Assessment and Scoring - Part 1 Flashcards
Who is part of the CAPD evaluation team?
Audiologist (manages and coordinates evaluation; top dog)
SLP (assesses receptive and expressive language skills, phonological skills, and written language abilities)
Psychologist (assesses cognitive skills and capacity for learning)
Social worker (serves as a liaison between home and school)
Parents (provide prenatal and neonatal history; information regarding developmental milestones, auditory behavior, and medical and academic history)
Physician (rules out a medical pathology that may affect learning abilities)
What is a test battery?
A number of tests used to diagnose a certain condition
Why is a test battery used for CAPD testing?
CAPD is not a unitary disorder (varying clinical presentations)
Different measures are required for accurate assessment of central auditory processes
Multiple assessment measures also may help establish a more appropriate management of (C)APD
What questions should be asked of the test battery to ensure it is accurate and useful?
Does the battery improve sensitivity and specificity over using individual tests?
How many tests are needed to obtain optimal sensitivity/specificity? (at some point, adding more tests may be detrimental to an accurate diagnosis)
Two to four tests in a test battery can provide maximum sensitivity (testing different areas thought to be a problem)
What criteria should be used to determine whether a patient passes or fails?
Lax criterion will yield better sensitivity but poorer specificity (won’t miss anyone but probably over-diagnosing)
Intermediate criterion
Strict criterion will yield better specificity but poorer sensitivity
*Problem is we don’t have one recommended one
What is the reason behind a lax criterion trend?
As size of the test battery increases, greater probability that a patient will fail any single test
It improves sensitivity but can undermine specificity as normal patients have an increased chance of being incorrectly identified
*only need to fail one test
What is the reason behind the strict criterion trend?
As size of the test battery increases, less probability that a patient will fail all tests
Beneficial for detecting normal function and improves specificity but can undermine sensitivity as patients with abnormal function will be less likely to fail the entire battery when more tests are included
For example, a patient is more likely to fail all tests when a battery has 2 to 3 tests as compared to when it has 10 tests
What is the reason behind the intermediate criterion?
Most reliable criteria
Abnormal performance on at least 2 tests (> 2 SD below mean)
Abnormal performance on at least 1 test (> 3 SD below mean)
Are tests with relatively low sensitivity/specificity useful diagnostic indicators of CAPD?
No
Should CAPD tests demonstrate test-retest reliability and age-appropriate norms?
Yes
Should tests that require extensive training, time, and client practice appropriate for clinical settings?
No
What are symptoms specific considerations?
The test battery process should not be test driven; rather, it should be motivated by the referring complaint and the relevant information available to the audiologist
We should not just do the same exact tests that we are most comfortable with
Should audiologists be sensitive to attributes of the individual?
Yes
The attributes may include language development; motivational level; fatigability; attention and other cognitive factors; the influence of mental age; cultural influences; native language; and socioeconomic factors
Does the patient’s history indicate they have the developmental maturity to complete the auditory task? (can they complete the tests)
Can individuals who are medicated for attention, anxiety, or other disorder be tested when on medication?
Yes
But there is still a caveat (you decide if you can test them or not)
Screening test for attention can be done if unsure
What age should you diagnose CAPD?
Only 7 years and above
Attention, memory, language, and several other aspects should be developed for assessment
What is the pediatric speech intelligibility test (PSI)?
Screening for CAPD (not diagnostic)
Authors: Jerger and Jerger
Low-redundancy speech test (words or sentences)
3-6 years old
Moderate to high sensitivity
Assesses auditory figure ground and auditory closure
Linguistic loading (language in the test)
Sensitive to lower brainstem deficits and CAPD (distinguishes between children with central auditory lesions and those without)
Insensitive to the normal developmental difference between cognitive skills
What is the PSI comprised of?
20 monosyllabic words
Message to competition ratio (MCR) (like SNR) - standard MCR is 4 dB MCR
Competitors/maskers can be sentences (either in the same ear or a different ear)
What is format I for PSI?
Receptive language level I
Age range: 3-4 years
“show me” carrier phrase
What is format II for PSI?
Receptive language level II
Age range: 5-6
“The bear is brushing his teeth” no carrier phrase
What are the results for the PSI based on?
Five items for performance on ceiling and floor of the test
First trial of a test condition = 80 to 100% (> 4/5) - ceiling
First trial of a test condition = 0 to 20% (< 1/5) - floor
If first trial results in a ceiling or floor level, only one trial (five items) are presented
If performance is at the midrange level, i.e., = 21 to 79%
Ten items presented (second trial of five words is presented)
What is ICM and CCM?
ICM (ipsi) - both the competing noise and the stimuli presented in the same ear
CCM (contra) - competing noise and stimuli in different ears
What are the guidelines for interpretation of abnormal PSI results?
ICM (0 dB MCR) - less than 80%
CCN (-20 dB MCR) - less than 70% (RLL I) and less than 90% (RLL II)
Why is it recommended that the northwestern syntax screening test (NSST) be administered prior to the PSI?
Maturational change characterizes language performance
The goal of the PSI was to provide a good auditory test of processing that was not influenced by the child’s language abilities
An audiologist cannot accurately gauge a child’s true language abilities to decide whether to administer Format I or II cards
Based on statistical analysis, receptive language ability provided the best variation in sentence intelligibility of children between 3 to 6 years
What is the ACPT?
Screening test
Developed by Keith (1994)
Binaural test
6-11.11 years
Developed as a screening test for ADHD, not CAPD
Measures a child’s selective attention as indicated by correct responses to specific language cues and sustained attention as indicated by the child’s ability to attend on a task for a prolonged time
Practice test should be administered prior to the actual test to make sure they understand