Assessment 2 Flashcards
Analytical procedures performed in the overall review stage of an audit suggest that several accounts have unexpected relationships. The results of these procedures most likely would indicate that:
misstatements exist among the relevant account balances.
internal control activities are not operating effectively.
additional tests of details are required.
the communication with the audit committee should be revised.
additional tests of details are required.
Explanation:
Analytical procedures are performed both at the beginning and at the review stages of an audit. At the review stage, the objective is to assess the conclusions reached about the overall financial statement presentation. If unexpected relationships still exist at this point after a significant amount of evidence has been gathered, then more testing is necessary.
A cooling-off period of how many years is required before a member of an issuer’s audit engagement team may begin working for the registrant in a key position?
One year
Two years
Three years
Four years
One year
Explanation:
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requires a cooling-off period of one year for a former member of an audit client engagement team before he or she can be employed in a financial oversight role for that same client. This requirement is necessary to preserve auditor (firm) independence.
Which of the following auditor concerns most likely could be so serious that the auditor concludes that a financial statement audit cannot be performed?
Management fails to modify prescribed internal controls for changes in information technology.
Internal control activities requiring segregation of duties are rarely monitored by management.
Management is dominated by one person who is also the majority stockholder.
There is a substantial risk of intentional misapplication of accounting principles.
There is a substantial risk of intentional misapplication of accounting principles.
Explanation:
Some circumstances may arise during the audit and bring into question the auditor’s ability to continue performing the audit. The circumstances include the following:
- The entity does not take appropriate action regarding fraud that the auditor considers necessary in the circumstances.
- The auditor’s consideration of the risks of material misstatement due to fraud and the results of the audit tests indicated a significant risk of material and pervasive fraud.
- The auditor has significant concern about the competence or integrity of management or those charged with governance.
In addition, fraudulent financial reporting may be accomplished by the following:
- Manipulation, falsification, or alteration of the accounting records or supporting documents
- Misrepresentation in or intentional omission from the financial statements of events, transactions, or other significant information
- Intentional misapplication of accounting principles relating to amounts, classification, manner of presentation, or disclosure
The phrase “generally accepted accounting principles” is an accounting term that:
includes broad guidelines of general application but not detailed practices and procedures.
encompasses the conventions, rules, and procedures necessary to define accepted accounting practice at a particular time.
provides a measure of conventions, rules, and procedures governed by the AICPA.
is included in the audit report to indicate that the audit has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards (GAAS).
encompasses the conventions, rules, and procedures necessary to define accepted accounting practice at a particular time.
Explanation:
Generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) are not broad guidelines, but the conventions, rules, and procedures (methods of applying the principles and practices) that govern how financial statements are prepared and presented. The principles are dynamic, and updates are regularly published.
GAAP is not just set forth in AICPA rules; GAAP comes from many different sources including, but not limited to, the FASB Codification and rules and interpretive releases from the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The objective of an audit is to state whether the financial statements are presented fairly in conformity with GAAP. However, the mention of GAAP in the report does not indicate that the audit has been conducted in accordance with GAAS.
An auditor obtains knowledge about a new client’s business and its industry to:
make constructive suggestions concerning improvements to the client’s internal control.
develop an attitude of professional skepticism concerning management’s financial statement assertions.
evaluate whether the aggregation of known misstatements causes the financial statements taken as a whole to be materially misstated.
understand the events and transactions that may have an effect on the client’s financial statements.
understand the events and transactions that may have an effect on the client’s financial statements.
Explanation:
While performing interim audit procedures of accounts receivable, numerous unexpected errors are found resulting in a change of risk assessment. Which of the following audit responses would be most appropriate?
Move detailed analytical procedures from year-end to interim
Increase the dollar threshold of vouching customer invoices
Send negative accounts receivable confirmations instead of positive accounts receivable confirmations
Use more experienced audit team members to perform year-end testing
Use more experienced audit team members to perform year-end testing
Explanation:
Numerous unexpected errors found while performing interim audit procedures of accounts receivable would cause the auditor to consider whether a client’s financial statements contain a greater risk of material misstatements.
AU-C 330.A1 states: “Overall responses to address the assessed risks of material misstatement at the financial statement level may include:
- “emphasizing to the audit team the need to maintain professional skepticism.
- “assigning more experienced staff or those with specialized skills or using specialists.
- “providing more supervision.
- “incorporating additional elements of unpredictability in the selection of further audit procedures to be performed.
- “making general changes to the nature, timing, or extent of audit procedures (for example, performing substantive procedures at period-end instead of at an interim date or modifying the nature of audit procedures to obtain more persuasive audit evidence).”
Moving detailed analytical procedures from year-end to interim is the opposite of the timing of audit procedures recommended in AU-C 330.
Increasing the dollar threshold of vouching customer invoices would decrease the number of invoices selected in a sample and would result in less persuasive audit evidence.
Sending negative accounts receivable confirmations instead of positive accounts receivable confirmations would result in less persuasive audit evidence.
An auditor is determining the sample size for an inventory observation using mean-per-unit estimation, which is a variables sampling plan. To calculate the required sample size, the auditor usually determines:
the variability in the dollar amounts of inventory items
the risk of incorrect acceptance.
both the variability in the dollar amounts of inventory items and the risk of incorrect acceptance.
neither the variability in the dollar amounts of inventory items nor the risk of incorrect acceptance.
both the variability in the dollar amounts of inventory items and the risk of incorrect acceptance.
Explanation:
The auditor must use professional judgment to determine the sample size, whether the auditor is using statistical or nonstatistical sampling.
In statistical sampling, the auditor will quantify the relevant factors.
The nature (or characteristics) of the population affects the sample size. As the variation within the population increases, the sample size must increase.
.
Also, to reduce the level of risk of incorrect acceptance (the risk that the sample supports the conclusion that the recorded account balance is not materially misstated when it is materially misstated), it is necessary to increase the size of the sample.
According to the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct, under which of the following circumstances may a CPA receive a contingent fee for services?
Examining a client’s prospective financial information
Preparing a client’s federal income tax return
Representing a client in an IRS examination of the client’s federal income tax return
Reviewing a client’s financial statements
Representing a client in an IRS examination of the client’s federal income tax return
Explanation:
A member in public practice may not receive a contingent fee for any professional services from a client for whom the firm prepares an audit, review, compilation (for use by a third party, and lack of independence has not been disclosed), or an examination of prospective financial information. They also may not prepare an original or amended tax return or claim for refund for a contingent fee for any client.
However, a fee is not considered contingent if it is fixed by the courts or other public authorities, or in tax matters, if it is determined based on the results of judicial processing or finding of a governmental agency.
Therefore, representing a client in an IRS examination by a revenue agent of the client’s federal or state income tax return is an example of where a contingent fee would be permitted.
In evaluating the reasonableness of an accounting estimate, an auditor most likely would concentrate on key factors and assumptions that are:
consistent with prior periods.
similar to industry guidelines.
objective and not susceptible to bias.
deviations from historical patterns.
deviations from historical patterns.
Explanation:
In evaluating the reasonableness of an accounting estimate, the auditor focuses on the key factors and assumptions that are deviations from historical patterns.
Also of concern to the auditor are key factors and assumptions that are significant, sensitive to variations, and subjective and susceptible to misstatement and bias.
Estimates are more likely to be reasonable if they are consistent with prior periods, similar to industry guidelines, and objective and not susceptible to bias.
An accountant may compile a nonissuer’s financial statements that omit all of the disclosures required by GAAP only if the omission is:
I. clearly indicated in the accountant’s report.
II. not undertaken with the intention of misleading the financial statement users.
I only
II only
Both I and II
Either I or II
Both I and II
Explanation:
Financial statements that omit all of the disclosures required by GAAP may be compiled only if the omission is clearly indicated in the accountant’s report and not undertaken with the intention of misleading the financial statement users.
Which of the following controls is not usually performed in the vouchers payable department?
Matching the vendor’s invoice with the related receiving report
Approving vouchers for payment by having an authorized employee sign the vouchers
Indicating the asset and expense accounts to be debited
Accounting for unused prenumbered purchase orders and receiving reports
Accounting for unused prenumbered purchase orders and receiving reports
Explanation:
The vouchers payable department should not account for unused prenumbered purchase orders and receiving reports; this is the responsibility of the purchasing and receiving departments, respectively.
Access to unused purchase orders and receiving reports and also to payables constitutes an inadequate segregation of duties. Consider what could happen: a vouchers payable clerk could write a fake purchase order, confirm receipt of the nonexistent goods, and then authorize payment to him or herself.
The vouchers payable department should:
- match vendor’s invoice with the related receiving report, which ensures that goods billed were received (i.e., that voucher is valid).
- approve vouchers for payment by having an authorized employee sign the vouchers (authorization).
- indicate the asset and expense accounts to be debited (ensuring proper classification).
When an auditor assesses control risk at the maximum level, the auditor is required to document:
the auditor’s understanding of the entity’s accounting system.
the auditor’s basis for concluding that control risk is at the maximum level.
both the auditor’s understanding of the entity’s accounting system and the auditor’s basis for concluding that control risk is at the maximum level.
neither the auditor’s understanding of the entity’s accounting system nor the basis for concluding that control risk is at the maximum level.
both the auditor’s understanding of the entity’s accounting system and the auditor’s basis for concluding that control risk is at the maximum level.
Explanation:
An auditor assesses control risk (and the risk of material misstatement) after obtaining an understanding of the internal control.
The auditor is required to document, in a way that provides a reasonable record, how the auditor has complied with the standards of fieldwork, one of which is gaining a sufficient understanding of internal control.
This would include an understanding of the entity’s accounting system, part of the Information and Communication component.
Regardless of control risk assessment, the auditor should document his or her understanding of the entity’s accounting system.
The auditor must document the assessment of the risks of material misstatement and the basis for the assessment.
Control risk is part of the risk of material misstatement. The auditor, therefore, should document the assessment (that it was assessed at maximum) and why (the basis for the assessment).
In assessing the competence and objectivity of an entity’s internal auditor, an independent auditor least likely would consider information obtained from:
discussions with management personnel.
external quality reviews of the internal auditor’s activities.
previous experience with the internal auditor.
the results of analytical procedures.
the results of analytical procedures.
Explanation:
The internal auditor’s competence and objectivity are assessed by using information from discussions with management personnel, external quality reviews, and previous experience with the internal auditor.
The information concerns the internal auditor’s education, professional experience, professional certification (e.g., CIA), work performed (review of audit programs, workpapers, reports, etc.), organizational status, and selection of audit areas.
Analytical procedures (used in planning the audit, as a substantive test, and in the overall review stage of the audit) depend upon the availability of a relationship between or among financial and nonfinancial data.
The relationship must be predictable enough for the auditor to develop an expectation.
Obviously, the internal auditor’s competence and objectivity cannot be assessed by using analytical procedures.
Which of the following is not a quality control policy or procedure related to engagement supervision?
Tracking the progress of the engagement
Scheduling vacations and other paid time off
Addressing significant issues arising during the engagement
Identifying matters for consultation or consideration by more experienced team members
Scheduling vacations and other paid time off
Explanation:
Policies and procedures for engagement supervision might include the following:
- Tracking the progress of the engagement
- Considering the capabilities and competence of individual members of the engagement team, whether they have sufficient time to carry out their work, whether they understand their instructions, and whether the work is being carried out in accordance with the planned approach to the engagement
- Addressing significant findings and issues arising during the engagement, considering their significance, and modifying the planned approach appropriately
- Identifying matters for consultation or consideration by more experienced engagement team members during the engagement
QC 10.A34
Scheduling vacations and other paid time off is an administrative function, not engagement performance.
Which of the following describes a weakness in accounts payable procedures?
The accounts payable clerk files invoices and supporting documentation after payment.
The accounts payable clerk manually verifies arithmetic on the vendor invoice.
The accounts payable system compares the receiving report to the vendor invoice.
The accounts payable manager issues purchase orders.
The accounts payable manager issues purchase orders.
Explanation:
An individual in the purchasing department should issue purchase orders with the appropriate supervisory approval.
The accounts payable clerk is responsible for verifying the arithmetic on the vendor invoice, comparing the vendor invoice to the receiving report and purchase order, processing the payment for the invoice, sending the check elsewhere for signature and mailing, and then filing all of the supporting documentation after payment.
If the accounts payable manager were able to issue purchase orders, he could order items for personal use (or for resale through his own side business) and then process payment for them through the company’s records.
Which of the following services would constitute a management function under Government Auditing Standards and result in the impairment of a CPA’s independence if performed by the CPA?
Developing entity program policies
Providing methodologies, such as practice guides
Providing accounting opinions to a legislative body
Recommending internal control procedures
Developing entity program policies
Explanation:
Government Auditing Standards (i.e., the Yellow Book) consider developing entity program policies to be a management function. As such, developing such policies would impair a CPA’s independence.
Providing methodologies (such as practice guides), providing accounting opinions to a legislative body, or recommending internal control procedures would not impair independence.
Which of the following disagreements between the auditor and management do not have to be communicated by the auditor to those charged with governance?
Disagreements regarding management’s judgment about accounting estimates for goodwill
Disagreements about the scope of the audit
Disagreements in the application of accounting principles relating to software development costs
Disagreements of the amount of the LIFO inventory layer based on preliminary information
Disagreements of the amount of the LIFO inventory layer based on preliminary information
Explanation:
The auditor needs to communicate any disagreements any matters, whether resolved or not, that individual or in the aggregate could be significant to the financial statements or the auditor’s report. Disagreements based on preliminary or incomplete information that were later resolved do not need to be disclosed.
The primary objective of procedures performed to obtain an understanding of internal control is to provide an auditor with:
knowledge necessary for audit planning.
audit evidence to use in assessing inherent risk.
a basis for modifying tests of controls.
an evaluation of the consistency of application of management’s policies.
knowledge necessary for audit planning.
Explanation:
The primary objective of procedures performed to obtain an understanding of internal control is to provide an auditor with knowledge necessary for audit planning.
The general objective of the auditor’s involvement with the client’s internal control is to obtain a sufficient understanding of the entity and its environment, including its internal control; to assess the risk of material misstatement of the financial statements whether due to error or fraud; and to design the nature, timing, and extent of further audit procedures.
The assessment of inherent risk assumes that there are no internal controls in place.