APM Flashcards
SWOT Analysis
Internal: SW, strengths weaknesses. EG financial, people, products, marketing
External: OT. Opportunities, threats. EG Competition, political, economic
Porters Five Forces
Competitive Rivalry within industry
Threat of substitute products
Bargaining power of suppliers
Threat of new entrants
Bargaining power of customers
Cost leadership
Lowest cost product
Opposite of differentiation
Differentiation
Not price sensitive. Has some kind of luxury/customers are willing to pay more
Opposite of Cost leadership
BCG Matrix
Analyse businesses product lines
Relevant market share vs market growth rate
Stars: high high
Question marks: low high
Cash cows: high low
Dogs: low low
Only the largest player can have a positive market share
Key words for BCG Matrix (4)
Build share: here the company can invest to increase market share (for example, turning a
Question mark into a Star), marketing, R&D, cut price, increase distribution etc
Hold: here the company invests just enough to keep the SBU in its present position.
Harvest: here the company reduces the amount of investment in order to maximise the short-term
cash flows and profits from the SBU. This may have the effect of turning Stars into Cash cows.
Divest: the company can divest the SBU by phasing it out or selling it.
Criticisms of the BCG model (5)
Average growth is difficult to define.
Many very successful products or business units would be classified as Dogs, e.g. 1 series BMW
ranks behind the Audi A3, Sainsbury, Asda, and Morrison rank behind Tesco.
Finding market share is difficult. (P&G and Lever Bros. each claim 62% of detergent market.)
BCG makes no attempt to measure cash flows or profit.
Difficult to know how to deal with declining markets.
Ansoffs Growth Matrix
Which direction for the business to grow in. e.g. new product, buy suppliers/competitor
Market: existing. new
Product: existing. new
In 4 squares
Best in class benchmarking / functional benchmarking
Southwest Airlines improved aircraft maintenance, refuelling and turnaround time by studying the
processes around Nascar racing pit stops
Value of benchmarking (7)
Challenges assumptions
Helps cut costs (BA cabin crew v Easy Jet)
Improves service if lessons are learned
Helps simplify processes
Improves quality if relevant actions are taken
Changes behaviour
Helps break resistance to change by demonstrating other methods of solving problems
Pitfalls of benchmarking (4)
“You get what you measure”. If the basis for benchmarking is flawed, it can lead to new
strategies that are flawed rather than improved performance.
Too much information for managers.
Takes too much time and money to perform. Getting the information may be problematic.
Benchmarking will not identify the reasons for good or poor performance because it does not
compare competences directly,
Mission statements should include (4)
(1) Purpose: Why do we exist and who for?
(2) Strategy: How and where are we going to compete
(3) Behavioural standards: To guide the actions of employees
(4) Values: What does the organisation believe in?
CSFs generally include objectives around (5)
Improving market share
Innovation in products
Quality of products and delivery
Growth in profits (margins are important)
Key performance metrics (e.g. EPS, ROCE, awards) especially if a listed company
Benefits of budgeting. PRIME
Planning – It forces you to look ahead and fee plan your resource requirements
Responsibility – Gives managers (budget holders) areas to oversee
Integration – This covers co-ordination and communication where different departments are forced
to talk to each other.
Motivation – The budget can be used as the basis for setting targets.
Evaluation – Gives a basis for comparison of actual performance
BPR Engineering
‘The fundamental rethinking and radical redesign of business processes to achieve dramatic
improvements in critical contemporary measures of performance, e.g. cost, quality, service, speed
Most of the work being done does not add any value for customers, and
this work should be removed, not accelerated through automation.
Instead, companies should reconsider their processes in order to maximise customer value, while
minimising the consumption of resources required for delivering their product or service
Criticisms of BPR (9)
Dehumanised the work place
increased managerial control
An excuse to downsize
Lack of management support and thus poor acceptance in the organisation
Exaggerated expectations regarding the potential benefits from a BPR initiative and
consequently failure to achieve the expected results
Underestimation of the resistance to change within the organisation
Generic “best-practice processes” do not fit specific company needs
BPR performed as a one-off project with limited strategy alignment
Poor project management
Impact of BPR on organisational performance
The two cornerstones of any organisation are the people and the processes. If individuals are
motivated and working hard, yet the business processes are cumbersome and non-essential activities
remain, organisational performance will be poor.
Business Process Re-engineering is the key to transforming how people work.
McKinsey 7-S Model
Premise of an organisation isn’t just structure
3 Hard S’s : Strategy, Structure, Systems. Easy to identify
4 Soft S’s: Shared values, skills, staff and style
Value chain analysis - Primary (5)
Porter suggests that once a business has decided the basis on which it would like to compete (cost
leader or differentiator) it needs to make sure all aspects of its primary and support activities are
consistent with this
Inbound Logistics
Operations
Outbound Logistics
Marketing and sales
Service
Value chain analysis - Support (4)
Porter suggests that once a business has decided the basis on which it would like to compete (cost
leader or differentiator) it needs to make sure all aspects of its primary and support activities are
consistent with this
Firm Infrastructure
Human Resource Management
Technology Development
Procurement