Attachment Flashcards
What are the two key animal studies in attachment?
- Harlow’s monkey study
- Lorenz Geese
What was the aim, procedure and findings for Harlow’s monkey study?
Aim - to test ‘cupboard love’ by applying it to a group of new-born monkeys
Procedure - 8 monkeys were raised in cages, they had the option to spend time with either a cloth mother who only provided warmth and comfort. Or, a wire mother who did not provide warmth or comfort, but instead provided food.
Findings - the monkeys all chose to spend the majority of their time with the cloth mother, only visiting the wire mother for food
Harlow’s monkeys AO3
Unethical - the monkeys were severely socially and cognitively deprived when they were put back into normal captivity, leading to them being outcast by the rest of the monkeys in the enclosure
Pioneering - disproved ‘cupboard love’
Influential - made Jon Bowlby begin his research into attachment which lead to his pioneering theories
Non-generalisable - humans are not monkeys
Lacks internal validity - likely to be other factors which affected the monkeys, such as how the mothers were so drastically different, it is plausible that the cloth mother was preferred on appearance instead
What was the aim, procedure and findings for Lorenz’s research into geese?
Aim - to test if his theory of imprinting
Procedure - a sample of 24 eggs were split evenly into a test and control group. The control group were raised normally and hatched with their mother. The test group were incubated instead, and Lorenz was the first thing that they saw, and he acted as their mother.
Findings - both groups imprinted to their respective ‘mother’. Lorenz claimed that the process of imprinting took place between the first 12-17 hours of life.
Lorenz’s Geese AO3
Guiton (1966) - supports Lorenz after performing a similar test using chickens and a rubber glove for their mother, which provided similar results
Ethical issues - the study had a permanent affect on the geese when they were returned to the other geese
Hoffman (1976) - questions Lorenz after proving that imprinting was not permanent and could be reversed to a certain degree if the animal is returned to its own kind for a decent period of time
What is Learning theory and who proposed it?
Dollard and Miller (1950) - stated that all children are “blank slates” at birth as they are unconditioned. Children then learn and develop through classical and operant conditioning
Define classical conditioning and give an example related to attachment
Classical conditioning = learning through association
- an example would be how children learn to associate food with their mother, which is how they develop their attachment
Define operant conditioning and give an example relevant to attachment
Operant conditioning = learning through reinforcement or consequence
- an example would be how children upkeep their attachment through reciprocity (child smiling = parent smiling and vice versa)
Learning theory AO3
Harlow - questions this approach as he proved that monkeys chose comfort > food
not generalisable - most research into Learning theory was performed by animals
What is Bowlby’s monotropic theory?
The theory that children develop one strong attachment bond to their primary caregiver during the critical period, the bond is used by the child to develop the internal working model
What is the critical period?
between birth and 2 and a half years of age, children must develop a bond with their primary caregiver or it will be detrimental to their cognitive and social ability later on in life as they do not develop a functioning internal working model
What is the internal working model?
a cognitive framework which is developed with interaction with their primary caregiver. It influences how the child will interact in a social environment. The IWM makes children realise that:
- other people are trustworthy
- the self is valued
- they can be socially effective when interacting with other people
AO3 for Bowlby’s monotropic theory
- supported by both Lorenz’s geese study (shows how IWM is developed) and Ainsworth’s strange situation (shows how the IWM is used in the real world)
- questioned by Rutter’s orphan study (showed how children can make attachment outside of the critical period) and Shaffer & Emmerson (proved that most children have strong attachments to multiple caregivers)
What was the aim, procedure and findings of Ainsworth’s strange situation?
Aim - to see if children had different types of attachment to their mother
Procedure - a controlled covert observation of 100 middle class mothers & children, who entered a room designed to be unknown to the child, but seemed familiar as it contained toys. The room also contained a stranger, who across 8 scenarios which lasted around 3 minutes each, would leave and re-enter the room and interact with the child. While the mother also left and re-joined the room at different points.
Findings - Ainsworth developed 3 types of attachment, which were Securely attached (70% of children), Insecure resistant (15%) or Insecure avoidant (15%)
What were the behaviours shown by the 3 attachment types discovered by Ainsworth?
Secure - distressed when the mother left, happy when she returned, and used the mother as a safe base to explore and interact with the stranger
Resistant - intense distress when the mother leaves, avoids the mother when she returns, and is fearful of the stranger regardless of the mother
Avoidant - no distress when the mother leaves, does not care when the mother returns and is happy to interact with the stranger and explore regardless of where the mother is