APPROACHES Flashcards
Behaviourist approach assumptions
- Everyone’s mind is born with a blank slate - tabula rosa
- Psychology is a science so behaviour must be measured in highly controlled environments to establish cause and effect
- Behaviourism is primarily connected with observable behaviour which can be objectively and scientifically measured
- Behaviour is the result of stimulus - response
- There is little difference between the learning that takes place in humans and animals
- All behaviour is learnt from the environment
Classical conditioning
Classical conditioning was discovered by Pavlov while he was studying salivation in dogs. The hungry dogs would produce an unconditioned response to the unconditioned stimulus of food. This was paired with the neutral stimulus of a bell. Eventually an association was formed and the dog was able to salivate to only the sound of the bell which is a conditioned response.
Theoretical and computer models
Theoretical and computer models are used to help understand internal mental processes
Theoretical models
- Theoretical models are abstract
- Theoretical models are diagrammatic representations
- Theoretical models are based on the way computers function
- The information processing approach suggests that information flows through the cognitive system in a sequence of stages. These include input, storage and retrieval as in the multi-store model.
Computer models
- Computer models are used for concrete things
- Computer models are software simulations of internal processes
- A computer model would involve actually programming a computer to see if such instructions produce a similar output to humans. If they do then we can suggest that similar processes are going on in the human mind.
- For example AI (artificial intelligence)
Cognitive approach positive evaluation
- One strength of the cognitive approach is that it uses objective , scientific methods. Cognitive psychologists employ highly controlled and rigorous methods of study so researchers are able to infer cognitive processes at work. This has involved the use of lab studies to produce reliable, objective data. This means that the study of the mind has a credible scientific basis.
- Another strength of the cognitive approach is that it has practical application. Cognitive psychology has been applied to a wide range of practical and theoretical contexts. For example the development of AI and ‘thinking machines’ (robots.) Cognitive principles have been applied to the treatment of depression and improved the reliability of eyewitness testimony.
Cognitive approach negative evaluation
- As the cognitive approach relies on the inference of mental processes, rather than direct observation of behaviour, it can occasionally suffer from being too abstract or theoretical in nature.
- Similarly, research studies of mental processes are often carried out using artificial stimuli (such as tests of memory involving word lists) that may not represent everyday experience. Therefore, research on cognitive processes may lack external validity.
- The computer analogy has been criticised. Such machine reductionism ignores the influence of human emotion and motivation on the cognitive system, and how this may affect our ability to process information. For instance, research has found that human memory may be affected by emotional factors, such as the influence of anxiety on eyewitnesses. This suggests that machine reductionism may weaken the validity of the cognitive approach.
Biological approach positive evaluations
One strength of the biological approach is that it has real world application. For example, the biological approach has promoted the treatment of clinical depression using antidepressant drugs that increases serotonin levels. Such drugs have been associated with the reduction of depressive symptoms. This means that people with depression may be better able to manage their condition and live their lives in the community, rather than remain in the hospital.
Another strength of the biological approach is that it uses scientific methods of investigation. In order to investigate the genetic and biological basis of behaviour, the biological approach makes us use a range of precise and highly objective methods. These include scanning techniques , such as fMRI’s and EEGs. With advances in technology, it is possible to accurately measure physiological and neural processes in ways that are not open to bias. This means that much of the biological process is based on reliable and objective data.
Biological approach negative evaluations
Although antidepressant drugs are successful for many patients, they do not work for everyone. For instance in a recent study, Cintrani compared 21 antidepressant drugs and found wide variations in their effectiveness. Although most of the drugs were more effective than placebos in comparative trials, the researcher concluded that the effect of antidepressants, in general, were mainly modest. This challenges the value of the biological approach because it suggests that the brain chemistry alone may not account for all cases, for example depression.
One limitation of the biological approach is that it is determinist. The biological approach is determinist in that it sees human behaviour as governed by internal, genetic causes over which we have no control over. However, we have already seen that the way a phenotype is expressed is heavily influenced by the environment. Not even monozygous identical twins who share 100% of the same DNA look and think the same. This suggests that the biological view is too simplistic and ignores the mediating effects of the environment.
A purely genetic environment becomes problematic when we consider things such as crime. A violent criminal for instance could excuse their actions by claiming their behaviour was controlled by a ‘crime gene.’
Behaviourist approach positive evaluations
One strength of the behaviourist approach is that it is based on well-controlled research. Behaviourists focus on the research of observable behaviour within highly controlled lab settings. By breaking down behaviour into basic stimulus- response units, all other possible extraneous variables were removed allowing for cause and effect to be established. This suggests that behaviourist experiments have scientific credibility.
Another strength of the behaviourist approach is that the principles of conditioning have been applied to real-world behaviours and problems. For example, operant conditioning is the basis of token economy systems that have been used successfully in prisons where prisoners get rewarded for good behaviour with things such as more tv time. This positive reinforcement increases the value of the behaviourist approach because it has widespread application.
Behaviourist approach negative evaluations
However, in reducing all behaviour to simple stimulus-response units and by only focusing on observable behaviour, behaviourism has oversimplified the learning process, ignoring other important influences on learning e.g mental processes. This suggests that learning is more complex than observable behaviour alone and that private mental processes are also essential.
One weakness of the approach is the reliance on animal and human relationships. Some psychologists claim that Skinner’s reliance on rats and pigeons means that we are unable to draw conclusions in relation to human behaviour. These psychologists argue that humans have free will and that our behaviour is simply not determined by our past conditioning history. This matters because psychologists may be unable to generalise the findings from animals to humans and because behaviourism is an extreme, deterministic view that ignores the influence of conscious decision making.
Many have questioned the ethics of behaviourists’ animal experiments. The animals were housed in harsh, cramped conditions for long periods of time and deliberately kept below their normal weight so that they were always hungry. At that time there were no ethical guidelines protecting animals but it would be unlikely that Skinner’s or Pavlov’s research would have been passed if judged by modern standards.
Origins of psychology timeline
1879- Wilhem Wundt opens the first experimental lab and psychology emerges as a distinct discipline. He studied the structure of the mind, by breaking down behaviours into basic elements.
1900- Sigmund Freud emphasised the influence of the unconscious mind and the psychodynamic approach is established.
1913- JB Watson rejects the vagueness of introspection instead focusing on how we are a product of our learning, experience and environment. Thus, the behaviourist approach was established.
1950- Carl Rogers and Abraham Maslow reject the ideas favoured by behaviourism and the psychodynamic approach. Humanistic psychologists emphasise the importance of self-determination and free will.
1960- With the introduction of the computer, psychologists applied the analogy of the workings of a computer to the human mind. Cognitive psychology studied the working of the internal mind in a more scientific way than Wundt’s earlier investigations.
1960- Around the time of the cognitive revolution, Albert Bandura proposes the social learning theory. This provided a bridge between behaviourism and cognitive psychology.
1980 onwards- The biological approach begins to establish itself as the dominant scientific perspective in psychology. Advances in technology have lead to increased understanding of the brain and biological processes.
Eve of the 21st century- Cognitive neuroscience emerges as a distinct discipline bringing together the cognitive and biological approaches.
Social learning theory positive evaluation
A strength of SLT is it recognises the importance of cognitive factors in explaining behaviour. Neither classical or operant conditioning from behaviourism offer a complete explanation of learning on their own. Humans and animals watch others to gain an idea of how a behaviour is performed, store this information and use it to make judgements about when it is appropriate to perform certain actions. Consequently, SLT provides a more complete explanation of human learning by recognising mediational processes.
However, as this was highly controlled experiment, Bandura or other psychologists could repeat it under the same conditions to check for consistency. This makes the Bobo doll experiment a reliable one.
Social learning theory negative evaluation
Social learning theory has been criticised for making too little reference to the influence of biological influences on behaviour. Recent research suggests the observational learning, of the kind Bandura was talking about, may be the result of mirror neurons in the brain, which allows us to empathise with and imitate other people. This suggests that biological factors may have been underestimated in the social learning theory.
The methodology used in the research to support SLT has been criticised. Bandura made extensive use of the experimental laboratory method, which is artificial and strictly controlled. As a result, there is the possibility of demand characteristics occurring whereby the children pick up on cues in the environment, guess the aim of the experiment and adjust their behaviour accordingly, lowering the internal validity of the study. Therefore, the participants may have been acting in an aggressive way towards the bobo doll because that is what they thought was expected of them rather than it being a genuine and new learned behaviour.
Biological approach assumptions
- Behaviour can be inherited
- Brain physiology and biochemical imbalances can affect our behaviour.
Psychodynamic approach assumptions
- Behaviour is determined by psychological factors, rather than biological or environmental
- People are born with basic instincts, needs and desires
- Behaviour is controlled by the unconscious mind
- It emphasises inner conflicts of the mind, unconscious motives and desires and early childhood experiences can shape your personality
Levels of consciousness: The iceberg analogy
At the top of the iceberg is the conscious mind. The conscious mind is all of the mental processes of which we are aware. For example: thoughts and perceptions.
In the middle of the iceberg is the preconscious mind. The preconscious mind when we are not aware of this, but we can recall some information with the right cue. Information can be n the ‘tip of the tongue.’ For example: memories and stored knowledge.
At the bottom of the iceberg is the unconscious mind. This contains our biologically based instincts. We can only access this information through hypnosis, or sometimes through are dreams. Threatening and disturbing memories from childhood that have been repressed (forgotten) are stored here and can cause problems if not retrieved.