Analytical Writing - Argument Analysis Topic Pool Flashcards
Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archaeologists discovered such a “Palean” basket in Lithos, an ancient village across the Brim River from Palea. The Brim River is very deep and broad, and so the ancient Paleans could have crossed it only by boat, and no Palean boats have been found. Thus it follows that the so-called Palean baskets were not uniquely Palean.
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
The following appeared as part of a letter to the editor of a scientific journal.
“A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual’s levels of stimulation. The study showed that in stimulating situations (such as an encounter with an unfamiliar monkey), firstborn infant monkeys produce up to twice as much of the hormone cortisol, which primes the body for increased activity levels, as do their younger siblings. Firstborn humans also produce relatively high levels of cortisol in stimulating situations (such as the return of a parent after an absence). The study also found that during pregnancy, first-time mother monkeys had higher levels of cortisol than did those who had had several offspring.”
Write a response in which you discuss one or more alternative explanations that could rival the proposed explanation and explain how your explanation(s) can plausibly account for the facts presented in the argument.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
The following appeared as a letter to the editor from a Central Plaza store owner.
“Over the past two years, the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically. Many Central Plaza store owners believe that the decrease in their business is due to the number of skateboard users in the plaza. There has also been a dramatic increase in the amount of litter and vandalism throughout the plaza. Thus, we recommend that the city prohibit skateboarding in Central Plaza. If skateboarding is prohibited here, we predict that business in Central Plaza will return to its previously high levels.”
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
The following appeared in a letter from a homeowner to a friend.
“Of the two leading real estate firms in our town—Adams Realty and Fitch Realty—Adams Realty is clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents; in contrast, Fitch has 25, many of whom work only part-time. Moreover, Adams’ revenue last year was twice as high as that of Fitch and included home sales that averaged $168,000, compared to Fitch’s $144,000. Homes listed with Adams sell faster as well: ten years ago I listed my home with Fitch, and it took more than four months to sell; last year, when I sold another home, I listed it with Adams, and it took only one month. Thus, if you want to sell your home quickly and at a good price, you should use Adams Realty.”
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
The following appeared in a letter to the editor of the Balmer Island Gazette.
“On Balmer Island, where mopeds serve as a popular form of transportation, the population increases to 100,000 during the summer months. To reduce the number of accidents involving mopeds and pedestrians, the town council of Balmer Island should limit the number of mopeds rented by the island’s moped rental companies from 50 per day to 25 per day during the summer season. By limiting the number of rentals, the town council will attain the 50 percent annual reduction in moped accidents that was achieved last year on the neighboring island of Seaville, when Seaville’s town council enforced similar limits on moped rentals.”
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
Arctic deer live on islands in Canada’s arctic regions. They search for food by moving over ice from island to island during the course of the year. Their habitat is limited to areas warm enough to sustain the plants on which they feed and cold enough, at least some of the year, for the ice to cover the sea separating the islands, allowing the deer to travel over it. Unfortunately, according to reports from local hunters, the deer populations are declining. Since these reports coincide with recent global warming trends that have caused the sea ice to melt, we can conclude that the purported decline in deer populations is the result of the deer’s being unable to follow their age-old migration patterns across the frozen sea.
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
The following is a recommendation from the Board of Directors of Monarch Books.
“We recommend that Monarch Books open a café in its store. Monarch, having been in business at the same location for more than twenty years, has a large customer base because it is known for its wide selection of books on all subjects. Clearly, opening the café would attract more customers. Space could be made for the café by discontinuing the children’s book section, which will probably become less popular given that the most recent national census indicated a significant decline in the percentage of the population under age ten. Opening a café will allow Monarch to attract more customers and better compete with Regal Books, which recently opened its own café.”
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
The following appeared in a memo from the director of student housing at Buckingham College.
“To serve the housing needs of our students, Buckingham College should build a number of new dormitories. Buckingham’s enrollment is growing and, based on current trends, will double over the next 50 years, thus making existing dormitory space inadequate. Moreover, the average rent for an apartment in our town has risen in recent years. Consequently, students will find it increasingly difficult to afford off-campus housing. Finally, attractive new dormitories would make prospective students more likely to enroll at Buckingham.”
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
Nature’s Way, a chain of stores selling health food and other health-related products, is opening its next franchise in the town of Plainsville. The store should prove to be very successful: Nature’s Way franchises tend to be most profitable in areas where residents lead healthy lives, and clearly Plainsville is such an area. Plainsville merchants report that sales of running shoes and exercise clothing are at all-time highs. The local health club has more members than ever, and the weight training and aerobics classes are always full. Finally, Plainsville’s schoolchildren represent a new generation of potential customers: these schoolchildren are required to participate in a fitness-for-life program, which emphasizes the benefits of regular exercise at an early age.
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia. Using an observation-centered approach to studying Tertian culture, he concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than by their own biological parents. Recently another anthropologist, Dr. Karp, visited the group of islands that includes Tertia and used the interview-centered method to study child-rearing practices. In the interviews that Dr. Karp conducted with children living in this group of islands, the children spent much more time talking about their biological parents than about other adults in the village. Dr. Karp decided that Dr. Field’s conclusion about Tertian village culture must be invalid. Some anthropologists recommend that to obtain accurate information on Tertian child-rearing practices, future research on the subject should be conducted via the interview-centered method.
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
The council of Maple County, concerned about the county’s becoming overdeveloped, is debating a proposed measure that would prevent the development of existing farmland in the county. But the council is also concerned that such a restriction, by limiting the supply of new housing, could lead to significant increases in the price of housing in the county. Proponents of the measure note that Chestnut County established a similar measure ten years ago, and its housing prices have increased only modestly since. However, opponents of the measure note that Pine County adopted restrictions on the development of new residential housing fifteen years ago, and its housing prices have since more than doubled. The council currently predicts that the proposed measure, if passed, will result in a significant increase in housing prices in Maple County.
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the prediction and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the prediction.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
Fifteen years ago, Omega University implemented a new procedure that encouraged students to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of all their professors. Since that time, Omega professors have begun to assign higher grades in their classes, and overall student grade averages at Omega have risen by 30 percent. Potential employers, looking at this dramatic rise in grades, believe that grades at Omega are inflated and do not accurately reflect student achievement; as a result, Omega graduates have not been as successful at getting jobs as have graduates from nearby Alpha University. To enable its graduates to secure better jobs, Omega University should terminate student evaluation of professors.
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
In an attempt to improve highway safety, Prunty County last year lowered its speed limit from 55 to 45 miles per hour on all county highways. But this effort has failed: the number of accidents has not decreased, and, based on reports by the highway patrol, many drivers are exceeding the speed limit. Prunty County should instead undertake the same kind of road improvement project that Butler County completed five years ago: increasing lane widths, resurfacing rough highways, and improving visibility at dangerous intersections. Today, major Butler County roads still have a 55 mph speed limit, yet there were 25 percent fewer reported accidents in Butler County this past year than there were five years ago.
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
The following appeared as part of an article in a business magazine.
“A recent study rating 300 male and female Mentian advertising executives according to the average number of hours they sleep per night showed an association between the amount of sleep the executives need and the success of their firms. Of the advertising firms studied, those whose executives reported needing no more than 6 hours of sleep per night had higher profit margins and faster growth. These results suggest that if a business wants to prosper, it should hire only people who need less than 6 hours of sleep per night.”
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants.
“Recently, butter has been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States. This change, however, has had little impact on our customers. In fact, only about 2 percent of customers have complained, indicating that an average of 98 people out of 100 are happy with the change. Furthermore, many servers have reported that a number of customers who ask for butter do not complain when they are given margarine instead. Clearly, either these customers do not distinguish butter from margarine or they use the term ‘butter’ to refer to either butter or margarine.”
Write a response in which you discuss one or more alternative explanations that could rival the proposed explanation and explain how your explanation(s) can plausibly account for the facts presented in the argument.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating, and fishing) among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department devotes little of its budget to maintaining riverside recreational facilities. For years there have been complaints from residents about the quality of the river’s water and the river’s smell. In response, the state has recently announced plans to clean up Mason River. Use of the river for water sports is, therefore, sure to increase. The city government should for that reason devote more money in this year’s budget to riverside recreational facilities.
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
The following appeared in a memorandum from the manager of WWAC radio station.
“To reverse a decline in listener numbers, our owners have decided that WWAC must change from its current rock-music format. The decline has occurred despite population growth in our listening area, but that growth has resulted mainly from people moving here after their retirement. We must make listeners of these new residents. We could switch to a music format tailored to their tastes, but a continuing decline in local sales of recorded music suggests limited interest in music. Instead we should change to a news and talk format, a form of radio that is increasingly popular in our area.”
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station.
“Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this period, most of the complaints received from viewers were concerned with our station’s coverage of weather and local news. In addition, local businesses that used to advertise during our late-night news program have canceled their advertising contracts with us. Therefore, in order to attract more viewers to our news programs and to avoid losing any further advertising revenues, we should expand our coverage of weather and local news on all our news programs.”
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
Two years ago, radio station WCQP in Rockville decided to increase the number of call-in advice programs that it broadcast; since that time, its share of the radio audience in the Rockville listening area has increased significantly. Given WCQP’s recent success with call-in advice programming, and citing a nationwide survey indicating that many radio listeners are quite interested in such programs, the station manager of KICK in Medway recommends that KICK include more call-in advice programs in an attempt to gain a larger audience share in its listening area.
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station.
“Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this time period, most of the complaints received from viewers were concerned with our station’s coverage of weather and local news. In addition, local businesses that used to advertise during our late-night news program have just canceled their advertising contracts with us. Therefore, in order to attract more viewers to the program and to avoid losing any further advertising revenues, we should restore the time devoted to weather and local news to its former level.”
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
The following appeared in an article written by Dr. Karp, an anthropologist.
“Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than by their own biological parents. However, my recent interviews with children living in the group of islands that includes Tertia show that these children spend much more time talking about their biological parents than about other adults in the village. This research of mine proves that Dr. Field’s conclusion about Tertian village culture is invalid and thus that the observation-centered approach to studying cultures is invalid as well. The interview-centered method that my team of graduate students is currently using in Tertia will establish a much more accurate understanding of child-rearing traditions there and in other island cultures.”
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
According to a recent report, cheating among college and university students is on the rise. However, Groveton College has successfully reduced student cheating by adopting an honor code, which calls for students to agree not to cheat in their academic endeavors and to notify a faculty member if they suspect that others have cheated. Groveton’s honor code replaced a system in which teachers closely monitored students; under that system, teachers reported an average of thirty cases of cheating per year. In the first year the honor code was in place, students reported twenty-one cases of cheating; five years later, this figure had dropped to fourteen. Moreover, in a recent survey, a majority of Groveton students said that they would be less likely to cheat with an honor code in place than without. Thus, all colleges and universities should adopt honor codes similar to Groveton’s in order to decrease cheating among students.
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
The following appeared in an article written by Dr. Karp, an anthropologist.
“Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than by their own biological parents. However, my recent interviews with children living in the group of islands that includes Tertia show that these children spend much more time talking about their biological parents than about other adults in the village. This research of mine proves that Dr. Field’s conclusion about Tertian village culture is invalid and thus that the observation-centered approach to studying cultures is invalid as well. The interview-centered method that my team of graduate students is currently using in Tertia will establish a much more accurate understanding of child-rearing traditions there and in other island cultures.”
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
A recently issued twenty-year study on headaches suffered by the residents of Mentia investigated the possible therapeutic effect of consuming salicylates. Salicylates are members of the same chemical family as aspirin, a medicine used to treat headaches. Although many foods are naturally rich in salicylates, food-processing companies also add salicylates to foods as preservatives. The twenty-year study found a correlation between the rise in the commercial use of salicylates and a steady decline in the average number of headaches reported by study participants. At the time when the study concluded, food-processing companies had just discovered that salicylates can also be used as flavor additives for foods, and, as a result, many companies plan to do so. Based on these study results, some health experts predict that residents of Mentia will suffer even fewer headaches in the future.
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the prediction and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the prediction.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
The following was written as a part of an application for a small-business loan by a group of developers in the city of Monroe.
“A jazz music club in Monroe would be a tremendously profitable enterprise. Currently, the nearest jazz club is 65 miles away; thus, the proposed new jazz club in Monroe, the C-Note, would have the local market all to itself. Plus, jazz is extremely popular in Monroe: over 100,000 people attended Monroe’s annual jazz festival last summer; several well-known jazz musicians live in Monroe; and the highest-rated radio program in Monroe is ‘Jazz Nightly,’ which airs every weeknight at 7 P.M. Finally, a nationwide study indicates that the typical jazz fan spends close to $1,000 per year on jazz entertainment.”
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
The following appeared in the summary of a study on headaches suffered by the residents of Mentia.
“Salicylates are members of the same chemical family as aspirin, a medicine used to treat headaches. Although many foods are naturally rich in salicylates, for the past several decades, food-processing companies have also been adding salicylates to foods as preservatives. This rise in the commercial use of salicylates has been found to correlate with a steady decline in the average number of headaches reported by participants in our twenty-year study. Recently, food-processing companies have found that salicylates can also be used as flavor additives for foods. With this new use for salicylates, we can expect a continued steady decline in the number of headaches suffered by the average citizen of Mentia.”
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a local newspaper.
“Commuters complain that increased rush-hour traffic on Blue Highway between the suburbs and the city center has doubled their commuting time. The favored proposal of the motorists’ lobby is to widen the highway, adding an additional lane of traffic. But last year’s addition of a lane to the nearby Green Highway was followed by a worsening of traffic jams on it. A better alternative is to add a bicycle lane to Blue Highway. Many area residents are keen bicyclists. A bicycle lane would encourage them to use bicycles to commute, and so would reduce rush-hour traffic rather than fostering an increase.”
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
The following appeared in the summary of a study on headaches suffered by the residents of Mentia.
“Salicylates are members of the same chemical family as aspirin, a medicine used to treat headaches. Although many foods are naturally rich in salicylates, for the past several decades, food-processing companies have also been adding salicylates to foods as preservatives. This rise in the commercial use of salicylates has been found to correlate with a steady decline in the average number of headaches reported by participants in our twenty-year study. Recently, food-processing companies have found that salicylates can also be used as flavor additives for foods. With this new use for salicylates, we can expect a continued steady decline in the number of headaches suffered by the average citizen of Mentia.”
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
The following appeared in an editorial in a local newspaper.
“Commuters complain that increased rush-hour traffic on Blue Highway between the suburbs and the city center has doubled their commuting time. The favored proposal of the motorists’ lobby is to widen the highway, adding an additional lane of traffic. Opponents note that last year’s addition of a lane to the nearby Green Highway was followed by a worsening of traffic jams on it. Their suggested alternative proposal is adding a bicycle lane to Blue Highway. Many area residents are keen bicyclists. A bicycle lane would encourage them to use bicycles to commute, it is argued, thereby reducing rush-hour traffic.”
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
The following appeared as a recommendation by a committee planning a ten-year budget for the city of Calatrava.
“The birthrate in our city is declining: in fact, last year’s birthrate was only one-half that of five years ago. Thus the number of students enrolled in our public schools will soon decrease dramatically, and we can safely reduce the funds budgeted for education during the next decade. At the same time, we can reduce funding for athletic playing fields and other recreational facilities. As a result, we will have sufficient money to fund city facilities and programs used primarily by adults, since we can expect the adult population of the city to increase.”
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
The following appeared in a letter to the editor of Parson City’s local newspaper.
“In our region of Trillura, the majority of money spent on the schools that most students attend—the city-run public schools—comes from taxes that each city government collects. The region’s cities differ, however, in the budgetary priority they give to public education. For example, both as a proportion of its overall tax revenues and in absolute terms, Parson City has recently spent almost twice as much per year as Blue City has for its public schools—even though both cities have about the same number of residents. Clearly, Parson City residents place a higher value on providing a good education in public schools than Blue City residents do.”
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of Quiot Manufacturing.
“During the past year, Quiot Manufacturing had 30 percent more on-the-job accidents than at the nearby Panoply Industries plant, where the work shifts are one hour shorter than ours. Experts say that significant contributing factors in many on-the-job accidents are fatigue and sleep deprivation among workers. Therefore, to reduce the number of on-the-job accidents at Quiot and thereby increase productivity, we should shorten each of our three work shifts by one hour so that employees will get adequate amounts of sleep.”
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
The following appeared in a memorandum from the planning department of an electric power company.
“Several recent surveys indicate that home owners are increasingly eager to conserve energy. At the same time, manufacturers are now marketing many home appliances, such as refrigerators and air conditioners, that are almost twice as energy efficient as those sold a decade ago. Also, new technologies for better home insulation and passive solar heating are readily available to reduce the energy needed for home heating. Therefore, the total demand for electricity in our area will not increase—and may decline slightly. Since our three electric generating plants in operation for the past twenty years have always met our needs, construction of new generating plants will not be necessary.”
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
The vice president of human resources at Climpson Industries sent the following recommendation to the company’s president.
“In an effort to improve our employees’ productivity, we should implement electronic monitoring of employees’ Internet use from their workstations. Employees who use the Internet from their workstations need to be identified and punished if we are to reduce the number of work hours spent on personal or recreational activities, such as shopping or playing games. By installing software to detect employees’ Internet use on company computers, we can prevent employees from wasting time, foster a better work ethic at Climpson, and improve our overall profits.”
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
The following appeared in a letter from the owner of the Sunnyside Towers apartment complex to its manager.
“One month ago, all the showerheads in the first three buildings of the Sunnyside Towers complex were modified to restrict maximum water flow to one-third of what it used to be. Although actual readings of water usage before and after the adjustment are not yet available, the change will obviously result in a considerable savings for Sunnyside Corporation, since the corporation must pay for water each month. Except for a few complaints about low water pressure, no problems with showers have been reported since the adjustment. I predict that modifying showerheads to restrict water flow throughout all twelve buildings in the Sunnyside Towers complex will increase our profits even more dramatically.”
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the prediction and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the prediction.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
The following report appeared in the newsletter of the West Meria Public Health Council.
“An innovative treatment has come to our attention that promises to significantly reduce absenteeism in our schools and workplaces. A study reports that in nearby East Meria, where fish consumption is very high, people visit the doctor only once or twice per year for the treatment of colds. Clearly, eating a substantial amount of fish can prevent colds. Since colds represent the most frequently given reason for absences from school and work, we recommend the daily use of Ichthaid—a nutritional supplement derived from fish oil—as a good way to prevent colds and lower absenteeism.”
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
The following appeared in a recommendation from the planning department of the city of Transopolis.
“Ten years ago, as part of a comprehensive urban renewal program, the city of Transopolis adapted for industrial use a large area of severely substandard housing near the freeway. Subsequently, several factories were constructed there, crime rates in the area declined, and property tax revenues for the entire city increased. To further revitalize the city, we should now take similar action in a declining residential area on the opposite side of the city. Since some houses and apartments in existing nearby neighborhoods are currently unoccupied, alternate housing for those displaced by this action will be readily available.”
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
The following appeared in a memo from the new vice president of Sartorian, a company that manufactures men’s clothing.
“Five years ago, at a time when we had difficulties in obtaining reliable supplies of high quality wool fabric, we discontinued production of our alpaca overcoat. Now that we have a new fabric supplier, we should resume production. This coat should sell very well: since we have not offered an alpaca overcoat for five years and since our major competitor no longer makes an alpaca overcoat, there will be pent-up customer demand. Also, since the price of most types of clothing has increased in each of the past five years, customers should be willing to pay significantly higher prices for alpaca overcoats than they did five years ago, and our company profits will increase.”
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
A recent sales study indicates that consumption of seafood dishes in Bay City restaurants has increased by 30 percent during the past five years. Yet there are no currently operating city restaurants whose specialty is seafood. Moreover, the majority of families in Bay City are two-income families, and a nationwide study has shown that such families eat significantly fewer home-cooked meals than they did a decade ago but at the same time express more concern about healthful eating. Therefore, the new Captain Seafood restaurant that specializes in seafood should be quite popular and profitable.
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
Milk and dairy products are rich in vitamin D and calcium—substances essential for building and maintaining bones. Many people therefore say that a diet rich in dairy products can help prevent osteoporosis, a disease that is linked to both environmental and genetic factors and that causes the bones to weaken significantly with age. But a long-term study of a large number of people found that those who consistently consumed dairy products throughout the years of the study have a higher rate of bone fractures than any other participants in the study. Since bone fractures are symptomatic of osteoporosis, this study result shows that a diet rich in dairy products may actually increase, rather than decrease, the risk of osteoporosis.
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
The following appeared in a health newsletter.
“A ten-year nationwide study of the effectiveness of wearing a helmet while bicycling indicates that ten years ago, approximately 35 percent of all bicyclists reported wearing helmets, whereas today that number is nearly 80 percent. Another study, however, suggests that during the same ten-year period, the number of bicycle-related accidents has increased 200 percent. These results demonstrate that bicyclists feel safer because they are wearing helmets, and they take more risks as a result. Thus, to reduce the number of serious injuries from bicycle accidents, the government should concentrate more on educating people about bicycle safety and less on encouraging or requiring bicyclists to wear helmets.”
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
The following is a letter to the head of the tourism bureau on the island of Tria.
“Erosion of beach sand along the shores of Tria Island is a serious threat to our island and our tourist industry. In order to stop the erosion, we should charge people for using the beaches. Although this solution may annoy a few tourists in the short term, it will raise money for replenishing the sand. Replenishing the sand, as was done to protect buildings on the nearby island of Batia, will help protect buildings along our shores, thereby reducing these buildings’ risk of additional damage from severe storms. And since beaches and buildings in the area will be preserved, Tria’s tourist industry will improve over the long term.”
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
The following appeared in a memorandum written by the chairperson of the West Egg Town Council.
“Two years ago, consultants predicted that West Egg’s landfill, which is used for garbage disposal, would be completely filled within five years. During the past two years, however, the town’s residents have been recycling twice as much material as they did in previous years. Next month the amount of recycled material—which includes paper, plastic, and metal—should further increase, since charges for pickup of other household garbage will double. Furthermore, over 90 percent of the respondents to a recent survey said that they would do more recycling in the future. Because of our town’s strong commitment to recycling, the available space in our landfill should last for considerably longer than predicted.”
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a journal on environmental issues.
“Over the past year, the Crust Copper Company (CCC) has purchased over 10,000 square miles of land in the tropical nation of West Fredonia. Mining copper on this land will inevitably result in pollution and, since West Fredonia is the home of several endangered animal species, in environmental disaster. But such disasters can be prevented if consumers simply refuse to purchase products that are made with CCC’s copper unless the company abandons its mining plans.”
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
The following is part of a memorandum from the president of Humana University.
“Last year the number of students who enrolled in online degree programs offered by nearby Omni University increased by 50 percent. During the same year, Omni showed a significant decrease from prior years in expenditures for dormitory and classroom space, most likely because instruction in the online programs takes place via the Internet. In contrast, over the past three years, enrollment at Humana University has failed to grow, and the cost of maintaining buildings has increased along with our budget deficit. To address these problems, Humana University will begin immediately to create and actively promote online degree programs like those at Omni. We predict that instituting these online degree programs will help Humana both increase its total enrollment and solve its budget problems.”
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the prediction and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the prediction.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
The following appeared in a health magazine published in Corpora.
“Medical experts say that only one-quarter of Corpora’s citizens meet the current standards for adequate physical fitness, even though twenty years ago, one-half of all of Corpora’s citizens met the standards as then defined. But these experts are mistaken when they suggest that spending too much time using computers has caused a decline in fitness. Since overall fitness levels are highest in regions of Corpora where levels of computer ownership are also highest, it is clear that using computers has not made citizens less physically fit. Instead, as shown by this year’s unusually low expenditures on fitness-related products and services, the recent decline in the economy is most likely the cause, and fitness levels will improve when the economy does.”
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
The following appeared in a memorandum from the owner of Movies Galore, a chain of movie-rental stores.
“Because of declining profits, we must reduce operating expenses at Movies Galore’s ten movie-rental stores. Raising prices is not a good option, since we are famous for our low prices. Instead, we should reduce our operating hours. Last month our store in downtown Marston reduced its hours by closing at 6:00 p.m. rather than 9:00 p.m. and reduced its overall inventory by no longer stocking any DVD released more than five years ago. Since we have received very few customer complaints about these new policies, we should now adopt them at all other Movies Galore stores as our best strategies for improving profits.”
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
The following appeared in a magazine article about planning for retirement.
“Clearview should be a top choice for anyone seeking a place to retire, because it has spectacular natural beauty and a consistent climate. Another advantage is that housing costs in Clearview have fallen significantly during the past year, and taxes remain lower than those in neighboring towns. Moreover, Clearview’s mayor promises many new programs to improve schools, streets, and public services. And best of all, retirees in Clearview can also expect excellent health care as they grow older, since the number of physicians in the area is far greater than the national average.”
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
The following is part of a memorandum from the president of Humana University.
“Last year the number of students who enrolled in online degree programs offered by nearby Omni University increased by 50 percent. During the same year, Omni showed a significant decrease from prior years in expenditures for dormitory and classroom space, most likely because online instruction takes place via the Internet. In contrast, over the past three years, enrollment at Humana University has failed to grow and the cost of maintaining buildings has increased. Thus, to increase enrollment and solve the problem of budget deficits at Humana University, we should initiate and actively promote online degree programs like those at Omni.”
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
An ancient, traditional remedy for insomnia—the scent of lavender flowers—has now been proved effective. In a recent study, 30 volunteers with chronic insomnia slept each night for three weeks on lavender-scented pillows in a controlled room where their sleep was monitored electronically. During the first week, volunteers continued to take their usual sleeping medication. They slept soundly but wakened feeling tired. At the beginning of the second week, the volunteers discontinued their sleeping medication. During that week, they slept less soundly than the previous week and felt even more tired. During the third week, the volunteers slept longer and more soundly than in the previous two weeks. Therefore, the study proves that lavender cures insomnia within a short period of time.
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants.
“Butter has now been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States. Only about 2 percent of customers have complained, indicating that 98 people out of 100 are happy with the change. Furthermore, many servers have reported that a number of customers who ask for butter do not complain when they are given margarine instead. Clearly, either these customers cannot distinguish butter from margarine or they use the term ‘butter’ to refer to either butter or margarine. Thus, to avoid the expense of purchasing butter and to increase profitability, the Happy Pancake House should extend this cost-saving change to its restaurants in the southeast and northeast as well.”
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
The following appeared in a letter from the owner of the Sunnyside Towers apartment building to its manager.
“One month ago, all the showerheads on the first five floors of Sunnyside Towers were modified to restrict the water flow to approximately one-third of its original flow. Although actual readings of water usage before and after the adjustment are not yet available, the change will obviously result in a considerable savings for Sunnyside Corporation, since the corporation must pay for water each month. Except for a few complaints about low water pressure, no problems with showers have been reported since the adjustment. Clearly, restricting water flow throughout all the twenty floors of Sunnyside Towers will increase our profits further.”
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
The following appeared in a health magazine.
“The citizens of Forsythe have adopted more healthful lifestyles. Their responses to a recent survey show that in their eating habits they conform more closely to government nutritional recommendations than they did ten years ago. Furthermore, there has been a fourfold increase in sales of food products containing kiran, a substance that a scientific study has shown reduces cholesterol. This trend is also evident in reduced sales of sulia, a food that few of the most healthy citizens regularly eat.”
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
Humans arrived in the Kaliko Islands about 7,000 years ago, and within 3,000 years most of the large mammal species that had lived in the forests of the Kaliko Islands had become extinct. Yet humans cannot have been a factor in the species’ extinctions, because there is no evidence that the humans had any significant contact with the mammals. Further, archaeologists have discovered numerous sites where the bones of fish had been discarded, but they found no such areas containing the bones of large mammals, so the humans cannot have hunted the mammals. Therefore, some climate change or other environmental factor must have caused the species’ extinctions.
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
The following appeared in an editorial in a business magazine.
“Although the sales of Whirlwind video games have declined over the past two years, a recent survey of video-game players suggests that this sales trend is about to be reversed. The survey asked video-game players what features they thought were most important in a video game. According to the survey, players prefer games that provide lifelike graphics, which require the most up-to-date computers. Whirlwind has just introduced several such games with an extensive advertising campaign directed at people ten to twenty-five years old, the age-group most likely to play video games. It follows, then, that the sales of Whirlwind video games are likely to increase dramatically in the next few months.”
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of marketing at Dura-Sock, Inc.
“A recent study of our customers suggests that our company is wasting the money it spends on its patented Endure manufacturing process, which ensures that our socks are strong enough to last for two years. We have always advertised our use of the Endure process, but the new study shows that despite our socks’ durability, our average customer actually purchases new Dura-Socks every three months. Furthermore, our customers surveyed in our largest market, northeastern United States cities, say that they most value Dura-Socks’ stylish appearance and availability in many colors. These findings suggest that we can increase our profits by discontinuing use of the Endure manufacturing process.”
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of marketing at Dura-Sock, Inc.
“A recent study of our customers suggests that our company is wasting the money it spends on its patented Endure manufacturing process, which ensures that our socks are strong enough to last for two years. We have always advertised our use of the Endure process, but the new study shows that despite our socks’ durability, our average customer actually purchases new Dura-Socks every three months. Furthermore, our customers surveyed in our largest market, northeastern United States cities, say that they most value Dura-Socks’ stylish appearance and availability in many colors. These findings suggest that we can increase our profits by discontinuing use of the Endure manufacturing process.”
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
The vice president for human resources at Climpson Industries sent the following recommendation to the company’s president.
“In an effort to improve our employees’ productivity, we should implement electronic monitoring of employees’ Internet use from their workstations. Employees who use the Internet inappropriately from their workstations need to be identified and punished if we are to reduce the number of work hours spent on personal or recreational activities, such as shopping or playing games. Installing software on company computers to detect employees’ Internet use is the best way to prevent employees from wasting time on the job. It will foster a better work ethic at Climpson and improve our overall profits.”
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
The following appeared in a memo from the president of Bower Builders, a company that constructs new homes.
“A nationwide survey reveals that the two most-desired home features are a large family room and a large, well-appointed kitchen. A number of homes in our area built by our competitor Domus Construction have such features and have sold much faster and at significantly higher prices than the national average. To boost sales and profits, we should increase the size of the family rooms and kitchens in all the homes we build and should make state-of-the-art kitchens a standard feature. Moreover, our larger family rooms and kitchens can come at the expense of the dining room, since many of our recent buyers say they do not need a separate dining room for family meals.”
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
The following appeared in a letter from a firm providing investment advice for a client.
“Most homes in the northeastern United States, where winters are typically cold, have traditionally used oil as their major fuel for heating. Last heating season that region experienced 90 days with below-normal temperatures, and climate forecasters predict that this weather pattern will continue for several more years. Furthermore, many new homes are being built in the region in response to recent population growth. Because of these trends, we predict an increased demand for heating oil and recommend investment in Consolidated Industries, one of whose major business operations is the retail sale of home heating oil.”
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
The following appeared in an article in the Grandview Beacon.
“For many years the city of Grandview has provided annual funding for the Grandview Symphony. Last year, however, private contributions to the symphony increased by 200 percent and attendance at the symphony’s concerts-in-the-park series doubled. The symphony has also announced an increase in ticket prices for next year. Given such developments, some city commissioners argue that the symphony can now be fully self-supporting, and they recommend that funding for the symphony be eliminated from next year’s budget.”
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
The following appeared in a memo from the director of a large group of hospitals.
“In a laboratory study of liquid antibacterial hand soaps, a concentrated solution of UltraClean produced a 40 percent greater reduction in the bacteria population than did the liquid hand soaps currently used in our hospitals. During a subsequent test of UltraClean at our hospital in Workby, that hospital reported significantly fewer cases of patient infection than did any of the other hospitals in our group. Therefore, to prevent serious patient infections, we should supply UltraClean at all hand-washing stations throughout our hospital system.”
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
The following appeared in a letter to the editor of the Parkville Daily newspaper.
“Throughout the country last year, as more and more children below the age of nine participated in youth-league sports, over 40,000 of these young players suffered injuries. When interviewed for a recent study, youth-league soccer players in several major cities also reported psychological pressure exerted by coaches and parents to win games. Furthermore, education experts say that long practice sessions for these sports take away time that could be used for academic activities. Since the disadvantages outweigh any advantages, we in Parkville should discontinue organized athletic competition for children under nine.”
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
Collectors prize the ancient life-size clay statues of human figures made on Kali Island but have long wondered how Kalinese artists were able to depict bodies with such realistic precision. Since archaeologists have recently discovered molds of human heads and hands on Kali, we can now conclude that the ancient Kalinese artists used molds of actual bodies, not sculpting tools and techniques, to create these statues. This discovery explains why Kalinese miniature statues were abstract and entirely different in style: molds could be used only for life-size sculptures. It also explains why few ancient Kalinese sculpting tools have been found. In light of this discovery, collectors predict that the life-size sculptures will decrease in value while the miniatures increase in value.
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the prediction and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the prediction.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
When Stanley Park first opened, it was the largest, most heavily used public park in town. It is still the largest park, but it is no longer heavily used. Video cameras mounted in the park’s parking lots last month revealed the park’s drop in popularity: the recordings showed an average of only 50 cars per day. In contrast, tiny Carlton Park in the heart of the business district is visited by more than 150 people on a typical weekday. An obvious difference is that Carlton Park, unlike Stanley Park, provides ample seating. Thus, if Stanley Park is ever to be as popular with our citizens as Carlton Park, the town will obviously need to provide more benches, thereby converting some of the unused open areas into spaces suitable for socializing.
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
The following appeared in a memo from the owner of a chain of cheese stores located throughout the United States.
“For many years all the stores in our chain have stocked a wide variety of both domestic and imported cheeses. Last year, however, all of the five best-selling cheeses at our newest store were domestic cheddar cheeses from Wisconsin. Furthermore, a recent survey by Cheeses of the World magazine indicates an increasing preference for domestic cheeses among its subscribers. Since our company can reduce expenses by limiting inventory, the best way to improve profits in all of our stores is to discontinue stocking many of our varieties of imported cheese and concentrate primarily on domestic cheeses.”
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
The following appeared as part of a business plan developed by the manager of the Rialto Movie Theater.
“Despite its downtown location, the Rialto Movie Theater, a local institution for five decades, must make big changes or close its doors forever. It should follow the example of the new Apex Theater in the mall outside of town. When the Apex opened last year, it featured a video arcade, plush carpeting and seats, and a state-of-the-art sound system. Furthermore, in a recent survey, over 85 percent of respondents reported that the high price of newly released movies prevents them from going to the movies more than five times per year. Thus, if the Rialto intends to hold on to its share of a decreasing pool of moviegoers, it must offer the same features as Apex.”
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
A recent study reported that pet owners have longer, healthier lives on average than do people who own no pets. Specifically, dog owners tend to have a lower incidence of heart disease. In light of these findings, Sherwood Hospital should form a partnership with Sherwood Animal Shelter to institute an adopt-a-dog program. The program would encourage dog ownership for patients recovering from heart disease, which should reduce these patients’ chance of experiencing continuing heart problems and also reduce their need for ongoing treatment. As a further benefit, the publicity about the program would encourage more people to adopt pets from the shelter. And that will reduce the incidence of heart disease in the general population.
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of a large, highly diversified company.
“Ten years ago our company had two new office buildings constructed as regional headquarters for two regions. The buildings were erected by different construction companies—Alpha and Zeta. Although the two buildings had identical floor plans, the building constructed by Zeta cost 30 percent more to build. However, that building’s expenses for maintenance last year were only half those of Alpha’s. In addition, the energy consumption of the Zeta building has been lower than that of the Alpha building every year since its construction. Given these data, plus the fact that Zeta has a stable workforce with little employee turnover, we recommend using Zeta rather than Alpha for our new building project, even though Alpha’s bid promises lower construction costs.”
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of a large, highly diversified company.
“Ten years ago our company had two new office buildings constructed as regional headquarters for two regions. The buildings were erected by different construction companies—Alpha and Zeta. Although the two buildings had identical floor plans, the building constructed by Zeta cost 30 percent more to build. However, that building’s expenses for maintenance last year were only half those of Alpha’s. Furthermore, the energy consumption of the Zeta building has been lower than that of the Alpha building every year since its construction. Such data indicate that we should use Zeta rather than Alpha for our contemplated new building project, even though Alpha’s bid promises lower construction costs.”
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
Read once straingt through, then read again, one sentence at a time. List the claims in order. Find three flaws:
What are the underlying assumptions? Evaluate the data/evidence, supports conclusion? Would any additional data help reinforce or refute the argument?
Overall Point:
Claim 1:
Claim 2:
Claim 3:
Grounds: Is there evidence to support the claims?
Warrant: Does the evidence actually support the claim?
