arguments based on reason - ontological Flashcards

1
Q

ontological meaning

A

ontos (being) logos (study of)
the study of being

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

type of knowledge and argument used (2 things)

A

a priori knowledge
deductive argument

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

a priori

A

arguments based on reason

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

deductive argument

A

the conclusion follows the premise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

the first and best known argument was made by

A

St. Anselm of Canterbury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

when did St. Anselm make his ontological argument

A

11th century CE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

the passage from the Bible that Anselms ontological argument reflects on

A

“fools say in their hearts “there is no God”” Psalm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what does St Anselm define God as

A

a being than which no greater can be conceived

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Anselms premise one

A

God is a being “that than which no greater can be conceived”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Anselms premise two

A

God may exist either in the mind alone (in intellectu) or in reality (in re) as well

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

anselms premise three

A

something which exists in reality and in the mind is greater than something which exists in the mind alone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

anselms premise four

A

god is the greatest conceivable being so he would exist both in the mind and reality. Therefore God exists.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

anselm’s ‘the fool’

A

‘the fool’ who does not believe God exists in reality, but still has the idea of god in their mind.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

anselms painter analogy

A

analogy of the painter:
a painter has an idea of what he is going to paint before he creates the painting - which then exists in the mind and in reality. This shows that existing in the mind and reality are different

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

reductio ad absurdum

A

‘reduction to the absurd’ in this argument we begin by assuming the opposite of the claim we want to prove and show that from this claim something absurd follows. this shows that the opposite of the claim we want to argue for is false, and that the claim we want to argue for is true.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what is a predicate

A

a description or attribute that tells us something about the subject

17
Q

predicate example (bachelor and god exists)

A

a bachelor is an unmarried man
subject - bachelor
predicate - unmarried, man
“god exists”
subject - god
predicate - exists

18
Q

who was guanilo

A

monk

19
Q

title of guanilos book

A

“on behalf of the fool”

20
Q

guanilos three ways why existence is not a predicate of god

A

gossip
defining things in to existence
guanilos island

21
Q

guanilos gossip argument

A

all sorts of things in my mind do not exist in reality
if someone hears something from gossip, it is unreliable and tricks you

22
Q

guanilos defining things in to existence

A

you cannot demonstrate the existence of something simply by having an idea about it
just because anselm described God as that than which nothing greater can be conceived, does not mean that God is this
anselm cannot define god into existence

23
Q

guanilos island

A

imagine a perfect island, just because you imagine it does not mean it exists in reality

24
Q

guanilo applying reducto ad absurdum against anselms argument

A

if anselms proof for the existence of a GCB was sound then we could give sound proof for the existence of a greatest conceivable island
we cannot give sound proof for the existence of a greatest conceivable island
therefore anselms proof for the existence of a greatest conceivable being is not sound

25
Q

anselms reply to guanilo

A

god isnt a perfect thing like an island, God is THE perfect thing.
god is not contingent like an island, God has necessary existence, since it is greater to be a necessary being than a contingent one

26
Q

alvin plantinga’s comment on islands

A

islands have no “intrinsic maximum”

27
Q

kants objection

A

existence is not a predicate

28
Q

kant: why is existence not a predicate

A

you would not describe something as having existence when describing them

29
Q

kants view on the statement “God is omnipotent”

A

‘is’ is not a predicate - it does not add anything
‘omnipotent’ is a predicate - it adds a quality to god

30
Q

analytic and synthetic statements

A

analytic statements are definitions - facts that cannot be disputed
synthetic statements need proof they are true - statements about existence are synthetic
example ‘god exists’ is a synthetic statement and needs to be verified
therefore the statement ‘god is omnipotent’ is necessary for the existence of God

31
Q

descartes definition of god

A

God is the supremely perfect being

32
Q

descartes on existence is a predicate and therefore god must exist

A

to be supremely perfect, something must exist
existence is part of the perfection of God which cannot lack (predicate)
therefore God must exist

33
Q

descartes triangle

A

a triangle has three sides - truth of mathematics
this is necessary existence
just as Gods existence is necessary

34
Q

russells argument against anselm

A

existence is not a predicate. if it was:
eg men exist
santa is a man
therefore santa exists
this is wrong therefore existence is not a predicate