assualts Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

what is S18 Offences agains persons act 1861

A

Wounding or causing GBH with intent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is s20 OAPA 1861

A

Wounding or inflicting gbh

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is the full offence of s20

A

Unlawfully wounding or inflicting GBH with the intention or wsa reckless to some harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is the actus reus for s20

A

Unlawfully wounding or inflicting GBH

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what does the case of DPP v Smith

A

GBH = really serious harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

in the case of Hill what does it say

A

whether V’s injury amount to GBH is a question of fact for the jury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what was the decision made in the case of Bollon

A

impact injuries on particular victims should be taken into account

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

examples of really serious injuries

A

injuries that result into permanent disability
broken/displace limbs or bones
substantial loss of blood
serious psychiatric injury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what is the mens rea for s20

A

Maliciously towards some harm - intention or cunningham recklessness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what does the case of Mowatt say

A

it is enough for D to foresee that some harm might result

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what is direct intention

A

d’s aim/purpose

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what is oblique intention

A

woolin virtual certainty test
1 - was some harm virtually certain as a result of D’s action
2 - Did D appreciate that was the case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what is recklessness

A

cunningham recklessness
1 - was d aware that there was a risk that their conduct might cause some harm
2 - was the risk an unreasonable one based on the circumstance known to D?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what is the AR of s18

A

unlawfully wounding or causing GBH - CAUSATION

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what is the MR of S18

A

Intention of causing GBH or resist or prevent the lawful apprehension or detention of any person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what can consent apply

A

what the consent of the victim is a defence to a common assault or battery and not anything above abh or more unless it falls under the exception categories

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

exceptional categories for consent

A

sporting activities, horseplau, dangerous exhibitions, surgery, body art, religious flaggellation, consensual intimate acts etc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

when is consent never a defence

A

where V has died.

19
Q

what happened in the case of barnes

A

sporting consent allowed

20
Q

what happened in the case of R v Dica

A

consented to unprotected sex but did not consent impliedly to the risk of HIV

21
Q

S39 CJA includes what two offences

A

common assault and batter

22
Q

what offence is s47 OAPA

A

Actual bodily harm

23
Q

what is the full offence of common assault

A

An act that causes v to apprehend imminent unlawful force with the intention or recklesslessness to

24
Q

what is the actus reus of common assualt

A

the act causing v to apprehend imminent unlawful force

25
Q

what does the case of fagan say

A

a common assault cannot be commmited by an omission

26
Q

what happened in the case of ireland

A

the court held that words alone can amount to an assault silence as well

27
Q

what did the case of tuberville v savage say

A

words indicating there will be no violence may prevent an act from being an assault

28
Q

what happened in the case of smithg v woking police

A

d looks through v’s window at night, causing fear is assault

29
Q

what happened in the case of constanza

A

writing in letters could be the basis of common assualt

30
Q

what is the case venna used for

A

the intetion for assault

31
Q

what is the case spratt used for

A

recklessness for assault

32
Q

what is the full offence of battery

A

an application of unlawful force by d upon v with the intention or recklessness to the use of force

33
Q

what is the actus reus for batter

A

application of unlawful force by upon v

34
Q

what did the courts say in the case of collins v wilcock

A

everyday touching is not a batter

35
Q

what does the case of faulkner v talbot say

A

touch need not be hostile, rude or agressive

36
Q

what happened in the case of haystead

A

d convicted of abtter agasinte a baby

37
Q

what is the mens rea for batter

A

intention to apply unlawful force or recklessness as to whether such force might be appleid - venna

38
Q

what is the full offence of s47

A

Common assault or battery occasioning (causing v to suffer) from actual bodily harm with the intetnion or recklessness to that common assault or abtterq

39
Q

what is the actus reus of abh

A

the actus reus for the assualt or battery occasioning abh

40
Q

what does the case of chan-fook define

A

‘harm’- there must be some injury

‘actual’ - more than merely trivial

41
Q

can psychaitric injury amount to abh

A

yes, if it involves medical conditions - confirmed in ireland

42
Q

what does occasion mean

A

cause

43
Q

what is th mens rea for abh

A

the mens rea for abh is the ame for the common or atter that has occasioned the ABH