As Summer 2017 Flashcards
Explain, using marginal analysis from the table above, the concept of opportunity cost. (You may use the last column in answeing the question.) (3 marks)
K/U:
* Definition of opportunity cost
App:
* Increasing opportunity cost (2 small calculations)
Ana:
* Opportunity cost for the economy moving from consumer goods to capital goods is small compared to gains in production
Define the term ‘base year’. (1 mark)
Benchmark year
The most likely effect of cutting subsidies for the installation of solar panels is to: (1 mark)
C - decrease consumer surplus
Explain how the price mechanism responds to excess supply in a free market. (3 marks)
K/U:
* Define excess supply/surplus
App:
* $530 or falling below
* Price mechanism in free market
Ana:
* Steel supply contracts and extension in demand for steel with diagram
Which one of the following is likely to result in an increase in carbon emissions? (1 mark)
D - Reducing indirect taxes on steel products
Explain why reducing the tuition fee cap may result in excess demand for university places. (3 marks)
K/U:
* Define excess demand/shortage
App:
* University now more affordable for applicants
Ana:
* Lower max price
Which one of the following statements is correct? (1 mark)
A - The marginal social benefits exceed the marginal private benefit from university education
Explain why ‘bands on tobacco advertising’ (Extract A, line 7) may result in a decrease in the revenue of tobacco firms. Include a supply and demand diagram in your answer. (5 marks)
K:
* Definiton of revenue/diagram
App:
* “can reduce tabacco consumption” leading to a decreased revenue shown in diagram
Ana:
* Demand shift left/less price inelastic
* New equilibrium
With reference to the information provided and your own knowledge, assess the view that tabacco consumers switching to e-cigarettes is an example of rational behaviour. (10 marks)
KAA
App:
* Price of e-cigarettes per nicotine cheaper
* PED shows some rational response to price change (e.g. 10% rise causes 4% fall in demand, Extract A)
Reasons rational:
* Smokers aware of finanal gain of switching
* Smokers informed of private health gains (Extract B, para 2)
* Reducing health external costs (e.g. passive smoking) (Extract A, line 15)
With reference to the information provided and your own knowledge, assess the view that tabacco consumers switching to e-cigarettes is an example of rational behaviour. (10 marks)
Ev para
Reasons against rational:
* Both products have nicotine which is addictive
* Switch may be short-term
* E-cigarettes complements tabacco smoking, increase nicotine consumption
Explain how changes in the price of tabacco cigarettes may affect the demand for e-cigarettes over time. (6 marks)
K/U:
* Definition of XED
* Tabacco cigarettes and e-cigarettes have a positive XED
App:
* e-cigarettes are less harmful so attractive than tobacco cigarettes
* Regulations and health awareness of tobacco
Ana:
* Increase in price of cigarettes changes quantity demanded for far/close substitutes
With reference to Extract A, lines 11-13, calculate the price elasticity of demand for tobacco cigarettes in high-income countries and in low-middle-income countries. You are advised to show your working. (4 marks)
- High-income countries = -4%/10% = -0.4
- Low-middle income countries = -5%/10% = -0.5
With reference to Figure 1, assess the likely reasons for the difference in price elasticity of demand for tobacco cigarettes and e-cigarettes. (15 marks)
KAA
App:
* PED tobacco cigarettes: -0.35
* PED e-cigarettes: -1.9
Reasons tabacco consumption is price-inelastic, e-cigarettes is price-elastic:
* Income spent on tobacco cigarettes lower than e-cigarettes
* Number of close substitutes
* Tobacco addictive/necessity, e-cigarettes luxury
With reference to Figure 1, assess the likely reasons for the difference in price elasticity of demand for tobacco cigarettes and e-cigarettes. (15 marks)
Ev
- Income spent on tobacco cigarettes is rising
- Closer substitutes
- Tobacco addiction
Evaluate the impact of governmetn intervention in the cigarettes market. (20 marks)
KAA para
Positive effects of gov intervention:
* Indirect tax
* Min cigarette price
* Regulation (e.g. ban smoking in public/advertise