arcl midterm Flashcards
list the 4 major periods in the history of archaeology
speculation
exploration
explanation
interpretation
describe the speculation phase (15th to 19th cent)
opinion without data
People see what they expect to see; bring preconceived notions to their “discoveries”
Ex. myth of the moundbuilders
Antiquarians collecting objects; cabinets of curiosity
Some excavations did take place: stonehenge, pompeii
describe the exploration phase (1910s to 1950s)
Coincides with the emergence of other disciplines:
Biology: speciation, taxonomy, evolution
Geology: age of the earth, uniformitarianism
Uniformitarianism: stratification is due to slow moving forces acting over long time frames
Material culture: found associated with extinct species in ancient geological strata
describe the explanation phase (1960s to 1980s)
Mid 20th century movement toward explanation via the scientific method
Make observations from data
Propose explanations/hypothesize
Develop testable predictions/test hypotheses, collect more data (experimentation)
Use resilient hypotheses to form general explanations (theories)
Goal: to bring explanatory rigor to a social science
describe the interpretation phase (1980s to present)
Originally a rejection of scientific archaeology, now a synthesis of science and social science:
A complex subject
Uncertainty about universal explanations (vulnerable to ethnocentrism)
Expectation that dynamics of power were manifest in archaeological explanations
People are unpredictable in important ways; data keeps disproving hypothesis
Archaeologists are vulnerable to ethnocentrism
Archaeological reconstructions are often similar to archaeological cultural expectations
Goal: understanding through more representative data/ better methods
Post Processual archaeology: critiques biases within the scientific process, emphasizes the subjectivity of archaeological interpretations, more focus on gender, identity, politics, human agency
Dorothy Garrod
one of the first to study the near-east systematically
exploration phase
General Augustus Lane Pitt-Rivers
excavator of Cranborne Chase, UK and pioneer in recording techniques (based off his military experience)
exploration phase
Alfred Kidder
cultural chronology techniques to make cross-sectional diagrams; cultural chronology based on artifact and architectural styles (1915-29)
exploration phase
Christian Jergen Thompson
develops the “three age system” to classify antiquities chronologically (1836): stone age, bronze age, iron age
exploration phase
Marie Wormington
Pioneering archaeologist of North American Paleoindian periods
Explanation phase
Lewis Binford
proposed that artifacts be examined in their cultural contexts and interpreted as reflections of tech, society, and belief systems
Change from thinking about things to thinking from things
The “new archaeology”
explanation phase
Walter Libbey
invented radiocarbon dating
explanation phase
Binford
positivism
Ian Hodder
emphasis on subjectivity of archaeological interpretations
interpretation phase
Key methods during the exploration phase
Data recording and management: Provenience: spatial context/mapping
Periodization: major stanzas in history: technological/subsistence
Classification: Patterns in things (material, morphology) = history and culture
Sampling: Patterns emerge with more data
Key methods during the explanation phase
Radiocarbon dating: radioactive isotopes; revolutionized chronometry
Zooarchaeology: animal bones; foundations of economics
Quantitative methods: statistics; patterns and confidence
Ethnoarchaeology: middle range theory; statistics and dynamics
Key methods during the interpretation phase
Representation: rediscovery of female and indigenous scholars, evidence for assumptions
Theorizing: complex interactions between meaning/culture/thing
Refined and expanded methods: especially via computation, visualization, chemistry
Context: legislation (ex. NAGPRA)
In practice: Reflexivity, Debates between stakeholders, Research partnerships
paradigm
The overarching framework, often unstated, for understanding a research problem; Working across paradigms can be more complicated but more well-rounded; The culture of research at a certain period of time
Culture-history paradigm
exploration phase
Goal: define historical societies into distinct ethnic and cultural groupings according to their material culture
Highly descriptive and comparative
Invention, diffusion, and migration is seen as drivers of cultural change and evolution
Nationalistic political agenda involved in this paradigm
Very comparative
Processual paradigm
explanation phase
goal: explain human behaviour using a scientific approach
Explains social, economic and cultural change as adaptations to material conditions
Emphasizes evolutionary generalizations, downplays importance of the individual
View culture from a systematic perspective, adaptive approach to human culture
Attempts to remain ethically and politically neutral
Attempts to come up with universal laws for human cultures/ behaviours (impossible)
Processualism: think Binford, positivism, science
processual vs post-processual
- deductive logic, generalizations, adaptive
- humanistic, ideational, multiple perspectives
culture
An integrated system of beliefs, traditions, and customs that govern or influence a person’s behavior. Culture is learned, shared by members of a group, and based on the ability to think in terms of symbols.
Archaeology considers 2 cultural frames:
The people being studied
The archaeologists
adaptive perspective on culture
emphasis on technology, ecology, demography, and economics as the key factors defining human behaviour
ideational perspective on culture
focuses on ideas, symbols, and mental structures as driving forces in shaping human behaviour
describe the scientific method
Define a relevant problem
Establish one or more hypotheses
Determine the empirical implications of the hypotheses
Collect appropriate data
Test the hypothesis by comparing these data with the expected implications
Reject, revise, and/or restest hypotheses as necessary
inductive reasoning
working from specific observations towards more general hypotheses
a bottom-up approach (data - patterns and analysis - conclusions)
Inductive reasoning takes you from the specific to the general,
deductive reasoning
reasoning from theory to account for specific observational or experimental results
top-down (theory - data - conclusion)
you make inferences by going from general premises to specific conclusions
low level theory
Data and obersvations
Observations and interpretations that emerge from hands-on archaeological field and lab work
Begins with archaeological objects and generates relevant facts or data about those objects
Data: relevant observations made on objects that then serve as the basis for study and discussion
Survey, excavation