Alexander II Flashcards
Short summary of Alexander II
‘Tsar Liberator’- However not in reality.
He was a conservative who wanted to preserve what was best of the old system.
List the reasons the Tsar was under pressure to reform.
- Moral Reasons
- Attempt to maintain his own power
- Risk of revolt
- Crimean War
- Economic reasons
Explain the moral reasons the Tsar felt he had to reform.
Writers such as Turgenev
enlightened nobles such as the Party Of St Petersburg Progress,
Tsars brother Grand Duke Konstantin,
Tsar’s Aunt Grand Duchess Elena,
Pavlovna
liberal state of ficials (Milyutin Brothers)
intelligentsia.
Explain how the Tsars want to maintain power influenced his reforms
Historian Terence Emmons believed the reforms were intended to maintain Tsarist authority
Explain how the risk of revolt influenced the reforms
Tsar worried over 1848 Revolutions throughout Europe and the spike in peasant revolts 1857-59.
He ordered weekly reports on the mood the peasants from December 1957 onwards.
Lindsey Hughes believes this was the main pressure to reform
Explain how the Crimean War influenced the reforms
Showed Russia to be backwards.
Bulk of the army were peasant conscripts who served 25 years.
It was obvious a smaller, better trained army was needed but shorter conscription period would mean Serfs going back to village with military training.
David Soon believed this was the main pressure to reform.
Explain how the Economic reasons influenced the reforms
Some officials and intellectuals believed free labour was more productive than forced labour. This was the view of historian Adam Smith.
This would lead to more grain production.
Grain could then be exported in return for investment in industry.
What reason does Olga Crisp believe to be more significant in preventing economic development in Russia?
Poor transport
List the terms of the Edict of Emancipation 1861
- 1861 Edict applied to privately owned serfs.
- They were to be freed in 2 years.
- They would be allocated a piece of land by the Mir.
- The Mir controlled farming, collecting and paying taxes.
- From 1863 volosts ran its own law courts, replacing the juris diction of the landlords.
- Peasants had to pay for their land over 49 years and were not allowed to leave the village until this had been achieved.
List the terms of the Edict of Emancipation 1866
- Applied to state-owned serfs.
2. They tended to receive more land
List the two years of the Edict of Emancipation
1861- Privately owned serfs
1866- State-owned serfs
List the negative consequences of the Edict of Emancipation
- Landlords kept the meadows, postures and woodlands (much of this had been common land)
- Landlords received compensation from the government for the land they did lose.
- Landowners tended to sell their worst land
- Some landlords felt they lost their status and were critical of the regime
- Peasants received less land than previously farmed and of poor quality.
- Little opportunity to adopt new farming methods
- In the Black Earth region the allocation of land was below average
- many peasants had to work as hired labourers to survive
- Peasants annoyed they had to pay redemption payments for 49 years
- Overall subsistence farming continued
List the positive consequences of the Edict of Emancipation.
- Some peasants bought land from poorer peasants and hired more to work for them
- Mir had large powers as responcible for collecting redemption payments, taxes and issued internal passports, the aim of which was to prevent peasants moving around the country
- Peasants were tied to the Mir
Nicholas Milyutin
He was responsible for much of the Edict of Emancipation.
He was dismissed by the Tsar in order to appease the conservative nobility.
This showed the Tsar did not want to damage the ruling class.
He depended on them for his survival.
Other than the Edict of Emancipation, list the reforms made by Alexander II
- Local Government reform
- Judiciary reform
- Military reform
- Education
- Censorship
Local Government reform
Elected Local government were to set up zemstva at district and provincial level.
There was an electoral college system to vote in representatives onto the zemstva but the system meant the nobles dominated, having 40% of seats at district level and over 70% seats in provincial zemstva. Thus noble control was maintained.
Work on self of the zemstva was carried out by permanently employed civil servants, teachers, doctors, lawyers and agricultural experts. They improved public services, e.g. road building and looked after school and public health and in charge of developing transport, drainage, water supply, industry and administer poor relief.
Building of hospitals and school was of lasting benefit.
Local Government reform disadvantages
- Nobles dominated
- This reform only introduced in 19 provinces and extended to 37 out of 70 provinces by 1914.
- Zemstva’s powers very limited- no control over state and local taxes plus had problems collecting the small tax they were allowed to levy.
- Provincial governors could overturn zemstva decisions.
- Peasants were under-represented
- Central government worried about power zemstva had over their locality as had a good knowledge of their local area and would use zemstva meetings to discuss political issues.
What year were the judiciary reforms?
1864
Judiciary reforms 1864
Emancipation meant private property rights needed reviewing and administration of local justice.
New system based on the West- innocent until proven guilty
New system of civil and criminal courts introduced at local and national level
Judges were well paid and could not be removed.
Reporting of cases was unrestricted.
Trial by jury for criminal cases was introduced.
Evidence by witnesses to be given orally.
JPs elected every 3 years.
If offences concerned solely peasants, they were heard in separate volost courts.
Overall summary of positive and negative consequences of the Judiciary reforms 1864
Positive consequences:
- Fairer trails developed
- JPs courts cost nothing to those appearing (no need for barrister)
- the courtroom became the one place where there was a genuine freedom of speech
Negative consequences:
- There were separate courts for peasants
- Church and military courts were excluded from reforms
- in the 1870s, revolutionaries could be tried in special courts