Aggression Flashcards
Aggression (Wilson)
a physical act or threat of action by one individual that reduces the freedom/genetic fitness of another
if both individuals live –> how to measure genetic fitness?
Agonistic
refers to any activity related to fighting, whether aggression, concilation, submission, or retreat
Self-restraint in aggressive behavior
- widely held to be trait that evolved for the good of the species
- ex. snakes X biting, just slamming head to ground per “rules of the game”
What regulates aggression?
- if goal of aggressive interaction is to win w. maximum fitness gain, best way to win is for winner to minimize costs to itself and NOT to maximize costs to loser
- continuing attack when not necessary to gain inventive adds risk
- Why not cheat? –> retaliation (nature of display makes cheating difficult)
Costs of aggressive behavior
- potential injury
- time & energy
Benefits of aggressive behavior
- contextually dependent
- increase individual fitness through access to resources/mates
- improved reproductive outcomes
- reduction of competitor’s fitness
Aggressive behavior types
- interspecific competition over resources
- territorial aggression
- dominance behavior
- sexual aggression (intra- & intersexual)
- infanticide
- parental aggression
- sibling aggression
- predatory/anti-predator aggression
interspecific competition over resources
hyenas vs. lions over food & beyond
Questions concerning territorial aggression
- why?
- benefits?
- how big territory?
- year-round vs. seasonal
- time/energy?
- qualities to determine contest winner?
- which sex defends?
Yarrow’s spiny lizard
- increased T in lizard
- increased survival rate (due to aggression & defending), but increased further if food isn’t contested for (X need to divide time between foraging and defending)
Black-winged damselfly (Marden & Waage)
- winner determination not weight-related, but % fat (more energy reserves)
Speckled wood butterfly - who wins? (Davies)
- “arbitrary rules” in settling contests?
- resident butterfly always wins territory (arbitrary bc unrelated to fitness)
- alternative explanation that contests are settled due to resource-correlated asymmetries in thoracic temperature (not arbitrary)
Schjelderup-Ebbe (~1935)
- studied chicken aggressive interactions
- “pecking order” reflects dominance hierarchy found in chicken groups
- unfamiliar hens + fighting over food = usual winner - dominant; usual lose - subordinate
- A > B > C > D etc
- need <10 chickens to remember past interactions
Dominance hierarchies
- naturally, established dominance hierarchies are usually “linear” & stable over periods of time
- rare and temporary intransitive hierarchies less common in nature
Dominance hierachies in primates controversies
- dominance emphasized in early studies
- does dominance really exist in primates? more complex than chickens & closely related to humans –> more research performed on primates
- is it the key to understanding primate societies?
- how to measure? correlation vs. values?