Architecture Compliance This

Question 1

The implementation has no features in common with the architecture specification (so the question of conformance
does not arise).

Answer 1

Irrelevant

Question 2

The implementation has some features in common with the
architecture specification, and those common features are
implemented in accordance with the specification. However,
some features in the architecture specification are not
implemented, and the implementation has other features
that are not covered by the specification

Answer 2

Consistent:

Question 3

Some features in the architecture specification are not implemented, but all features implemented are covered by the specification, and in accordance with it.

Answer 3

Compliant:

Question 4

There is full correspondence between architecture specification and implementation. All specified features are implemented in accordance with the specification, and there are no features implemented that are not covered by the specification.

Answer 4

Fully Conformant:

Question 5

Some features in the architecture specification are implemented not in accordance with the specification.

Answer 5

Non-conformant:

Question 6

The phrase “in accordance with means

Answer 6

■ Supports the stated strategy and future directions
■ Adheres to the stated standards (including syntax and semantic rules specified)
■ Provides the stated functionality
■ Adheres to the stated principles; for example:
— Open wherever possible and appropriate
— Re-use of component building blocks wherever possible and appropriate

Question 7

What is used to check the compliance of a specific project against established architectural criteria, spirit, and business objectives.

A formal process for such reviews normally forms the core of an Enterprise Architecture Compliance strategy.

Answer 7

An Architecture Compliance review