Article 1 Client-Lawyer Relationship Flashcards
Rule 1.2 Scope of Representation and Allocation of Authority Between Client and Lawyer
(a) Subject to paragraphs (c) and (d), a lawyer shall abide by a client’s decisions concerning the objectives of representation and, as required by Rule 1.4, shall consult with the client about the means to be use to reach the client’s objectives. A lawyer may take such action on behalf of the client as is impliedly authorized to carry out the representation. Civil = settle; criminal case = plea, waive jury trial and testify.
(b) A lawyer’s representation of a client, including representation by appointment, does not constitute an endorsement of the client’s views and activities
(c) A lawyer may limit the scope of the representation if reasonable under the circumstances and the client gives informed consent.
(d) A lawyer shall not help with crime but a lawyer may discuss the legal consequences of any proposed course of conduct with a client and may help a client to determine the validity, scope, meaning or application of the law.
Rule 1.6(a) Confidentiality of Information
(a) A lawyer shall not reveal information relating to the representation of a client unless the client gives informed consent, it is impliedly authorized or is permitted by paragraph (b).
Rule 1.13(a) Organization as Client
(a) A lawyer employed or retained by an organization represents the organization
Rule 1.14 Clients with Diminished Capasity
(a) When a client’s capacity to make adequately considered decisions in connection with a representation is diminished, the lawyer shall maintain a normal client-lawyer relationship with the client.
(b) When the lawyer reasonably believes that the client has diminished capacity, is at risk of substantial harm unless action is taken and cannot adequately act in the client’s own interest, the lawyer may take reasonably necessary protective action.
(c) Information relating to the representation of a client with diminished capacity is protected by Rule 1.6. When acting under (b), the lawyer is impliedly authorized under Rule 1.6(a) to reveal information about the client, but only to the extent reasonably necessary to protect the client’s interests.
Tripartite Relationship - Insurer, Insured, Attorney
When hired by an insurance company, the attorney may represent the insured, insurer or both. Most insurers write contracts stating that the insurer controls the defense. If a lawyer is hired by an insurer to defend an insured, the lawyer must not assume the insured read and understood the contract. Rather, he must notify the insured of the limited scope of his representation.
Rule 1.5(a) Fees
(a) A lawyer shall not have an unreasonable fee or an unreasonable amount for expenses. The factors to be considered in determining the reasonableness of a fee include the following:
(1) the time and labor required, the novelty and difficulty of the questions involved, and the skill requisite to perform the legal service properly;
(2) the likelihood, if apparent to the client, that the acceptance of the particular employment will preclude other employment by the lawyer;
(3) the fee customarily charged in the locality for similar legal services;
(4) the amount involved and the results obtained;
(5) the time limitations imposed by the client or by the circumstances;
(6) the nature and length of the professional relationship with the client;
(7) the experience, reputation, and ability of the lawyer or lawyers performing the services; and
(8) whether the fee is fixed or contingent.
Rule 1.15(a) Safekeeping Property
(a) A lawyer shall hold property of clients or third persons separate from the lawyer’s own property. Funds and other property should be safeguarded. Complete records shall be kept by the lawyer and shall be preserved for [five years] after termination
Rule 1.16(a) Declining or Terminating Representation
(a) Except as stated in paragraph (c), a lawyer shall not represent a client or shall withdraw from the representation of a client if:
(1) violation of the rules or other law;
(2) the lawyer’s ability to represent the client is impaired by health; or
(3) the lawyer is discharged.
Rule 1.1 Competence
A lawyer shall provide competent representation. Competent representation requires the legal knowledge, skill, thoroughness and preparation reasonably necessary for the representation.
Rule 1.3 Diligence
A lawyer shall act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing a client.
Rule 1.4(a) Communication
a) A lawyer shall:
(1) promptly inform the client of any decision or circumstance with respect to which the client’s informed consent, as defined in Rule 1.0(e), is required by these Rules;
(2) reasonably consult with the client about the means by which the client’s objectives are to be accomplished;
(3) keep the client reasonably informed about the status of the matter;
(4) promptly comply with reasonable requests for information; and
(5) consult with the client about any relevant limitation on the lawyer’s conduct when the client wants to do something wrong.
Rule 1.9(a) Duties to Former Clients
(a) If a current or prospective client’s interests are materially adverse to a former client in the SSRM, the lawyer may not represent that client, unless the FC gives ICIW.
Rule 1.18(a) Duties to Prospective Client
(a) PC = a person who consults with a lawyer
Rule 1.7 Conflict of Interest: Current Clients
No rep if concurrent conflict
cc = directly adverse or significant risk of material
limitation in rep
Except if
- Lawyer believes he can provide competent and diligent rep to each
- Rep is legal
- Rep is not directly against another client in same litigation and
- Each client gives ICIW
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 44
(c) Inquiry Into Joint Representation.
(1) Joint Representation. Joint representation occurs when:
(A) two or more defendants have been charged jointly under Rule 8(b) or have been joined for trial under Rule 13; and
(B) the defendants are represented by the same counsel, or counsel who are associated in law practice.
(2) Court’s Responsibilities in Cases of Joint Representation. The court must promptly inquire about the propriety of joint representation and must personally advise each defendant of the right to the effective assistance of counsel, including separate representation. Unless there is good cause to believe that no conflict of interest is likely to arise, the court must take appropriate measures to protect each defendant’s right to counsel.
Trilemma
With regard to false statement to a tribunal, the responsibilities of an attorney require a delicate balance of three professional obligations: (1) the lawyer must learn as much about the client’s case as possible in order to be able to represent the client competently (Rule 1.1); (2) the lawyer must keep confidential any private information divulged by the client, with certain exceptions (Rule 1.6); and (3) the lawyer must not knowingly participate in a fraud on the tribunal (Rule 3.3).
3 trumps 1 and 2
Sahl, John P.. Professional Responsibility in Focus (Focus Casebook Series) (p. 368). Wolters Kluwer. Kindle Edition.
Rule 1.11(a) Special Conflicts of Interest for Former and Current Government Officers and Employees
(a) Except as law may otherwise expressly permit, a lawyer who has formerly served as a public officer or employee of the government:
(1) is subject to Rule 1.9(c); and
(2) shall not otherwise represent a client in connection with a matter in which the lawyer participated personally and substantially as a public officer or employee, unless the appropriate government agency gives its informed consent, confirmed in writing, to the representation.
Rule 1.10(a) Imputation of Conflicts of Interest: General Rule
(a) While lawyers are associated in a firm, none of them shall knowingly represent a client when any one of them practicing alone would be prohibited from doing so by Rules 1.7 or 1.9, unless
(1) the prohibition is based upon a personal interest of the disqualified lawyer or
(2) the prohibition is based upon Rule 1.9(a) or (b), and arises out of the disqualified lawyer’s association with a prior firm, and
(i) the disqualified lawyer is timely screened and gets no fee;
(ii) written notice is promptly given to any affected former client to enable the former client to ascertain compliance with the provisions of this Rule, which shall include
- a description of the screening procedures employed;
- a statement of the firm’s and of the screened lawyer’s compliance with these Rules;
- a statement that review may be available before a tribunal; and
- an agreement by the firm to respond promptly to any written inquiries or objections by the former client about the screening procedures; and
(iii) certifications of compliance with these Rules and with the screening procedures are provided to the former client by the screened lawyer and by a partner of the firm
Rule 1.10(b) Imputation of Conflicts of Interest: General Rule
(b) When a lawyer has terminated an association with a firm, the firm is not prohibited from thereafter representing a person with interests materially adverse to those of a client represented by the formerly associated lawyer and not currently represented by the firm, unless
(1) the matter is the same or substantially related to that in which the formerly associated lawyer represented the client; and
(2) any lawyer remaining in the firm has information protected by Rules 1.6 and 1.9(c) that is material to the matter.
(c) A disqualification prescribed by this rule may be waived by the affected client under the conditions stated in Rule 1.7.
(d) The disqualification of lawyers associated in a firm with former or current government lawyers is governed by Rule 1.11.
Rule 1.10(c) Imputation of Conflicts of Interest: General Rule
(c) A disqualification prescribed by this rule may be waived by the affected client under the conditions stated in Rule 1.7.
Rule 1.10(d) Imputation of Conflicts of Interest: General Rule
(d) The disqualification of lawyers associated in a firm with former or current government lawyers is governed by Rule 1.11.
Rule 1.12(a) Former Judge, Arbitrator, Mediator or Other Third-Party Neutral
a) Except as stated in paragraph (d), a lawyer shall not represent anyone in connection with a matter in which the lawyer participated personally and substantially as a judge or other adjudicative officer or law clerk to such a person or as an arbitrator, mediator or other third-party neutral, unless all parties to the proceeding give informed consent, confirmed in writing.
Rule 1.12(b) Former Judge, Arbitrator, Mediator or Other Third-Party Neutral
(b) A lawyer shall not negotiate for employment with any person who is involved as a party or as lawyer for a party in a matter in which the lawyer is participating personally and substantially as a judge or other adjudicative officer or as an arbitrator, mediator or other third-party neutral. A lawyer serving as a law clerk to a judge or other adjudicative officer may negotiate for employment with a party or lawyer involved in a matter in which the clerk is participating personally and substantially, but only after the lawyer has notified the judge or other adjudicative officer.
Rule 1.12(c) Former Judge, Arbitrator, Mediator or Other Third-Party Neutral
(c) If a lawyer is disqualified by paragraph (a), no lawyer in a firm with which that lawyer is associated may knowingly undertake or continue representation in the matter unless:
(1) the disqualified lawyer is timely screened and no fee; and
(2) written notice is promptly given to the parties and any appropriate tribunal to enable them to ascertain compliance with the provisions of this rule.
Rule 1.12(d) Former Judge, Arbitrator, Mediator or Other Third-Party Neutral
(d) An arbitrator selected as a partisan of a party in a multimember arbitration panel is not prohibited from subsequently representing that party.
4 Types of Direct Adversity
- Rep one client and suing them later in an unrelated matter
- Cross-examining a current client for another current client
- Rep a client in a transactional setting and then sue the client in an unrelated matter
- Rep one client against the other in the same litigation (1.7(b)(3))
Substantially Related Under 1.9
same transaction or legal dispute or if there’s substantial risk that confidential info normally obtained in prior rep would help the PC or current client in the matter