Assault Flashcards

1
Q

There are five main offences relating to violence against a person, these range in severity:

A
  1. Common Assault
  2. Assault by Beating (Battery)
  3. Actual Bodily Harm (‘ABH’)
  4. Wounding/ inflicting Grievous Bodily Harm (‘GBH’)
  5. Wounding/ causing Grievous Bodily Harm (‘GBH’) With Intent
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is Common Assault?

A

s39 Criminal Justice Act 1988

“any act by which a person intentionally or recklessly causes another person to apprehend immediate and unlawful personal violence”.

Assault by threat only, e.g:
- E.g I’m going to slap you, or conditional threat (if you do this I’ll___)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is Assault by Beating (Battery)?

A

s39 Criminal Justice Act 1988

Application of intentional or reckless unlawful force to another, physical contact occurs but with minor / no injury.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is Actual Bodily Harm (‘ABH’)?

A

s47 Offences Against the Person Act 1861

Application of force to another, the victim receives hurt or injury which has disrupted the health or comfort of the victim. Capable of being seen or felt by victim, including psychiatric although this must be supported by medical evidence.

Needs to be proved assault was intended or carried out recklessly. Doesn’t need to be proved they intended to cause injuries that amounted to ABH.

A triable either-way offence with a max penalty of 5 years imprisonment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is Wounding/ inflicting Grievous Bodily Harm (‘GBH’)?

A

s20 Offences Against the Person Act 1861

Offence to “unlawfully and maliciously ..wound another person” or to “inflict grievous bodily harm”

The victim receives life-changing injuries, e.g breaking all layers of skin, broken bones, biological harm, heavy bleeding or significant psychological injury.

Age and characteristics of person is taken into account.

Triable on indictment only and penalty is 7 years imprisonment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is Wounding/ causing Grievous Bodily Harm (‘GBH’) With Intent?

A

s18 Offences Against the Person Act 1861

“Unlawfully and maliciously by any means whatsoever wound or cause any grievous bodily harm to any person…with intent to do some grievous bodily harm to any person, or with intent to resist or prevent the lawful apprehension or detainer of any person”.

Triable on indictment only and penalty is life imprisonment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are non-fatal offences?

A

Offences against a person that don’t result in death. It does, however, result in various degrees of injury.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What would constitute the mens rea of any offence of assault?

A

The intention of the offender to commit any offence of assault, or be acting recklessly.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Give an example of acting intentionally?

A

Nadeem punches Alan in the mouth wanting to bust his lip and the lip bleeds after the blow (The injury brought about is exactly the desire of the instigator)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Give an example of acting recklessly?

A

Syeda and Peter are throwing stones out of a window onto a busy street (the chance of injury is considered a likely result from planned force and the instigator goes on to use that force).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What happens when ‘assaults’ are found to be purely accidental?

A

There is normally no offence committed.

For example, if, when walking down the high street, you were to trip forward and hit someone on the back, this would be purely accidental as there is no mens rea.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

As with all offences, assaults may be proven as a result of a transfer of malice. What does this mean?

A

If person A intends to commit an offence on person B, that intent may be transferred to another victim, person C, for that (or a like offence). For example:

During a pub fight, Alex throws his glass across the bar intending for it to hit James. Seeing it coming, James ducks out of the way. The glass hits Tony instead causing injury to his face.

Alex intended (the mens rea) to cause injury, the offence is complete. Therefore, the doctrine of transferred malice means that Alex may be guilty of the assault and battery of Tony, despite the fact that he was not his intended target.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the distinction between a common assault and battery?

A

In common law, an assault is “any act by which a person intentionally or recklessly causes another person to apprehend immediate and unlawful personal violence”.

Therefore, an assault, in itself, does not require any physical application of force on another person. The distinction between a victim experiencing the application of force and a victim apprehending that force is thus relevant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What kind of an offence is assault?

A

A summary offence under common law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the Actus Reus of assault?

A

Any unlawful act which leads to the victims apprehension that something bad might happen to them.

The acts can extend to…actions, words or even silent phone calls.

Saying I will not hurt you can prevent assault.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the Actus Reus of battery?

A

The application of unlawful force to another.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is battery in practice?

A

The application of unlawful force can occur without assault for example when the victim is hit in the back of his head.

Any unlawful physical contact can amount to battery, such as slapping or pushing.

There is no need to prove harm or pain.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Do you need to apply force directly to the victims body for it to be counted as battery?

A

No- touching the victims clothing can amount to it too - even if they didn’t feel a thing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is the Actus Reus of ABH?

A

The application of unlawful force to another which leads to injuries classed as ABH.

It is necessary to prove the existence of assault or battery.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Does physical pain have to always be the case for ABH?

A

No- cutting someones hair was held to be ABH as said in DPP v Smith (2006)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What is the mens rea of GBH?

A

The defendant had either intended to cause harm or was subjectively reckless - this means there must have been some awareness of the risk of harm involved.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Give two examples where a threat constitutes an assault:

A

During an argument, THACKER brings his fist back and threatens SMITH so that SMITH thinks he is about to get punched. Offence complete.

A collection of silent phone calls that caused the victim to believe that they were about to be attacked have been held to constitute an offence and the instigator can be held liable for any injury sustained as a result, physical or otherwise. Offence complete.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Grievous is described in law as “really serious injury”. GBH injuries can take many forms, for example:

A
Breaking of skin, with loss of blood
Broken bones
Deep bruising and internal bleeding
Significant psychological injury
Infection with or debilitating diseases, e.g. reckless transmission of HIV.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

When a suspect causes an injury that is consistent with GBH, which section is the most commonly used to prosecute the offence?

A

Section 20 Offences Against the Person Act 1861 is complete.

S20 is the most commonly used because it requires no proof of the suspect’s intention to cause the level of injuries acquired by the victim. The court must only prove that the suspect had the mens rea for some kind of assault.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Example 2 GBH s20 Offences Against the Person Act 1861

A

ROBERTS becomes upset with the way that SMITH is looking at his boyfriend. ROBERTS shoves SMITH with two hands to the chest. SMITH is pushed backwards, loses her footing and falls to the ground, fracturing her skull on the concrete curb. ROBERTS had no intention to cause the level of injuries sustained in this case. Under s20 GBH complete.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Example 2 GBH Section 20 Offences Against the Person Act 1861

A

JAMES meets MORRIS at a club and has consensual sex with her that evening. At the time, JAMES was unaware that six weeks previously, having had unprotected sex with another stranger who he knew was positive for Hepatitis B, he also contracted Hepatitis B. MORRIS is infected with Hepatitis B. JAMES had no intention to infect MORRIS but was reckless to the risk of infecting MORRIS with a sexually transmitted disease. Under s20 GBH complete.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

A persons will be found guilty of s18 GBH (under the Offences Against the Person Act 1861) if…

A

He/she “unlawfully and maliciously by any means whatsoever wounds or causes any grievous bodily harm to any person with intent to do some grievous bodily harm to any person, or with intent to resist or prevent the lawful apprehension or detainer of any person.”

Being an offence of specific intent, the injury sustained must constitute GBH and the defendant must be proven to have intended to cause that level of injury.

28
Q

Example 1 GBH s18 Offences Against the Person Act 1861

A

Following a verbal altercation outside a pub, HALL reaches for a brick from the floor and shouts to MOAH “I am going to break you!”. HALL grabs MOAH and smashes the brick on his skull, intending to cause serious injury. MOAH suffers a fractured skull, significant bleeding and permanent brain damage. S18 offence complete.

29
Q

Example 2 GBH s18 Offences Against the Person Act 1861

A

GAIL hits PC FRENCH with a bat to stop her from arresting her husband JOE. PC FRENCH receives a broken wrist as a result of the impact. After, GAIL states that she did not want to seriously hurt PC FRENCH but admits that she had foreseen this as a likelihood and only did it to prevent the arrest of her husband. S18 offence complete.

30
Q

What is the evidence needed for Section 18 Offences Against the Person Act 1861?

A

Proof of the intent to cause a high level of injury can be supported by evidence of kicking/heavily the defendant in the head, repeated blows/wounds, pre-existing motive, accompanying words (e.g. “I’ll put you in hospital”) or if the event occurs in an obviously dangerous environment (e.g. a cliff top).

31
Q

What is a non conditional threat and is it an assault?

A

“If your brothers weren’t here i’d thump you” - not considered an assault. The wording of the threat shows they’re not going to assault the person therefore there is no IMMEDIATE threat.

32
Q

Define threat in the context of common assault

A

An assault is any act by which a person intentionally or recklessly causes another to suffer or apprehend immediate unlawful violence.

33
Q

What are the two notable elements of a primary investigation that are particularly relevant to assaults:

A

Golden hour principle: this is particularly relevant in the case of assaults, not least because some evidence of injury may be lost if not captured immediately, e.g. photographs of injuries or items used by paramedics at the scene of an assault.

Crime Scene: Minimum standards for responding to GBH assaults will always require the establishing of a crime scene (and the commencement of a Crime Scene Log). This is because GBH is a very serious offence which will often require specialist Scenes of Crime Officer (SOCO) attendance. A sad reality of GBH offences is that they often have the potential to become a murder if the patient’s health deteriorates further.

34
Q

When getting a request for a violent incident, what important things should be checked on the Police National Computer (if the person is known)?

A

Risk factors for physical violence, including:

  • History of violent or disturbed behaviour
  • Substance or alcohol abuse
  • Previously expressing an intention to harm others.
35
Q

Once at the scene of an assault, what should happen?

A

A reassessment of victim and officer safety should be made, including immediate risked posed by availability and possible use of weapons.

The need for First Aid or other medical assistance (such as an ambulance) for anyone present.

Parties may need to be separated, especially if children are present.

Look out for visual threats from suspect.

Accurate records of anything thats happening.

36
Q

There are common and statutory defences to all offences of assault/battery. The justification, however, must always be comparable to the level of injury caused/ force used – which must always be ‘reasonable in the circumstances’.

The defences that may be used for charges of assault and battery include:

A
  • Consent,
  • Lawful correction / reasonable chastisement of a child,
  • Prevention and detection of crime / self-defence (under common law).
37
Q

What is consent in an assault?

A

Put simply, if a person is fully willing and able to consent to an assault, then there is no offence. Consent can be implied or explicit.

38
Q

What are some every day examples where there is an implied or explicit consent to “assault” are:

A

A tap on the shoulder to draw attention.

Commuters on busy public transport where standing in very close proximity is expected.

A tattooist or piercer permanently disfiguring the skin of a customer.

Football stadium security ‘patting down’ a fan who voluntarily submits to the search as a condition of grounds entry.

Adults touching, lightly spanking or holding each other during sex.

Contact during lawful sports - providing injuries are sustained within play and within the rules

A doctor touching, pushing, moving the limbs of a patient.

39
Q

What are the types of consent?

A

Implied consent

Explicit consent

40
Q

What is implied consent?

A

In certain circumstances, consent to an assault is not specifically given but is implied and allowed. Implied consent can only apply to reasonable bodily contact.

41
Q

What is explicit consent?

A

Consent can only apply to reasonable bodily contact.

Even explicit consent given by the victim for more serious injury (ABH or GBH) is usually not enough for a court to find a not-guilty verdict.

42
Q

Who can explicit consent not be given by?

A

Explicit consent to assault cannot be given by a child who is too young to know what he or she is consenting to.

The age at which the young person becomes able to give that consent would be for the court to decide, based on the individual and the specific act.

43
Q

What is Lawful Correction/Reasonable Chastisement of a Child?

A

A ‘reasonable chastisement’ defence remains available for parents (or adults acting in loco parentis) when a child is less than 16 years old.

This does not include school staff, as the use of corporal punishment in all British schools is unlawful.

This only applies charges of Battery under s39 Criminal Justice Act 1988.

44
Q

What are the three ‘use of force’ powers that police officers should learn word-for-word?

A

Common Law
Section 3 Criminal Law Act 1967
Section 117 Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE)

45
Q

What is Common Law (R v Griffiths 1988)?

A

If no more force is used than is reasonable to repel the attack, such force is not unlawful.

If you have an honestly held belief that you or another, are in imminent danger, then you may use such force as is reasonable and necessary to avert that danger.

46
Q

What is Section 3, Criminal Law Act 1967?

A

“A person may use such force as is reasonable in the circumstances in the prevention of crime, or in effecting the lawful arrest of offenders or suspected offenders, or of persons unlawfully at large”

47
Q

What is Section 117 of PACE 1984?

A

States that “constables may use reasonable force, if necessary, in the exercise of powers under PACE, providing the exercise of this power does not first require the consent of another person”.

48
Q

What power allows for so-called ‘citizen’s arrests’?

A

Section 3, Criminal Law Act 1967

This power allows to be used for so-called ‘citizen’s arrests’ (under Section 24A of PACE) to be carried out by a member of the public, or more commonly, a shop security guard.

49
Q

Defending against intruders in a dwelling

A

In these situations, it might still be reasonable in the circumstances to use a degree of force that might otherwise be considered disproportionate.

50
Q

Defences that include the notion of ‘reasonable force’ include:

A

Self defence (a common law defence, 76(2)(a) of the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008.

Defence of property (a common law defence, 76(2)(a)(a) of the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008.

The use of force in the course of prevention of crime, or in making an arrest (s 3(1) of the Criminal Law Act (s 76(2)(b)).

51
Q

In Dewar v DPP [2010] EWHC 1050 it was reaffirmed that there is a two part test to self defence?

A
  1. That the individual believes that he/she was acting in self-defence
  2. That the force used was reasonable in the circumstances

There is no need to consider which person was the initial aggressor.

52
Q

What is a handy mnemonic to remember which offences may be aggravated?

A

‘CHAP’:

C riminal Damage (s1 Crim Dam)
H arassment (s2 Harassment and s4 Fear of Violence)
A ssaults (Common Assault, ABH and s20 GBH)
P ublic Order (s5 Disorderly Behaviour, s4a Intentional Behaviour and s4 Threatening Behaviour)

53
Q

What are charges for racially or religiously aggravated offences?

A

The racially or religiously aggravated offences carry a maximum penalty that is one step higher on the sentencing ladder than the basic offence.

However, the aggravated offences place on the prosecution the additional burden of proving racial or religious motivation, or hostility in connection with the offence, in addition to the ’basic’ offence.

54
Q

An offence, under s28 of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998, is racially or religiously aggravated if:

A

(a) at the time of the offence (or immediately before or after doing so), the offender demonstrates towards the victim of the offence hostility based on the victim’s membership (or presumed membership) of a racial or religious group,

or

(b) the offence is motivated (wholly or partly) by hostility towards members of a racial or religious group based on their membership (or presumed membership) of that group.

55
Q

Does racial/religious aggravation have an effect on the offence of S.18 GBH (with intent)>

A

No, due to the seriousness of the premeditation already required, however the evidence you gather of any racial or religious motivations may help to prove the intent needed for this offence.

56
Q

Section 16 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 is about what?

A

Threats to kill and covers:

Person A threatens to kill person B, which person B believes to be real.

Person A makes a threat to kill with intent for person B to believe the threat, but the threat is about killing person C. It is irrelevant whether person C knows or not.

It is not necessary for A to actually kill anyone for this offence to take place, but it must be proved that A intends that B believes the threat. The offence can be premeditated or spontaneous, it can be communicated by any means, and there does not need to be the sense that the offence would be carried out immediately.

57
Q

Police Responses to Threats to Life

Police have a positive obligation to preserve life under…

A

Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

58
Q

Threats to kill are hard to prove but surprisingly common.

A

They are usually one persons’ word against another. Self-defence can be used as a defence.

Threats to kill charges can be useful when no assault has taken place, yet person B believes and fears that it would be carried out.

A public order charge or a charge of affray may be appropriate alternative charges in some instances.

59
Q

There are four key offences that were created to protect the police and other public workers whilst they are acting in an official capacity:

A

Assault of a Constable – Section 89 (1) Police Act 1996

Obstruct Constable – Section 89 (2) Police Act 1996

Assault with intent to resist arrest – Section 38 Offences Against the Person Act 1861

Obstruct/hinder emergency workers – Section 1 Emergency Workers (Obstruction) Act 2006

60
Q

Assault of a Constable – Section 89 (1) Police Act 1996

A

“Any person who assaults a constable in the execution of his duty, or a person assisting a constable in the execution of his duty, shall be guilty of an offence.”

If the constable has become a trespasser or is making an unlawful arrest, then this offence will not apply.

61
Q

Obstruct Constable – Section 89 (2) Police Act 1996

A

“Any person who resists or wilfully obstructs a constable in the execution of his duty, or a person assisting a constable in the execution of his duty, shall be guilty of an offence”

e.g failing to yield to a police car displaying lights/sirens or standing in the way of an officer as they give chase to a person in the street for arrest.

62
Q

Assault with intent to resist an arrest – Section 38 Offences Against the Person Act 1861

A

“Whoever shall assault any person with intent to resist or prevent the lawful apprehension or detainer of himself or of any other person for any offence”

Offence is triable summarily and the penalty is two years imprisonment

63
Q

Obstruct/hinder emergency workers – Section 1 Emergency Workers (Obstruction) Act 2006

A

“A person who without reasonable excuse obstructs or hinders another while that other person is, in a capacity mentioned in subsection (2) below, responding to emergency circumstances”

Section 2 of this Act covers any persons assisting an emergency worker who is acting as above.

64
Q

Assaults of Emergency Workers (Offences) Act 2018

A

Covers the offence of common assault, or battery, when committed against an emergency worker acting in the exercise of functions as such a worker (including when not working).

Either way offence, and the maximum custodial sentence is 12 months.

65
Q

In common law, an assault is…

A

“any act by which a person intentionally or recklessly causes another person to apprehend immediate and unlawful personal violence”.