Argument Based on Reason Flashcards
What does teleological argument mean?
It is the name for a number of arguments which attempt to prove His existence through the reasonableness of his existence. They look at observable things on micro-cosmic and macro-cosmic levels.
What is Plato’s teleological argument?
In his book the republic, he argues that a being of supreme intelligence called the demiurge created the universe. It did not have the ex nihlo power but used the existing materials to create a beautiful and orderly world.
What book did Aristotle write of the prime mover in?
Metaphysics.
What book did St Thomas Aquinas refer to when explaining how God made the universe?
Metaphysics.
What did Cicero come up with?
His own teleological argument. He said that a creator must exist due to the divine reason found throughout the universe
What quote can be used from St Paul to support the teleological argument?
“For since the creation of the world, Gods invisible powers - his eternal power and divine nature - have been clearly seen, being understood from what is made, so that people are without excuse.”
What did St Augustine say that can be used to support teleological arguments?
He said that the worlds well ordered changes and movements together with the beautiful appearance of all things provides strong evidence that God exists.
What does design qua purpose mean?
Aquinas term for saying the way the parts of the universe fit together for a purpose.
What does design qua regularity mean?
Aquinas term for the way that order and regularity in the world are proof of a designer.
What is Aquinas argument generally called?
The fifth way.
What type of argument is a teleological argument?
A posteriori
What is the fifth way argument?
The idea that it is observable to see that there is a creator and that everything has a telos. For example, you would be able to presume that an arrow is created and fired by some being of intelligence and knowledge with a purpose. Things like cells work towards their telos without being aware that they are doing so, proving that they are being guided by something.
What analogy did Paley come up with?
The watch analogy.
What type of theology is Paley’s theology?
Natural and revealed theology.
What natural evidence did Paley use to illustrate his argument?
He looked at the different parts of the eyes and how they all work together in order to allow someone to see to prove that they were all designed for a particular purpose and therefore must have a designer behind it.
Why does Paley say that it does not matter that we have not observed God?
Just because you have not seen a watchmaker before does not mean that you would presume that there wasn’t one.
What is Aquinas theology referred as too?
Thomism
Why does Paley say that flaws in nature don’t disprove his argument?
If you found a broken watch you would still presume it was created. Like wise, there may also be superfluous parts.
What does anthropomorphism mean?
Giving God human characteristics in order to understand Him.
How did Paley rebut the idea that the watch just came about through chance?
The parts are too complicated and intricate for that to be possible.
How does Paley predict a response to evolutionary theory?
He says that no matter how far the chain of reproducing watches went we would still presume that they were designed. Hence, it does not matter that plant and animal species reproduce, they are still in need of a designer.
When was Hume’s critism of teleological arguments published?
23 years before Paley’s was.
Why does Hume say that even if the design argument works it doesn’t prove the existence of God?
All it would prove would be a designer, not the existence of the God of classical theism. For example, there could be multiple designers.
How does Hume critise the idea that we know a something is designed?
We know that a watch has been designed because we are familiar with the process of watch making, however we have never seen a universe designed so it is illogical to presume that it was designed.
What does Hume point to be logically wrong with a teleological analogy?
If a watch was designed because everything needs a purpose then the mind who created it would also need a purpose which would result in a infinite regression.
Why does Hume believe that teleological arguments lead us to anthropomorphize God?
When you compare a watch to a universe they are incomparable, therefore doing this may lead you to make the same mistake with a designer and God, God is transcendent so shouldn’t be compared to a human.