AP Lang 141-160 Flashcards
Onerous
burdensome, oppressive, or troublesome, causing hardship
Discretion
cautious reserve in speech; ability to make responsible decisions
Burgeon
to grow rapidly or flourish
Axiom
universally reorganized principle
Ubiquitous
existing everywhere
Disabuse
to undeceive; to set right
Heretical
violating accepted dogma or convention
Vilify
to defame; to characterize harshly
Dogmatic
expressing using rigid opinion based on unproven or improbable principles
Perennial
recurrent through the year or many years; happening repeatedly
Fallacy
is an erroneous argument dependent upon an unsound or illogical contention. There are many fallacy examples that we can find in everyday conversations
Appeal to Ignorance
Happens when one individual utilizes another individuals lack of information on a specific subject as proof that his or her own particular argument is right
Appeal to Authority
This sort of error is also known as “Argumentation Verecundia” (argument from modesty) Instead of concentrating on the benefits of an argument, the arguer will attempt to append their argument to an individual of power or authority in an effort to give trustworthiness to their argument.
Appeal to Popular Opinion
This sort of appeal is when somebody asserts that a thought or conviction is correct since it is the thing that the general population accepts
Association Fallacy
sometimes called “guilt-by-association” this happens when somebody connects a particular thought or issue to something or somebody negative so as to infer blame on another individual
Attacking the Person
also regarded as “argumentation ad hominem” (argument against the man) this common fallacy used during debates, where an individual substituted a rebuttal with with a personal attack
Begging the Question
The conclusion of a contention is accepted as a statement of the inquiry itself
Circular Argument
this fallacy is also known as “circulus in probando”. This argument takes evidence from an element inside the argument itself
Relationship Implies Causation
also called “cum hoc ergo propter hoc,” this fallacy is a deception in which the individual making the contention joins two occasions that happen consecutively and accepts that one created or caused the other
False Dilemma/Dichotomy
Sometimes called “bifurcation” this sort of error happens when somebody presents their argument in such a way that there are just two conceivable alternatives left