Article 78 Flashcards
When are Article 78 proceedings available (4)
- compel public body to perform legal duty
- prevent public body or officer from exceeding authority
- review decision made in violation of lawful procedure, in error of law, or was arbitrary, capricious or abuse of discretion
- review decision not supported by substantial evidence
Article 78 of CPLR provides
exclusive means of seeking review of governmental actions
allows filing of action in Supreme Court
When article 78 is not available (3)
- appeal is available
- decision not final
- test validity of statute
Sol for Article 78
4 months unless otherwise limited by statute
begins to run when
determination to be reviewed becomes final or
after respondents refusal to perform duty on demand of petitioner
Incompetency and SoL for Article 78
Court can extend period for up to 2 years for infants and insane
Method of commencement
filing notice of petition
or
order to show cause and verified petition
answer must also be verified
Venue for Article 78
any county where respondent made determination complained of
where respondent refused to perform duty
where material events took place
principal office of respondent is located
Conduct of hearing
Designed to give an expedited process
for review of governmental actions
hearing must be held at least 20 days after service of motion
answer must be served at least 5 days before hearing
Relief available
may annul, confirm, or modify determination of government body
direct or prohibit action by it
restitution or damages MUST be incidental to injunctive relief sought by petitioner
only available if relief could be recovered in a supreme court action
When Declaratory judgements available
Determine constitutional issues
validity of statute
administrative law compliance with the constitution
Standard of Review for Article 78 proceedings
Determinations of law are upheld if reasonable
determinations of fact are upheld if supported by substantial evidence
What is Substantial Evidence
relevant proof as a reasonable mind will accept as adequate
to support a conclusion or ultimate fact
Review of Administrative actions
upheld if there was a rational basis and not arbitrary or capricious