APPROACHES: Origins of Psychology Flashcards
Psychology as a science: Psychology has 4 goals
DESCRIPTION: tells us ‘what’ occurred
EXPLANATION: tells us ‘why; a behaviour or mental process occurred
PREDICTION: identifies conditions under which a future behaviour or mental process is likely to occur
CHANGE: applies psychological knowledge to prevent unwanted behaviour & to bring abt desired change
Is psychology a science
OBJECTIVITY: scientific observations should be recorded w/o bias & not influenced by other factors or other ppl
CONTROL: should take place under controlled conditions
PREDICTABILITY: results should be able to predict future behaviours
HYPOTHESIS TESTING: theories should be tested to support or disprove a theory
REPLICATION: if smth is replicated & they find the same results, the study is reliable
Why are there different approaches in psychology
- Each approach looks at human behaviour from a different perspective. They all contribute to our understanding in different ways
- For eg, the BIOLOGICAL APPROACH shows us how genetic factors might contribute to some mental disorders, whereas the LEARNING APPROACH helps us to understand how we learn behaviours through experience
- No approach is right & the others wrong, but some are more useful than others depending on what we try to explain
When was psychology introduced
In contrast to the natural sciences (physics, chemistry, biology), Psychology is a relatively new scientific discipline.
It has its roots in 17th & early 19th century philosophy & was indeed once known as experimental philosophy
Early influences in Psychology: Rene Descartes
Early influences included Rene Descartes (1596-1650), & his concept of Cartesian dualism, which simply means that the mind & body are separate entities, the brain is not the same as the mind. This is a clear starting point for psychology
Early influences in Psychology: John Locke
The work of John Locke (1642-1704) & his concept of empiricism, the belief that all knowledge is derived from sensory experience, also had an influence on the emergence of psychology as a science
Early influences in Psychology: Charles Darwin
The evolutionary theories of Charles Darwin (1809-1882) set the stage for the emergence of psychology as we know it today (biological approach)
Who is considered ‘the father of psychology’
Wilhelm Wundt (1832-1920)
What did Wilhelm Wundt do in 1873
After studying medicine, he worked as a physiologist at Heidelberg Uni. While there he delivered the first uni course on scientific psychology & published the first book on psychology, ‘Principles of Physiological Psychology’ in 1873, to establish the subjects as an independent branch of science
What did Wilhelm Wundt do in 1879
In 1879, opened the first psychology laboratory in Leipzig, Germany - the Institute of Experimental Psychology.
- The lab was designated to the scientific study of psychological enquiry under controlled conditions
- The focus was on trying to understand psychological processes of perception & sensations, rather than biological processes
- In doing sp, he separated psychology from philosophy & biology, & became the first person to be called a ‘psychologist’
What is Structuralism
- Wundt’s approach became known as ‘structuralism’ bc he used experimental methods to find the basic building blocks (structures) of thought & investigate how they interacted
- A theory of consciousness that seeks to analyse the elements of mental experiences, such as sensations, mental images, feelings, & how these elements combine to form more complex experiences
- Using controlled methods, sa introspection, to break down consciousness to its basic elements w/o sacrificing any of the properties of the whole
Introspection continued…
- Wundt later recognised higher mental processes were difficult to study using introspection & encouraged others to look for more appropriate methods, paving the way for other approaches sa scanning
- Led to the development of the field of cultural psychology, based on general trends in behaviour of groups of ppl
What is introspection
- Highly trained assistants would be given a stimulus such as a ticking metronome & would reflect on the experience
- They would report how the stimulus made them think & feel. The same stimulus, physical surroundings & instructions were given to each person
Evaluation (downsides) of introspection
- Introspection relies primarily on non-observable responses & although participants can report conscious experiences, they are unable to comment on unconscious factors relating to their behaviour
- Introspection produced data that was subjective (varied greatly from person to person), so it became very difficult to establish general principles. This means introspective experimental results are not reliably reproduced by other researchers
Subjectivity of Wundt’s methods
- It is difficult for modern psychologists to objectively study unobservable matter
- This is a contrast to the scientific methods
- These methods are therefore difficult to replicate
- Questions the methods validity - many aspects of our minds are outside of our conscious awareness (Nisbett & Wilson, 1977)
However, these methods are still used in modern scientific psychological research (Csikszentmihalyi & Hunter, 2003)