Atrial Fibrillation Flashcards

1
Q

Definition of atrial fibrillation

A

Supraventricular arrhythmia with uncoordinated atrial activation
Resulting in loss of effective atrial contraction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

AF on ECG

A
  1. Absent of regular P waves +/- fibrillatory f waves
  2. Irregular activation of ventricles
  3. No specific RR interval pattern
  4. Absent of atrioventricular block
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Temporal classification of atrial fibrillation

A

A. First diagnosed AF - never diagnosed before, regardless of symptoms, temporal pattern or duration
B. Paroxysmal AF - terminates spontaneously within 7 days or with intervention. (mostly terminates < 48 hours)
C. Persistent AF - not self terminating >7 days (longstanding persistent AF - at least 12 months duration where rhythm control still a treatment option)
D. Permanent AF - no further attempts at restoration to SR planned, after shared decision between patient and physician

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Causes of AF
- Cardiac condition
- Non-cardiac condition

A

Cardiac related AF
1. Any condition that triggers LA enlargement, abnormal conduction pathways
- Eg: ACS, cardiomyopathy, heart failure, etc
2. Pericarditis, myocarditis, endocarditis
3. Congenital heart disease

Non-cardiac related AF
1. Sepsis and infection
2. Burns, severe trauma, shock
3. Alcohol consumption - alcoholic cardiomyopathy
4. Illicit drug - methamphetamine, cocaine, opiates, cannabis
5. Stress - interventions, procedures, surgery
6. Endocrine - thyroid, adrenal, pituitary, etc (see Endocrine in AF card)
7. Autoimmune - RA, SLE, IBD, coeliac, psoriasis, etc
8. Obesity
9. COPD
10. OSA
11. Malignancy
12. Fatty liver disease

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Endocrine disorders and AF and considerations in MRCP PACES

A
  1. Thyroid disorder (hyper and hypo) causing cardiomyopathy
  2. Amiodarone induced thyroiditis
  3. Hyperparathyroidism and hypercalcaemia causing AF
  4. Primary aldosteronism (Conn’s) causing hypertension and aldosterone vascular effect
    4 Acromegaly and growth hormone excess leading to cardiomyopathy
  5. Diabetes as cardiovascular risk factor
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Pathophysiology of AF

A

Pulmonary veins prone to atopy
1. Smaller L-type calcium-current and inward-rectifier potassium current, larger delayed-rectifier potassium current
- Reduced action potential duration -> incraesing likelihood of re-entry and spontaneous ectopy due to delayed after-depolarisation
2. Located adjacent to major cardiac autonomic ganglia that modulates electrical properties of atrium

Pathophysiology
1. Ectopic activity occurring in pulmonary veins
- Predisposing factors: CVRF, ion channel abnormalities, structural abnormalities
2. Altered atrial structure and function (electrical and fibrotic remodelling)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Clinical presentation of AF

A
  1. Mostly asymptomatic
  2. Symptomatic - chest pain, SOB, palpitations, reduced ET, giddiness, fatigue, syncope, depression, sleep disturbance
  3. Specific triggers leading to AF with RVR
  4. Complications of AF - heart failure, stroke, thromboembolism, cognitive decline (vascular dementia), depression
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Modified European Heart Rhythm Association (mEHRA) Symptom Classification

A

1 - None
2a - Mild
2b - Moderate: ADL unaffected but patient troubled by symptoms
3 - Severe - ADL affected by symptoms
4 - Disabling - ADL discontinued

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Diagnostic evaluation of new AF

A

Initial Evaluation
1. Medical history - AF pattern, family history, comorbids
2. CHADsVASc and HASBLED score
3. Electrocardiography
4. Bloods
- FBC
- Troponin, NTpBNP
- Electrolytes (Na, K, Ca, Mg, Phos)
- CVRF (lipid, HbA1c)
- Thyroid function test
5. TTE - for LAA thrombus, valvular heart disease

Further Evaluation
1. Holter monitoring - AF burden and ventricular rate control
2. Treadmill ECG - monitor effects of 1C antiarrhythmias
3. TOE
4. CT CA or coronary angiogram - suspected CAD
5. MRI heart - cardiomyopathies, plan for interventional procedures
6. CT brain or MRI brain - cognitive assessment, dementia, stroke

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Relationship between atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation

A

Atrial flutter - commonest tachyarrhythmias - 88 to 317 per 100,000 person
Risk factors of AFL and AF are similar
Complications of AFL and AF are similar - stroke, thromboembolism

50% AFL progresses into AF

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

The AF-CARE Pathway
Modalities for assessment in AF-CARE pathway

A

_C_ - Comorbidity and risk factor management
- Assess for CAD or ischaemia
- Determine etiology for heart failure and management

_A_ - Avoid stroke and thromboembolism
- Rule out thrombus, ensure safety of rhythm control strategy
- Guide left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion procedure

_R_ - Reduce symptoms with rate and/or rhythm control
- Determine potential to maintain SR
- Determine potential to improve LVSF
- Assist in planning rhythm control

_E_ - Evaluation and dynamic reassessment
- Detect changes in heart structure and function

Modalities for assessment:
1. CT CA or coronary angiogram
2. MRI heart
3. TTE or even TOE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

HF-CARE: Comorbidity and risk factor management
- What are the comorbidities/risk factor and their management evidence class?

A

A. Hypertension - BP target 120-129/70-79 (class I)
B. DM - glycaemic control (class I)
C. Heart failure
- Diuretics (Class I)
- GDMTs and SGLT2i (Class I)
D. Overweight/obesity
- Weight loss target 10% or more (Class I)
- Bariatric surgery in rhythm control (Class IIb)
E. OSA - CPAP (Class IIb)
F. Alcohol - reduction 3 drinks or less per week (Class I)
G. Exercise programme (Class I)
H. Others - managed aggressively (Class I)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

HF-CARE: Avoid stroke and thromboembolism

A

A. Assess risk of thromboembolism
- CHADsVASc score: 2 or more (class I); 1 or 0 (Class IIa)
- Temporal pattern NOT relevant

B. Choice of anticoagulation
- DOAC except valvular AF (mechanical valve or MS) (Class I)
- VKA target INR 2-3 (Class I); >70% range (IIa)
- Antiplatelet NOT an alternative

C. Assess bleeding risk
- HASBLED score, but manage modifiable risk factors for bleeding (Class I)
- DO NOT use risk score to withhold anticoagulation

D. Prevention of bleeding
- DO NOT combine antiplatelets and DOAC for stroke prevention
- AVOID antiplatelets beyond 12 months in DOAC treated CCS/PVD with AF
(AUGUSTUS trial)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

HF-CARE: Reduce symptoms by rate and rhythm control
- Patient pathways for different temporal classification of AF

A

First onset AF
- Wait for spontaneous cardioversion or if haemodynamic instability for electrical cardioversion
- AF < 24-48 hours NO NEED pre-procedure DOAC or TOE for thrombus exclusion
(RACE 7 ACWAS trial)

Paroxysmal and persistent AF
- Aim for rate control depending on LVEF and shared decision making on rhythm control
- AF > 24 hours to receive DOAC at least 3 weeks OR perform TOE to exclude thrombus
- Both AF class I for antiarrhythmics depending on LVEF and heart disease
(ATHENA trial)
- Paroxysmal AF class I for catheter ablation
- Persistent AF class IIb for catheter ablation
(CABANA trial, EAST-AFNET 4 trial)
(CASTLE-AF trial for AF with HF)

Permanent AF
- Aim for rate control depending on LVEF
- Intensify rate control therapy and evaluation for AVN ablation and pacemaker (Class IIa)
- Severe symptomatic or HF hospitalisation for AVN ablation and CRT (Class IIa)

Post-conversion
- DOAC for at least 4 weeks
(Optional only if AF < 24 hours)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

HF-CARE: Evaluation and dynamic reassessment

A
  1. Thorough evaluation of comorbidities and risk factors.
  2. Regular reassessment of patient’s condition and adjusting the treatment plan as needed.
    - Timing: 6 months after the initial presentation and then at least yearly.
    - Imaging: TTE, CMR, TOE, nuclear
  3. Proactive in identifying changes that could impact patient well-being.
  4. Promoting patient education and empowerment to improve efficiency of care and allow patients to identify when management changes are needed.
    - Assess QOL, functional status, symptoms, treatment burden
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Management algorithm for first diagnosed AF

A
  1. Haemodynamics
    - Unstable -> electrical cardioversion then AF-CARE bundle
    - Stable -> AF-CARE bundle
  2. Rate control agents depending on LVEF
  3. Watchful waiting for spontaneous restoration < 48 hours (pAF)
  4. Cardioversion of symptomatic persistent AF
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Management algorithm for paroxysmal AF

A
  1. Rate control target < 110/min (lenient), or stricter with continuing symptoms
    - Agents depending on LVEF
  2. Shared decision making on rhythm control - antiarrhythmias vs ablation
    - Anti-arrhythmias:
    > HFrEF -> amiodarone +/- sotalol (mrEF);
    > No heart disease -> dronedarone, flecainide, propafenone +/- sotalol
    - Catheter ablation (class I)
  3. Monitor for recurrence of AF and consider further ablation, anti-arrhythmias or surgical ablation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Management algorithm for persistent AF

A
  1. Rate control target < 110/min (lenient), or stricter with continuing symptoms
  2. Shared decision making on rhythm control - antiarrhythmias vs ablation
    - Anti-arrhythmias:
    > HFrEF -> amiodarone +/- sotalol (mrEF);
    > No heart disease -> dronedarone, flecainide, propafenone +/- sotalol
  3. Shared decision making on rhythm control
    - Electrical cardioversion in haemodynamic instability, rhythm control, benefits of SR
    - Anti-arrhythmias
    - Catheter ablation (IIb)
  4. Monitor for recurrence of AF and consider further ablation, anti-arrhythmias or surgical ablation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Management algorithm for permanent AF

A
  1. Severely symptomatic/HF hospitalisation - consider AV node ablation and CRT (IIa)
  2. Stable patients, depending on LVEF
    - < 40%: beta blockers or digoxin -> rate control
    - > 40%: BB, digoxin, diltiazem or verapamil -> rate control
  3. Consider intensity rate control therapy
    - Evaluate for AV node ablation and pacemaker (IIa)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

CHA2DS2VASc Score for AF

A

C - congestive heart failure
H - hypertension
A2 - Age > 75 years
A1 - Age 65-75 years
D - Diabetes
S2 - Stroke / TIA / thromboembolism
V - MI, PAD, plaque
S - Sex (female 1)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

HASBLED Score vs ORBIT for AF

A

HASBLED
H (+1) - Hypertension uncontrolled > 160
A (+1-2) - Abnormal liver and/or renal function
S (+1) - Stroke
B (+1) - Bleeding history or anaemia
L (+1) - Labile INR TTR < 60%
E (+1) - Elderly > 65 years
D (+1-2) - Drugs (antiplatlets, NSAIDs) and/or alcohol

3 or more (high risk); 1-2 (intermediate risk)

ORBIT Score
+1 Age > 74 years
+2 Bleeding history
+1 GFR < 60
+1 Antiplatlet

4 or more (high risk); 3 (intermediate); 0-2 (low risk)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Choice of anticoagulation in AF
What are the evidence for DOAC?
What are the evidence for VKA?

A
  1. DOAC preferred to VKAs except valvular AF
  2. Target INR 2-3
  3. Switch to DOAC for eligible patients that failed to maintain therapeutic VKA INR range
  4. DO NOT dose adjust DOAC unless met specific criterias (increase stroke risk without reducing bleeding risk)

Evidence for DOAC
1. Non-inferior in non-valvular AF (superior in ARISTOTLE-AF trial)
2. 50% reduction in ICH, but similar to higher risk of other bleed (ROCKET-AF)
3. UNSAFE in valvular AF (PROACT Xa trial)

Evidence for VKA
1. Reduces stroke risk by 64%, reduces mortality by 25%
2. MUST be on VKA for mechanical valve and MS
3. Target INR 2-3 (established in lower vs standard INR target for warfarin)
4. Higher intracranial bleeding and other types of bleeding (GARFIELD-AF)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Device-detected subclinical AF

A

DOAC considered in subgroups of patient with device-detected subclinical AF
- High risk for stroke based on CHADSVAsc score at least 4 AND
- Abscence of major bleeding risk
- Higher burden of AF (> 3 hours)

Evidence
1. ARTESiA Trial - apixaban vs aspirin in DDSCAF
- Lesser stroke or embolism
- Bleeding risk higher with apixaban

  1. NOAH trial - edoxaban in AF
    - Prematurely stopped due to safety concerns and futility
  2. Meta-analysis
    - No difference in composite for CVS death, stroke or embolism
    - Higher rate of death or major bleeding in edoxaban
24
Q

What are the specific criterias for dose reduction of DOAC?

A
  1. Age > 80 years old
  2. Body weight < 60kg
  3. Serum Cr > 133mmol/L or CrCl 30-50mL/min
  4. Bleeding risks
  5. Drug interaction - ciclosporin, drodenarone, erythromycin, ketoconazole
25
Q

Are antiplatelets or combination antiplatelets-anticoagulants suitable for AF?

A

No. Antiplatelets (aspirin, clopidogrel) are not alternatives and may lead to potential harm

Evidence
1. ACTIVE W trial - DAPT less effective than warfarin in prevention of stroke, embolism, MI or vascular death BUT similar rate of bleeding

  1. AVERROES trial - apixaban superior and lower rate of stroke or embolism compared with aspirin, and SIMILAR bleeding risk
  2. AUGUSTUS trial - limited combination antiplatelet-anticoagulation duration in ACS and PCI
  3. COMPASS trial - low dose rivaroxaban 2.5mg (NOT AF dosing) and aspirin might benefit stable vascular disease (THUS NOT for AF)
26
Q

Residual ischaemic stroke risk despite anticoagulation in AF
Why stroke could still happen despite anticoagulation?
Does switching anticoagulation have an advantage to protect against future recurrent stroke?

A
  1. Reduction but not elimination of stroke risk
    - About 50% reduction in risk
    - 1/3 stroke + AF patients were already on anticoagulation

Possible etiologies for stroke in anticoagulation
1. Non-AF related: large vessel disease, small vessel disease
2. Medication adherence issue
3. Insufficient dose
4. True treatment failure
5. Other risk factors - BP, cholesterol, DM

Switching anticoagulation
1. Benefits proven if switch VKA -> DOAC
2. No benefits from DOAC to another DOAC or to VKA
3. Harmful to add antiplatelet to existing anticoagulation (higher risk of bleeding)

27
Q

Balancing bleeding risk in AF

A
  1. DO NOT use bleeding risk score to decide or withdraw OAC, or even underdose OAC
  2. Assess and manage modifiable bleeding risk factors
  3. PPI use individualised - RCT on pantoprazole in rivaroxaban/aspirin did not show any impact
28
Q

Management of compressible bleeding on OAC

A
  1. Compress bleeding site mechanically
  2. Assess haemodynamics, coagulation panel, FBC and RP
  3. Determine OAC and last dose
  4. Hold off OAC until stabilised

VKA
Life threatening: resuscitation, transfusion, PCC preferred than Vit K (FFP if no PCC)
(PCC achieves faster coagulation with fewer complications compared to traditional antidote Vit K)
Major bleed: consider PCC, FFP or vitamin K
Minor bleed: hold VKA until INR < 2

DOAC
Life threatening: resuscitation, transfusion, antidote, PCC if no antidote, monitor DOAC level
(Antidote: andexanet alfa)
Major bleed: charcoal or gastic lavage if DOAC taken within 2-4 hours, consider PCC if needed
Minor bleed: hold DOAC for a few doses

Post-bleeding management
1. Re-discuss risk and benefits of restarting OAC (shared decision making)
2. Review choice and dose of OAC
3. Re-initiate OAC after source of bleeding controlled
4. Assess risk of rebleeding, modify bleeding risk factors

29
Q

Antidote for VKA (warfarin)

Antidote for factor Xa inhibitors (apixaban, edoxaban, rivaroxaban)

A

Antidote for VKA:
- Classically vitamin K however slower onset
- PCC

Antidote for DOAC: Andexanet alfa
- ANNEXA-I trial: significant improved control of bleeding, trial stopped early

30
Q

Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) in AF

A

LAAO - device implantation to close off LAA (small pouch in heart where blood clots often form in AF)

Evidence
1. PROTECT AF and PREVAIL trial (LAAO vs warfarin)
- LAAO similar to warfarin in preventing stroke, embolism, cardiovascular death
- Lesser haemorrhagic stroke and all cause death
- Non-significant trend towards ischaemic stroke

  1. PRAGUE-17 trial (LAAO vs DOAC)
    - LAAO non-inferior to DOAC
    - Ongoing larger trials

Current Indication
1. Patients who are contraindicated to ALL anticoagulations (VKA and DOAC)

Risks of LAAO
1. Stroke
2. Major bleeding
3. Device related thrombosis and peri-device leak
4. Pericardial effusion
5. Vascular complications
6. Sudden death

Paradox
- Still needs some form of antithrombotic post-LAAO, which carries bleeding risk
- Short course warfarin + aspirin, followed by DAPT, then aspirin alone

Pending future trials

31
Q

Surgical LAAO in AF

A

LAA closed off via surgery, often concurrently during another open heart surgery or MIS

Evidence
1. LAAOS III trial
- Surgical LAAO during surgery reduced risk of stroke
- Patient remained on anticoagulants after surgery (did not compare to anticoagulation)

  1. No clear benefit for surgical LAA clipping during thoracoscopy or AF ablation
  2. Limited date on standalone surgical LAAO with AtriClip
32
Q

Target heart rate control in AF

A

Individualised: depends on settings, symptom burden, heart failure, rate control combined with rhythm control

Generally: lenient HR control < 110/min

Evidence
1. RACE II trial - lenient control non-inferior to strict rate control (<80/min at rest, < 110 during exercise), similar composite outcome
- However mean HR in lenient group is 85/min

  1. AFFIRM trial and RACE trial - similar result
33
Q

Acute AF with RVR heart rate control

A
  1. Look and treat reversible causes of rapid AF (eg: sepsis, fluid overload, cardiogenic shock)
  2. Choice of drug depends on clinical status, HF and EF
    A. Beta blockers - selective > non-selective
    B. Diltiazem/verapamil - avoided in EF < 40%
    C. Digoxin - slower onset of action and less effective in HR control during acute onset, to consider in combination with beta blockers
    (RATE-AF trial - low dose digoxin comparable to bisoprolol for QOL in AF, fewer adverse effects)
    D. Intravenous amiodarone, landiolol, digoxin - haemodynamically unstable patients with reduced EF
34
Q

AV Node Ablation and Pacemaker Implantation (Ablate and Pace)

A

Indications
1. Refractory rate control despite medications
2. Older patients
3. Heart failure with permanent AF (APAF-CRT trial)

Procedure sequence:
1. Pacemaker first - pacing at 70-90/min
2. AV node ablation

APAF-CRT trial
- Low complication and low long term mortality
- Improves LVEF

35
Q

RACE 7 ACWAS Trial - comparing wait-and-see approach vs immediate cardioversion

A

Wait-and-see approach was non-inferior to immediate cardioversion for achieving sinus rhythm at 4 weeks in hemodynamically stable patients.

  • Wait-and-see approach (up to 48 hours) to allow for spontaneous conversion is a reasonable alternative to immediate cardioversion.
36
Q

The historical AFFIRM studies - comparing rate vs rhythm control in AF
(NO LONGER VALID)

A

No difference in mortality or stroke between rhythm control (with AADs) and rate control

Rhythm control improved quality of life only.

(Now superceded by newer studies)

37
Q

CASTLE-AF Trial and CASTLE-HTx Trial - ablation in HFrEF

A

Catheter ablation improved mortality and morbidity in select patients with HFrEF.

Combination medical and catheter ablation, improved outcomes in end-stage HFrEF patients eligible for heart transplant.

38
Q

EAST-AFNET 4 Trial - on early rhythm control in AF

A

Early rhythm control (mostly with AADs) reduced cardiovascular events in patients with cardiovascular risk factors and early AF.

39
Q

ATHENA trial - dronedarone in AF

A

Dronedarone reduced cardiovascular hospitalizations or death in patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF.

40
Q

CABANA trial - comparing ablation vs medical therapy in AF

A

No significant difference in mortality and morbidity between catheter ablation and medical therapy (rate and/or rhythm)

Has limitations in this study

41
Q

An approach to cardioversion in AF

A

A. Consider rhythm control in:
1. Symptomatic patients, including HF
2. Haemodynamic instability
3. Suspected tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy
4. Brief AF history
5. Non-dilated left atrium (best chance of maintenance of sinus rhythm)
6. Patient prefernce

B. Anticoagulation choice
1. AF < 24 hours: no need prior anticoagulation
2. AF > 24 hours: either
> therapeutic anticoagulation at least 3 weeks OR
> TOE to rule out thrombus

C. Choice of cardioversion
1. Wait-and-see approach
2. Electrical cardioversion
3. Chemical cardioversion

D. Post-procedure anticoagulation
- Continue at least 4 weeks after cardioversion
- Continue indefinitely in high stroke risk factors regardless whether SR is maintained

The only exception of anticoagulation is:
- SR restoration within 24 hours of AF
- NO thromboembolic risk factors

42
Q

Electrical cardioversion in AF

A

Indications
1. Acute settings - haemodynamic instability
2. Elective - diagnostic and trial in persistent AF with uncertainty about value of SR restoration, as well as to assess LVEF improvement

A. Standby and monitoring
1. BP, oximetry
2. Anticipate bradycardia - standby atropine or isoproterenol, temporary cutaneous pacing

B. Pre-procedure_
1. Sedation
2. +/- anti-arrhythmias: vernakalant, flecainide, propafenone, amiodarone
(pre-treatment with amiodarone 200-800mg/day for 1-6 weeks, followed by post-treatment with amiodarone 200mg/day improved restoration and SR maintenance)

C. Synchronised electrical cardioversion
1. Biphasic preferred (over monophasic) - higher efficacy (BEST-AF trial)
2. Active compression to defib pads - lower defib thresholds, lower total energy delivery, fewer shocks for success, higher success rates
3. Fixed energy 200J up to 3 times
- Emerging study - Maximum fixed-energy shocks (360J) instead of escalating energy shocks (125-150-200J)

43
Q

Pharmacological Cardioversion in AF

A

Indication
Restoration of sinus rhythm in haemodynamically stable AF

Choice of drugs:
1. IV Vernakalant and Flecainide - highest conversion rates within 4 hours
2. Oral Flecainide and Propafenone (class 1C drug) - effective within 12 hours
3. Amiodarone - delayed effect, efficacy within 24 hours

Advantages: no fasting, sedation or anaesthesia

44
Q

Pill-in-the-pocket approach for pAF

A

Single dose of flecainide or propafenone standby at home
For infrequent, symptomatic, recent-onset paroxysmal AF.

Selection criteria:
1. Excluded sinus node disease, AV conduction defect, Brugada syndrome
2. Tested in hospital prior to ensure safety and effectiveness
3. AV nodal blocking agent beforehand to prevent development of atrial flutter and rapid conduction

45
Q

Anti-arrhythmic drugs for long term AF rhythm control

A
  1. AADs reduce but do not eliminate AF recurrence, and recurrence do not necessarily mean treatment failure (less frequent, shorter, less symptomatic)
  2. Identify and treat reversible triggers and comorbidites
    (RACE 3 trial - treated triggers improved early persistent AF and mild to mod HF maintenance of SR at 1 year)
  3. Limited long term effectiveness, but better than none (20-50% vs zero)
  4. Combination AADs are not recommended
    (Sotalol + amiodarone increases mortality)
46
Q

Side effects of AADs?
Especially amiodarone

A
  1. Pro-arrhythmias (new/worsened arrhythmias)
  2. Negative inotropy (reduced heart muscle contraction)
  3. Hypotension

For the case of amiodarone:
1. Interstitial pneumonitis and fibrosis, ARDS
2. Amiodarone induced thyroiditis (hyper/hypo)
3. Liver toxicity - hepatitis, cirrhosis
4. Ocular toxicity
5. Prolonged QTc
6. Worsening of heart failure
7. Peripheral neuropathy
8. Cerebellar toxicity - ataxia
9. Blue-gray skin discolouration and photosensitivity

47
Q

Consideration of catheter ablation of AF

A

1. Symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent AF
- First line therapy: RAAFT-2, MANTRA-PAF
- Persistent AF or intolerance to AADs
(Evidence unclear if ablation is superior to drug therapy as initial approach)
2. HFrEF
- CASTLE-AF: improve arrhythmia recurrence, EF, clinical outcomes and mortality
3. Timing of ablation (no difference)
- EARLY-AF: delayed ablation by 12 months with optimised medical therapy vs early ablation did not significantly impact arrhythmia-fee survival
4. Asymptomatic patients (unclear benefit)
- CABANA trial: no benefit of ablation vs medical therapy

48
Q

Catheter ablation of AF
- Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI)
- Pulsed field ablation (PFA)
- Other access: endoscopic/hybrid, surgical

A

PVI - endocardial ablation to electrically isolate pulmonary veins from rest of LA
- Access: femoral vein to the heart
- Mapping: electroanatomical mapping
- Ablation: scar tissue around ostia of pulmonary veins to block abnormal electrical signals

Types of PVI
1. Wide area circumferential ablation (WACA) - continuous line of ablation around PV ostia, encircling each vein/pair of veins
2. Segmental ablation - specific points where electrical activity is detected
3. Cryoballoon ablation - freezing tissue around PV ostia to achieve WACA
(FIRE and ICE trial - non-inferiority)

PFA - high-voltage electrical pulses that are tissue-selective to reduce damage to surrounding structures
(ADVENT trial - non-inferior to PVI)

Endoscopic epicardial ablation - MIS through thoracoscopy or subxiphoid.
(Hybrid via both endoscopic epicardial and endocardial catheter ablation)

Surgical transmural ablation - MAZE procedure

49
Q

Why are the Pulmonary Veins targeted?
(See pathophysiology card)

A

Pulmonary veins are major source of irregular, rapid impulses
1. Complex anatomy of PV ostia forms re-entrant circuits
2. Rich innervation of autonomic nervous system

50
Q

What are the risks and complications of PVI?

A
  1. Life threatening arrhythmias
    - 1:1 AV conduction block
    - VT and VF
    - Bradyarrhythmias
  2. Transient or persistent arrhythmia - atrial tachycardia, atrial flutter or AF
  3. Pericardial effusion/tamponade
  4. Stroke / TIA
  5. Pulmonary vein stenosis
  6. Phrenic nerve injury
  7. Atrio-oesophageal fistula
  8. Vascular access complications - bleeding, hematoma
  9. Death
  • Low serious peri-procedural adverse events (2.9%–7.2%)
  • Very low 30-day mortality rate (<0.1%).
51
Q

Causes of recurrence of AF after PVI
Management of AF recurrence after ablation

A

Causes of Recurrence of AF after PVI_
1. Pulmonary vein reconnection - gaps in ablation line allows electrical signals conduction
- Incomplete ablation or lesion formation
(not continuous/transmural, poor catheter contact, tissue oedema)
- Tissue healing
2. Non-pulmonary vein sources
- SVC, LAA, coronary sinus, atria
(Commonly in persistent AF with remodeling)
3. Progression of atrial substrate disease and development of new triggers or re-entry circuits
4. Autonomic nervous system influence (increased vagal tone)
5. Procedural related - operator experience, ablation and mapping system (causing point 1)
6. Inflammation - pericarditis, inflammation
7. Patient factor - duration of AF, LA size (causing point 3)

Management of AF recurrence after ablation
1. Continue or re-initiate AADs
2. Repeat PVI
3. Rate control

52
Q

Anti-coagulation pre and post-ablation

A
  1. OAC at least 3 weeks pre-procedure
    (unless very low thromboembolic risk factors - but not confirmed by RCTs)
  2. Continue OAC at least 2 months post-ablation
    2A. Lifelong OAC if high CHA2DS2-VASc score
53
Q

Antithrombotic therapy post-ACS and PCI

A

AUGUSTUS trial:
- Short-term triple therapy (≤1 week)
- OAC + a P2Y12 inhibitor (usually clopidogrel) for 1 year
- Then lifelong OAC

Longer duration triple therapy (up to 1 month) in patients at very high ischemic risk if the ischemic risk outweighs the bleeding risk:
- STEMI
- Prior stent thrombosis
- Complex PCI

Emerging studies: EPIDAURUS, WOEST-3

54
Q

Anticoagulation After Stroke in AF

A

Ischaemic stroke
1. NOT recommended for early anticoagulation (within 48 hours)
- Continue on low dose aspirin for first 48 hours

  1. Possible feasible early > 48 hours initiation of anticoagulation
    - ELAN trial: early vs late DOAC no significant difference in composite outcome
    - TIMING trial - early non-inferior to delayed
    (Further studies needed)

Haemorrhagic stroke
Double edged sword: high ischaemic stroke risk and high ICH recurrence risk
- APACHE-AF: no significant difference between apixaban use vs no OAC (study too small)
- SoSTART: no difference in starting OAC vs avoiding OAC (study too small)

55
Q

Management of AF in pregnancy

A

Anticoagulation use:
1. UFH or LMWH preferred - does not cross placenta, safe for fetus
2. AVOID VKAs in first trimester and 36 weeks
- 1st trimester: miscarriage, birth defects
- after 36 weeks: fetal ICH
3. AVOID DOAC - not recommended for any trimester

Management of AF
1. Beta-1 selective beta blockers (except atenolol - risk of IUGR)
2. Digoxin or verapamil after 1st trimester
3. Electrical cardioversion for instability
4. Limited evidence on ibutilide or flecainide
5. Avoid catheter ablation unless no fluoroscopy and radiation free

Delivery method
1. Vaginal delivery preferred
2. LSCS if VKA is used - risk of fetal ICH in SVD