Article 5 Flashcards
What is article 5?
The right to liberty and security
What does article 5(1) state?
5(1)Everyone has the right to liberty and security of a person. No one shall be deprived of his liberty save in the following cases and in accordance with a procedure prescribed law:
What does article 5(1)(a) state?
a) the lawful detention of a person after conviction by a competent court
What does article 5(1)(b) state?
b) the lawful arrest or detention of a person for non-compliance with the lawful order of a court or in order to secure the fulfilment of any obligation prescribed by law
What does article 5(1)(c) state?
c) the lawful arrest or detention of a person effected for the purpose of bringing him before the competent legal authority on reasonable suspicion of having committed an offence or when it is reasonably considered necessary to prevent his committing an offence or fleeing after having done so
What does article 5(1)(d) state?
d)the detention of a minor by lawful order for the purpose of educational supervision or his lawful detention for the purpose of bringing him before a competent legal authority
What does article 5(1)(e) state?
e) the lawful detention of persons for the prevention of the spreading of infectious diseases, of a persons unsound mind, alcoholics or drug addicts or vagrants
What does article 5(1)(f) state?
f) the lawful arrest or detention of a person to prevent his effecting an unauthorised entry into the country or of a person against whom action is taken with a view to deportation or extradition
What does article 5(2) state?
Everyone who is arrested shall be informed promptly, in a language which he or she understands, of the reasons for his arrest and of any charge against him
What does article 5(3) state?
Everyone arrested or detained in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 1(c) of this article shall be brought promptly before a judge or other officer authorised by law to exercise judicial power and shall be entitled to trial within a reasonable time or to release pending trial. Release may be conditioned by guarantees to appear for trial
What does article 5(4) state?
Everyone who is deprived of his liberty by arrest or detention shall be entitled to take proceedings by which the lawfulness of his detention shall be decided speedily by a court and his release ordered if the detention is not lawful
What does article 5(5) state?
Everyone who has been the victim of arrest or detention in contravention of this article shall have enforceable rights to compensation
Guzzardi v Italy 1981
Guzzardi was suspected of being in the Mafia. He was ordered to live on an island with limited contact and a curfew. The court decided this was more than a restriction of liberty, it was a deprivation. The decision of deprivation is based on degree or intensity. The court gave a list of things to be considered when deciding if a person was deprived of their liberty: type, duration, effects and manner of implementation of the measure in question.
Austin and ors v UK 2012
Kettling was used during a protest in London. Protesters where blocked into a small area and gradually released over a number of hours. HOL and ECtHR decided this was NOT deprivation of liberty as police were prevention violence, damage and injury.
Moos v MPC
High Court ruled that kettling of G20 protesters was unlawful however COA decided the police acted lawfully. Kettling should only be used as a last resort where there is evidence of an imminent breach of the peace.
Cheshire West and Chester Council v P 2014
P has cerebral palsy and downs syndrome. He required 24 hour care. The court of first instance decided this was a deprivation of liberty but in his best interests. COA held there was NO deprivation of liberty, Supreme Court said it was a deprivation of liberty.
Winterwerp v Netherlands 1979
Detention can only be justified if:
-the patient has a medically recognised mental condition established by a medical expert
-the disorder must be sufficient to justify the detention
-detention should only be for the duration that the disorder exists
-detention must be at and appropriate institution
-the detention should be periodically reviewed.
If the police ‘stop and question’ a person do they have to answer?
They are entirely free to refuse to answer, Rice v Connolly 1966