AHA Guidelines - Coronary Artery Revasc 2021 Flashcards
In patients being considered for CABG, calculation of what should be done to stratify patient risk?
STS risk score
significant L main disease preferred approach for revascularization
surgical - improves survival; PCI still better than med therapy in low/med complexity and LM equally suitable
in pt w/ stable IHD, nl EF, and 3v CAD, what is preferred revasc?
surgical - improves survival; PCI survival benefit is uncertain
radial artery vs saphenous vein for CAD revasc second target?
radial - superior patency, reduced cardiac events, improved survival;
make sure you know if and which radial was accessed during cath
best access for PCI for ACS or stable IHD?
radial better than femoral - dec bleeding and vasc complications, ACS w/ radial approach also has reduced mortality;
if doing CABG after cath and are planning radial conduit, make sure you know which arm was accessed
Dual or single antiplatelets after PCI w/ stable IHD?
Length of time and reasoning?
short duration of dual antiplatelet - reduces bleeding events; after 1-3 mo, transition to plavix monotherapy
Pt presents w/ STEMI s/p PCI for culprit artery. What to do for nonculprit artery intervention?
Staged perc intervention (while inpt or after DC) for nonculprit - improved outcomes; can be done at initial PCI, but benefit unclear - do if low-complexity and no renal disease.
PCI of nonculprit in cardiogenic shock can be harmful.
Triple vessel CAD and DM - preferred revasc?
surgical; PCI if poor candidate
What scoring system is best used for tx decisions for surgical revasc of CAD?
STS surgical risk score. (COR1)
SYNTAX score benefit is less clear d/t interobserver variability - more useful for demonstration of complexity for PCI vs CABG decision. (2b)
What procedural measurement can help decision making to proceed w/ PCI in pt w/ angina or equivalent when it isn’t otherwise clear from cath (angiographically intermediate)?
FFR >0.8 or iFR >0.89.
Deferring PCI assd w/ lower rates of major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE).
Of note, FFR does not seem to help improve SURGICAL outcomes.
In pt w/ intermediate stenosis of LM artery, what can be used to help define lesion severity?
IVUS (2a)
STEMI and PCI not feasible. Cardiogenic shock and/or instability despite IABP. What should be done?
CABG. Irrespective of time delay from MI onset (24 hrs is out of window if no ongoing ischemia).
Early revascularization is associated w/ significant survival benefit.
Specifically, the mortality at 6 mo is improved (30-day survival is not when compared to medical mgmt).
Pt has STEMI and mechanical complication (VSD, MVR, free wall rupture), should you do CABG at the time of the surgery?
Yes. COR1. Goal is improving survival.
Mechanical support stabilization is often performed, but if ongoing instability or ischemia, surgery may be only option if otherwise a good candidate.
Can CABG as a primary revascularization strategy ever be considered for STEMI?
Yes. If PCI is not possible/unsuccessful for anatomic reasons, or even for LM or multivessel CAD. This is particularly effective if there is a large area of myocardium at risk.
STEMI pt <12 hrs and PCI not feasible. Large area at risk and ongoing ischemia despite medical therapy and mechanical support. What is revascularization strategy?
Emergent/Urgent CABG (2a).
This is the only indication for EMERGENCY isolated CABG.
Fibrinolytic therapy is recommended only in which STEMI cases?
primary PCI is not immediately available and the delay from hospital presentation to PCI is anticipated to be >120 minutes
STEMI and ischemic symptoms decision making?
WHEN did symptoms happen: < or > 12 hrs?
<12 hrs - PCI feasible? Proceed.
<12 hrs - PCI not feasible & LARGE AREA AT RISK? CABG (irrespective of time delay)
>12 hrs - <24 hrs? PCI (2a)
>24 hrs w/ total occlusion w/o sx or severe ischemia - NO PCI (delayed PCI after 24 hrs should only be considered in pts w/ patent artery)
ASSOCIATED ISSUES?
>12 hrs - cardiogenic shock or HF? revasc (PCI pref if feasible)
>12 hrs - ongoing ischemia, HF, VF/VT? primary PCI
Failed PCI in STEMI pt w/o ischemia or large area of myocardium; or w/ poor targets - NO emergency CABG.
In conclusion… revasc if <24, shock, ischemia, or unstable rhythm.
STEMI pt w/ failed primary PCI. Pt is asymptomatic now, the area of possible ischemia is small, and the distal targets are poor. Cardiology asking about CABG. What is the answer?
CABG could cause harm. CABG has a limited role in the acute phase of STEMI, and its use in this setting continues to decrease.
Asymptomatic and stable pt w/ STEMI who presents 24 hrs after initial symptoms (resolved) w/o evidence of severe ischemia. ED calls asking for PCI. What is the answer?
No benefit. PCI should not be performed.
HD stable pt w/ STEMI s/p successful primary PCI. Pt has multivessel disease. What should be done for the non-infarct significant stenosis? What is the timing?
Is there anything that could alter this plan?
Usually staged PCI if not complex. (1)
Low-risk w/ low-complexity lesions? -> PCI of non-culprit at same time.
Complex multivessel lesions? -> can consider CABG vs staged PCI (2a) after heart team discussion (1)
STEMI pt s/p PCI of infarct artery. Timing of CABG for complex multivessel non-infarct disease?
elective - reduce risk of cardiac events (2a)
Management for NSTE-ACS?
Shock? Angina? VF/VT? -> immediate/emergent revasc
GRACE >140? = high risk -> early revasc w/in 24 hrs
Initially stabilized w/ int/low risk of clinical event? - revasc before DC.
Typically, this is done with PCI, but CABG is not inferior.
Shouldn’t DC these pts.
Although there are no randomized trials specifically evaluating emergency CABG versus medical therapy or delayed revascularization in patients with NSTE-ACS and failed PCI who have ongoing ischemia or hemodynamic compromise, multiple retrospective reviews have noted what?
Reduced mortality with an emergency approach.
If pt is on DAPT, appropriate safe timing of CABG is determined with a heart team.
Revasc algorithm in pts w/ SIHD?
Refractory angina (eg requiring lots of nitro)? revasc (CABG best outcomes in intermed f/u)
LM? CABG
Multivessel? CABG (especially if low EF - benefit >10 yrs)
In pt w/ SIHD, nl EF, and 1 or 2 vessel CAD not involving LAD, what would you recommend for coronary revascularization?
Not recommended. Does not benefit (3).
What SYNTAX score seems to confer CABG survival benefit over PCI for multivessel CAD?
SYNTAX 33