Article 3 Flashcards

1
Q

ACTS

A

any bodily movement tending to produce some effect in the external world

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

OMISSION

A

failure to perform a positive duty which one is bound to do

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

DOLO V. CULPA

A
dolo = deceit (deceiving someone by concealing the truth)
culpa = fault
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

ELEMENTS OF FELONIES

A
  1. That there must be an act or omission.
  2. That said act or omission is punishable by the RPC
  3. That the act is performed or the omission incurred is by means of dolo or culpa.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

EXTERNAL ACTS

A
  • only external acts must be punished, because internal acts are beyond the sphere of penal law
  • a criminal thought, no matter how immoral or improper, will never constitute felony
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

FELONY BY OMISSION

A
  1. Anyone who fails to render assistance to any person whom he finds in an uninhabited place wounded, or in danger, or dying, is liable for abandonment of persons in danger.
  2. An officer entrusted with collection of taxes, who voluntarily fails to issue a receipt as provided by law, is guilty of illegal exaction.
  3. Every person owing allegiance to the Philippines, without being a foreigner, and having knowledge of any conspiracy against the government, who does not disclose the same to the proper authority, is liable for misprision of treason
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

CLASSIFICATION OF FELONIES: INTENTIONAL V. CULPABLE FELONIES

A

intentional felonies
the act or omission of the offender is malicious (with deliberate intent); has the intention to cause harm to another.

culpable felonies
the act or omission of the offender is not malicious or is unintentional, it being an incident of another act performed without malice; still punishable but as a lesser degree and with an equal result

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

IMPRUDENCE

A

indicates a deficiency of action; person fails to take the necessary precaution to avoid injury to person or damage of property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

NEGLIGENCE

A

indicates a deficiency of perception; persons fails to pay proper attention and to use due diligence in foreseeing the injury or damage impending to be caused

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

LACK OF FORESIGHT

A

usually involves negligence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

LACK OF SKILL

A

usually involves imprudence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

VOLUNTARY ACT OR OMISSION

A
  1. RPC is based on the Classical Theory to which the basis of criminal liability is human free will.
  2. Punishable acts or omissions are always deemed voluntary as humans are rational beings.
  3. Whether dolo or culpa, both are voluntary as the former was done with deliberate intent and the latter was done by failing to do an act which material injury results
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

DOLO OR MALICE REQUISITES

A
  • Freedom – a person who acts under the compulsion of an irresistible force is exempt from criminal liability.
  • Intelligence – no crime can exist without the necessary power to determine the morality of human acts
  • Intent – intent to commit the act with malice, being purely a mental process, and the presumption arises from the proof of the commission of an unlawful act.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

MISTAKE OF FACT

A

is a misapprehension of fact on the part of the person who caused injury to another.

not criminally liable as he did not act with criminal intent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

REQUISITES FOR MISTAKE OF FACT AS A DEFENSE

A
  1. The act done would have been lawful had the facts been as the accused believed them to be;
  2. The intention of the accused in performing the act should be lawful; and
  3. The mistake must be without fault or carelessness on the part of the accused.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

CRIMINAL INTENT REPLACED BY NEGLIGENCE

A

when committed by means of culpa

requisites:

  1. He must have freedom while doing an act or omitting to do an act;
  2. He must have intelligence while doing the act or omitting to do the act;
  3. He is imprudent, negligent, or lacks foresight or skill while doing the act or omitting to do the act.
17
Q

MALA IN SE

A

criminal acts that are wrong because they violate the moral, public, or natural principles of a society (murder, rape, robbery)

penalized by RPC

18
Q

MALA PROHIBITA

A

criminal acts that are wrong because they violate a statute or law rather than being an action that harms or offends society (parking violation, tax fraud, copyright violation)

acts made criminal by special laws

19
Q

INTENT V. MOTIVE

A

intent
the purpose to use a particular means to effect such result

motive
moving power which impels one to action for a definite result, not an essential element of crime

20
Q

MOTIVE RELEVANCE

A
IANC
I = dentity of the accused
A = ntagonistic theories
N = o eyewitnesses
C = circumstantial evidence of sufficient evidence
21
Q

IDENTITY OF THE ACCUSED

A

a. Proof of motive is not necessary to pin a crime on the accused if the commission of the crime has been proven and the evidence of identification is convincing.
b. When identity of person accused is in dispute, the motive is very relevant.
c. Motive is essential when there is doubt as to the identity of the assailant.
d. When the defendant admits the killing, inquiring for the motive is no longer necessary.
e. When there is no longer doubt that the defendant was the culprit, it becomes unimportant to know the exact purpose for the crime.

22
Q

ANTAGONISTIC THEORIES

A

Motive is important in ascertaining the truth between two antagonistic theories or versions of the killing

23
Q

NO EYEWITNESSES

A

Where there are no eyewitness or suspicion is likely to fall upon a number of persons, motive is significant

24
Q

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE OF SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE

A

a. If evidence is merely circumstantial, proof of motive is essential.
b. Proof of motive is not indispensable where guilty is otherwise established by sufficient evidence.