Approaches Flashcards
Explain what is meant by classical conditioning
A type of learning that occurs through associations being made between the unconditioned response and the neutral stimulus.
Explain classical conditioning in Pavlov’s experiment
Before conditioning, the dog would salivate when food was presented in front of it. When a bell sound was heard by the dog it had no observable effect.
Pavlov then placed the food in front of the dog but also paired it the a bell sound, and this was repeated.
The dog then made the connection of the food and the bell so that when just the bell sound was heard, the dog began to salivate. The neutral stimulus
What are the main assumptions of the behaviourist approach?
-We learn through associations between stimuli in our environment and our responses to them (classical conditioning) or the consequences of our behaviour (operant conditioning)
-Behaviour is learnt through environment, therefore it can be unlearnt
- Ignores mental processes
-Learning can be generalised across species
Explain operant conditioning
-A type of learning where behaviour is acquired and maintained based on its consequences.
-Reinforcement increases the likelihood of the observed behaviour being repeated, whilst punishment (an unpleasant consequence of behaviour) decreases this likelihood.
Explain positive reinforcement
Providing a reward or pleasant consequence when a particular behaviour is performed
This is done to encourage the behaviour so that it can be repeated in the future
Explain negative reinforcement
When your actions stop a negative stimulus. Increases reinforcement
E.g.
Your mum shouts at you to clean your room so you clean it and she stops shouting
Explain positive punishment
Providing an unpleasant consequence after a behaviour is displayed. This is done to discourage the behaviour so that it can be reduced in the future
E.g.
A child talks in class so teacher gives them extra homework
Explain negative punishment
-When you remove the positive stimulus
Explain Skinners box experiment
-The rat moves around the cage and accidentally presses the lever- which releases food (the reinforcer)
-The rat then continues to press the lever in order to obtain food as a positive consequence
-If the food pallets stop, the rat presses the lever a few more times and the abandons it
This validates the behaviourist approach as it clearly provides an explanation for how we learn behaviour through consequences
Aim of Bandura’s experiment
To investigate whether behaviour is learnt through observation and imitation of role model
Method of Bandura’s experiment
-ppts: 72 (36 boys, 36 girls) children aged 3-6 years old
-Lab experiment
-Independent group design
Procedure of Bandura’s experiment (pt.1)
Explain non aggressive, aggressive and control group
Children were pretested for how aggressive they were through observation in their nursery on 4, 5 rating point scales. Children were then placed into one of 3 conditions; aggressive model, non aggressive model and a control group.
In the aggressive model condition children were exposed to a filmed model demonstrating aggressive behaviour towards the bobo doll.
In the non aggressive condition, children watched film of model playing with toys in presence of bobo doll
In the control group, children didnt watch any model and were not exposed to aggressive or non aggressive behaviour.
Procedure of Bandura’s experiment (pt.2)
Explain the frustration induction, aggressive arousal and observation
Frustration induction: After modelling, children taken to room with toys, but they were told that they cant play with these toys as they are for other children
Aggressive arousal: The children were then taken to another room with aggressive and non aggressive toys. The purpose was to arouse aggression in the children, regardless of their exposure to the model
Observation: Children were placed in a room containing a bobo doll. The children’s behaviour was then observed by observers (who didnt know the exposure the children had to aggressive model). They recorded the behaviours over a 20 minute period.
Results of Bandura’s experiment
-Boys imitated more physically aggressive behaviours than girls. Boys were also more likely to imitate the same sex role model than girls
-Children were more likely to imitate behaviours of the same sex role model
-Children exposed to aggressive model were more likely to reproduce aggressive behaviours, both verbally and physically towards the bobo doll in comparison to those who were shown non aggressive model or the control group.
-1/3 Children who observed the aggressive behaviour model repeated the models verbal responses - none of the children exposed to non aggressive model produced verbally aggressive remarks
Conclusion from Bandura’s experiment
Children learn behaviours through observing and imitating role models in a social context
(AO3)
Provide a strength of social learning theory
(Supporting research)
-One strength of Social learning theory is the existence of supporting research
-For example, Bandura (1961) studied whether behaviour is learned through imitation and observation of a role model in children. He exposed children aged 3-6 to aggressive and non aggressive adult models and found that children who were shown the aggressive models were more likely to reproduce the same observed aggressive behaviours.
-This suggests that children imitate role models, which is consistent with SLT. In this case, if the role modes are aggressive then the children were more likely to imitate that aggressive behaviour which has been observed
- Therefore, Bandura’s results increase the validity of the social learning theory as an explanation for behaviour and learning
AO3
Outline one weakness of SLT
(biological differences)
-One weakness of SLT is that it ignores the impact of biological factors on social learning.
-For example, in Bandura’s study (1961), one consistent finding in the experiment was that boys imitated more physically aggressive acts than girls, thus suggesting boys are more aggressive than girls
-This suggests that hormonal factors such as differences in testosterone levels can influence levels of aggression. However this isn’t accounted for in the explanation proposed by SLT
-Therefore SLT can be criticised for only acknowledging the influence of ones environment in explaining how we learn and ignoring biological factors that could influence behaviour
Provide a strength of social learning theory
(acknowledges mediational processes)
One strength of the social learning theory is that it acknowledges mediational processes
For example, within mediational processes there are 4 different stages of reproducing the behaviour. This provides more insight and gives a deeper explanation as it takes into account thought processes.
Whereas the behaviourist approach only focuses on observable behaviour and ignores the influence of cognition on behaviour and the influence of thoughts on behaviour
Therefore, the social learning theory provides a more comprehensive explanation of human learning by recognising the role of mediational processes.
AO3
Outline one weakness of SLT
(Cause and effect)
Point :One weakness of the social learning theory is that there is ambiguity when establishing causality of deviant behaviour.
Evidence: For example, SLT claims that increased identification with deviant peers increases the likelihood that an individual will adopt the same values and behaviours. Siegel and McCormick (2006) found that young people who posses deviant attitudes and values would seek out peers with similar attitudes and behaviours. This is due to the fact that they are more fun to be around as opposed to well behaved peers.
Explanation: This means that the causes of delinquency may not be due to identifying with a deviant role model and social learning but the possession of deviant attitudes prior to contact with deviant peers.
Link: Therefore, It cant establish the cause and effect between social learning theory and delinquent behaviour.
Explain schemas
Cognitive framework that helps organise and interpret information in the brain. Schemas help an individual to make sense of new information. Package of information developed through experiences.
Advantages of Schemas
-Help us predict what will happen based on our prior experiences
-Allow us to process vast amounts of information rapidly
-Schemas prevent us from becoming overwhelmed by environmental stimuli
(AO3)
Provide a strength of the cognitive approach (application to real life)
Point: One strength of the cognitive approach is that it has real world applications
Evidence: The cognitive approach has been used in psychopathology to explain faulty thinking processes. For example, depressed people have negative self schemas.
Explanation: Cognitive based therapies can be used to treat depression. These treatments have been shown effective in reducing rates of the disorder.
Link: Implies cognitive approach has real life applications. This strengthens our acceptance as it can positively impact society.
(AO3)
Outline a weakness of the cognitive approach
(MACHINE REDUCTIONISM)
Point: One limitation is the use of computer models.
Evidence: MSM, WMM
Explanation: The computer model has been criticised by many for being MACHINE REDUCTIONIST. It ignores the involvement of human emotion and motivation on the cognitive system and how this may affect our ability to process information.
Link: Therefore this weakens the cognitive approach as it doesn’t take into account the complexity of the human mind
Outline a strength of the cognitive approach (scientific approach)
+
2nd weakness of cognitive approach as a counter argument
Point: Scientific approach
Explanation: Cognitive psychologists place and emphasis on scientific methods so it is objective. When variables are controlled during experiments, we can easily establish cause and effect.
Counter argument:
Point: Studies conducted on the cognitive approach lack ecological validity
Explanation: Most research comes from laboratory experiments during which participants were asked to do tasks which aren’t something you would do in everyday life.
Evidence: For example, memory task of remembering a list of words is not how everyday memory works. Artificial stimuli produce artificial behaviours
Link: This invalidates the approach as it doesn’t take into account how people would behave in a real life setting
Outline the main assumptions of the biological approach
-Everything psychological has a biological basis
-Actions of our genes, hormones, neurotransmitters and neurochemical mechanisms must be understood in order to explain behaviour fully.
-All thoughts, ideas and cognitive processes must be biological in origin.
What is meant by genotype?
What is meant by phenotype?
-Genotype :Genetic code that is written in the DNA of an individuals cells
-Genetic make up on an individual
-Phenotype is the observable characteristics of an individual. Consequence of an interaction of the genotype with the environment
What is the parietal lobe responsible for?
Processing sensory information