Article 2 ECHR Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What does article 2 say of the ECHR

A

Right to Life

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what does it say about the right of life

A
  • shall be protected by law

- no one shall be deprived of his life

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what does the case of McCann and others v UK say

A

Right to life - strict interpretation

Terrorist shot, based upon intelligence, intending to detonate car bomb - large quantity of explosives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what was held in the case of Mccann and others v UK

A

breach of article 2(2), suspects were under surveillance for a period.
Court was not persuaded - was no more than absolutely necessary.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what case proves that there is a duty to investigate - and the action must be reasonabl

A

Gul v Turkey

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what did the case of Gul v Turkey say

A

M killed by poffers who fired approx 55 times, M’s father said that his son had been shot without warning while trying to open the door
no autopsy was carried out/x-rays taken - state prosecutor did not collect any physical evidence and no statement taken from officers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what was held in the case of Gul v Turkey

A

recalling McCann v UK ECtHR held - firing at the door was not justified by any reasonable belief that officers lives were at risk - therefore a breach of article 2.
an effective investigation was required, but no adequate investigation was carried out therefore d was denied an effective remedy and was in breach of article 13

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what case proves of no right to prosecution/conviction

A

Brecknell v UK

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what happened in the case of Brecknell v UK

A

B’s husband was shot dead in terrorist attack, police investigated killing but unable to identify any individual assailant, B commenced proceedings in respect of the alleged inadequacy of the investigation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what did the ECtHR hold in the case of Brecknell v UK

A

obligation to carry out an effective investigation into unlawful or suspicious deaths is well established.
There is no absolute right to obtain a prosecution or conviction, and the fact investigation ends without results does not indication any failings as sucj

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Does article 2 impose positive obligation

A

Yes Article 2 imposes positive obligations on a state to protect individuals from lethal attacks from other citizens

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what does the case of Osman v UK say

A

Osman complained about the failure of the authorities to appreciate the seriousness of the threat to the physical safety of family - said that the first sentence tells the state not to only refrain from intentional and unlawful taking of life but also take appropriate steps to safeguard the lives of those within its jurisdiction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what did the ECtHR hold in the case of Osman v UK

A

having regard to the nature of right protected by Art 2, a right fundamental in the scheme of the convention, it is sufficient for an applicant to show

that the authorities did not do all that could be reasonably expected of them to avoid a real and immediate risk to the life of which they have or ought to have knowledge…

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what does the case of pretty v UK talk about

A

the right to life on the idea of assisted suicide

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what were the facts of pretty v uk

A

pretty had a degenerative disease and was in the advanced stages - she had to endure the disease and wished to control how and when she died to be spared of suffering and indignity
it was declined to gran an indemnity against the prosecution of P’s husband

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what was held in the case of Pretty v UK by the ECtHR?

A

article 2 is unconcerned with issues about the quality of life or what a person chooses to do with their life
article2 cannot be interpreted as conferring the diametrically opposite right, namely a right to die
nor can it create a right to self-determination in the sense of conferring on an individual the entitlement to choose death rather than life

17
Q

what was found in the case of pretty v uk by the ECtHR

A

NO right to die whether at the hands of a thrid person or with assistance of a public authority, can be derived from articl 2.

18
Q

when does human life begin and what case proves this

A

Vo v France

where a fotus was not a living person but an extension of the mothers body