Aggression Flashcards
Explain the neural mechanisms in aggression
the limbic system
- hypothalamus, amygdala and hippocampus
- the more reactive the amygdala, the more aggressive
- Gospic found that when participants reacted aggressively, fMRI scans showed a fast response by the amygdala
- taking benzodiazepine decreased the activity of the amygdala and reduced aggression
orbitofrontal cortex and serotonin
- serotonin slows down neural activity
- normal levels in the orbitofrontal cortex are linked to a reduced firing of neurons, leading to greater behavioral self control
- serotonin deficiency hypothesis suggests that low levels of serotonin is linked to impulsive behavior
- Virkunen found lower levels of 5-HIAA in impulsive offenders compared non-impulsive offenders
Describe hormonal mechanisms in aggression
Testosterone
- generally, men are more aggressive than women
- it has a role in regulating social behavior via its influence on certain areas of the brain implicated in aggression
- castrating animals reduces aggression in the males of many species and injecting testosterone restores aggressive behavior
- Dolan found a positive correlation between testosterone levels and aggressive behavior in 60 offenders in UK maximum security hospitals
progesterone
- women
- Ziomkiewicz found a negative correlation between progesterone levels and self reported aggression, suggesting low levels lead to increased aggression
Evaluate the neural mechanisms in aggression
Strength
drugs and serotonin
- drugs that increase serotonin have been found to also reduce levels of aggressive behavior
- Berman gave participants either a placebo or paroxetine and then they had to give shocks in response to insults
- the drugged group gave less intense shocks than the placebo
- this is a causal link between serotonin and aggression
limitation
other brain structures
- non limbic brain structures are also involved
- the orbitofrontal cortex is involved in impulse regulation and inhibition of aggressive behavior
- Coccaro said that OFC activity is reduced, which disrupts the impulse control function, causing aggressive behavior
- therefore, this theory is more complex than originally thought
Evaluation of the hormonal mechanism in aggression
Strength
animal research
- Giammanco reviewed studies and found that there is an increase in testosterone levels and aggressive behavior in monkeys during the mating season
- castrating male rats reduces testosterone and mouse killing behavior
- injecting female rats with testosterone increases mouse killing
Limitation
dual hormone hypothesis
- Carre and Mehta suggest that high levels of testosterone lead to aggression, but only when cortisol is low
- when cortisol is high, testosterones influence is blocked, ass it plays a role in the body’s response to chronic stress
- therefore, the combined activity may be a better predictor of aggression than just either hormone
Describe the genetic factors in aggression
Twin studies
- Coccaro found the concordance rates for MZ and DZ twins in physical assault is 50% and 19%, and for verbal aggression 28% and 7%
adoption studies
- Rhee and Waldman carried out a meta analysis of adoption studies and found that genetic influences account for 41% of the variance in aggression, in line with the twin studies
the MAOA gene
- controls the production of monoamine oxidase A, which regulates serotonin
- MAOA-L leads to low activity of the enzyme and therefore less serotonin in the synapse
- the warrior gene had been found in 56% of the maori people compared to 34% of caucasians
- Brunner studied 28 men from a large Dutch family who were repeatedly involved in criminal behavior and found that they had low levels of the enzyme MAOA-A as well as the MAOA-L gene
gene environment interactions
- gene activity is only related to adult aggression if paired with early traumatic life experiences
- Frazzetto found an association between higher levels of antisocial aggression and the MAOA-L gene in men, but only in those who had experienced significant trauma
- this is an example of diathesis stress
Evaluation of genetic factors in aggression
Strength
research support
- Mertins found that men with the MAOA-H gene were more cooperative and made less aggressive moves than the low variant during a money distributing game, this supports the link between the variant of the gene and aggression
- however, non genetic factors are also crucial, as those with the low variant acted less aggressive once they saw that others were also behaving cooperatively
- therefore, genes are influenced by environmental factors that are at least as important in aggression
limitations
complex link
- low activity of the enzyme should lead to higher serotonin, as it doesn’t deactivate serotonin, leaving more for synaptic transmission
- therefore, the serotonin level may be disrupted and not lowered, and the relationship between MAOA gene, serotonin, and aggression is not yet fully understood
problems with twin studies
- may lack validity as DZ twins don’t share the same environment to the same extent as MZ twins. by assuming they do, this is means that the concordance rates are inflated and genetic influences on aggression may not be as great as twin studies suggest
Describe the ethological explanation of aggression
adaptive functions of aggression
- beneficial to survive, as a defeated animal is rarely killed, but forced to establish territory elsewhere
- this reduces competition pressure and the possibility of starvation
- chimps use aggression to climb the social hierarchy to get mating rights over females, etc.
- aggression brings dominance, which bring benefits such as access to resources
ritualistic aggression
- Lorenz found that fights between animals of the same species didn’t bring about much damage, just threats, ie, showing their teeth
- they also end with ritualistic behaviors to prevent damage, such as raising hands to show that you are making yourself vulnerable and bowing out
- adaptive, as if every encounter ended in death, the existence of the species could be threatened
innate releasing mechanisms
- an inbuilt physiological process which is triggered by an environmental stimulus and then releases a specific sequence of moves
- stereotyped, universal, unaffected, ballistic, single-purpose, a response to an identifiable specific sign stimulus
Tinbergen’s research
- male sticklebacks are territorial during mating season and develop a red spot on their underbelly, if the fish sees another fish with a red spot, this triggers aggressive behavior
- he found that regardless of the shape of the wooden object, if it had a red spot, the fish would show aggressive behavior, but wouldn’t if there was no red spot, even if it looked like a fish
- the aggressive FAP were unchanging from one encounter to the other and ran the full course without any further stimulus
Evaluation of the ethological explanation of aggression
Strength
research support
- research related to genetics and evolution, including brunner, twin and adoption studies
- this suggests an innate basis to aggressive behavior just like the ethological approach
- however, aggressive behavior differs from culture to culture, as Nisbett found that one type of homicide was more common in the southern states than the northern states
- this was caused by culture of honor in the south that’s less prevalent in the north
- therefore this aggressive behavior comes from learned social norms rather than instinctive
- therefore, culture can override innate predispositions, which the ethological approach doesn’t explain
limitations
ritualistic aggression
- Goodall observed a four year war when male chimps killed all the members of another group in a systematic way, even if the other showed signs of appeasement
- this signs didn’t inhibit the behavior like the theory suggests and therefore behavior hasn’t become relatively harmless between members of the same species
FAPs are not fixed
- Hunt pointed out that FAP are greatly influenced by environmental factors and learning, as the duration of certain behaviors differs between individuals as well as within individuals
- therefore the patterns are more flexible than originally thought
Describe the evolutionary explanation of human aggression
evolutionary explanation of sexual jealousy
- men experience cuckoldry, they don’t know if the child they are caring for is theirs, and if it isn’t have then wasted resources to invest in his own future offspring
- those who could avoid this were more reproductively successful increasing sexual jealousy
male retention strategies
- direct guarding
- negative inducements
physical violence against partner
- Wilson found that women who agreed with statements about retention strategies were twice as likely to have experienced physical violence by the hands of their partners
- 73% required medial attention and 53% feared for their lives
- male retention strategies are linked to violence
evolutionary explanation of bullying
- bullying is an adaptive strategy to increase survival by promoting health and creating opportunities for reproduction
male bullying
- those who gain a reputation for being tough are less likely to be fought
- can ward off potential rivals
- are more attractive to females
- leads to an increase in survival
female bullying
- used to secure partners fidelity so that they continue to provide resources
- enhances reproductive success
what are the male retention strategies
direct guarding
negative inducements
Evaluation of evolutionary explanations of human aggression
Strengths
real world application
- can be used to reduce bullying by addressing their perceived deficiencies
- increases the costs of the bullying as well as the rewards of prosocial behaviors, so that bullies have roles in the school that provide an alternative source of status
- viewing bullying as an adaptive behavior then leads to more effective anti bullying interventions
gender differences
- Campbell argues that it is not adaptive for a female to be physically aggressive, as this risks her own survival as well as the child, and as a result uses verbal aggression to retain a partner who provides resources
- this explains why women prefer verbal to physical, providing support for the evolutionary approach to explaining aggression
Limitation
cultural differences
- Kung San people in africa have very negative views towards the use of aggression, and its discouraged from childhood
- those who do use it are seen as below everyone else, and therefore culture has a very big constrain on aggressive behavior
- the aggressive behavior may not be adaptive then
- however, the homicide rate is quite high for “harmless” people. this could be due to the fact that what an observer sees is biased by their own expectations and by the sample of people observed
- therefore, observations by outsiders may not be useful and lack validity
Explain the frustration-aggression hypothesis as a social psychological explanation of aggression
the original hypothesis
- frustration always leads to aggression and is caused when our attempts to reach a goal are blocked by some external factor
- this creates an aggressive drive leading to behavior that removes the negative emotion, reducing the drive and making further aggression less likely
- aggression may not be directly at the source because it is abstract, its too powerful and we risk punishment, or is unavailable, so we displace onto an alternative
the weapon effect
- participants were given real electric shocks creating frustration and then were given the oppurtunity to shock another person.
- when there were two guns on the table, 6.07 shocks were given compared to 4.67 when there were no guns
- therefore the presence of aggressive environmental cues stimulates aggression
research on frustration aggression
- Geen had university men complete an impossible jigsaw puzzle, one where another student kept interrupting so they ran out of time, and one where the confederate insulted the puzzler
- they then all had the ability to give electric shocks
- the insulted gave the strongest shocks, followed by the interfered, and then the impossible, and all three were more intense than a control group
Evaluation of frustration aggression hypothesis as a social psychological explanations of aggression
Strength
research support
- Marcus Newhall conducted a meta analysis of 49 studies of displaced aggression where the aggression had to be directed at a human target not the person who caused it
- those who were provoked but unable to directly retaliate were more likely to aggress against an innocent party than those not provoked
- therefore frustration can lead to aggression which is then displaced
Limitations
role of catharsis
- Bushman found that participants who vented their anger by repeatedly hitting a punching bag became more aggressive rather than less, and doing nothing was more effective
- therefore it doesn’t work even for people who think it does, as the better people feel after, the more aggressive they are
- therefore, this central idea might not be valid
frustration aggression link
- someone who feels frustrate may become helpless rather than aggressive and people can be aggressive for different reasons
- therefore the frustration aggression hypothesis is inadequate because it only explains how aggression arises in some situations but not in others
- however, Berkowitz then adjusted his theory, called negative affect, suggesting that loneliness, jealousy, pain, and frustration trigger aggression
- the outcome of frustration can also be a range of responses
- therefore, frustration can form a part of a wider explanation of what causes aggression
Describe social learning theory as a social psychological explanation of aggression
direct and indirect learning
- operant conditioning with positive and negative reinforcement is direct
- indirect, observational learning, accounts for social learning of most aggressive behaviors
observational learning and vicarious reinforcement
- we acquire aggressive behavior through watching aggressive models and the consequences of their actions
- vicarious reinforcement
cognitive conditions for learning
- attention
- retention
- reproduction
- motivation
self-efficacy
- the extent to which we believe our actions will achieve a desired goal
- they learn that aggression works and that they are good at it
banduras research
- children observed an adult assaulting a bobo doll and then were prevented from playing with toys to create frustration and the let into a room where there was a bobo doll and other toys
- they found that the children imitated the behavior with boys acting more aggressive than girls physically
- for the children who witnessed an adult not acting aggressively to the bobo doll, aggressive behavior was almost non existent
Evaluation of social learning theory as a social psychological explanation of aggression
Strengths
real world application
- we can encourage children to form friendships with children rewarded for non-aggression and give them more opportunities to model non-aggressive behavior
- therefore helps offer practical steps to reduce the development of aggressive behavior in children
research support
- Poulin and Boivin found that aggressive boys aged between 9 and 12 years formed friendships with other aggressive boys, and they mutually reinforced their aggressive behavior through modelling
- these social learning processes made imitation of aggressive behavior by the boys much more likely
- however, the study didn’t find similarity between friends for reactive aggression and that the boys were much less likely to influence each others reactive aggressive outbursts
- they observed but generally didn’t imitate as the consequences of this are unpredictable and not often as positive as they are for planned, proactive aggression
- therefore, SLT is limited because it is a weak explanation of reactive aggression
limitation
biological influences
- bandura suggests that aggression is the outcome of nurture, however, there are powerful genetic, evolutionary, neural, and hormonal influences on aggression, which SLT fails to acknowledge
- therefore is an incomplete explanation, as it underplays the role of biological factors