APCCMPD Chapters Flashcards
Define chronic bronchitis
Chronic bronchitis- 3+ months of cough in a year for 2 consecutive years, other causes of cough ruled out
Define emphysema
Emphysema- permanent destruction of airspaces (terminal bronchioles and alveoli)
Differentiate centrilobular, panacinar, and paraseptal emphysema
Depends what part of the lobule/terminal airway has damange
Centrilobular- damage/destruction of central part of acinus
-seen in smokers, coal workers pneumoconiosis
Panacinar- all parts of the acinus destroyed
-smoking, alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency
Purpose of GOLD criteria in use clinically
GOLD- to risk stratify patients by degree of obstruction (based on FEV1) and symptoms (mMRC and CAT score) to determine treatment, also to determine risk of future exacerbation
Name LABA/LAMA combinations
LABA/LAMA
vilanterol/umeclidinum = Anoro Elipta
Olodaterol/tiotropium = Stiolto respimat
2 ways that GOLD criteria distinguishes respiratory symptoms
Classifying respiratory symptoms by
-mMRC: 0-1 scale of dyspnea
mMRC 0-1: A and C GOLD disease
mMRC 2 or above: B and D
-CAT (COPD assessment test): questions about symptoms (cough, dyspnea) cuttoff below or above 10, max is 40 (8 questions ranked 1-5, higher is worse), above 10 indicates worse disease
CAT below 10: A, C
CAT above 10: B, D GOLD disease
Scale for mMRC
mMRC: perceived dyspnea scale
0- no concerning dyspnea, breathless only with strenuous exercise
1- SOB when hurrying
2- walk slower b/c of breathlessness
3- stop to catch breath after 100m or a few minutes on level surface
4- breathlessness with ADLs (dressing), leaving house
Scale for CAT
0-40, cutoff for GOLD is under 10 (minimal) vs. over 10 (bad symptoms)
8 questions total, rank on scale of 0 (no symptoms) to 5 (severe or constant symptoms)
Differentiate GOLD 1-4 for degree of flow obstruction
GOLD by FEV1
1- over 80% predicted
2- 50-79% predicted
3- 30-49%
4- under 30% predicted
Differentiate GOLD A-D
GOLD by symptom categorization and exacerbations
GOLD A: mMRC 0-1 or CAT under 10, 0-1 moderate exacerbation a year (not leading to hospitalizations)
GOLD B: mMRC over 2 or CAT over 10, 0-1 moderate exacerbations a year (not leading to hospitalization)
GOLD C: mMRC 0-1 or CAT under 10, 2 or more moderate exacerbations or at least one leading to hospitalization
GOLD D: mMRC over 2 or CAT over 10, 2 or more moderate exacerbations or at least 1 requiring hospitalization in the past year
Differentiate treatment options delineated by GOLD Groups A-D
For GOLD A (low symptoms, low exacerbations) can try SABA alone
For Gold B and C (either low symptoms high exacerbations or high symptoms low exacerbations) try LAMA/LABA combo
Gold D- triple therapy
Guidelines for LAMA alone vs. LAMA/LABA for COPD
For COPD pts with dyspnea or exercise intolerance - combo LAMA/LABA recommended over monotherapy
from 2019 GOLD GUidelines
-combo LAMA/LABA increases FEV1, reduces symptoms, reduces exacerbations compared to monotherapy
When to escalate from LAMA/LABA to triple therapy (ICS/LAMA/LABA?)
Add ICS if have an exacerbation, requiring steroids/abx (even if managed outpatient)
COPD pts with dyspnea or exercise intolerance despite LAMA/LABA escalate to triple therapy if one or more exacerbations in the past year requiring abx or oral steroids
2019 GOLD Guidelines: inhaled triple therapy improves lung function, symptoms, and reduce exacerbations
-so once already on LABA/LAMA but don’t start on triple off the bat
65M COPD, FEV1 45%, 1 exacerbation in the past year
Best treatment plan?
GOLD class 3 (FEV 30-49%) B (1 exacerbation)- start combination LAMA/LABA (anoro, stiolto respimat)
2019 Gold Guidelines: combo better than either monotherapy
LAMA improves mortality, symptoms, and/or FEV1?
LAMA improves symptoms and quality of life
No improvement in mortality or FEV1
70F FEV1 40% on ICS/LAMA/LABA, mMRC 4, 1 exacerbation in the past year managed outpatient with antibiotics and steroids
GOLD class? (number and letter)
GOLD 3B
3 (FEV1 39-49%)
B not A b/c mMRC over 1
B not D b/c only one moderate exacerbation (would need 2 or more moderate within a year or at least one hospitalization)
Proven benefits of LAMA (vs. placebo)
UPLIFT trial- NEJM 2008
-Improved symptoms, quality of life, exacerbation, COPD admissions
NO reduction in FEV1 or mortality
TORCH trial- proven benefit of ICS/LABA
TORCH trial- NEJM 2007: ICS/LABA vs. placebo vs. either alone
-Combo ICS/LABA Improved symptoms, improved FEV1, reduced exacerbation
vs. placebo or either ICS or LABA alone
ATS Guidelines for positive PPD in the following cases
(a) 5mm or greater
(b) 10mm or greater
(c) 15mm or greater
ATS guidelines for positive PPD
(a) 5mm or greater in those w/ high risk of progression to active Tb
-HIV, TNFalpha inhibitor/immunocompromised
-those with close contact of recent positive case
-abnormal CXR c/w prior Tb infection
-silicosis
(b) 10mm or greater: those at increased risk of prior exposure or intermediate risk of progression to active
-Exposure: from endemic country (India), prison/homeless, healthcare workers
-Comorbidities that increase risk of progression: DM, CKD, IVDU
(c) 15mm or greater = everyone else
ATS Guidelines for positive PPD in the following cases
(a) TNF-alpha inhibitor
(b) IVDU
(c) From India
(d) Close contact of recent TB case
(e) Healthcare workers
(f) Prison/homeless
(g) Abnormal CXR c/w prior Tb
(h) Silicosis
(i) Chronic renal failure
ATS guidelines for positive PPD
(a) 5mm or greater in those w/ high risk of progression to active Tb
-HIV, TNFalpha inhibitor/immunocompromised
-those with close contact of recent positive case
-abnormal CXR c/w prior Tb infection
-silicosis
(b) 10mm or greater: those at increased risk of prior exposure or intermediate risk of progression to active
-Exposure: from endemic country (India), prison/homeless, healthcare workers
-Comorbidities that increase risk of progression: DM, CKD, IVDU
(c) 15mm or greater = everyone else
What patients be most concerned about a false-negative PPD?
False-negative PPD in:
-acute disease, first 6-8 weeks
-immunocompromised (truly no Ab response)
-such widespread disseminated disease (miliary)
What patients be most concerned about a false-positive PPD?
False-positive PPD:
-BCG vaccine (still given to prevent CNS Tb)
-NTM
First line tx for LTBI
LTBI: 4R
-rifampin daily x4 months
Second line alternative regimens for LTBI (aside from 4R)
LTBI regimens aside from 4R
-INH daily x6 mo
-Rifapentine + INH weekly x3 mo
-Rifampin + INH daily x3 mo
Differentiate LFT abnormality expected from rifampin vs. INH
LFT abnormality
Rifampin- expect cholestatic picture (alk phos, bilis)
INH- expect transaminitis
Which LTBI regimens to add pyridoxine to and why
B6 whenever using INH to prevent peripheral neuropathy
-if pt has tingling/symptoms increase B6 dose
Typical treatment regimen for pan-sensitive tuberculosis
IRPE + pyridoxine
-stop ethambutol if returns rifampin sensitive
-stop PZA after 2 months
-continue rifampin + INH for additional 4 months (6 months total)
Longer (9 mo) for severe cavitary disease or CNS involvement
Diagnostic criteria for MAC infection
MAC infection per ATS guidelines
Appropriate clinical picture, radiographic findings, and exclusion of other things (ex: Tb)
Micro data: 2 positive sputum Cx OR 1 + BAL OR 1 + tissue (BAL with AFB or granulomatous inflammation)
2020 Guidelines for first line treatment of nodular bronchiectatic MAC
(a) Drug regimen
(b) Duration
(a) Azithro
Rifampin
Ethambutol
-TIW can be used for most nodular bronchiectatic disease as better tolerated and shown to have similar sputum conversion rates in moderate (not severe or fibrocavitary disease)
(b) for 12 months from sputum culture conversion (test sputum each month, 12 months from conversion)
When daily MAC tx is indicated over 3x/week
-severe nodular bronchiectatic disease
-fibrocavitary disease
What is considered refractory MAC?
(a) Tx
Pts who remain culture positive at 6 months of azithro, rifampin, ethambutol
(a) Add inhaled amikacin