Anglo-Saxons Flashcards
Bede and the Adventus Saxonum
- Monk writing in early 8th & century Northumbria
- Describes the arrival of peoples, from the ‘three most formidable races of Germany’: the Angles, Saxons and Jutes
- Said to be led by brothers Hengist & Horsa
- Incomers supposedly granted land in exchange for maintaining peace and security
Gildas’ On the Ruin of Britain
- 6th & century British cleric, possibly in south& west England
- Disasters blamed on sins of British Christian clergy
- Talks about Anglo & Saxon mercenaries
- Chronologically unreliable but best source we have for the period
Jutes
‘From the Jutes are descended the people of Kent and the Isle of Wight and those in the province of the West Saxons opposite the Isle of Wight who are called Jutes to this day…
Saxons
‘From the Saxons – that is, the country now known as the land of the Old Saxons – came the East, South and West Saxons…’
Angles
‘From the Angles … Angulus, which lies between the provinces of the Jutes and Saxons and is said to remain unpopulated to this day – are descended the East and Middle Angles, the Mercians, all the Northumbrian stock, and the other English peoples’ (Bede’s Historia EcclesiascaI:15)
Traditional model
- Not to be taken literally
- Written from Christian standpoint – narrative of ‘chosen ones’ crossing water to promised land
- North Sea zone interconnected in this period anyway
Historiography of Anglo & Saxonism
- ‘Culture history’ approach: belief that groups of migrants could be traced through material culture
- John Mitchell Kemble in mid 19th century – Germanist who pioneered comparative Continental approach
- J.N.L. Myres in 1930s – Continental background to ‘English settlements’ starts with Bede
Ethnicity and material culture
- Superficially, the geographical distribution of certain artefact types fits the narrative…
- But always problematic: objects can’t be passive reflection of identities
Migration vs acculturation
- Mass movement vs small scale influx of warriors and elite groups
- Folk migration unfashionable by late 1980s and 90s – processualists also sceptical of historical sources
- Post & processualism – renewed relevance of migration, with debates about ethnicity and ethnographies of migration and assimilation
- ‘Apartheid & like’ society? (Härke 2011)
Genetics
• Research in early 2000s (Weale et al. 2002) – central English and Frisian samples indistinguishable
• New paper just published (Schiffels et al. 2016) using genome sequencing:
‐ Oakington cemetery, Cambs, displays evidence of culturally Anglo & Saxon but genetically mixed community
‐ Contemporary E England population derives 38 of ancestry from Anglo & Saxon migrations
‐ Anglo & Saxon samples closely related to modern Danish and Dutch populations
Isotopes
West Heslerton, N Yorks (Montgomery et al. 2005)
– high mobility, and individuals with ‘Anglian’ cruciform brooches and wrist clasps more likely to have non & local strontium levels
• Bowl Hole cemetery, Bamburgh, Northumberland (Groves et al. 2013) – majority non & local
• Recent study at Berinsfield cemetery, Oxfordshire (Hughes et al. 2014) – only 5 of individuals originated outside area
Anglo & Saxon identity
- Historical sources suggest 8th & century populations believed, or liked to believe, in Continental origins • Part ‘origin myth’, part truth?
- New scientific techniques useful, but have to be careful fimng results into existing narratives
- Concept of ethnicity may have differed
- Regional identities probably developed here, not on Continent
- Study people not cultures
Anglo & Saxon kingdoms
Evidence and sources for kingdoms and regiones:
- Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, but written much later and from perspective of West Saxons
- Tribal Hidage – probably 7th & century tribute list of Mercian or Northumbrian overlord
Tribal Hidage
-List of 35 tribes or territories, many of which are known only from this source
-Size in hides (land needed to support one family)
West Saxons 100,000
Mercians 30,000
East Angles 30,000
Kent 15,000
East Saxons 7000
South Saxons 7000
Kingdom Formation
Regiones: older subdivisions which were ‘building blocks’ in kingdom formation?
• Bassett (1989): Competing micro & kingdoms, weakest gradually eliminated or subsumed ‘Football analogy’ – like knockout
• Place & name evidence, e.g. -ingas = ‘dwellers of’ or members of a particular tribal group
• Emerged from Roman estate centres?
Hundreds and assembly places
- Hundred/wapentake = later A & S administrative unit (100 hides)
- Assembly helped forge and maintain group identity
- Perhaps related to seasonal movement of livestock
- Barrows or ancient sites open used, suggesting long & term significance
- Place & names open theophoric
The ‘Heptarchy’
Traditionally seven kingdoms
… East Anglia, Essex, Kent, Mercia, Northumbria, Sussex and Wessex
…which eventually unified to form England
The ‘Heptarchy’ Term not used so much now – number of kingdoms fluctuated, but certainly many more than seven