unlikely meaning that participants’ behaviour will be genuine. - No demand characteristics
- Increases internal validity
L= Less ethical as participants are not aware they are taking part and cannot give fully informed consent
Overt observation
Ps behaviour is watched and recorded with their knowledge and consent.
Strengths and limitations of Overt observation
S= It is possible to inform participants in advance and obtain informed consent.
L= Behaviour can be distorted through investigator effects in which the participant changes their behaviour through social desirability bias
Structured observations
Behavioural categories - target behaviour is broken into components that are observable and measurable
Event sampling - target behaviour or event is first established then the researcher records this event every time it occurs.
Time sampling - a target individual or group is first established then the researcher records their behaviour in a fixed time frame eg. every 60 seconds
Strengths and limitations of Structured observations
S=
- Makes the recording of data easier and more systematic.
- Likely to produce quantitative data which makes it easier to analyse and compare.
- The smaller risk of observer bias.
L=
-Results aren’t as in-depth and detailed.
- Some behaviours the researcher records may not be important.
Evaluation
- It is easier to analyse the data recorded using a structured observation, but the results aren’t as detailed.
unstructured observations
the researcher records all relevant behavior without system.
Strengths and limitations of unstructured observations
S=More detailed results
L=
-There may be a greater risk of observer bias (no behavioural categories)
- Produces qualitative data which is more difficult to analyse.
Evaluation -
Although unstructured observations produce more in-depth results, they are much harder to analyse and there is a greater risk of observer bias.
Observer bias
The observer’s expectation may affect what they see and hear. This reduces the validity of the observation.
Observers must be consistent in their judgement and record the same data. Trained to establish inter-observer reliability.
A test of correlation between 2 sets of scores +0.8/.8 or above.
Reciprocity
is where an infant responds to the actions of another person. With reciprocity, the actions of one person (e.g. the mother) elicit a response from the other (e.g. the infant).
Interactional synchrony
-Mother and infants actions mirror each other
- Caregiver and baby reflect both the actions and emotions and do this in a co-ordinated way.
Supporting evidence for interational synchrony
Andrew Meltzoff and Keith Moore 1977
- Babies’ expressions and gestures were more likely to mirror those of the adults than the chance would predict.
Isabella et al - assessed the quality of mother-baby attachment. They found high levels of synchrony were associated with better quality mother-baby attachment. This shows how important caregiver interaction is probably in development.
Schaffer and Emerson 1964
The majority of babies become attached to their mothers at around 7 months.
3% of cases the father was the first object of attachment.
27% was the joint object attachment with the mother.
75% of babies studied by Schaffer and Emerson formed an attachment with their father by the age of 18 months.
This was determined by the fact that the babies protested when the father walked away - a sign of attachment.
Grossmann et al 2002
He found that the quality of fathers’ play with babies was related to the quality of adolescent attachments. This suggests that fathers have a different role from mothers- one that is more to do with play and stimulation and less to do with emotional development
Field 1978
So it seems that fathers have the potential to be the more emotion focused
The study concluded that the caregiver’s behaviour, not their gender, is more important in establishing attachment with the infant.
Schaffer and Emerson stages of attachment
can be used for supporting evidence for reciprocity
P= Schaffer and Emerson studied 60 infants, visiting their homes every 4 weeks for 12 months and then again when the infant was 18 months old. They recorded and then analyzed children’s reactions during seven everyday situations where adults would naturally be separated from their infants.
FINDINGS -
- Results revealed that attachments were most likely to form with carers who were sensitive to the baby’s signals, rather than the person they spent the most time with.
- Between 25-32 weeks 50% showed separation anxiety
towards a particular adult, usually the mother (specific attachment)
- Attachment tended to be with the person who was most interactive and sensitive to infant signal and facial expressions (reciprocity).
- By 40 weeks 80% had specific attachments and 30% displayed multiple attachments.
4 stages of attachment
Asocial - 0-6 weeks
Very young infants are asocial in that many kinds of
stimuli, both social and non-social, produce a
favourable reaction, such as a smile, Very few
produce protest.
Indiscriminate attachment - 6 weeks -7 months
Infants indiscriminately enjoy human company.
They get upset when an individual ceases to interact
with them. From 3 months smile more at familiar
faces and comforted easily being a regular caregiver.
Specific attachment / The first true attachment 7 months -9 months
Expresses protest when separated from one
particular individual.- primary attachment figure
They attempt to stay close to the person, and show
wariness of strangers.
Multiple attachments - 10 months onward
Children begin to attach to others- secondary
attachment. By 18 months the majority of infants
have formed multiple attachments.
Lorenz
P= He randomly divided a large clutch of goose eggs. Half of the eggs were hatched with the mother goose in their natural environment. The other half hatched in an incubator where the 1st moving object they saw was Lorenz.
F= The control group continued to follow the mother whereas the experimental group followed Lorenz.
Imprinting - Bird species that are mobile from birth attach to and follow the Ist moving object they see.
- Lorenz identified a critical period in which imprinting needs to play. Depending on the species, it takes a few hours after hatching. If imprinting does not occur within that time Lorenz found that chicks did not attach themselves to a mother figure.