Anti-Commandeering Flashcards
The most salient limit to what the federal govt can do under the CC and NP clause is ___
state sovereignty/anti-commandeering
Garcia facts
DOL attempted to apply FLSA to SATMA
Garcia holding 1
National League of Cities overruled
Garcia holding 2
attempt to draw boundaries of state regulatory immunity in terms of “traditional government function” is not only unworkable but also incosistent with federalism
Garcia holding 3
nothing in overtime/min wage requirements of FLSA that is destructive of state sovereignty
Garcia reasoning 1
Post National League identifying which state functions are immune as “traditional” difficult for courts
Garcia reasoning 2
States retain sovereignty only to the extent that Const not divested them and transferred to Fed
Garcia reasoning 3
Framers chose system with special restraints on federal power inhered principally in workings of National Govt, rather than discrete limitations on objects of federal authority
Garcia court is essentially arguing that the protection for states in all of this is through ___
political process not limits on Fed govt
Hamburger critiques of Garcia
political process protection maybe not true after 17th + point of Consti to not just create a structure but also rights that are enforceable in court
O’Connor dissent in Garcia
majority washes its hands of all efforts to protect the States
Powell dissent in Garcia
the result of the holding is that federal political officials, invoking CC, are sole judges of limits of their own power
Main takeway of Garica
State sovereignty does not limit CC
Effect of Garcia on the states
replace “traditional govt functions test” with nothing so almost no limit left on what Congress can legislate over the States
Some observers have suggested Garcia court effectively holds that federalism questions are ___
political questions and thus not justiciable