Arbitration Flashcards

1
Q

§ 301 LMRA

A

Primary source for resolving labor dispute

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

can anyone be an arbitrator?

A

yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Other two arbitration variations

A

Administrative/regulatory (federal statutes) and family, public sector (state law)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Top 5 private dispute resolution service providers

A

AAA

JAMS

CPR

FMCS

NAA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Three Primary Arbitration Variations

A
  1. Labor management (unions-employer) (National Labor Relations Act)
  2. Commercial Setting (business non-union employees, consumers, construction, leases) (FAA and Forced Arbitration Agreements)
  3. International Disputes
    (New York Convention)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Key Features in Comparison with Litigation

A
  1. Private dispute resolution services
  2. Parties select an arbitrator
  3. Much less or no discovery, pre-trial practice, dispositive motions and pleadings, summary judgement
  4. Relaxed rules of evidence
  5. Written opinions in only limited instances
  6. Enforcement/deferential review
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Advantages of Arbitration

A

Expertise of arbitrator

Speed and Expense

Accessibility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Disadvantages ** FINISH

A

Lack of regulation and credentials of arbitrators

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Hearing Process

A

Attorneys may be present

Witnesses

Exhibits admitted into evidence

Transcripts at some proceedings

Post hearing briefs (expensive)

Written awards

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Which law deals with the enforcement of agreement to arbitrate?

A

Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) § 2 or NLRA § 301/LMRA § 301

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Which laws deal with enforcement of Arbitral Awards

A

FAA § 10

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Wilko v. Swan (1953)

A

Supreme Court Decision - Overturned

Facts: Customers of securities brokerage firm was damages under SA §14 - alleged that the firm made a false representation and provided false info. Forced arbitration clause.

Rule: Arbitration clauses can not be enforced because there is a right to a judicial forum that can not be waived.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp. 1991

A

Supreme Court Case - Show a Shift in Judicial Attitudes

Facts: Dispute over ADEA. Employee registered with NYSE to arbitrate, not with his employer. Brings a suit, company wants to compel arbitration.

Rule: When you agree to arbitrate a statutory claim, you are not giving up your substantive rights just procedural rights so they can compel you to arbitrate. General challenges to arbitration are inadequate to deny compelling arbitration.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

McMahon

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Rodriguez

A

Reversal of Wilko in 1989

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Gardner-Denver

A
17
Q

Penn Plaza

A

Justice said it technically did not overrule Garner-Denver but it actually did

18
Q

Rodgers v. Vladeck debate

A
19
Q

Stempel’s proposal

A
20
Q

Common grounds for contract revocation

A

unconscionability, fraud, lack of capacity, duress

21
Q

FAA - section 10

A

when a judge can vacate an award

22
Q

FAA - 10(a)(1)

A

the award is procured through corruption, fraud, or undue means

23
Q

FAA - 10(a)(2)

A

where there was an evident partiality or corruption in the arbitrators

24
Q

FAA - 10(a)(3)

A

denying a fundamentally fair hearing

ex.
- denied the right to counsel
- was prejudiced by an ex parte hearing
- refusal to grant a subpoena
- refusal to grant a discovery request

25
Q

FAA - 10(a)(4)

A

when the arbitrators exceed their powers or imperfectly executed them so there is no final/definite award at the end

issue an award on a problem not presented in arbitration

do not adhere to the criteria of the parties

26
Q

separability principal

A

the arbitration agreement is separate from the content of the contract it’s attached to

27
Q

FAA - section 2

A

written arbitration agreements “shall be valid, irrevocable, and enforceable, save upon such grounds as exist at law or in equity for the revocation of any contract”

28
Q

difference between FAA and service providers (like AAA)

A

FAA - governs the enforcement of the arbitration agreements and awards

service providers create rules of procedure that arbitrators could use in the hearings

29
Q

what are NOT grounds for vacating an award

A

errors of law or fact are not grounds for vacating the award

a serious misconstruction of the contract is not grounds for vacating an award

30
Q

Essence test

A

even if the arbitrator is mistaken in the interpretation of the contract, the award is legitimate as long as it draws on the essence from the collective bargaining agreement

31
Q

Manifest disregard of the law

A

when an arbitral award contradicts a clearly controlling law, the arbitrator knew what the law was, and clearly disregarded it

32
Q

non statutory grounds for vacating a judgement

A

manifest disregard, pubic policy, essence test, arbitrary and capricious

33
Q

vacating based on public policy

A

whether the specific terms of the award violate public policy by creating an explicit conflict with other laws and legal proceedings

34
Q

arbitrary and capricious

A

the arbitrator’s decision can not be inferred from the facts of the case or no judge could have ever made such a ruling

35
Q

what happens if an award is vacated

A

you go back to arbitration, sometimes with the same arbitrator and sometimes another one

36
Q

Punitive damages different jurisdictional approaches

A
  • Never authorized
  • Only authorized when the parties agreed to it
  • Authorized unless the parties have explicitly stated they are not on the table
  • Punitive damages sometimes have been reinstated, even when it was against state law
37
Q
A