Aritcle 3 and 5 ECHR Flashcards

1
Q

What does article 3 say

A

prohibition of torture

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what does it mean when obligations placed on states is aboslute

A

no exceptions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

does article 3 have a positive obligations

A

yes, states have a psotive obligation to take reasonable steps to ensure that individuals are protected from action coming from other individuals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what happened in the case of Dordevic v Croatia

A

D disabled suffered from meningitis, D aruged that the state had not given him adequate protection from harassment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what was held in the case of Dordevic v Croatia

A

Court considered the state to not have taken all reasonable measures to prevent abuse, nonetheless that the fact that the risk of such absue was real and forseeable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what happened in the case of ireland v UK

A

interrogation technique used by british army on a suspected terrorist - the five techniques

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what was the existence of ireland v UK essentially for

A

the meaning of inhuman and degrading treatment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what did the ECtHR hold in the case of ireland v UK

A

although 5 techniques amounted to inhuman+degrading treatment… the did not occasion suffering of the particular intensity and cruelty implied by the word torture as understood
5 techniques amounted to inhuman and degrading treatment - breach of articl 3

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

using the case of Ireland v UK how did the ECtHR differ torture and inhuman/degrading treatment from each other

A

the distinction of the two concepts lies in the intensity of the suffering inflicted
torture constitutes an aggravated and deliberate form of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what does the case of jabari v turkey talk about and what happened

A

deportation cases - applicant committed adultery and submitted that she would be sentenced to a form of inhuman punishment in iran because of it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what was held in the case of jabari v turkey

A

There is a real risk of the applicant being subjected to treatment contrary to article 3 - the order for her deportation to iran, if executed would give rise to a violation of article 3

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what does article 5 say

A

right to liberty and security

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what are some examples of deprivation of liberty excluding behind prison walls

A

placing a voluntary psychiatric patiet in a closed mental hospital subject to sever restrictions, holding a 5yo foreign national without his family in a centre for adult illegal immigrants, confinement of crew on board ship after it had been arrest on suspicion of carrying drugs and house arrest in excess of 24 hours

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what case proves that placing a voluntary psychiatric patient in a closed mental hospital subject to severe restriction is a deprivation of liberty

A

HL v UK

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what case proves that holding a 5yo foreign national without his family in a centre for adult illegal immigrants is a deprivation of liberty

A

Leger v France

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what case proves that confinement of a crew on board ship after it had been arrest on suspicion of carrying drugs an example of deprivation of liberty

A

medvedyev v france

17
Q

what case proves that house arrest in excess of 24 hours is a deprivation of liberty

A

Mancini v italy & Vachev v bulgaria

18
Q

what does section one of article 5 say

A

it provides the limitations of article 5

19
Q

what happened in the case of Hilda Hafsteindottir v iceland

A

hilda arrested and held on remand in custody on six occasions on different dates, hilda alleged that her detention in custody for drunkenness and disorderly conduct had not been justified

20
Q

what did the ECtHR hold in the case of Hilda v ICeland

A

At the time of six disputed events, in one essential respect, namely the duration, police discretion, lack of necessary regulatory framework, the court is not satisfied that the law, was precise and accessible to avoid all risk of arbitrariness - applicant’s deprivation of liberty was no tlawful