Article 10 Flashcards

1
Q

What is stated in Article 10.1?

A

Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers. This Article shall not prevent States from requiring the licensing of broadcasting, television or cinema enterprises.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Which limitations are set out under Article 10.2?

A

Limitations are justified if they are:
1) prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society
2) in the interests of national security, territorial integrity or public safety
3) for the prevention of disorder or crime
4) for the protection of health or morals
5) for the protection of the reputation or rights of others
6) for preventing the disclosure of information received in confidence
7) for maintaining the authority and impartiality of the judiciary.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Which case shows there is no obligation for the state to provide information?

A

Guerra v Italy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Which case shows that Article 10 includes the right to “offend, shock and disturb”?

A

Handyside v UK

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Why was there no breach of Article 10 in the case of Handyside v UK?

A

The court found that there was no breach of Article 10 and that the UK fell within the margin of appreciation when banning the ‘Little Red Schoolbook’ that taught children about sex and recommended pornography to children.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Which case involves freedom of the press?

A

Goodwin v UK - forcing a journalist to reveal their source violated Article 10

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the six-part criteria to balance competing interests between Article 8 and 10?

A

1) whether the information contributes to a debate of public interest
2) the notoriety of the person concerned
3) prior conduct of the person concerned
4) the method of obtaining information and its veracity
5) the content, form and consequence of the publication
6) the severity of the sanction imposed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Which case involved the balancing of Article 8 and 10 rights?

A

In Axel Springer AG v Germany, a German newspaper publishes stories and articles about the arrest and conviction of an actor portraying a police officer for the possession of drugs. The Courts found that his right to privacy under Article 8 outweighed the newspaper’s right to freedom of expression under Article 10.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Which case shows the large margin of appreciation given to Article 10 cases?

A

In Otto-Preminger-Institut v Austria, the authorities banned a film that was offensive towards Catholics. The ECtHR permitted this as Austria is a predominantly Catholic country.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

In which case was there no breach of Article 10 because the restriction was justified under Article 10.2?

A

In Garaudy v France, there was found to be no breach of Article 10, because Gaurady’s book disputed the existence of many historical events, including the Holocaust

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Which act gives everyone in the UK the right to access information held by a public sector organisation?

A

Freedom of Information Act 2000

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Under Article 10, when does information need to be disclosed?

A

Access to the information must be instrumental for the individual to exercise their freedom of expression for the information to need to be disclosed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How is whether information is instrumental or not shown?

A

1) the purpose of the request is considered
2) the nature of the information is considered
3) is the information ready and available
4) the role of the applicant - e.g. Journalists, social watchdogs, non-governmental organisations, researchers and academics are in a privileged position to seek information if they have a view of informing the public

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Which case decided that blocking google was a breach of Article 10?

A

Yildirim v Turkey

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Give an example of where a limitation was prescribed by law

A

The passing of the Contempt of Court Act 1981 following Sunday Times v UK to clarify the law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Give an example of where a limitation was not necessary in a democratic society

A

Observer v Guardian - there was no pressing social need for the injunction because the book was available in other countries

17
Q

Give an example of where a limitation was justified for the prevention of disorder and crime

A

In Surek v Turkey, the applicant disseminated propaganda and provoked hatred amongst the people, justifying the limitation of their rights

18
Q

Give an example of where a limitation was for the protection of health and morals

A

In Muller v Switzerland, the applicant was fined for organising an exhibition with obscene paintings

19
Q

Give an example of where a limitation was for the protection or rights of others

A

In Bedat v Switzerland, information about criminal proceedings against a motorist who caused three deaths was published, including photographs and letters sent to him by the judge. The fine imposed on the publisher did not breach Article 10

20
Q

Give an example of where a limitation was to maintain the authority and impartiality of the judiciary

A

This was questioned in Sunday Times v UK, however the injunction was not granted because it was believed to be a matter of public interest

20
Q

Give an example of where a limitation was to prevent the disclosure of information received in confidence

A

In Bedat v Switzerland, information about criminal proceedings against a motorist who caused three deaths was published, including photographs and letters sent to him by the judge. The fine imposed on the publisher did not breach Article 10

24
Q

Which act means that public authorities are obliged to publish certain information about their activities and allows the public to request information?

A

The Freedom of Information Act 2000

25
Q

Which act provides legal protection against espionage and the unauthorised disclosure of information?

A

The Official Secrets Act 1911-1989

25
Q

Which act allows members of the public to access information about themselves held by a public authority?

A

The Data Protection Act 1998

26
Q

Which act protects workers who disclose malpractice in their workplace?

A

The Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998

27
Q

Which act prevents the publication of information that would prejudice ongoing legal proceedings unless it is a serious matter of public interest?

A

The Contempt of Court Act 1981

28
Q

Which act covers publications intended to corrupt and deprave the audience?

A

Obscene Publication Acts 1959 and 1964

29
Q

Which acts govern obscenity in theatre, on the radio and on TV?

A

The Theatres Act 1968 and the Broadcasting Act 1990

30
Q

Which offence was the defendant in R v Gibson guilty of and why?

A

The common law offence of outraging public decency for displaying freeze-dried foetuses as earrings

31
Q

Which act made it an offence to use abusive or insulting words to incite racial hatred?

A

Racial and Religious Hatred Act 2006

32
Q

Which case does the six-part criteria for balancing Article 8 and 10 rights come from?

A

The Von Hannover cases