AOS 1 - UNIT 3 Flashcards

1
Q

Define the criminal justice system and identify the two parties in a criminal case.

A

Criminal justice system = a set of processes and institutions used to investigate and determine the outcomes of criminal cases.

Parties = Prosecution v Accused (sometimes referred to as defendant in the Magistrates’ Court).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Define the principle of ‘fairness’ in relation to justice.

A

Fairness in the criminal justice system means appropriate processes and a just hearing throughout the whole case, in order to uphold the rule of law

This includes:
*Having your court case heard impartially and objectively
*Understanding court processes
*Having an opportunity to present a defence & a chance to rebut the prosecution’s case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Define the principle of equality in relation to justice.

A

Everyone should be treated without disadvantage before the law, with the same opportunity to present their case as everyone else. This means all processes should be free from prejudice and bias.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Define the principle of access in relation to justice.

A

All people should be able to understand their legal rights and pursue their case, and be able to utilise bodies and institutions within the criminal justice system.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How are the principles of fairness and equality different?

A

Fairness = just processes and an unbiased hearing throughout the whole case, even if that means treating people differently.

Equality = everyone being treated as equals before the law, allowing them to present their case.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Explain the three types of criminal offences (according to their seriousness).

A

Summary= less serious offences heard in the MC by a Magistrate (no jury), usually found in the Summary Offences Act 1966 (Vic)

Indictable=serious crimes heard in a higher court by a judge (and jury if the person pleads not guilty), usually found in the Crimes Act 1958 (Vic)

Indictable tried summarily = serious crimes heard in the MC as though they are summary offences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Provide 3 examples of summary offences.

A

Drink driving, common assault, disorderly conduct, traffic violations, loitering, littering, shoplifting etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Provide 3 examples of indictable offences.

A

Drug trafficking, Murder, Manslaughter, Rape, Drug cultivation, Aggravated burglary etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Provide 2 examples of indictable offences tried summarily.

A

Robbery, Theft or Burglary over the value of $100,000

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Define the key concept of the burden of proof in the criminal justice system and explain who holds it.

A

*The task or responsibility of proving the facts of the case to the required level.
*Usually held by the prosecution (as they are the initiating party) although in some rare situations (such as drug cases) the burden can be reversed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Define the key concept of the standard of proof in the criminal justice system and explain what the standard is.

A

*It is the level or degree of proof needed in order to have satisfactorily proved the facts of the case.
*In criminal cases the standard is usually beyond reasonable double, which means there can be no other reasonable conclusion from the facts presented.
*However, in cases where the burden of proof is reversed, the standard of proof is lowered to ‘the balance of probabilities’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Describe the key concept of the presumption of innocence in the criminal justice system.

A

A right guaranteed by the Victorian Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities that states everyone must be treated as though they are innocent until proven guilty.
This means they can’t be treated, as far as possible, like they are a criminal until the case has been determined.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Identify 3 ways the presumption of innocence is upheld in the criminal justice system.

A

*Giving the prosecution the burden of proof
*Having a high standard of proof in criminal cases
*Providing bail (unless there are good reasons not to!)
*The accused’s right to silence
*Exclusion of propensity evidence in most trials

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Identify the 3 rights an accused person holds, and the way each of these rights is protected.

A

1 – Trial without unreasonable delay (Victorian Charter of Human Rights & Responsibilities 2006)

2 – A fair hearing (Victorian Charter of Human Rights & Responsibilities 2006)

3 – Trial by jury (s.80 commonwealth constitution for cth indictable offences, Criminal Procedure Act 2009 (Vic) for Victorian indictable offences)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Describe the right to a trial without unreasonable delay held by an accused.

A

*Right protected by (Victorian Charter of Human Rights & Responsibilities 2006)
*Right doesn’t mean no delays are allowed, but they must be reasonable to the case
*Right doesn’t discriminate – it is available to everyone in society, regardless of past behaviours or convictions
*Case example: Gray v DPP (released on bail)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Describe the right to a fair hearing as held by an accused in a criminal trial.

A

*An accused person is entitled to have their charges decided by a competent, independent and impartial court after a fair and public hearing
*Case example: Dietrich v The Queen – The HC accepted that Dietrich’s trial had been miscarried because he was not provided with legal representation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Describe the right to a trial by jury held by an accused in a criminal trial.

A

*Only available for indictable offences
*Protected by s.80 Commonwealth Constitution for Cth indictable offences & Criminal Procedure Act 2009 (Vic) for Victorian indictable offences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Identify the 3 rights a victim has, and the way each of these rights is protected.

A

1 – Give evidence as a vulnerable witness (Criminal Procedure Act 2009 (Vic) and Evidence Act 2008 (Vic))

2 – Right to be informed about the proceeding (Victims Charter)

3 – Right to be informed of the likely release date of the accused (Victims Charter)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Describe the right to be informed about the proceedings held by a victim of a criminal offence.

A

*Relevant institutions must give required information to victims if they request it
*Information doesn’t have to be given if it is likely to interfere with the case
*Once the prosecution starts, victims have to be given:
-Details of charges (or if no charges made, the reason why)
-How the victim can find the date, time and place of the hearing
-The outcome, including any sentence imposed
-Details of any appeal made
-Victim must be told they can attend court proceedings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Describe the right to be informed of the likely release date held by a victim of a criminal offence.

A

*Victims of violent crimes can register for the Victim’s register, which provides a range of information (including the likely release date of the offender)
*Likely release date must be given no less than 14 days prior to expected release date

*Violent crimes eligible for the victims register include: rape & sexual offences, aggravated burglary, kidnapping, stalking, child stealing, offences involving assault or injury punishable by imprisonment, culpable driving causing death, dangerous driving causing death or failing to stop after a motor vehicle accident causing death or serious injury.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Describe the right to give evidence as a vulnerable witness as held by a victim of a criminal offence.

A

*For all witnesses, the Evidence Act requires the court to disallow improper questions or tell the witness that they do not need to answer a particular question
*For witnesses in a sexual offence, family violence offence or summary offence of sexual exposure or obscene/indecent/threatening language/behaviour, the Criminal Procedures Act requires the court to allow alternative arrangements to be used, such as using CCTV to give their evidence from outside the court room
*CCTV is compulsory if the witness is the complainant in a sexual offence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What are the roles of VLA?

A

*Provide legal aid to people accused of a crime
*Control the Legal Aid Fund (money available to them to use)
*Cooperate with government to meet legal aid needs
*Make recommendations about law reform
*Create and present educational programs
*Research legal aid issues

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What are the different purposes of committal proceedings?

A

*Determine if the charge is appropriate to be heard summarily
*Determine if there is enough evidence to support a conviction
*Find out how the accused will plead to the charges
*Ensure a fair trial by;
- Disclosing the prosecution’s case
- Allowing the accused to read/hear evidence against them, and cross-examine witnesses
- Allowing the accused to put forward an early case(if desired)
- Allowing the accused a chance to properly prepare and present a case
- Ensuring issues are clearly defined

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What is a plea negotiation, what is it used for & what are the possible outcomes?

A

Plea negotiation = discussions between the prosecutor and the accused about the charges they’re facing to try and encourage an early determination of the case.

Outcomes:
*May agree to plead guilty to less charges if the others are dropped OR
*Plead guilty to a lesser offence OR
*Proceed with trial (so the process fails)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

What is a sentence indication? What indications can be given to accused people during this process?

A

Sentence indication =a court statement made by a judge or magistrate about the sentence the accused
could face if they plead guilty to an offence at a particular point in time

Possible indications:
Summary offence - find out whether an immediate term of imprisonment is likely, or an alternative sentence
Indictable offence - find out what type of sentence OR the total length of sentence (which caps the sentence to that amount)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Suggest when plea negotiations are appropriate.

A

*There are issues with availability, reliability or willingness of witnesses to give evidence
*There are issues with admissibility of key pieces of evidence
*The police made errors with the charges
*The accused has been cooperative with police
*The trial is likely to be long, expensive & stressful

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Suggest when plea negotiations are not appropriate.

A

*The case is high profile, so transparency is needed
*The victim doesn’t want lesser charges considered (although the prosecution doesn’t have to follow these wishes)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Suggest when sentence indications are appropriate.

A

*‘Borderline cases’ where it’s not clear if imprisonment is likely
*Victimless crimes (i.e. drug offences or fraud) where sentencing doesn’t need to consider the victims views

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Suggest when sentence indications are not appropriate.

A

*Some crimes against the person where the indication wouldn’t allow for sufficient consideration of the victims views (i.e. sexual assault)
*If the prosecution submits an application to oppose the indication being given and the judge agrees

30
Q

Outline the two reasons why we need a criminal court hierarchy?

A

Specialisation:
Courts develop expertise by hearing similar cases often
*Develop skills to handle such cases efficiently, and may result in more just and consistent outcomes
*Not possible without hierarchy because all judges would need to familiar with all types of cases

Appeals:
*On appropriate grounds, parts of a case may be re-heard on appeal in an attempt to fix potential miscarriages of justice
*Not possible without hierarchy because there would be no higher court to go to

31
Q

When explaining specialisation as a reason for a court hierarchy, how would you use the Supreme Court Trial Division as an example?

A

Supreme Court Trial Division specialises in the most serious criminal indictable offences, such as murder, because they are the only Victorian court with the original jurisdiction to hear the most serious forms of indictable offences.

32
Q

What are the two types of Community Legal Centres available to help the accused?

A

*Generalist – provide services to a geographical area (e.g. West Heidelberg Community Legal Service)
*Specialist – provide services to a particular group or for a particular area of law (e.g. YouthLaw)

33
Q

What are the key roles of Community Legal Centres?

A

*Provide basic legal information (usually online)
*Legal advice via phone or in-centre visits, as well as initial help (like completing forms)
*Duty lawyer service for urgent, one-day matters
*Ongoing legal services for SOME matters – this is RARE!

**Aside from basic legal information, CLCs focus on people that need legal assistance the most because of their personal circumstances (e.g. those who have a disability)

34
Q

What are some of the strengths associated with the use of committal proceedings?

A

*Filters out weak cases due to insufficient evidence, saving trial time
*Informs the accused of the case against them, which may lead to a change in plea, or abetter prepared case (leading to a fairer trial)
*The hearings protect the accused’s right to the presumption of innocence because it is up to the prosecution to prove they have enough evidence
*Prosecution can withdraw or combine charges, reducing trial time and creating a fairer trial

35
Q

What are some of the weaknesses associated with the use of committal proceedings?

A

*Considered a ‘waste of time’ for strong cases
*Complex and difficult to understand, which can enhance party imbalances and result in an unfair outcome
*Can contribute to the stress and trauma of a criminal case
*Can add to delays of getting to trial, increasing the risk of an unfair outcome and reducing access to justice

36
Q

What are some of the purposes of sentence indications?

A

*Provide the accused with some clarity about the likely sentence, alleviating the possible fear of going to jail
*Save time, costs, resources, stress and inconvenience of going to trial
*Brings closure to victims and their families, signifies the accused’s willingness to accept responsibility &reduces the need for lengthy trials, freeing up court resources
*Offender benefits from the likelihood of a reduced sentence due to their early guilty plea

37
Q

What are the two main purposes of plea negotiations?

A

1 - Resolve criminal cases by ensuring a guilty plea to a charge that adequately reflects the accused’s behaviour/crime

2 - To achieve an efficient and prompt resolution of the case without having to deal with the negatives associated with a hearing/trial (such as the cost, time, stress, trauma and inconvenience)

38
Q

What are some of the key roles of a judge during a criminal trial?

A

*Manage the trial, for example, by giving relevant directions or orders
*Decide on the admissibility of evidence
*Attend to jury matters, such as excusing jurors who have good reason & giving jurors information prior to the trial
*Giving juries directions throughout the trial and summing up the case for them at the end
*Sentencing offenders found/pleaded guilty

39
Q

What are some of the key roles of the jury during a criminal trial?

A

*Remain objective by keeping an open mind on the evidence presented
*Listen to and remember all evidence presented during the trial
*Understand any judge directions given, and ask to clarify where needed (via foreman)
*Determine a verdict and deliver it to the court
*Participate in jury room deliberations

40
Q

What are some of the key roles of the parties during a criminal trial?

A

*Give an opening address to the court
*Assist the judge in jury matters, such as participating in the empanelment process and challenging potential jurors according to set guidelines/instructions
*Presenting their case using relevant evidence & witnesses
*Exercise party control, deciding how to present case in the best possible way

41
Q

What are some of the key roles of legal representatives during a criminal trial?

A

*Be prepared for the trial
*Comply with their overarching duty to the court to find justice
*Present their client’s case in the best possible way

42
Q

Outline the purpose of deterrence when determining an appropriate criminal sanction for an offender.

A

The aim of discouraging the accused (specific deterrence) or the wider public (general deterrence) from committing similar offences in the future, for fear of receiving a similar consequence.

43
Q

Outline the purpose of denunciation when determining an appropriate criminal sanction for an offender.

A

The aim of expressing the court’s disapproval of a particular crime in order to show society that that kind of behaviour is not tolerated.

44
Q

Outline the purpose of rehabilitation when determining an appropriate criminal sanction for an offender.

A

The aim of re-educating or assisting the offender to change their attitudes and behaviours, thereby reducing the need or desire to re-offend in the future.

45
Q

Outline the purpose of punishment when determining an appropriate criminal sanction for an offender.

A

The aim of serving the accused with some form of retribution that sees them suffer hardship for their actions, thereby serving justice against the accused and preventing the public from seeking their own revenge.

46
Q

Outline the purpose of protection when determining an appropriate criminal sanction for an offender.

A

The aim of safeguarding the community against the actions of the accused by revoking or limiting their free behaviour.

47
Q

Define the term ‘criminal sanction’.

A

A legal consequence imposed on someone who has admitted to, or been found guilty of,breaking a criminal law. The power of the Victorian courts to impose such sanctions is given by the Sentencing Act 1991 (Vic).

48
Q

Describe the criminal sanction of a fine.

A

*Monetary penalty paid by the offender to the court fund
*Expressed in penalty units –current value (from July 2022) $192.31
*12 ‘levels’ of fines (each with a set number of penalty units) – level 12 is the lowest (1 penalty unit)
*Unpaid fines can default to imprisonment (1 day per penalty unit owed up to 2 years) and/or community work (5 hours per penalty unit owed up to 500 hours)
*Courts must consider financial position of offender
*Fines can be ordered to be paid in instalments to make them more manageable

49
Q

Describe the criminal sanction of a community corrections order.

A

*Non-custodial supervised sentence with conditions and restrictions attached
*Tailor made/flexible sanction
*Can be in place a max of 2 years if given by Mag. Court, or 5 years if given by a higher court
*Must have full list of core conditions attached (e.g. comply with directions given by CCO officer) and at least one special condition (e.g. curfew, residential restriction)
*Can be combined with fine or imprisonment up to one year

50
Q

Describe the criminal sanction of imprisonment.

A

*The detaining of an offender in jail for a specified period of time, removing their freedom & liberty
*Nine ‘levels’ of imprisonment – level 9 the lowest
*Sentences longer than 2 years must have a minimum non-parole period attached
*Time served in remand counts as time served from final sentence
*Considered the sanction of last resort
*Mag Court can give max sentence of 2 years for one offence, or 5 years for multiple offences
*Concurrent sentences run together, cumulative sentences run one after the other

51
Q

There are four factors that a judge must consider prior to sentencing a criminal offender. What are they, and what legislation lists them?

A
  1. Mitigating factors
  2. Aggravating factors
  3. Guilty Pleas
  4. Victim impact statements

Legislation = Sentencing Act 1991 (Vic)

52
Q

What are aggravating factors in terms of sentencing criminal offenders? Provide two examples.

A

Circumstances that worsen either the seriousness of the offence or the level of the offender’s culpability (wrong/responsibility), resulting in a harsher sentence.

Examples
*Use of violence or weapons
*Whether the offence was unprovoked or pre-planned
*How vulnerable the witness was (disabled, old)
*The offending taking place in front of children
*Offence occurred while offender was on bail or completing a CCO

53
Q

What are mitigating factors in terms of sentencing criminal offenders? Provide two examples.

A

Circumstances that ease either the seriousness of the offence or the level of the offender’s culpability (wrong/responsibility), resulting in a lower sentence.

Examples
*Provocation from the victim
*No previous criminal record
*Offender has shown remorse for their actions
*Offender has fully co-operated with authorities
*Offender has sought rehabilitation or has good prospects of doing so
*Injury was not substantial

54
Q

What is a victim impact statement, and how is it used in criminal sentencing?

A

A statement made by a victim of a crime to be read out in court that details how the crime has impacted their life, including any injuries, damage or loss. Courts use them as a factor to consider when determining an appropriate sentence.

55
Q

How does the cost factor of ‘the cost of legal representation’ impact the principle of fairness in the criminal justice system?

A

Without legal representation, an unfair trial may happen for a number of reasons (such as not understanding legal language or the processes used, or being too emotionally invested in the case). Even when legal representation is given through agencies like VLA or pro bono, it may mean a less experienced lawyer is helping your case, which in itself, could result in errors being made that impact the fairness of the case.

56
Q

How does the time factor of ‘court delays’ impact the principle of fairness in the criminal justice system?

A

Delays cause emotional strain on victims struggling to move forward without closure, may weaken the strength of witnesses’ accounts, and can make it harder for a person on remand to adequately prepare their defence – all of which may lead to an unjust outcome. That being said, it also means the accused has time to prepare their defence, which may be helpful to assist a just outcome.

57
Q

How does the cultural factor of ‘the use of the Koori Court in sentencing’ impact the principle of fairness in the criminal justice system?

A

The use of this court enables better communication to overcome cultural differences and limits the possibility of unfair sentencing processes.

58
Q

Outline the recent reform of ‘broadening sentence indications’ aimed at improving the criminal justice system.

A

Previously, sentence indications for indictable offenders only told the accused whether or not they were likely to face an immediate term of imprisonment.

In Feb 2022, legislation changed. Now, an accused person can be told what type of sanction they will receive OR the total duration of their sentence, provided they plead guilty at the earliest possible time after that indication is given.

This significantly enhances the likelihood the accused will plead guilty, making the process more successful. In addition, the prosecution can no longer completely stop a sentence indication being given, but can oppose it (generally on the basis that they don’t think there is enough information to give one).

59
Q

Outline the recent reform of ‘expansion of Koori Court’ aimed at improving the criminal justice system.

A

In 2002 the first Koori Court was established as a way of reducing over-representation of Indigenous offenders in our legal system, and has continued growing since. It is not a trial court, and is only used for sentencing where offenders plead guilty. However, the informal process adopted, and the inclusion of Aboriginal elders in the process, helps to address a range of issues and limitations with the traditional court system for A&TSI peoples.

Since 2018 alone, there have been 4 new Koori Courts established. I.e. In 2020 both the Dandenong and Mildura Koori Courts opened. This allows for greater access to justice for Indigenous peoples within these areas that were previously unable to access these specialised services.

60
Q

Outline the recommended reform of ‘judge alone trials’ aimed at improving the criminal justice system.

A

During the COVID pandemic, trials in higher courts were temporarily allowed to run without juries, allowing the judge in a ‘judge-only’ trial to determine the outcome of the case, as well as the sentence.

Now, there have been calls from legal professions to re-instate this, and to make a judge-only trial a permanent part of the Victorian legal system.

The main argument behind this is that jury members do not have the knowledge or expertise needed to decide on facts of law. There is also the argument that in today’s technological age, jurors can’t be considered neutral and unbiased like they once were. To overcome this, a judge-only trial could be requested by an accused person in a high-profile case where jury impartiality is unlikely. This would mean they were more likely to get a fair trial.

61
Q

Outline the recommended reform of ‘the abolition of the committal hearing test’ aimed at improving the criminal justice system.

A

The Victorian Law Reform Commission (VLRC) recommended in September 2020 that the current “strength of the evidence” test be abolished, instead, converting the committal process into a less time-consuming formality where the Magistrate simply puts forward an order to proceed to trial.

The only time a committal process would then turn into a more time-consuming test of the evidence would be when the accused submitted an application to have the matter discharged, which would need to be considered and decided on by the Magistrate.

This change would hopefully speed up the committals process, and reduce the need for so many situations where victims and/or witness have to give evidence twice (one throughout a contested committal, and then again at trial).

62
Q

Does imprisonment achieve the aims of criminal sanctions?

A

Deterrence
*Yes – Fearful of going back (specific), community may not like the idea of going to prison (general)
*No – High rates of recidivism suggest it doesn’t deter people (specific)

Denunciation
*Yes – Long sentences can show disapproval
No – Judges restricted by legislation, so limited ability to express disapproval of the actions in all cases

Rehabilitation
*Yes – Some programs offered in prison to offenders
*No - Programs voluntary, statistics suggest there is easy access to drugs in some prisons, high level of exposure to criminals may increase desire to offend once released

Punishment
*Yes – Removes freedom and liberty, prevents them from doing what they want to do & person suffers hardship of being away from friends and family
*No - People offending for reasons such as homelessness may prefer being under state care with no expenses

Protection
*Yes – Removes a dangerous person from the community
*No - Protection is only for the time they are in jail, not after they are released

63
Q

Does a CCO achieve the aims of criminal sanctions?

A

Deterrence
*Yes – Offender may not like work (specific)
*No – May not be ‘visible’ enough to deter community (general)

Denunciation
*Yes – Lots of conditions attached to order
*No – Judges restricted to stipulated conditions, which may not effectively express their disapproval of the crime

Rehabilitation
*Yes – Program is tailored to individual needs

Punishment
*Yes – Demands offenders time, so not free to do what they want

Protection
*Yes – Occupies the offender’s time, so they’re less likely to offend if ‘bored’
*No – Offender still free in the community

64
Q

Do fines achieve the aims of criminal sanctions?

A

Deterrence
*Yes – Don’t want to part with money (specific & general)
*No – May be well-off, so unaffected by paying money (specific)

Denunciation
*Yes – High fine shows disapproval
*No – Not always ‘visible’, so may not affect the public

Rehabilitation
*No – Paying money has nothing to do with addressing any underlying problems that led to the offending behaviour

Punishment
*Yes – Paying money may lead to financial hardship
*No – Person may be unaffected if wealthy

Protection
*No – Offender not removed from community or restricted in any way
*No – Often given without a conviction, so future ‘checks’ won’t reveal offending

65
Q

How does the cost factor of ‘the cost of legal representation’ impact the principle of equality in the criminal justice system?

A

Parties who can’t afford representation, or use legal representation that is less experienced, are at risk of being disadvantaged, as they may be ‘out-performed’ by experienced prosecutors. Further, when an accused is self-representing, a judge has to find a careful balance between assisting them through the procedures but remaining neutral. Given this is different treatment to others, it may be seen as reducing equality.

66
Q

How does the cost factor of ‘the cost of legal representation’ impact the principle of access in the criminal justice system?

A

Not affording legal representation may lead to a person pleading guilty even if they didn’t do the crime, simply
because they don’t have the ability to defend themselves. Even if the accused pleads not guilty, they may not be able to properly represent themselves, or make appropriate submissions during sentencing, due to their limited legal knowledge.

67
Q

How does the time factor of ‘court delays’ impact the principle of equality in the criminal justice system?

A

Delays potentially place accused people or victims in a more disadvantageous or distressed state, reducing the legal system’s capacity to treat them equally.
This is especially the case for accused people who have been denied bail, or for victims who have suffered significant trauma and want/need greater closure to move on with their lives.

68
Q

How does the time factor of ‘court delays’ impact the principle of access in the criminal justice system?

A

Courts become less accessible as delays increase, especially for victims of trauma or sexual offences that have to keep re-living the trauma of the crime, and for witnesses that have to try and remember what happened over an extended period of time.

69
Q

How does the cultural factor of ‘the use of the Koori Court in sentencing’ impact the principle of equality in the criminal justice system?

A

Recognising cultural differences during sentencing processes can enhance the achievement of equality by reducing disadvantage. However, the court is limited to sentencing and has strict eligibility requirements, so it doesn’t address inequalities with trials to determine guilt.

70
Q

How does the cultural factor of ‘the use of the Koori Court in sentencing’ impact the principle of access in the criminal justice system?

A

The informality associated with this court can increase understanding of processes and result in clearer communication, leading to greater access. However, it only does this for accused persons who plead guilty, so access is still not addressed for a number of A&TSI peoples.