AR Case Test Flashcards
Adomako
Duty under contract —> omission
Dytham
Duty through status —> omission
Evans
Voluntary Assumed Responsibility —> omission
Gibbons & Proctor
Duty of reliance through relationship —> omission
Miller
D has caused a dangerous situation and has failed to put it right —> omission
White
But for the actions of the defendant would the consequences have occurred at that time? —> Factual Causation
Jordan
D was given palpably wrong treatment so the wound was no longer the operating cause
Cheshire
Only in the most extraordinary and unusual circumstances would the chain be broken
There has to be an overwhelming failure on the doctors part
Smith
For an omission, if the wound is still an operating or substantial cause D is still liable
Roberts
Actions of the V were reasonably foreseeable so no break of the chain
Williams
Vs actions not foreseeable so chain was broken
Daftness test = Was Vs conduct reasonable or so daft to break the chain?
Blaue
Refusal of treatment—> thin skull rule
Pagett
NAI of third party
Police’s actions were reasonably foreseeable so the chain didn’t break
Holland
Self Neglect
Ignoring medical advice won’t break the chain
Dalby
Voluntary Acts
HOL stated that a voluntary act by V also breaks the chain