Anti-Commandeering Flashcards

1
Q

The most salient limit to what the federal govt can do under the CC and NP clause is ___

A

state sovereignty/anti-commandeering

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Garcia facts

A

DOL attempted to apply FLSA to SATMA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Garcia holding 1

A

National League of Cities overruled

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Garcia holding 2

A

attempt to draw boundaries of state regulatory immunity in terms of “traditional government function” is not only unworkable but also incosistent with federalism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Garcia holding 3

A

nothing in overtime/min wage requirements of FLSA that is destructive of state sovereignty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Garcia reasoning 1

A

Post National League identifying which state functions are immune as “traditional” difficult for courts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Garcia reasoning 2

A

States retain sovereignty only to the extent that Const not divested them and transferred to Fed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Garcia reasoning 3

A

Framers chose system with special restraints on federal power inhered principally in workings of National Govt, rather than discrete limitations on objects of federal authority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Garcia court is essentially arguing that the protection for states in all of this is through ___

A

political process not limits on Fed govt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Hamburger critiques of Garcia

A

political process protection maybe not true after 17th + point of Consti to not just create a structure but also rights that are enforceable in court

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

O’Connor dissent in Garcia

A

majority washes its hands of all efforts to protect the States

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Powell dissent in Garcia

A

the result of the holding is that federal political officials, invoking CC, are sole judges of limits of their own power

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Main takeway of Garica

A

State sovereignty does not limit CC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Effect of Garcia on the states

A

replace “traditional govt functions test” with nothing so almost no limit left on what Congress can legislate over the States

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Some observers have suggested Garcia court effectively holds that federalism questions are ___

A

political questions and thus not justiciable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

NY v. US facts

A

radioactive waste policy required state govts to adopt fed legislation or take tile of waste within their borders

17
Q

NY v. US holding

A

Congress can’t require States to do either, Fed cannot compel State to enact/administer federal regulatory program

18
Q

Printz facts

A

act that firearms dealers must send forms to chief law enforcemtn officer of gun owner residence who in 5 days should ascertain whether posession of gun lawful

19
Q

Printz holding 1

A

Congress can circumvent (NY decision) by conscripting state officers

20
Q

Printz has helped create ___

A

anti-commandeering doctrine

21
Q

Printz holding 2

A

Fed Govt cannot issue directives requiring States to address particular problems, command State officers to enforce/admin fed regulatory program

22
Q

Printz holding 3

A

doesn’t matter if policymaking involved or case by case weighing

23
Q

Printz reason 1

A

Absence of executive-commandeering statues in early Congresses and in later history

24
Q

Printz reason 2

A

Consti establishes dual sovereignty, would augment executive power so much and upset balance, NP doesn’t support (not law executing CC, instead a usurpation)

25
Q

Printz reason 3

A

New York v. US precedent

26
Q

What could be “traditional state power”

A

police power – sex, marriage, family, education, contracts, torts, health

27
Q

Garcia court basically says limits protecting states ___

A

do not lie in the Court, in political process

28
Q

Anti-commandeering doctrine cases

A

New York, Printz

29
Q

Problems with commandeering (3)`

A

reduce states to cogs of fed govt (undermine localized self-govt), accountability concerns (who will voters blame), detract from states as public policy labs

30
Q

Anti-commandeering doctrine is a product not of ___ but of __

A

constitutional provision, construction of dual sovereign

31
Q

What are wasy around anti-commandeering

A

taxing and spending powers (conditional grants and taxing as penalty) + preemption

32
Q

Sebelius says anti commandeering applies not only to ___ but also __

A

direct regulation, conditions

33
Q

What is police power

A

general legislative power to regulate a Jdx internal affairs

34
Q

police power was ___ and did not exist ___

A

imported from civil law system, at the founding

35
Q

Police power includes ____ so it can justify ___

A

exec/judicial/leg, the admin state

36
Q

Court says Congresss ____ have police power (___)

A

does not have (lopez)

37
Q

In practice, ______ have given fed govt police power (___)

A

expansive interpretations of CC and NP, Comstock Thomas dissent

38
Q
A