Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Philosophy > Arguments from reason for the existence of God > Flashcards

Arguments from reason for the existence of God Flashcards

1
Q

What book does Anselm’s argument come from

A

Proslogian

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is significant about Anslems proslogian

A

Written with the purpose of a prayer expressing love and reason for believing in god, not written as an argument to prove gods existence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What does Anselms argument rely on

A

Reason and logic, depends on valid premises leading to a reasonable deduction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is Anselm’s definition for God

A

A being than which nothing greater can be conceived

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What biblical verse does Anselm use

A

The fool in psalms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

In re

A

in reality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

In intellectu

A

in the mind

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is Anselm’s example to show existence in reality is better than in the mind

A

A painter can imagine his next masterpiece but it only becomes a great master piece when it is drawn and put into reality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What does Anselm argue is greater existence

A

things that exist in both the mind and in reality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Explains Anselm’s use of the fool as an example

A

The fool would agree with Anselm’s definition of god so god exists in his mind there is a universal idea of what a god is. So he always exists in the mind even if some may deny his existence in reality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the contradiction Anselm shows in the fools statement

A

Things that exist in reality are greater than in the mind, so how if the god only exists in the mind as the fool said he cant be the greatest being that can be conceived

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Anselms conclusion

A

God must exist in reality because he exists in the mind and is the greatest being conceived.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Strengths of Anselm’s Ontological Argument

A
  • Anselms definition of God is agreeable for all people
  • Apriori argument so is logically and reasonably based
  • Valid to say existence in reality is greater than in the mind
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Where is the logical fallacy in Anselms argument

A

In jumping from it being greater to exist in reality to god must exist, leap in logic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Weaknesses of Anselms Ontological argument

A
  • How can we come up with a definition of god
  • Aposteriori arguments use better inductive logic
  • Existence in the mind is better, like a flying carpet, we can imagine things that don’t exist
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the fools quote

A

The fool has said in his heart there is no god

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Who criticised Anselms first formulation

A

Gaunilo

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What was Gaunilos book

A

on behalf of the fool

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What part of Anselms logic did Gaunilo disagree with

A

Having an understanding of something in your mind must lead to it existing in reality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Explain Gaunilos example

A

You can picture a perfect lost island that no one has ever found, exists in ones mind. Therefore it must exist because it is the greatest conceivable island so exists in mind and in reality
—–> But it doesn’t exist as it is imaginary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Gaunilos conclusion

A

Anselms reasoning only defines god into existence as can be done with any imaginary concept, it doesn’t prove his existence, just because something is in the mind doesn’t mean it must exist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

How does Gaunilo also criticise Anselms reliance on reason

A

relying on reason alone has no quantifiable evidence of gods existence, difficult to even have an idea of god in the mind

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What is Anselms response to Gaunilo in his second formulation

A

He defines existence as necessary and contingent, he states that the island is contingent so can not exist but god is necessary so must exist, as necessary existence is greater

24
Q

Necessary

A

Self existent as has no cause of being, cannot not exist

25
Q

Contingent

A

Can not exist and brought into existence by something else

26
Q

What is a critique of necessary existence

A

This is an empirically and rationally invalid idea because necessary existence has no evidence from the human world or mind. humans can only grasp cause and effect, a being with no cause is physically impossible idea

27
Q

Strengths of Gaunilo

A
  • Possible to imagine something in your mind that deosnt exist in reality
  • Anselms defines existence, this is possible for any concept
  • enforces a need for empirical evidence existence arguments
28
Q

Weaknesses of Gaunilo

A
  • Apriori arguments work in this sense that if you agree with the original definition then the rest of the premises make logical sense
  • Gaunilo proposes more empirical arguments but these have their own criticisms, fallacy of composition, assuming purpose
29
Q

How does Platinga criticise Gaunilo

A

The island has no intrinsic maxim, something can always be added to improve it so it isnt the greatest conceivable, whereas god has an intrinsic maxim as he is perfect.

30
Q

How does Malcolm support Anselms second formulation

A

If god doesn’t exist then he cant come into existence as he is necessary, god existing then would require a cause making him a limited being with something more powerful than him. this contradicts with him being the greatest being so therefore he must exist as the greatest possible being

31
Q

How would Flew criticise Anselms second formulation

A

He would argue this dies the death of a thousand qualifications as Anselm changes his argument to a state where it cant be verified in necessary existence so is meaningless

32
Q

How does Russell criticsie Anselm

A

Existence is only meaningful if we refer to an instance of something, some empirical evidence.

He also uses quantum physics to disprove necessary existence

33
Q

What id Descartes definition for god

A

Supremely Perfect Being

34
Q

What is a predicate

A

Essential Characteristic

35
Q

What does Descartes argue are the predicates of a supremely perfect being

A
  • Omnipotence
  • Omnibenevelonce
  • Existence
36
Q

What is Descartes Conclusion

A

If god is a supremely perfect being then he must exist as that is one of the predicates of a supremely perfect being

37
Q

What are Descartes examples

A

A triangles predicates being three sides, angles equivalent to 180 degrees, these cant be separated from the triangle as existence can be separated from god

Mountain and a valley cant be separate

38
Q

What is the key idea or premise of priori ontological arguments

A

The initial definition

39
Q

What are criticisms of the premise of an priori argument

A
  • difficult to define a metaphysical concept like god
  • By agreeing with a definition of god, this doesn’t prove his existence
40
Q

What is Descartes other argument

A
  • He has idea of supremely perfect being in his mind
  • He is imperfect so cant come up with supremely perfect being so this idea came form somewhere else
  • concept must have originated from the perfect being therefore god must exists
41
Q

What is the logical fallacy with all arguments for existence with god

A

They all jump from statements about a designers or perfect necessary being to the god that they want to picture of classical theism, this perfect designer or being could be anything

42
Q

Strengths of Descartes

A
  • existence is a predicate as it is part of the essence of a truly perfect being
  • supports the fact existence cant be operated form god
  • God exists is an analytic statement, because existence is an intrinsic definition of god
43
Q

Criticisms of Descartes

A
  • Existence isn’t a predicate
  • You can think of a triangle not existing, so you can think of a god not existing
  • God exists is a synthetic statement, needs an instance to prove its existence, cannot be proves by reason alone in an ontological argument
44
Q

How does Russell criticise Descartes

A

Can describe all the characteristics of cows and unicorns, then saying it exists doesn’t give the other any new properties that the other lacks

45
Q

How does Swinburne criticise Descartes

A

Statements about god are syllogisms, men exist, Santa is a man, so Santa exists. logical error as existence isnt a predicate, an invalid conclusion can be drawn from to statements

46
Q

How Hume criticise Descartes

A

To prove an objects existence we must look outside the object, proving existence isnt an intrinsic predicate, existence is only a thing because of the world around it

47
Q

Steps of Anselms second formulation

A
  • God exists or he does not exist
  • If god exists he must be necessary
  • If he doesn’t exist this is logically impossible as necessary beings cannot not exist
  • God isnt logically impossible
  • Gods existence must be necessary and he must exist
48
Q

Analytic statements

A

Statement that contains its verifiable truth within it

49
Q

Synthetic statements

A

Statement that needs external evidence to verify it

50
Q

What is Kants argument about existence being a synthetic statement

A

Existence must be proved by external verification, it isn’t intrinsic, Descartes triangle may be logically necessary to have three sides, but it isnt logically necessary for it to exist. Therefore one can reject god existing as it isn’t an essential predicate

51
Q

What is Kants argument about real or determining predicates

A

These predicates add something to the existence of an object, saying what colour it is. Saying something exists doesn’t add to the characteristics of an object so isnt a predicate

52
Q

Explain Kants 100 thalers example

A

100 real thalers don’t contain any more value than the concept in the mind of 100 possible thalers, therefore showing how existence doesn’t add any value or new properties to something

53
Q

Strengths of Kant

A
  • Existence does need synthetic verification, cant just say something exists
  • exsietcen isnt a predicate as it doesn’t add anything new to a concept
  • By defining a concept this doesn’t bring it into existence, as we can think of things with definitions existing but also not existing
54
Q

Weaknesses of Kant

A
  • Apriori arguments follow a line of logical reasoning, cant be reduced with synthetic reasoning
  • Gods definition includes existence, to be perfect one must exist
  • God is logically necessary and this is greater existence so god must exist, logically necessary beings or predicates must exist
55
Q

What is one of the mina questions raised by this topic

A

Is existence in the mind really existence, what is existence

56
Q

How does Gasendi criticise Descartes

A

Perfection can only be discussed for something that exists
——> this is wrong as perfection is impossible so cant be discussed for something that exists

57
Q

How does Malcolm criticsie Kant

A

Kant talks about contingent existence which he is correct isnt a predicate, but gods existence is necessary which is a predicate.

Philosophy (9 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions