Aggression Flashcards
Definition of aggression
Behavior that leads to self assertion, angry and destructive behavior causing injury. An act carried out with the intention of harming another person
Define proactive aggression
-Cold blooded
-A planned method of getting what you want
Define reactive aggression
-Hot blooded
-Angry and impulsive, accompanied by physiological arousal
Outline the role of the amygdala in aggression
-Most important structure in terms of aggression
-The amygdala is a key structure for humans and non-humans in terms of assessing and responding to threats in an environment
-The reactivity of the amygdala in humans has proven to be an important predictor of aggressive behavior
-Additionally, if the limbic system malfunctions/becomes damaged, this can raise levels of testosterone, making aggressive behavior more likely
AO1
Evidence for limbic system
-Ultimate game, lab experiment
-Gospic et al
-2 players are asked to divide a given amount of money, the confederate must decide how this money should be divided, while the responder (ppt) may reject or accept the offer
-If the responder accepts the offer, both players receive money
-If the responder rejects, neither of them gets anything
-At the same time, the responders (ppt) had an FMRI scan
-When the responder rejected the unfair offers (an aggressive reaction to social provocation) there was fast and heightened response in the amygdala recorded
-Ppts were given benzodiazepine (drug which reduces arousal in the CNS) before the game
-It halved the number of rejections to ‘unfair offers’ (reduced aggression) and decreased the activity in the amygdala
-THEREFORE SHOWING AN ASSOCIATION BETWEEN REACTIVE AGGRESSION AND AMYGDALA ACTIVITY
Outline the role of serotonin in aggression
-Serotonin has an inhibitory effect on the brain (slows down and dampens neurological functioning)
-Normal levels of serotonin the orbitofrontal cortex are linked to reduced firing of neurons and this is associated with a greater degree of self control
-Decreased levels of serotonin may disturb the mechanisms in OFC
-Reducing self control and leading to an increase in impulsive behavior such as aggression
AO1
Evidence for serotonin affecting aggression
-Virkkunen et al (1994)
-Compared levels of serotonin breakdown product (metabolite called 5-HIAA) in the cerebrospinal fluid of violent impulsive and violent non-impulsive offenders
-The levels were significantly lower in the impulsive offenders (also suffered sleep irregularities)
-Serotonin regulates sleep patterns
-Disturbance of this pattern strongly implies some disruption of serotonin functioning
-Further supporting the role of serotonin in reactive aggression
Explain the effect of serotonin on aggression
Serotonin has widespread inhibitory effects on the brain; it slows down and dampens neuronal activity.
MAKES AGGRESSION LESS LIKELY
Outline the role of testosterone in aggression
-Male sex hormone and androgen responsible for the development of masculine features
-It also has a role in regulating social behaviours via its influence on certain areas in the brain implicated in aggression
-There is lots of documented evidence of testosterone being increased in various species which has resulted in increased aggression. Lower test lowers aggressive behaviours
AO1
Testosterone on aggression study
-Dolan et al 2012
-Studies of prison populations
-Found a positive correlation between testosterone levels and aggressive behaviours
-Sample of 60 males (high security prison)
-These males suffered from personality disorders and had history of impulsive violent behaviour
AO3
Outline one strength of the hormonal explanations of aggression
(Supporting research, Berman et al)
One strength of the neural explanations of aggression is that there is supporting research from Berman.
Berman carried out an experiment where he gave ppt’s either a placebo or a drug which increases serotonin. Ppt’s took part in a game whereby they could give electric shocks (due to provocation). Berman found that those who took the drug gave loss shocks than those who took the placebo, indicating that higher levels of serotonin result in lower levels of aggression.
This research clearly demonstrates that a lack of serotonin may directly be linked to increased levels of aggression as increasing serotonin levels can actually reduce aggressive responses. This is in line with what the theory predicts, thus strengthening our acceptance of the neural explanations of aggression.
HOWEVER, a problem is that this research is correlational and therefore we cannot ascertain causality e.g. Low levels—> Increase aggression or vice versa, therefore it is a limited explanation of aggressive behaviour
AO3
Outline one weakness of the hormonal explanations of aggression
(Dual hormone hypothesis)
One weakness of the hormonal explanations of aggression is that the role of testosterone may be overamplified.
For example, Carre and Mehta suggested testosterone cannot work alone in determining aggression, but rather has an antagonistic relationship with the stress hormone cortisol, where increased levels of aggression are associated with increased testosterone levels but only when cortisol is low. Therefore, this implies that different hormones have different predictive values for aggression and are part of a system when developing aggressive behaviour.
Therefore, this weakness acceptance of the hormonal explanation as it lacks detail when referring to other hormones interacting with testosterone to produce aggressive behaviours
AO3
Outline one weakness of the neural explanations of aggression
(Reductionist)
One weakness of the neural explanations of aggression is that it is reductionist as it ignores other brain structures when explaining aggression.
For example, recent studies suggest that the amygdala appears to function alongside the OFC (not part of the limbic system). Cocarro et al found that patients with psychiatric disorders (which often displayed aggression), activity in the OFC was reduced.
Aggressive behaviour may actually better be explained as a connection between both the amygdala’s activity and reduced activity within the OFC, which implies the explanation is limited for only focusing on the role of the amygdala in aggression.
Overall, this is a weakness of the neural explanations because aggression may be far more complex than the explanation suggests
AO3
Outline one weakness of the neural explanations of aggression
(Cause and effect)
Much of the research onto neural/hormonal explanations of aggression is correlational. A strength of this is the avoidance of ethical issues from experimental manipulation e.g. altering a ppts hormonal levels would be extremely unethical
However the main weakness of much of this research means that the findings are still largely inconclusive. We can only see a link between two variables but cant tell what variable caused what result. E.g. increased amygdala activity and aggressive behaviour, but we are unclear on which variable causes the other
Concordance rates for genetic explanations of aggression
Cocarro et al (1997)
Concordance rates (physical assault) = 50% for Mz and 19% for Dz twins
AO3
Problems with twin studies
-Twin share genes but also share environments meaning it is very difficult to ‘detangle’ genetic and environmental influences
-If aggression is purely determined by our genetics then we would expect the concordance rates for Mz twins to be much higher/nearer to 100%