Areas of difficulty Flashcards
What is the difference between a police interview and police routine questioning?
- Police interview is of a suspect about their alleged involvement in an offence - usually takes place after arrest
- Routine questioning is the police asking an individual details about an incident to gain further information
Can a confession given during routine police questioning be admissible?
The general rule is a confession is admissible if relevant provided no exclusions under s76 or s78 apply
When conducting a routine questioning, the police do not have to comply with the interview requirements under PACE
When does the business document exception apply for admissible hearsay?
A business document can be admitted as hearsay if the document was created in:
- the course of profession, trade, business or other occupation
- the person who supplies the information has personal knowledge of the matter; and
- the person who receives the information does so in the course of a trade, business, profession or other occupation
What happens if a conflict of interest arises when a solicitor is acting for two clients (co-defendants)?
Cease acting for both
If a solicitor acts for two clients (because there is no conflict of interest or significant risk of one or because the exceptions under Rule 6.2 of the Code are relied on) and then a conflict arises, the solicitor must stop acting for one of the clients.
But they may need to cease acting for both because the duty to disclose relevant information under 6.4 may clash with the duty of confidentiality under 6.3 to former clients
In what circumstances is a co-defendant competent and compellable?
A co-defendant is neither competent nor compellable as a witness for the prosecution, unless they are no longer a defendant (e.g., they plead guilty)
Does a previous conviction amount to bad character evidence?
Yes, a previous conviction amounts to bad character under s98
- need to see if there is a gateway to admit it
What is the position on taking intimate samples of a suspect?
- the suspect must consent
- the taking of the sample must be authorised by an inspector or above
- authority and consent must be in writing
Reasonable force cannot be used
What is required for adverse inferences under s36 and s37 to be drawn at trial?
For these adverse inferences to be drawn - the police officer must give a special warning and a caution before asking questions
The jury cannot draw an adverse inference if the police do not give the special warning at the time of interview
- s36 (object/mark) and s37 (presence at scene) arise from arrest
- there is no requirement for reasonableness (unlike s34)
What are the requirements for a properly conducted interview?
- Must take place in an interview room in a designated police station (according to PACE recommendations)
- is recorded
- done under caution
- in the presence of a lawyer - asks if suspect wants solicitor present
- gives client option to suspend interview and have further consultations with solicitor
What happens if a suspect refuses to have an interview in the interview room?
- an interview does not have to be conducted with suspect’s consent and if necessary can be done in the cell room if the suspect refuses to be taken to the interview room
Must still comply with PACE Code C: done under caution, sufficient disclosure, asked if suspect wants solicitor present
What is Sentencing Guideline’s approach to sentencing?
- Determine offence seriousness
- Consider aggravating factors
- Consider mitigating factors
- Consider any assistance given to prosecution
- Consider appropriate reduction for any guilty plea
- Consider totality
- Appropriate ancillary orders must be considered
Deliver sentence and give reasons
What powers do the police have under PACE Code D to get fingerprints?
The police can use reasonable force
- this can be done where the suspect refuses to consent
- fingerprints are not an intimate sample - meaning reasonable force can be used to get them
When must the first detention review take place and by whom?
- suspect’s detention must be reviewed by the review officer (officer of at least the rank of inspector not involved in the case)
- the first review must take place no more than 6 hours after the custody officer first authorised the detention
Relevant time for review = time at which detention was authorised
What is the maximum time in policy custody without charge (without extensions)?
24 hours
- starts from relevant time = arrival at police station
What are the powers to extend detention?
Detention can be extended for a further 12 hours, taking maximum period of detention to 36 hours
- Investigating officer request extension of time in detention from the superintendent for up to 36 hours
- authorised by superintendent and an indictable offence