Assignment 9 Flashcards
The greater interest in variable pay can be traced to 2 trends.
1) Increasing competition- from foreign producers forces American producers to cut costs and/or increase productivity.
2) Workers are willing to adjust what they do and how they do it.
Reward system
System designed so that the workers will be willing and able to move quickly into new jobs and new ways of performing old jobs.
Pay for performance plans that introduce variability into the level of pay wokers receive
seem to have a positive impact on performance if designed well.
Merit pay
A merit pay system links increases in base pay, sometimes call merit increases, to how highly employees are rated on perfromance evaluation. Merit pay is expensive, but many argue it doesn’t acheive the desired goal- to improve employee and coporate performance.
Allocation of raises under merit pay:
This usually means improving the accuracy of performance ratings, allocating enough merit money to truly reward performance and making sure the size of the merit increases differentiates across performance levels.
Unless the reward for merit pay is made larger for every increment in performance
it will not act to motivate employees to perform at a higher level.
Lump-sum bonuses
used as a substitute for merit increases. Based on company or employee performance. Employees receive an end of year bonus that does not build into base pay. Employees must re-earn this increase every year, so it is viewed less of an entitlement than merit pay. They can be considerably less expenive than merit pay over the long run.
Spot Award
Should fall under pay for performance plans. Payouts are awarded for exceptional performance, often on special projects or for performance that so exceeds expecations as to be deserving of an add-on bonus.
One feature that all incentive plans have in common
An established standard against which worker performance is compared to determine the magnitude of the incentive pay.
For individual incentive systems, the stand is compared against
indivdual woker performance.
2 dimensions on which individual incentive systems vary.
1) Rate of determination- plans either set up rates based on units of production per time period or on time period per unit of production.
2) Specified relationship between production level and wages.
Straight piece work system
Rate determination is based on units of production per time period, and wages vary directly as a funciton of production level.
Standard Hour plans
A generic term for plans setting incentive rate based on completion of a task in some expected time period. More practical than a straight piecework plan for long-cycle operations and jobs that are nonrepetitive and require numerous skills for completion.
Bedeaux Plan
Provides a variation on straight piecework and standard hour plans. This type of plan requires division of a task into simple actions and determination of the time required by an average skilled worker to complete each action.
Taylor Plan
establishes 2 peicework rates. One rate goes into effect when a worker exceeds the published standard for a given time period. The rate is set higher than the regular wage incentive level. A second rate is established for production below standard, and this rate is lower than the regular age.
Merrick System
Operates like the Taylor plan, except 3 piecework rates are set. The high end of the range for production exceeding 100% of standard is one rate set. The 2nd rate set is for production between 83% and 100% of standard. The 3rd rate set is the one for the low end, or less than 83% of standard.
Hasley 50-50
Provides variable incentives linked to a standard expressed as time period per unit of production. Shared split between worker and employer on any savings in direct cost. An allowed time for a task is ls determined via time study. The savings resulting from the completion of the task in less than the standard time are allocated 50-50 b/t the worker and the company.
Rowan PLan
Employer and employee both share in savings resulting from work completed in less than standard time. The major distinction in this plan is that worker’s bonus increases as time required to complete the task decreases.
Gantt Plan
Differs from the Hasley and the Rowan plan in that standard time for a task is purposely set at a level requiring high effort to complete. Any worker who fails to complete the task in standard time is guaranteed a pre-established wage, but if the task is completed in standard time of less, earnings are pregged at 120% of the time saved.