Animal Models Flashcards
Intro
Drosophilia:
- C. elegans are the only organism for which the entire connectome (complete set of synaptic connections) has been deciphered —> invaluable for guided developmental and neural circuit research
- C. elegans has a transparent body which is great for developmental and imaging studies
- *Rodents and nonhuman primates**
- mouse specifically are the only mammals for which the production of transgenic and knockout animals is routine —> facilitates genetic manipulation and allows genetically identified neuronal populations to be recorded and manipulated
- historically, rats were used more for behavioural paradigms while mice were use for genetic manipulation
Forward Genetics
= traces an observed phenotype to a gene
—> screens use random mutagenesis to identify genes that control complex biological processes
- a series of unknown genes play a role in the process of interest —> can use chemical mutagens, radiation, or transposon insertion to mutagenize a population of animals —> each animal carries a different set of random mutations of a single gene or few genes —> screen for mutations that disrupt the biological process of interest based on the phenotypes exhibited by the offspring
- particularly powerful in tackling problems for which the cellular and molecular pathways are poor understood
- identifies genes involved in a specific process without any bias or knowledge as to what is expected
Reverse Genetics
= follows a gene to its associated phenotype
—> disrupting a pre-designated gene
- with genome sequences completed for most model organisms, researchers can use databases to identify genes that may perform certain functions based on expression patterns and predicted protein sequences
- essentially hypothesis driven
- to test function of candidate gene, you must create a loss-of-function mutation and examine the phenotypes of the animals (deleting the gene) —> is this gene indeed necessary for what we think it is
- most popular technique for gene deletion is homologous recombination
- piece of endogenous DNA is replaced by a piece of in vitro engineered DNA that have identical end sequences
- knockout = type of homologous recombination
- many variations of knockout now exist, making the technique more versatile - knock-in
- e.g. single nucleotides can be made to test the contribution of specific AA residues to protein function
- knock-in mouse can express a marker gene
Conditional knockout mice more detailed
- first developed using the Cre/LoxP system
- Cre recombinase is an enzyme that catalyzes recombination between two sequence-specific DNA elements called loxP sites
- when two loxP sites are in the same orientation, a recombination event will delete the intervening sequence
—> hundreds of transgenic Cre lines with different patterns of Cre expression have been generated —> gene deletion only occurs after the Cre transgene is first expressed
Animal models of neurodegenerative diseases (overview)
—> animal models of adult-onset neurodegenerative diseases have enhanced the understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of AD, PD etc.
- genetic forms of the human disorders do not perfectly phenocopy diseases, but in many cases are still excellent surrogates —> can still be used as models of the disorders to provide insight into molecular mechanisms to help identify disease-modifying therapies
- arguably, no animal model fully phenocopies the human disease
- BUT some models develop a more complete neurodegenerative cascade, but it still remains uncertain whether the entire sequence of pathophysiological events that occur in a disease are captured
- animal models have been used to develop, test, and refine therapies BUT animal models have poor predictive power for drug efficacy in human neurodegenerative diseases
- translation failure not always due to shortcomings of the animal model but due to the models being limited in terms of maturation and complexity
- e.g. lack of complex neuronal circuits, full glia complexity, no immunologic components etc.
- translation failure not always due to shortcomings of the animal model but due to the models being limited in terms of maturation and complexity
Common Challenges in modelling neurodegenerative disorders in rodents
- potentially limited relevance of models based on expression of rare genetic variants —> may be inappropriate when molecular and cellular events leading to the neurodegeneration differ from human disease
- short life-span of rodents —> may lead to an incomplete development of pathological hallmarks and/or neurodegeneration —> major limitations in the modelling of age-related diseases
- inherent differences in the development and function of rodent and human brains —> need to be cautious when interpreting behavioural deficits in animal models when the human disease is characterized by cognitive, emotional and language deficits
- there are genomic differences between rodent and human e.g. amino acid changes has a different impact in various species —> not always the same
- using inbred animals → does not reflect genetic diversity of a population
Animal Models of AD and related disorders
—> modelled either based on amyloid pathology or tau pathology
Amyloid Pathology Models Problems
- even though Aß aggregates can be produced and overexpressed, these models do not show behavioral abnormalities or show only subtle abnormalities
- models mimic some aspects of preclinical asymptomatic AD but lack the tau pathology, robust neurodeeneration, and neurotransmitter abnormalities that are associated with the symptomatic phases of human AD —> animal models which accumulate Aß are not AD models
Tau Pathology Models
- in comparison to the Aß models, the animals exhibit overt neurdegenerative changes
- BUT there is concern whether the tauopathy in these models are relevant to the tauopathy in AD
- a mutant tau transgene expressed in the spinal cord leads to motor phenotype, while expression in forebrain, hippocampus, or entorhinal cortex results in tau pathology and neurodegeneration in those regions —> mutations in tau can drive tau aggregation which produce neurodegeneration
- BUT it is still unclear why only specific neuronal population degenerated in AD although tau is widely expressed throughout the human CNS
Animal Models of PD
- characterized by progressive loss of DA neurons in the substantia nigra and misfolded alpha-synuclein in Lewy bodies and neurites
- many different causes of PD have been found, both genetic and environmental
Pharmacological models of PD
- historically used to advance successful therapies for PD —> lead to L-dopa treatment
- effective models for symptomatic therapies for the motor symptoms of PD, but other therapeutic approaches have failed to demonstrate any utility in the identification of disease-modifying therapies
Genetically based models of alpha-synuclein pathology
- models of alpha-synuclein-induced degeneration have allowed the expression of varying degrees of neurodegeneration where animals develop many clinical biochemical feature of PD
- BUT degeneration occurs in the absence of any measurable loss of DA neurons
- BUT PRO: exhibit nonDA deficits such as anxiety, GI issues, and non-DA related motor dysfunction
- absence of DA neuron loss is viewed by some as a major shortcomings of these models
Improving Translatability
- one of the primary goals of animal model development is to identify key points in the process of neurodegeneration that represent therapeutic targets
- clinical trials for AD and PD based on therapeutics that showed success in animal models have largely failed —>may be attributed to numerous factors in both preclinical and clinical studies e.g. imperfect animal models, overly optimist interpretation of preclinical data, clinical trials conducted in absence of informative biomarkers
- one major issue: lack of alignment between clinical and preclinical studies—> e.g. it is important to consider timing of treatment initiation and whether it alters the onset or progression of the disease —> if onset is altered rather than progression, then this will likely have no effect in patients that are already affected
- in AD: therapies are only tested EITHER in an Aß model or tau model, but not both; animal models often only at asymptomatic stage leading to therapies failing in humans with symptomatic AD
- Generally: therapies need to be tested in multiple models and we should not rely on results from just one —> likely to fail in clinical trial
- importance of effect size and significance in preclinical studies —> too often small significant effect sizes in preclinical trials are used to justify clinical trials —> BUT unlikely to find evidence of these small effects
- claims about what a model shows should remain conservative —> due to imprecise correlations between models and the extent to which they phenocopy human disease
Shortcomings of rodent models for psychiatric disorders especially SCZ
- rodent models replicate only CERTAIN neurophysiological, neuroanatomical and/or behavioral features of genetic mutations implicated in SCZ or ASD —> none fully replicates the complexity of these disorders —> each model provides only a specific facet that then needs to be integrated into a greater whole that reflects the heterogeneity of the disorder
- animal models cannot be used to assess the necessary depth —> how can one research thought processes, perception and abstract learning in animals when they cannot convey these fully through language —> can only assess core features of disorders indirectly with a focus on simpler behavioural and physiological features—> translation to complex human symptomatology not always clear
- induction of disease states in rodents may require pharmacological or other insults which to not accurately replicate causes of psychiatric disorders in humans
- even transgenic approaches may be inaccurate —> a single gene knockout is unlikely to capture the complexity of genetic causes of psychiatric disorders —> genomic landscapes of genes may differ in rodents and humans
- humans and rodents have different lifespans —> may not be appropriately congruent with respect to timeline of disease development
- pharmacology of potential drug treatments may differ in species —> creating false positives and negatives in preclinical studies
Behavioral models of depression - adult stress model examples
- learned helplessness
- exposure to uncontrollable stressful like events makes people feel a loss of control and can lead to depressive behavouirs
- rodents develop deficits in escape, cognitive, and rewarded behvaiours following repeated unavoidable and uncontrollabe shocks
- helpless behaviour is measured based on performance of active escape test
- Pros: can be used to measure escape performance of mice with different mutations —> target genes of depression may affect the vulnerability to develop a depressive-like state
- cons: requires very strong stressors —> ethic concerns; not long lasting
- chronic mild stress
- likely the most valid animal model of depression
- aims to model chronic depressive-like state that develops over time in response to stress
- animals are exposed to series of mild and unpredictable stressors during at least two weeks
- results in long lasting changes of behavioral, neurochemical, neuroimmune, and neuroendocrinological variables —> reversed by chronic but not acute antidepressant treatment
- can be used to screen and test potential antidepressant compounds and to develop new treatment strategies
- Pros: most valid model of depression
- cons: labor intensive, demanding of space, long duration