Art 37 to 54 Flashcards
Art. 37
Marriages between the following are incestuous and void from the beginning, whether relationship between the parties be legitimate or illegitimate:
(1) Between ascendants and descendants of any degree; and
(2) Between brothers and sisters, whether of the full or half blood.
Art. 38. (public policy)
The following marriages shall be void from the beginning for reasons of public policy:
(1) Between collateral blood relatives, whether legitimate or illegitimate, up to the fourth civil degree;
(2) Between step-parents and step-children;
(3) Between parents-in-law and children-in-law;
(4) Between the adopting parent and the adopted child;
(5) Between the surviving spouse of the adopting parent and the adopted child;
(6) Between the surviving spouse of the adopted child and the adopter;
(7) Between an adopted child and a legitimate child of the adopter;
(8) Between adopted children of the same adopter; and
(9) Between parties where one, with the intention to marry the other, killed that other person’s spouse, or his or her own spouse.
Allowed to marry
1 sister in law and brother in law
2 step brother and step sister
3 guardian and the ward
4 parties who have been convicted of adultery and concubinage
5 adopted and illegitimate child of the adopter
6 adopted and parents or relative of consanguity of the adopter
7 collateral relatives by the half blood
what are the views on the termination of marriage on the affinity prohibition?
relationship by affinity is not terminated with the termination of marriage whether there are children or not in the marriage.
The relationship of the marriage is dissolved if one of the spouses dies and the spouse has no living issues or children. It does not cease if there are living issues of children of the marriage and whose veins the blood of parties are co-mingled since the relation of affinity was continued through the medium of issue of the marriage
followed by the Philippines is the CONTINUING AFFINITY VIEW the death of one’s spouse does not terminate the relationship by affinity regardless of whether or not there are children produced under the marriage
Marriages Between Step-Brothers and Step-Sister
Prior to the effectivity of the Family Code, step-brothers and stepsisters are prohibited from marrying each other.325 This prohibition, however, was eliminated under the Family Code since they are not related at
all, either by blood or by affinity. Consequently, marriages between stepbrothers and step-sisters are now valid. In the example above, the marriage between C and W is a valid marriage.
Subsequent Marriage Without Judicial Declaration of
Nullity of Previous Marriage
Under Article 40 of the Family Code, for purposes of remarriage, there must first be a prior judicial declaration of nullity of a previous marriage, though void, before a party can enter into a second marriage, otherwise, the subsequent marriage is in itself void ab initio.
Void Marriages under Article 38(7); Between Adopted
Child and illegitimate Child of the Adopter
the marriage between an adopted child and an illegitimate child of the adopter is a valid marriage.
adopted childs prohibited from marrying the
following:
(1) the adopter;
(2) the surviving spouse of the adopter;
(3) the legitimate children of the adopter; and
(4) the other adopted children of the same adopter.
adopter is prohibited from
marrying the following:
(1) the adopted child; and
(2) the surviving spouse of the adopted child
August 3, 1988
Article 40 is applicable to remarriages entered into after the effectivity of the Family Code on August 3, 1988 regardless of the date of the first marriage.”
present state of jurisprudence (wrong)
one must first secure a final judicial declaration of nullity of the previous marriage before he is freed from the marital bond of the previous marriage and that if he fails to secure such judicial declaration of nullity and contracts a second marriage, then the second marriage becomes bigamous.
correct jurisprudence
the Family Code does not consider a subsequent marriage entered into in violation of Article 40 as bigamous.
for review
In the first place, the Family Code does not consider a subsequent marriage entered into in violation of Article 40 as bigamous. As explained earlier, a marriage which is declared void ab initio under Article 40, in relation to Article 50, is distinct and separate from the marriage declared void under Article 35(4). In other words, a subsequent marriage contracted in violation of Article 40 is not a bigamous marriage under Article 35(4). A contrary interpretation may not be sustained since it will render nugatory the explicit terms of Article 50, which makes applicable paragraph (2) of Article 43 to void marriages under Article 40. Pursuant to Article 50, the effects of the termination of a subsequent marriage under Article 41, specifically those provided in paragraphs (2), (3), (4) and (5) of Article 43, are applicable pro hac vice to void marriages under Article 40. One of such effects is the dissolution of the absolute community or the conjugal partnership, as the case may be. In other words, in a void marriage under Article 40, the property regime of the union is not governed by Article 148 of the Family Code. On the other hand, the property regime of a bigamous marriage under Article 35(4) is governed by Article 148. As explained by the Supreme Court, Article 148 refers to the property regime of bigamous marriages, adulterous relationships, relationships in a state of concubinage, relationships where both man and woman are married to other persons, multiple alliances of the same married man.383 This being the case, it is submitted that the Family Code itself does not classify as bigamous a subsequent marriage contracted in violation of Article 40. Consequently, the ruling of the Supreme Court in Cariño vs. Cariño applying the provisions of Article 148 to a void marriage under Article 40 appears to be erroneous as it contradicts the explicit mandate of Article 43(2), in relation to Article 50.
civil law rule
the purpose of the law is to clarify the status of the subsequent marriage as void ab initio
Art. 41
A marriage contracted by any person during subsistence of a previous marriage shall be null and void, unless before the celebration of the subsequent marriage, the prior spouse had been absent for four consecutive years and the spouse present has a well-founded belief that the absent spouse was already dead. In case of disappearance where there is danger of death under the circumstances set forth in the provisions of Article 391 of the Civil Code, an absence of only two years shall be sufficient.
For the purpose of contracting the subsequent marriage under the preceding paragraph the spouse present must institute a summary proceeding as provided in this Code for the declaration of presumptive death of the absentee, without prejudice to the effect of reappearance of the absent spouse
declaration of presumptive death
-four consecutive years and the spouse present had a well-founded belief that the absent spouse was already dead.
-two years - danger of death (provisions of Article 391 of the Civil Code)
(1) A person on board a vessel lost during a sea voyage, or an aeroplane which is missing, who has not been heard of for four years since the loss of the vessel or aeroplane;
(2) A person in the armed forces who has taken part in war, and has been missing for four years;
(3) a person who has been in danger of death under other circumstances and his existence has not been known for four years.
Exception: Subsequent Bigamous Marriage under Article 41
(a) The prior spouse of the contracting party must have been absent for four consecutive years, or two years where there is danger of death under the circumstances stated in Article 391 of the Civil Code at the time of disappearance;
(b) The spouse present has a well-founded belief that the absent
spouse is already dead; and
(c) There is a judicial declaration of presumptive death of the absentee for which purpose the spouse present can institute a summary proceeding in court to ask for that declaration.
Judicial Declaration of Presumptive Death FC vs NC
Under the Family Code, there must be a judicial declaration of presumptive death; otherwise the subsequent marriage is void ab initio for being a bigamous marriage.
Under the Civil Code, however, a judicial declaration of presumptive death is not necessary as long as the prescribed period of absence is met. Thus, if the subsequent marriage took place prior to the effectvity of the Family Code, the same is considered valid notwithstanding the absence of a judicial declaration of presumptive death.
Requisites for Declaration of Presumptive Death
Republic vs. Nolasco
(a) That the absent spouse has been missing for four consecutive
years, or two consecutive years if the disappearance occurred where there is danger of death under the circumstances laid down in Article 391, Civil Code;
(b) That the present spouse wishes to remarry;
(c) That the present spouse has a well-founded belief that the
absentee spouse is dead; and
(d) That the present spouse files a summary proceeding for the
declaration of presumptive death of the absentee.
reappearance procedure
- the presumption of death of the absentee is rendered ineffective.
- affidavit of reappearance of the absentee spouse is required to be recorded in the civil registry of the residence of the parties to the subsequent marriage.
- if reappearance if not disputed automatic termination of the subsequent marriage
- resumption of all the rights, obligations and effects of the previous marriage.
- the subsequent marriage, though contracted during the subsistence of the previous marriage, is exceptionally recognized as valid if both parties thereto did not act in bad faith.
effects of reappearance on subsequent spouse
once the termination of the subsequent marriage is “automatic” and without need of judicial intervention, the second spouse (of the spouse present), barring the existence of other impediments, may immediately contract another marriage since the requirements in Article 52 of the Family Code do not apply in the case of extra-judicial termination of the subsequent marriage under Article 41.
Who Can File Affidavit of Reappearance
The affidavit of reappearance required in Article 42 may be executed and filed by “any interested person,” and not only by the reappearing spouse.
the second spouse may terminate the marriage by simply recording the required affidavit of reappearance, without prejudice to the fact of reappearance being judicially determined in case such fact is disputed.
children under art 41.
- considered legitimate.
custody and support of such children - the subject of an agreement between the spouses to the subsequent marriage
Dissolution and Liquidation of Property Regime art 41
the absolute community or the conjugal partnership, as the case may be, shall be dissolved and liquidated
-bad faith spouse his or her share of the net profits of the community property or conjugal partnership property shall be forfeited in favor of the common children
If no children -
Effect on Donation Propter Nuptias art 41
- remain valid.
- if the donee contracted the marriage in bad faith, such donations made to said
donee are revoked by operation of law. - if both in bad faith - all donations by reason of marriage are likewise revoked by operation of law
Effect on Designation of One Spouse as Beneficiary in
Insurance Policy art 41
bad faith - the innocent spouse has the right to revoke such designation even if the designation be stipulated as irrevocable upon the termination of the subsequent marriage by reason of the recording of the affidavit of
reappearance of the absentee spouse
Disqualification to Inherit From Innocent Spouse art 41
- Upon the termination of the subsequent marriage, the parties thereto
cease to be a legal heir of each other
bad faith - is also disqualified to inherit from the innocent spouse by testate succession.
both spouses in bad faith - testamentary dispositions made by one in favor of the other are revoked by operation of law.
Where Both Parties Acted In Bad Faith art 41
under the Family Code, if only one of the parties to the subsequent marriage acted in bad faith, whether it is the spouse present or
the other party, the subsequent marriage remains valid
It may then be asked, is it possible for the spouse present to contract the marriage in bad faith even if he or she obtains a judicial declaration of presumptive death of the absentee prior to the celebration of
the subsequent marriage?
the existence of a judicial declaration of presumptive death is not a guarantee that the spouse present has acted in good faith in contracting the marriage
- it is possible that after obtaining such declaration, but prior to the celebration of the subsequent marriage, the spouse present will become aware that the absentee is still
alive.
- the law requires that the good faith should last up to the time of the celebration of the subsequent marriage.
both parties in bad faith
their marriage is considered bigamous under Article 35 (4) and they shall be liable for the crime of bigamy notwithstanding the existence of the judicial declaration of presumptive death.
- the existence of such judicial declaration does not immunize the parties from liability for the crime of
bigamy.
voidable marriage
s considered valid and produces all its civil effects until it is set aside by
final judgment of a competent court in an action for annulment.
Annulment
is the judicial or legal process of invalidating a voidable marriage.
Characteristics of Voidable Marriages
(1) It is valid until otherwise declared by the court;
(2) In a voidable marriage, the defect which serves as ground for annulment must be in existence at the time of the celebration of the marriage;
(3) A voidable marriage cannot be assailed collaterally except in a direct proceeding;
(4) A voidable marriage can be assailed only during the lifetime of the parties and not after death of either, in which case the parties and their offspring will be left as if the marriage had been perfectly valid;
(5) Only the parties to a voidable marriage can assail it;
(6) The action for annulment is subject to prescription;
(7) The defect in a voidable marriage is generally subject to ratification except for the grounds mentioned in paragraphs (5) and (6) of Article 45, which are not subject to ratification.
**(5) physically incapable of consummating -incurable; or
**(6) sexually-transmissible - incurable.