All Units2 Flashcards
<p><p></p>
<p>What is the difference between a express, implied and contract implied in fact?</p>
<p></p>
</p>
<p><p></p>
<p>Terms for contract are: Express - Stated (writing/orally) Implied - partially/wholly from conduct and circumstances</p>
<p></p>
</p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p>On 5-Sep I sent a letter to John to sell a house for 6.5 mil. Explain which of the following responses would be a counter offer: 1. I'll buy the house for 6mil 2. Would you sell the house for 5.5mil?</p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p>1. I'll buy the house for 6mil - Counter offer, original offer is terminated.</p>
<p>2. Inquiry original offer still stands</p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p><p><p>On 1-Mar I sent a letter to Joe sell a car for 1.5mil, the offer is open for 30 days.
On 15-Mar I sent a letter revoking the offer before Joe sent a response.
Do we have a contract?</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>No, offer was terminated before acceptance.</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>In deciding whether consideration necessary to form a contract exists, a court must determine whether:</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>There is mutuality of consideration.
Consideration must be bargained for and given in exchange for the consideration provided by the other party. Thus, consideration is mutual.
</p></p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p>The mailbox rule ordinarily makes acceptance of an offer effective at the time the acceptance is dispatched. The mailbox rule does not apply if:</p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p>The offer provides that an acceptance shall not be effective until actually received. Acceptance under common law, unless stipulated otherwise in the offer, is effective upon dispatch by the same mode used to transmit the offer. The UCC provides that acceptance may be by any means reasonable under the circumstances. It is effective upon dispatch unless the offeror stipulates another moment when acceptance will be effective.</p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p>How can an offer be revoked/terminated? When can an offer not be revoked?</p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p>Offer that states that it will remain open can be terminated by giving offeree notice, unless it is an option contract or signed written firm offer (by a merchant) to sell goods, and the offer is to be held open for a stated or reasonable period (not greater than 3 months).</p>
<p>Revocation is only effective when received by the offeree (either direct or indirect). A third party that offers to buy does not equal revocation (but if it is sold-yes). Rejection is effective when received by the offeror.</p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p>Explain the mailbox Rule.</p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p>Generally, under the mailbox rule acceptance is effective at the moment of dispatch if</p>
<p>1. The offeree used an authorised means of acceptnace to communicate</p>
<p>2. The offer is still open. Note that if a offer is revoked and an acceptance is sent while the revocation in transit then the revocation is only valid if it is received by the offeree before the acceptance is received by the offeror.</p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p>What are the elements of fraud?</p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p>1. An actual or implied false representation (or concealment) of a material fact,</p>
<p>2. Intent to misrepresent (scienter),</p>
<p>a. The intent element is satisfied if the defendant (1) knew the representation was false or (2) recklessly disregarded its truth of falsity.</p>
<p>3. Intent to induce reliance,</p>
<p>4. Justifiable actual reliance by the innocent party based on the misrepresentation, and</p>
<p>5. Damage (loss) suffered by the innocent party.</p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p><p><p>If a minor seeks a job from an employment agency and the minor refuses to pay the fee after the agency finds a job. Is the minor liable?</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>Minors are liable for necessaries such as food, clothing, shelter, medicine, and tools of a trade. Other items may be considered necessaries depending upon the circumstances. This rule protects the minor: A person may be unwilling to contract to supply necessaries to a minor who is not liable on the agreement. Nevertheless, a minor may still disaffirm a contract for necessaries. In that event, the minor will be liable in quasi-contract for the reasonable value of the necessaries, not for the contract price.</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>To prevail in an action for innocent misrepresentation, the plaintiff must prove</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>The misrepresentations concerned material facts.</p></p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p>What types of contracts are covered under that statute of frauds?</p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p>1. Agreements that cannot be performed within 1 year of the making of the contract (contracts longer than a year).</p>
<p>1a. The day the contract is made is excluded, and the 1-year period expires at the close of the contract’s express termination date.</p>
<p>2. Agreements for the sale of an interest in land</p>
<p>3. Agreements for the sale of goods for $500 or more</p>
<p>4. Agreements to answer for the debt of another.</p>
<p>5. Agreements in contemplation of marriage.</p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p><p><p>Which one of these does the statute of frauds relate to?
a. Formation of contracts
b. Enforcement</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>An oral contract is usually enforceable. However, the statute of frauds requires certain contracts to be in writing and signed by the defendant. The statute of frauds relates to enforcement, not formation, of contracts.</p></p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p>What is the required writing for a contract under the statute of frauds?</p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p>a. A written memorandum complies with the statute if it contains the following:</p>
<p>1. A reasonably certain description of the parties and the subject matter,</p>
<p>2. The essential terms and conditions of the contract,</p>
<p>3. A description of the consideration (no minimum or adequate amount is required), and</p>
<p>4. The signatures of the parties against whom the writing is to be enforced.</p>
<p>b. The agreement may consist of several writings if 1. One is signed and</p>
<p>2. The facts clearly indicate that they all relate to the same transaction.</p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p><p><p>Who is bound in a written signed contract under the statute of frauds?</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>Only the party that signed is bound by the contract</p></p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p>What is the parol evidence rule?</p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p>The parol evidence rule prohibits admission of oral evidence when a writing is intended to be the final and complete expression (integration) of the agreement of the parties. The terms of such a contract cannot be contradicted or varied by extrinsic evidence of</p>
<p>1. Any prior understanding (oral or written) or</p>
<p>2. An oral understanding reached at the same time as the final writing.</p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p>What is Rescission?</p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p>Rescission cancels a contract and returns the parties to the positions they would have been in if the contract had not been made. It results from mutual consent, conduct of the parties, or a court order in the following situations:</p>
<p>1. Nonperformance or a material breach by the other party</p>
<p>2. Negligent or innocent misrepresentation</p>
<p>3. A mutual or unilateral mistake in contract formation</p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p><p><p>What does it mean to reform a contract?</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>When the parties’ written agreement imperfectly expresses the parties’ intent, it can be rewritten.</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>What is a replevin?</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>Replevin is an action to recover personal property taken unlawfully.</p></p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p>What is restitution?</p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p>Restitution is available when a party’s performance conferred a recoverable benefit on the other party.</p>
<p>1 . A valid contract need not have existed.</p>
<p>2. Restitution is an equitable remedy to prevent unjust enrichment, correct an erroneous payment, or recover advances.</p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p><p><p>If someone does not perform under a contract, what relief is generally granted by the court?</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>Compensatory damages or specific performance.
The equitable remedy of specific performance is available only when damages are inadequate to remedy a breach of contract, usually when the subject matter is unique. Land is usually considered not interchangeable. Each parcel is unique. But a plaintiff may accept compensatory damages in place of specific performance.</p></p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p>What contract rights can be assigned?</p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p>Contract rights generally are assignable without consent of the obligor and without a written document. But a signed assignment is required if the statute of frauds applies. An attempted assignment of a contract right is not effective if the contract expressly states that it is not assignable. Nevertheless, the following are assignable despite an agreement not to assign:</p>
<p>1. A right to receive money</p>
<p>2. Negotiable instruments</p>
<p>3. An option contract</p>
<p>4. The right to receive damages for breach of contract or for payment of an account owed in a contract for the sale of goods</p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p><p><p>Jim, CPA and Bob formed a contract for Jim, CPA to do accounting work for Bob. Jim, assigned the job to Rose without Bob's knowledge. Bob sues, who will win?</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>Bob.
Assignments of highly personal services contracts without consent are invalid. Examples are accounting, legal, medical, architectural, and artistic services.</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>When is the assignment of a rights of a contract effective?</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>Between assignor and assignee, assignment is effective when made, even if no notice of assignment has been communicated to the obligor.</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>What causes an assignment to be irrevocable? </p></p></p>
<p><p><p>An assignment given for consideration is irrevocable.</p></p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p>What are the means of revoking an assignment?</p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p>A gratuitous assignment is usually revocable by the assignor (no consideration given for assignment). The following are means of revocation:</p>
<p>1. Notice of revocation communicated by the assignor to the assignee or obligor</p>
<p>2. Assignor’s receipt of performance directly from the obligor</p>
<p>3. Assignor’s subsequent assignment of the same right to another assignee</p>
<p>4. Bankruptcy of the assignor</p>
<p>5. Death or insanity of the assignor</p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p><p><p>Catherine delivered a contract assigning her rights in a contract with Bob to Mat. Explain how the contract can be revoked.</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>The contract can't be revoked.
An effective delivery of the gratuitous assignment to the assignee by the assignor prevents revocation. An example is a physical delivery of a signed, written assignment of the right.</p></p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p>Explain when revocation of an assignment is ineffective.</p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p>1. An assignment given for consideration is irrevocable</p>
<p>2. An effective delivery of the gratuitous assignment to the assignee by the assignor prevents revocation.</p>
<p>3. Revocation also is ineffective if the assignee has (a) collected from the obligor and</p>
<p>(b) made a further assignment for consideration.</p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p><p><p>What is a novation? </p></p></p>
<p><p><p>A novation is a special form of substituted contract that replaces a party to the prior contract with another who was not originally a party. It completely releases the replaced party.</p></p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p>Ashley sells her house to Don, and Don assumes the mortgage, however Don defaults on payments who is liable?</p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p>Ashley. A real estate mortgagor (the landowner-borrower) generally may sell or otherwise transfer the property. However, the mortgagor may not delegate performance and avoid liability under the mortgage unless specifically released by the lender-mortgagee. Without the lender-mortgagee’s agreement to substitute the delegatee for the mortgagor (a novation), the mortgagor remains liable.</p>
<p>1. A transfer of real property subject to the mortgage is not a novation. The buyer pays the seller his or her equity but is not personally liable on the existing mortgage loan.</p>
<p>2. Assumption of a mortgage by the buyer also is not a novation. The buyer pays the mortgagor the value of the property minus the debt secured by the mortgage and promises to pay the balance of the debt.</p>
<p>3. The mortgagor is a surety. If the buyer defaults, the mortgagor is liable.</p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p><p><p>Ellington agreed to fix Francis's car for $500. The terms of their oral agreement provided that Carr was to complete the work within 18 months. Actually, the work could be completed within 1 year.
Is the agreement enforceable?</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>Enforceable because the work could be completed within 1 year.
Oral contracts are generally enforceable. But the statute of frauds prevents enforcement at law of certain contracts unless a signed writing exists that contains essential contract terms. A services contract is within the statute of frauds unless it can be completed within a year of entering into the contract.
i.e. It would not be enforceable if it covers a period of more than 1 year.</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>Ferco, Inc., claims to be a creditor beneficiary of a contract between Bell and Allied Industries, Inc. Allied is indebted to Ferco. The contract between Bell and Allied provides that Bell is to purchase certain goods from Allied and pay the purchase price directly to Ferco until Allied’s obligation is satisfied. Without justification, Bell failed to pay Ferco and Ferco sued Bell.
Who will prevail and why?</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>Ferco will prevail, because Ferco was an intended beneficiary of the contract.
A creditor beneficiary has standing to enforce a contract to which (s)he is a third party. Because the intent of the promisee (Allied) in entering into the contract with Bell was specifically to have return performance (payment) to discharge the debt to a third party (Ferco), the third party is a creditor beneficiary.</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>Sand orally promised Frost a $10,000 bonus, in addition to a monthly salary, if Frost would work 2 years for Sand. If Frost works for the 2 years, will the statute of frauds prevent Frost from collecting the bonus?</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>No, because Frost fully performed.
Under the statute of frauds, if it is not possible to complete performance of an oral contract within a year of formation, the contract is not enforceable at law. A fully executed contract, however, is enforceable without regard to the statute of frauds. Also enforceable in most states is a contract fully performed by one party.</p></p></p>
<p><p><p> Jordan leased an apartment from Olsen. Shortly before the lease expired, Olsen threatened Jordan with eviction and physical harm if Jordan did not sign a new lease for twice the old rent. Jordan, unable to afford the expense to fight eviction and in fear of physical harm, signed the new lease. Three months later, Jordan moved and sued to void the lease, claiming duress. Will be lease be held voidable?</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>No, it will be Void because of Olsen’s threat of physical harm.
Duress is a threat (words or acts that instil fear or apprehension) intended to coerce a person to enter a contract (s)he did not intend to enter. The threat of physical violence is sufficient to render the contract void.</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>Kelly owed Connor $500. Connor agreed to accept Kelly’s microwave oven instead of the money. Kelly immediately delivered the oven to Connor. Which term correctly describes this agreement?</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>Accord and satisfaction.
In an accord and satisfaction, parties to a contract may make a new contract in which both the prior and the new contracts are to be discharged by performance of the new contract.</p></p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p>At what times is parol evidence admissible and enforceable?</p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p>Parol evidence is admissible to prove or explain the following:</p>
<p>1. Circumstances that make the written contract void, voidable, or unenforceable. The following are examples:</p>
<p>a. Illegality or lack of capacity to make a contract</p>
<p>b. Fraud, mistake, duress, or undue influence</p>
<p>c. Failure of a condition precedent</p>
<p>2. The meaning of ambiguous terms in the contract, such as a. Custom and usage not inconsistent with the agreement or</p>
<p>b. Typographical or obvious drafting errors that clearly do not represent the intention of the parties. 3. A subsequent modification or rescission.</p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p><p><p>A party to a contract who seeks to rescind the contract because of that party’s reliance on the unintentional but materially false statements of the other party will assert</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>Misrepresentation.
Innocent misrepresentation is a false representation of a material fact, intended to induce reliance, and justifiably relied upon. The only remedy customarily available is rescission (cancelling the agreement and restoring the parties to their original positions).</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>Mildred saw a vase in a store. A tag on the vase said, “Genuine Crystal, $125.” Mildred said to the owner of the shop, “I’ll buy this vase for $125.” Milford, the owner of the shop, refused to sell the vase. In a lawsuit brought by Mildred against Milford</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>Milford will win because he rejected Mildred’s offer.
Advertisements or price quotations made to the public are not offers. Advertisements (in any format) are usually only invitations to negotiate. They are not considered offers because they contain no words of promise, they are addressed to the public (the quantity accepted could exceed the supply), and they are usually indefinite.</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>Jimmy enters into a contract with the Exotic Car Museum to purchase a rare car from the early 1900s. After entering into the contract, Jimmy learns that the museum had previously contracted to sell the same car to a different dealer. Which type of discharge of contract obligations occurs?</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>Discharge by performance – anticipatory breach.
Anticipatory breach occurs when one party repudiates the contract. It is an express or implied indication that (s)he has no intention to perform the contract prior to the time set for performance. Most courts allow the aggrieved party, in this case Jimmy, to suspend performance. Thus, when Jimmy learned that the museum intended not to honor its contract with him, he was discharged.</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>Karen requested that Lara ship 10 bags of cement to her @$5/bag by Friday. On Thursday Lara shipped 5 bags and charged her $5/bag. On what date is a contract formed?</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>The nonconforming delivery was not an acceptance. The delivery was a counteroffer.</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>What kind of contract type is involved in an agency relationship?</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>None.
An agency relationship itself is not a contract. The doctrine of consideration belongs exclusively to contracts.
</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>What is the equal-dignities rule?</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>The equal-dignities rule, requires that the agency relationship be in writing if the agent is entering contractual transactions with third parties that must be in writing to be enforceable under the statute of frauds.</p></p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p>What is agency by estoppel?</p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p>This condition may arise if</p>
<p>a. A person presents himself or herself as an agent,</p>
<p>b. The alleged principal knows (or should know) of the representation and fails to make an effective denial, and</p>
<p>c.A third party detrimentally relies on the existence of this presumed agency. The principal is prevented from asserting the nonexistence of an agency after a third party has taken some action in reasonable reliance on its existence.</p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p><p><p>What are the types of agents and what they can do?</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>General agents are authorized to perform all acts relevant to the purpose for which they are engaged.
Universal agents are authorized to conduct all of the principal’s business that the principal may legally delegate.
Special agents are engaged for a particular transaction and are authorized to perform specific activities subject to specific instructions.
Del credere agent acts not only as a salesperson or broker for the principal, but also as a guarantor of credit extended to the buyer. The del credere agent guarantees a third party’s obligation to the principal.
a. Because the primary purpose of the agent’s guarantee is for the agent’s benefit (to close the deal), it is not subject to the statute of frauds and, unlike other suretyship promises, it need not be in writing.</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>What is an agency coupled with an interest ?</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>An agency coupled with an interest is a special type of agency relationship. In a typical agency relationship, the agent works on behalf of the principal but does not retain any ownership or interest in the asset. An agency coupled with an interest is when the agent receives an estate or interest in the property that is the subject of the agency. The agent in this relationship holds or controls the principal's property and has legal rights against interference by outside parties.
For example:
A writer enters into a contract with an agent to distribute the writer's works to publishers or film producers. When the writer's work is sold, the agent receives a commission on the sale. If the agency relationship is coupled with an interest, the interest gives the agent a level of legal power over any decisions about the writer's works.</p></p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p>What are the duties of the agent?</p>
<p></p>
<p>1. Contractual Duties</p>
<p>2. Duty of Loyalty a. Loyalty and good faith</p>
<p>b. Duty not to compete</p>
<p>c. Duty not to engage in self-dealing</p>
<p>d. No secret profits</p>
<p>e. Avoidance of conflicts of interest f. No misappropriation</p>
<p>g. Protection of confidential information</p>
<p>3. Duty of Care</p>
<p>4. Duty of Notification (Duty of Disclosure)</p>
<p>5. Duty of Obedience</p>
<p>6. Duty of Accounting</p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p>What are the principal's duties to their agent?</p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p>• Financial</p>
<p>1) Compensation</p>
<p>2) Reimbursement</p>
<p>3) Indemnification</p>
<p></p>
<p>• Occupational</p>
<p>1) Nonimpairment of agent’s performance</p>
<p>2) General duty of care</p>
<p>3) Disclosure of known risks</p>
<p>4) Provision of reasonably safe working conditions</p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p><p><p>Explain what can be done to ratify a contract by a principal and cases where acts cannot be ratified.</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>1. Knowledge of the material facts by the principal
Part ratification is not valid
It is irrevocable.
Under the Second Restatement, an undisclosed principal cannot ratify.
Under the Third Restatement, a person may ratify (e.g., by accepting the benefits of the contract) if the unauthorized act was done or purported to be done on that person’s behalf. However, the person who performed the unauthorized act need not have disclosed that (s)he was acting on behalf of a principal.
The third party has no right to ratification.</p></p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p>What contracts may a undisclosed principal not ratify or might not be ratified?</p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p>An undisclosed principal may not be able to ratify certain contracts involving</p>
<p>(1) personal services,</p>
<p>(2) credit extended by the third party, or</p>
<p>(3) nondelegable duties. If the agent’s unauthorized act is purportedly for an identified principal, only that person may ratify it. Thus, the agent cannot substitute another principal if the identified principal does not ratify it.</p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p><p><p>What is Vicarious liability as it relates to a principal / agent relationship?</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>Vicarious liability results from the actions of the agent for which the principal, whether or not disclosed, is liable. Thus, both the principal and the agent are liable.
This type of liability is based upon the doctrine of respondeat superior (Latin for “let the master reply”). Vicarious liability holds employers liable for the tortious conduct of their employees.
An employer may be held vicariously liable for the employee’s conduct when the employee
Commits a tort, whether negligently or intentionally;
Was not authorized by the principal to perform the act; or
Performs the act within the scope of employment</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>Bob had previously agreed to buy 20 pounds of flour from Joe (merchant) for $50 to be delivered to Bob's house. Bob said "I accept, but I will pay $40 for 15 pounds of flour and 2 pounds of cheese". Is a contract formed under UCC article 2?</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>He has indicated a definite expression of acceptance, forming a contract. His acceptance suggests an added term modifying the offer. Because Bob is not a merchant, the additional term is merely a proposal. Joe is not legally obligated to comply.</p></p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p>What remedies are available under the UCC to a buyer?</p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p>The buyer’s basic remedy when (s)he rejects the goods or justifiably revokes acceptance, or the seller fails to deliver, is to sue for monetary damages. The UCC normally does not allow recovery of punitive damages.</p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p>At what point is a security interest enforceable against a debtor?</p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p>The security interest attaches and becomes enforceable against the debtor when the following 3 events have occurred:</p>
<p>1. The debtor has authenticated (signed manually or electronically) a security agreement (contract) that describes the collateral. The description suffices if it reasonably identifies the collateral. For example, with certain exceptions, identification may be by a type of collateral defined in the UCC, such as inventory.</p>
<p>a. But other evidence of authentication may suffice if it is in accordance with the security agreement: The secured party’s possession of the collateral and/or The secured party’s control of collateral in the form of deposit accounts (e.g., savings and checking) or investment property (e.g., securities) b. If the collateral cannot be possessed or controlled (e.g., in the case of accounts such as receivables), a signed writing (or one in electronic form) is necessary for attachment.</p>
<p>2. The secured party has given value. Contract consideration suffices and need not be new. An example is an agreement to take a security interest instead of enforcing a previously existing debt is considered value.</p>
<p>3. The debtor</p>
<p>(a) has rights in the collateral or</p>
<p>(b) can transfer such rights (but not necessarily title). Attachment of a security interest in collateral gives the secured party rights to proceeds.</p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p><p><p>Which of the following statements is true with regard to an auction of goods?
A. A bidder may retract a bid before the completion of the sale only if the auction is without reserve.
B. A bidder’s retraction of a bid will revive the prior bid if the sale is with reserve.
C. The auctioneer may withdraw the goods at any time prior to completion of the sale unless the goods are put up without reserve.
D. In a sale with reserve, a bid made while the hammer is falling automatically reopens the bidding.</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>Answer (C) is correct.
An auction is with reserve unless the goods are explicitly offered without reserve. When goods are auctioned with reserve, the auctioneer may withdraw them at any time before (s)he announces completion of the sale. In an auction without reserve, the goods may not be withdrawn after the auctioneer calls for bids unless no bid is made.</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>Which of the following factors is most important in deciding who bears the risk of loss between merchants when goods are destroyed during shipment?
A. The terms of applicable insurance policies.
B. Whether the goods are perishable.
C. The agreement of the parties.
D. Who has title at the time of the loss.</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>Answer (C) is correct.
The parties to a contract for the sale of goods ordinarily may determine who will have the risk of loss, or they can divide the risk of loss. The agreement as to risk may be express or implied from trade usage, course of dealing, or course of performance. In the absence of contrary agreement, the intent with respect to risk is often determined by shipping and delivery terms. Whether the parties are merchants usually does not affect risk of loss.</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>Under Article 2 of the UCC, in an FOB place of shipment contract, the risk of loss passes to the buyer when the goods</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>Are delivered to the carrier.
Answer (B) is correct.
FOB means the seller bears both the risk and the expense of getting the goods to the point named. If the shipping term is FOB place of shipment, the seller has the risk and expense of delivering the goods to the carrier. Expenses and risk after delivery to the carrier are borne by the buyer in a shipment contract. Accordingly, without a contrary agreement, the buyer has the risk of loss during shipment.</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>Under Article 2 of the UCC and unless otherwise agreed to, the seller’s obligation to the buyer is to
A. Set aside conforming goods for inspection by the buyer before delivery.
B. Hold conforming goods and give the buyer whatever notification is reasonably necessary to enable the buyer to take delivery.
C. Deliver all goods called for in the contract to a common carrier.
D. Deliver the goods to the buyer’s place of business.</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>Answer (B) is correct.
The seller must transfer and deliver the goods, and the buyer must accept and pay the price in accordance with the contract. If the goods or the seller’s tender of delivery fail to conform to the contract in any respect, the buyer may reject the goods or the tender. In noncarrier situations, the seller must put and hold conforming goods at the buyer’s disposition for a time sufficient for the buyer to take possession. The tender must be at a reasonable hour, and the seller must give notice to enable the buyer to take possession.</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>Unless the parties to a sale of goods have agreed otherwise, the UCC states that
A. The buyer must pay before the seller has an obligation to deliver.
B. When the seller is to ship the goods on credit, the credit period runs from the time of receipt.
C. Payment is due at the time and place at which the goods are to be shipped.
D. If the seller demands payment in cash, (s)he must give any reasonably necessary extension of time.
</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>Answer (D) is correct.
Tender of payment suffices when made in the ordinary course of business unless the seller demands payment in cash and gives any extension of time reasonably necessary to procure it. Thus, the buyer is protected from an unexpected demand for cash. A seller who accepts a check also is protected. Payment by check is conditional. Between the parties, it is ineffective if the check is dishonored.</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>Under Article 2 of the UCC, a firm offer will be created only if the
A. Offeree is a merchant.
B. Offer states the time period during which it will remain open.
C. Offer is made by a merchant in a signed writing.
D. Offeree gives some form of consideration.</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>Answer (C) is correct.
A firm offer is an assurance, in writing and signed by a merchant, that the offer will remain open. A firm offer remains open during the time stated, even if it is not supported by consideration. If no time is stated, the time is a reasonable time. But in no event may the period of irrevocability exceed 3 months.</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>An oral agreement concerning the sale of goods entered into without consideration is binding if the agreement
A. Is a firm offer made by a merchant who promises to hold the offer open for 30 days.
B. Modifies the price in an existing, enforceable contract from $525 to $475.
C. Contradicts the terms of a subsequent written contract that is intended as the complete and exclusive agreement of the parties.
D. Is a waiver of the non-breaching party’s rights arising out of a breach of the contract.</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>Answer (B) is correct.
An oral modification of a contract for the sale of goods does not require consideration to be binding, but the UCC’s statute of frauds section must be satisfied if the contract as modified is within its provisions. Because the contract as modified is for less than $500, no writing is required, and the oral agreement is enforceable.</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>Under Article 2 of the UCC and the United Nations Convention for the International Sale of Goods (CISG), absent specific terms in an international sales shipment contract, when will risk of loss pass to the buyer?
A. When the goods are delivered to the first carrier for transmission to the buyer.
B. When the execution of the contract is concluded.
C. When the goods are identified to the contract.
D. When the goods are tendered to the buyer.</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>Answer (A) is correct.
The CISG is similar to Article 2 of the UCC. Under Article 2 and the CISG, title to goods passes from the seller to the buyer in any manner and on any conditions explicitly agreed to by the parties. Under a shipment contract, title passes when the goods are delivered to the carrier. In carrier cases, unless otherwise explicitly stated, a shipment contract is assumed.</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>Which of the following remedies is more likely to be available for a breach of a contract to sell real rather than personal property? A. Replevin. B. Damages. C. Specific performance. D. Rescission.</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>Answer (C) is correct.
The equitable remedy of specific performance will be granted when the legal remedy of damages is insufficient, for example, because the subject matter is unique. Each parcel of realty is considered unique, so contracts to sell real estate are specifically enforceable. Although contracts for the sale of antiques, heirlooms, and other rare items also are specifically enforceable, most contracts involving personal property are not.</p></p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p>The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (ACA) is intended to increase health insurance coverage by all of the following means except A. Providing insurance premium subsidies for individuals with low- or middle-incomes. B. Expanding Medicaid. C. Creating insurance exchanges and markets in which individuals can buy health insurance. D. Allowing nondependent children up to age 21 to be covered by a parent’s policy.</p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p>Answer (D) is correct. Among the primary ways by which the ACA increases health insurance coverage are</p>
<p>(1) expanding Medicaid,</p>
<p>(2) providing insurance premium subsidies for certain low- and middle-income individuals,</p>
<p>(3) creating insurance exchanges,</p>
<p>(4) allowing nondependent children up to age 26 to be covered by a parent’s policy, and</p>
<p>(5) mandating that certain employers provide coverage.</p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p><p><p>Chester Michaels appointed Regina Fairfax as his agent. The appointment was in writing and clearly indicated the scope of Regina Fairfax’s authority and also that Fairfax was not to disclose that she was acting as an agent for Michaels. Under the circumstances,
A. Michaels must ratify any contracts made by Fairfax on behalf of Michaels.
B. Fairfax’s appointment had to be in writing to be enforceable.
C. Fairfax is an agent coupled with an interest.
D. Fairfax has the implied authority of an agent but not apparent authority.</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>Answer (D) is correct.
When an agent has express actual authority, (s)he also has implied actual authority to use reasonable means to accomplish the purposes of the express authority. However, apparent authority is granted to the agent by words or conduct directed by the principal to a third party. Thus, it does not exist when the principal is undisclosed.</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>On May 2, Handy Hardware sent Ram Industries a signed purchase order that stated, in part, as follows: “Ship for May 8 delivery 300 Model A-X socket sets at current dealer price. Terms 2/10/net 30.” Ram received Handy’s purchase order on May 4. On May 5, Ram discovered that it had only 200 Model A-X socket sets and 100 Model W-Z socket sets in stock. Ram shipped the Model A-X and Model W-Z sets to Handy without any explanation concerning the shipment. The socket sets were received by Handy on May 8. Assuming a contract exists between Handy and Ram, which of the following warranties would result?
i. Implied warranty of merchantability
ii. Implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose
iii. Warranty of title</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>I and III only.
Answer (B) is correct.
A warranty of title is made in every contract for the sale of goods, unless it is excluded or modified by specific language or by circumstances. The warranty of merchantability is implied only when the seller is a merchant. Ram is a merchant because it deals in goods of the kind sold. The warranty of fitness for a particular purpose is implied only when a seller has reason (1) to know the particular purpose for which the goods are to be used and (2) that the buyer is relying on the seller’s skill and judgment to select the goods.</p></p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p>Under the Sales Article of the UCC, which of the following events will release the buyer from all its obligations under a sales contract?</p>
<p>A. Anticipatory repudiation by the buyer that is retracted before the seller cancels the contract.</p>
<p>B. Impracticability of delivery under the terms of the contract.</p>
<p>C. Destruction of the goods after risk of loss passed to the buyer.</p>
<p>D. Refusal of the seller to give written assurance of performance when reasonably demanded by the buyer.</p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p>Answer (D) is correct. If the buyer has reasonable grounds to believe performance may not occur, the buyer may in writing demand adequate assurance of performance. The seller’s failure to provide adequate assurance within a reasonable time, not to exceed 30 days, is a repudiation of the contract that releases the buyer from its obligations.</p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p><p><p>Taso Corp. sells laptop computers to the public. Taso sold and delivered a laptop to Cara on credit. Cara gave Taso a purchase money security interest in the laptop by executing and delivering to Taso a promissory note for the purchase price and a security agreement covering the laptop. Cara purchased the laptop for personal use. Taso did not file a financing statement. Under the Secured Transactions Article of the UCC, is Taso’s security interest perfected?</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>Yes, because it was perfected at the time of attachment.
Answer (C) is correct.
A PMSI in consumer goods ordinarily is automatically perfected without filing or possession. Thus, it becomes effective at the time of attachment.</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>Under the Secured Transactions Article of the UCC, what would be the order of priority for the following nonpurchase money security interests in consumer goods?
i. Financing statement filed on April 1
ii. Possession of the collateral by a creditor on April 10
iii. Security interest perfected on April 15</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>I, II, III.
Answer (B) is correct.
Under the general priority rules of the UCC, a creditor perfects a security interest in consumer goods either by possession of the collateral or by filing a financing statement. A perfected security interest has priority according to the date of filing or perfection (April 1, April 10, and April 15) unless a special priority rule applies. For example, if a security interest also is a PMSI in collateral other than inventory, it has priority if it is perfected when the debtor receives possession or within 20 days thereafter.</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>Winona Owner planned to add a wing to her house and to install central air conditioning. She obtained a loan from Bank to finance the construction and gave a mortgage on the realty as security. Bank recorded the mortgage on August 1. On July 29, Owner purchased on credit a central air conditioning unit from Seller. Seller took a security interest in the unit and made a proper fixture filing of a financing statement on August 2. The air conditioning unit was permanently installed on August 15 and construction of the house was completed on August 30.
A. Seller has priority over Bank because it has a perfected PMSI in fixtures that was perfected by a fixture filing before the goods became fixtures.
B. Bank has priority over Seller because it has a recorded real estate mortgage against a perfected security interest in a fixture.
C. Seller has priority over Bank because it recorded first.
D. Bank has priority over Seller because the conditions for priority of a construction mortgage have been met.</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>Answer (D) is correct.
Seller has a PMSI in the air conditioning unit that was perfected by a proper fixture filing on August 2. The goods subsequently became fixtures on August 15. But Bank has priority because the construction mortgage was recorded (August 1) before the goods became fixtures, and the goods became fixtures (August 15) before completion of construction (August 30).</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>Cross has an unperfected security interest in the inventory of Safe, Inc. The unperfected security interest
A. Causes Cross to lose important rights against Safe as an entity.
B. May only be perfected by filing a financing statement.
C. Is subordinate to lien creditors of Safe who become such prior to any subsequent perfection by Cross.
D. Is superior to the interest of subsequent lenders who obtain a perfected security interest in the property.</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>Answer (C) is correct.
Certain interests have priority over unperfected security interests. Included are the rights of a lien creditor, that is, a creditor who has acquired a lien on the property by judicial process, an assignee for the benefit of creditors, a receiver in equity, or a trustee in bankruptcy. The lien creditor takes the property subject to any security interest perfected before the lien attached, but its rights are superior to any security interest perfected after the lien attached.</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>Milo Manufacturing Corp. sells baseball equipment to distributors, who in turn sell it to various retailers throughout the United States. The retailers then sell the equipment to consumers who use it for their own personal use. In all cases, the equipment is sold on credit with a security interest taken in the equipment by each of the respective sellers. Which of the following is true?
A. The security interests of all of the sellers remain valid and will take priority even against good faith purchasers for value, despite the expectation of resales.
B. Milo and the distributors must file a financing statement or take possession of the baseball equipment to perfect their security interests.
C. The baseball equipment is inventory in the hands of all the parties concerned.
D. Milo’s security interest is automatically perfected because Milo qualifies as a purchase money secured party.</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>Answer (B) is correct.
The equipment is inventory in the hands of Milo, the distributors, and the retailers. Milo and the distributors must therefore either take possession of the goods or file a financing statement to perfect their security interests. The only purchase money security interest that is automatically perfected is one in consumer goods.</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>Under the UCC Secured Transactions Article, what is the order of priority for the following security interests in store equipment?
i. Security interest perfected by filing on April 15.
ii. Security interest attached on April 1.
iii. Purchase money security interest attached April 11 and perfected by filing on April 20.</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>III, I, II.
Answer (A) is correct.
The basic rule is that conflicting security interests in the same collateral will rank in priority according to the time of filing or perfection. If a purchase money security interest (PMSI) in goods (e.g., equipment) other than inventory or livestock is perfected when the debtor receives possession of the collateral, or within 20 days afterward, the PMSI has priority over a conflicting security interest even if it was perfected first. The reasonable assumption is that the debtor took possession between April 11 (when the security interest attached) and April 20 (when perfection occurred). Furthermore, a perfected security interest generally has priority over a security interest that has attached but is not perfected.</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>Roth and Dixon both claim a security interest in the same collateral. Roth’s security interest attached on January 1, and it was perfected by filing on March 1. Dixon’s security interest attached on February 1, and it was perfected on April 1 by taking possession of the collateral. Which of the following statements is true?
A. Roth’s security interest has priority because Roth perfected before Dixon perfected.
B. Dixon’s security interest has priority because Dixon’s interest attached before Roth’s interest was perfected.
C. Roth’s security interest has priority because Roth’s security interest attached before Dixon’s security interest attached.
D. Dixon’s security interest has priority because Dixon is in possession of the collateral.</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>Answer (A) is correct.
The basic rule is that conflicting security interests in the same collateral rank in priority according to the time of filing or perfection. Perfection of a security interest can occur only if the attachment requirements have been met. Attachment has occurred for both parties, and the party whose security interest was perfected first will have priority. Roth’s security interest was perfected 1 month prior to the perfection of Dixon’s security interest, so Roth has priority, assuming no special rules apply.</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>On June 15, Harper purchased equipment for $100,000 from Imperial Corp. for use in its manufacturing process. Harper paid for the equipment with funds borrowed from Eastern Bank. Harper gave Eastern an authenticated security agreement covering Harper’s existing and after-acquired equipment. On June 21, Harper was petitioned involuntarily into bankruptcy under Chapter 7 of the Federal Bankruptcy Code. A bankruptcy trustee was appointed. On June 23, Eastern duly filed a sufficient financing statement. Which of the parties will have a superior security interest in the equipment?
A. Eastern, because it had a perfected purchase money security interest without having to file a financing statement.
B. Eastern, because it perfected its security interest within the permissible time limits.
C. The trustee in bankruptcy, because the filing of the financing statement after the commencement of the bankruptcy case would be deemed a preferential transfer.
D. The trustee in bankruptcy, because the trustee became a lien creditor before Eastern perfected its security interest.</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>Answer (B) is correct.
The equipment is purchase money collateral that secures the purchase money obligation arising from the lender’s giving value to permit the debtor to obtain rights in the collateral. Thus, Eastern Bank has a PMSI. A PMSI in goods other than inventory or livestock has priority over a perfected conflicting security interest in the same collateral if it is perfected at the time the debtor receives possession of the collateral or within 20 days thereafter. Even in bankruptcy proceedings, a secured creditor with a perfected security interest may pursue its remedy against the particular property. Thus, Eastern Bank’s perfected PMSI in the equipment is superior (it is not inventory). However, the trustee in bankruptcy has the status of a hypothetical lien creditor and can defeat a nonperfected security interest in the equipment.</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>Tawney Manufacturing approached Worldwide Lenders for a loan of $50,000 to purchase vital components it used in its manufacturing process. Worldwide decided to grant the loan but only if Tawney would agree to a field warehousing arrangement. Pursuant to their understanding, Worldwide paid for the purchase of the components, took a negotiable bill of lading for them, and surrendered the bill of lading in exchange for negotiable warehouse receipts issued by the bonded warehouse company that had established a field warehouse in Tawney’s storage facility. Worldwide did not file a financing statement. Under the circumstances, Worldwide
A. Must not relinquish possession of any of the components to Tawney for whatever purpose, unless it is paid in cash for those released.
B. Has a security interest in the goods that has attached and is perfected.
C. Does not have a security interest that has attached because Tawney has not signed a security agreement.
D. Must file an executed financing statement in order to perfect its security interest.</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>Answer (B) is correct.
The requirements of attachment have been satisfied. (1) Value was given, (2) the debtor had rights in the collateral, and (3) the secured party had possession of the collateral. Whether the debtor authenticated a security agreement describing the collateral is irrelevant because the collateral is in the possession of the secured party in accordance with the debtor’s security agreement. The warehouser issued negotiable documents of title representing the goods. These negotiable documents are in the possession of the secured party. Also, value was given when Worldwide paid for the parts, and the debtor has rights in the collateral (use of the components in manufacturing). Perfection of a security interest in the goods also has occurred. Possession of the negotiable documents of title is a means of perfecting a security interest in them. Furthermore, perfecting a security interest in the negotiable documents is a means of perfecting a security interest in the goods they represent while the goods are held by the issuer of the documents.</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>Describe the types of bankruptcy</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>Chapter 7
Liquidation (voluntary or involuntary)
Chapter 11
Reorganization (voluntary or involuntary)
Chapter 13
Adjustment of debts of an individual (voluntary only)
</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>Describe the entities that can't have a involuntary petition filed against them</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>An involuntary petition cannot be filed against the following:
1. Farmers
2. Banks
3. Insurers
4. Nonprofit corporations
5. Railroads
6. Persons who owe less than $15,775</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>Describe how creditors may file an involuntary petition for a debtor.</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>1. If the debtor has 12 or more different creditors, any 3 or more who together hold unsecured claims of at least $15,775 may file an involuntary petition.
2. If the debtor has fewer than 12 creditors, any 1 or more who alone or together have unsecured claims of at least $15,775 may file an involuntary petition.
Any creditors who are the debtor’s employees or are insiders, e.g., officers or directors of a corporation, relatives, or a partner, are not counted.</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>What is an order for relief in a bankruptcy petition? </p></p></p>
<p><p><p>It means that at this time you are several months behind on your car or mortgage payment and the bank is requesting permission from the bankruptcy court in order to eventually repossess/foreclose on your car/home.
The Motion for Relief is the creditor’s way of asking the Court for permission to contact and collect from a debtor during the life of a bankruptcy. In order to do so, the Court must hold a hearing on the Motion for Relief and the Court must grant an Order for Relief to the creditor.</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>What are the grounds that court will order relief on behalf of creditors in a involuntary bankruptcy?</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>1. The debtor is not paying undisputed debts as they become due.
2. Within 120 days before the filing of the petition, a custodian, assignee, or general receiver took possession of all or most of the debtor’s property to enforce a lien against the property.</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>One advantage of an assignment for the benefit of creditors over a composition agreement with creditors is that the assignment
A. Discharges the debtor’s obligations.
B. Involves the transfer of assets directly to creditors.
C. Requires the consent of creditors.
D. Prevents attachment of the debtor’s assets.</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>Answer (D) is correct.
An assignment for the benefit of creditors requires the transfer of legal title to the assets from the debtor to a trustee. Creditors cannot attach the transferred assets because the debtor does not own them. Nonparticipating creditors can attach the debtor’s assets prior to the execution of a composition agreement.</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>On Monday, April 1, Mr. Paint, in exchange for Kelly’s promise to pay $250 cash on completion, agreed to paint Kelly’s car at his shop. When the job was done on April 5, Kelly told Mr. Paint she was not yet able to pay. Kelly took her car, having assured Mr. Paint that she would return it on Monday, April 8. She consented to his stipulation that he would retain his lien until she paid in full. Mr. Paint perfected the lien by recording on April 9. Instead of returning the car, Kelly simply returned on foot Wednesday, April 10, and placed $250 cash in front of Mr. Paint as payment. As a fair equivalent to Kelly’s not returning possession on Monday, Paint told her he would not accept her payment before Friday, April 12.
What date did artisan’s lien terminate on?</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>April 10.
Answer (A) is correct.
A proper and sufficient tender of payment discharges an artisan’s lien. The tender also relieves the obligor from liability for further interest or damages (such as legal fees). But tender does not operate to discharge the underlying obligation, which, in this case, was to pay $250.</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>A state homestead exemption ordinarily could exempt a debtor’s equity in certain property from post-judgment collection by a creditor. To which of the following creditors will this exemption apply?
i. Valid Home Mortgage Lien (Yes/No)
ii. Valid IRS Tax Lien (Yes/No)</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>i. No; ii No
State homestead exemption acts ordinarily exempt a debtor’s equity in his or her home from post-judgment collections by a creditor. However, these acts generally do not apply to a holder of a valid mortgage against the home or a valid IRS tax lien.</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>Rolf Adenstedt, an individual, filed a voluntary petition in bankruptcy. A general discharge in bankruptcy will be denied if Rolf
A. Filed a fraudulent federal income tax return 2 years prior to filing the petition.
B. Negligently made preferential transfers to certain creditors within 90 days of filing the petition.
C. Obtained a loan by using financial statements that he knew were false.
D. Unjustifiably failed to preserve his books and records.</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>Answer (D) is correct.
Discharge will be denied if the debtor conceals or destroys property with the intent to hinder, delay, or defraud a creditor, or fails to adequately explain the loss of assets. Similarly, unjustifiable or fraudulent concealment or destruction of the debtor’s financial records is a basis for denying discharge of indebtedness.</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>Chapter 7 of the Federal Bankruptcy Code will deny a debtor a discharge when the debtor
A. Made a preferential transfer to a creditor.
B. Obtained a Chapter 7 discharge 10 years previously.
C. Is a corporation or a partnership.
D. Accidentally destroyed information relevant to the bankruptcy proceeding.</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>Answer (C) is correct.
A general discharge of most debts is provided a person under Chapter 7. But certain types of entities are not eligible. They include municipalities, railroads, insurance companies, banks, credit unions, and savings and loan associations. Partnerships and corporations do not receive a general discharge under Chapter 7. They are merely liquidated.</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>On October 31, Year 1, Green rented equipment under a 5-year lease. On March 8, Year 2, Green was involuntarily petitioned into bankruptcy under the liquidation provisions of the Bankruptcy Code, and a trustee was appointed. The fair market value of the equipment exceeds the balance of the lease payments due. The trustee
A. Must assume and subsequently assign the equipment lease.
B. Must assume the equipment lease because its term exceeds 1 year.
C. May elect not to assume the equipment lease.
D. May not reject the equipment lease because the fair market value of the equipment exceeds the balance of the payments due.</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>Answer (C) is correct.
The trustee in bankruptcy is given several options under the Bankruptcy Code, all of which are subject to court approval. The options are to assume and perform the unexpired lease, to assume and assign the unexpired lease to a third party, or reject the unexpired lease. The trustee must act to assume the lease within 60 days after the order for relief is entered, or it is deemed to be rejected.</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>Fact Pattern: Strong Corp. filed a voluntary petition in bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. A reorganization plan was filed and agreed to by all necessary parties. The plan was confirmed, and a final decree was entered.
Question: 13 Which of the following parties ordinarily must confirm Strong Corp’s plan?
i. One-half of the Secured Creditors (Yes/No)
ii. Two-thirds of the Shareholders (Yes/No)
</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>i. No
ii. No
Creditors and shareholders accept, not confirm plans of reorganization under Chapter 11. Confirmation is performed by the bankruptcy court. The holders of more than 50% of the creditors’ claims representing at least two-thirds of the dollar amount of the claims in a class must accept. A class of equity shareholders accepts the plan if holders of at least two-thirds in dollar amount of the interests approve the plan.</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>Fact Pattern: Knox operates an electronics store as a sole proprietor. On April 5, Knox was involuntarily petitioned into bankruptcy under the liquidation provisions of the Bankruptcy Code. On April 20, a trustee in bankruptcy was appointed, and an order for relief was entered. Knox’s nonexempt property has been converted to cash, which is available to satisfy the claims and expenses presented in the right column as appropriate. The cash available for distribution includes the proceeds from the sale of the stereos.
Claim by Dart Corp. (one of Knox’s suppliers) for computers ordered on April 6 and delivered to Knox on April 10
$20,000
Fee earned by the bankruptcy trustee
15,000
Claim by Boyd for a deposit given to Knox on April 1 for a computer Boyd purchased for personal use but that had not yet been received by Boyd
1,500
Claim by Noll Co. for the delivery of stereos to Knox on credit. The stereos were delivered on March 4, and a financing statement was properly filed on March 5. These stereos were sold by the trustee with Noll’s consent for $7,500, their fair market value
5,000
Fees earned by the attorneys for the bankruptcy estate
10,000
Claims by unsecured general creditors
1,000
What amount will be distributed to the trustee as a fee if the cash available for distribution is $15,000?</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>$6,000
Answer (B) is correct.
Secured creditors’ claims are satisfied in full to the extent of the security before other claims will be considered. Thus, Noll must be paid to the extent of the security interest. Among the priority claims, administrative costs of the estate, which include trustees’ and attorneys’ fees, receive second priority in the distribution process after domestic support obligations. However, funds are not adequate to satisfy these claims in full, and a pro rata distribution is necessary. The trustee will receive $6,000 {[$15,000 ÷ ($10,000 + $15,000)] × ($15,000 – $5,000)}, and the attorney will receive the remaining $4,000.</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>A claim will not be discharged in a bankruptcy proceeding if it
A. Is for unintentional torts that resulted in bodily injury to the claimant.
B. Arises from an extension of credit based upon false representations.
will not be discharged.
C. Is brought by a secured creditor and remains unsatisfied after receipt of the proceeds from the disposition of the collateral.
D. Arises out of the breach of a contract by the debtor.</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>Answer (B) is correct.
A discharge terminates the dischargeable debts. It voids existing judgments and operates as an injunction against further proceedings on the discharged obligations. But not all debts are dischargeable in bankruptcy. For example, debts incurred through false representations </p></p></p>
<p><p><p>In a voluntary bankruptcy proceeding under Chapter 7 of the Federal Bankruptcy Code, which of the following claims incurred within 90 days prior to filing will be paid first?
A. Unsecured federal taxes.
B. Utility bills up to $1,000.
C. Voluntary contributions to employee benefit plans.
D. Employee vacation and sick pay up to $12,850 per employee.</p></p></p>
<p><p><p> Answer (D) is correct.
Secured claims must be satisfied in full before any unsecured claims may be paid. Unsecured claims with a higher priority are then paid in full before lower priority claims. The list of priorities among unsecured claims is as follows:
1. Domestic support obligations,
2. Administrative expenses,
3. Claims arising in the ordinary course of business after the petition was filed but before the order for relief was granted,
4. Claims up to $12,850 for wages earned by an individual within 180 days before filing,
5. Claims for contributions to employee benefit plans,
6. Claims of grain producers and fishermen,
7. Claims of depositors of money for the purchase of undelivered consumer goods,
8. Tax claims of governmental units, and
9. Death and injury claims arising from an intoxicated person’s operation of a motor vehicle.
Employee vacation pay and sick pay are forms of compensation (wages).</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>Ott and Bane agreed to act as co-sureties on an $80,000 loan that Cread Bank made to Dash. Ott and Bane are each liable for the entire $80,000 loan. Subsequently, Cread released Ott from liability without Bane’s consent and without reserving its rights against Bane. If Dash subsequently defaults, Cread will be entitled to collect a maximum of</p></p></p>
<p><p><p>$40,000 from Bane.
Answer (C) is correct.
The unconsented-to release of Ott by Cread without reservation of rights against Bane is a true release. Consequently, Bane also is released to the extent that Bane cannot obtain contribution from Ott. Because both co-sureties agreed to be liable for the entire loan, Ott’s pro rata contributive share is $40,000. Thus, Bane’s potential liability to Cread is reduced from $80,000 to $40,000.</p></p></p>